To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phosphodiesterase 1, PDE1, EC 3.1.4.1, systematic name oligonucleotide 5-nucleotidohydrolase) is a phosphodiesterase enzyme also known as calcium- and calmodulin-dependent phosphodiesterase. It is one of the 11 families of phosphodiesterase (PDE1-PDE11). Phosphodiesterase 1 has three subtypes, PDE1A, PDE1B and PDE1C which divide further into various isoforms. The various isoforms exhibit different affinities for cAMP and cGMP.[1][2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    632 248
    5 924
    10 709
    1 679
    1 263
  • PDE 1 | Introduction
  • Lecture 1 || Introduction to Partial Differential Equations||
  • Phosphodiesterase (PDE) Inhibitors | Mechanism of action of PDE Inhibitors
  • Bulgarian PDE-1 Gas Mask Review
  • Dr. Scott Gettinger on the PD-1 Inhibitor BMS-936558 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Transcription

Hello and welcome to the first video in my video series on partial differential equations. So I'll start with a definition, and that is: a PDE is "an equation relating the partial derivatives of some unknown function". So hopefully you've studied some ordinary differential equations already, and you know that an 'ordinary differential equation' relates the 'ordinary' derivatives. (when there's only 'one' independent variable) Now we have (perhaps) 'many' independent variables, so we have 'partial' derivatives and the equation will relate those partial derivatives. Now oftentimes the goal when we study PDEs is to learn something about this 'unknown function'. This unknown function we'll call: 'a solution'. The solution is often something that we want to find an explicit formula for.. ..or sometimes it's something we just want to know something about. (we want to know some of its properties) Now we will have three basic goals in our study of partial differential equations. Let me describe those now: The first goal is one that's kind of easily overlooked (and that is..) to learn 'how to formulate' partial differential equations. So what do I mean by this? Well if you're studying some field of science or engineering you often encounter some kind of dynamical process: you may be observing data from laboratory experiments, you may be deriving something from physical principles, but you're going to encounter a dynamical process ..and you're going to want to convert that into a mathematical description of the process. and that is the 'art' of formulating a PDE, ..coming from a dynamical process based on perhaps laboratory data ..and writing down a mathematical equation to describe that process. (So this is a very useful skill) The second goal will be pretty much the most obvious one: to 'solve' the partial differential equations.. That is: to find the unknown functions that satisfy the relation the parital differential equation describes. (So we're going to spend most of our time doing this) We won't be able to solve every PDE that we encounter, but we will be able to develop techniques.. that will solve large classes of important equations, and so that will be most of our focus. Now the third goal is: to study the solutions to partial differential equations. Now I don't necessarily mean.. ..to study the 'formulas' that we get from part two: oftentimes we will have trouble obtaining formulas or.. we may get formulas which don't give us much information So we would like to have techniques for learning things 'about' the solutions to partial differential equations without doing a lot of hard work to find formulas for the solutions. (So things we can learn about a PDE ..just from the equation itself) I'll introduce now a little bit notation that I'll use in the rest of the videos (to be consistent) So for independent variables I'll use things like 'x' and 'y' and 'z' and 't'. (So these are the independent variables) For dependent variables I'll use letters like 'u' and perhaps 'v' (if I have more than one) ..and I'll use subscripts for partial derivatives so when I write something like: 'u' (subscript) 'x', I mean the partial derivative of 'u' with respect to 'x' or if I write: 'u' (subscript) 'xt', I mean the 2nd partial derivative.. with respect to the 'x' - and then with respect to 't'. (Okay so these will be) .." subscripts for partial derivatives " And one thing I should point out here is I will use letters like: 'x', 'y' and 'z' for 'spatial' coordinates.. ..and something like 't' ..will be 'time'. We will often have partial differential equations which describe some relationship between derivatives with respect to 'space' and with respect to 'time' So right now we should just try to get our feet wet a little bit by looking at a particular partial differential equation and examples of solutions to that PDE. So the equation we're going to look at is: 'u_t' = 'u_xx' This equation is called the 'Heat equation' and I'll explain in the next video why we would want to call it the 'Heat equation' but for now let's just take it as it is: 'u_t' = 'u_xx'. Now I claim first of all that the function: 'u' = one half 'x'^2 plus 't' is indeed a solution to the Heat equation. Let's check it: (ok: so, "check") How do we check? Well we take this particular function and we compute 'u_t'... and 'u_xx' ..and compare them, and see that they are equal and we know that it will be a solution to that point. So first let's compute 'u_t' 'u_t' is the partial derivative of 'u' with respect to 't' Now that is ..'1' because the partial derivative (with respect to t) of 't'.. is '1' and the partial derivative of one half 'x'^2 with respect to 't' is '0' Now we'll compute 'u_xx' ..but first let's compute 'u_x'. (and then we'll take one more partial derivative) So 'u_x' is: partial derivative of 'u' with respect x and that is.. well, 't' goes away because the derivative of t with respect to x is '0' and I get a: 'two times one-half x'. (so that's just 'x') So taking one more derivative, I get 'u_xx' which is the second partial with respect to x: (that's just '1') So checking that the Heat equation is true amounts to checking that: 'u_t' = 'u_xx' (and this simply the identity '1' = '1') so, we get a solution. So we've checked this is a solution to the Heat equation. Now (just for fun) let me point out that 'this guy' right here.. this particular solution to the Heat equation. this is called ..a 'heat polynomial' and the reason it's called a 'heat polynomial' is because it is a 'polynomial' in x and t and,, .. it is a solution to the Heat equation! There are many heat polynomials and I challenge you to find another one ..to find a different heat polynomial. (they're not that hard to find) Okay now let's do something just a little bit different: let's see if we can find a solution to the Heat equation simply by making 'a guess'. So this guess is often called an 'ansatz' [from German] and it's a little smarter than 'a guess'. What it is.. it's an assumption that the solution has a 'certain form'. So what we're going to assume is that the solution ..has the form: 'u = e^(ax+bt)' This kind of an assumption is a lot more powerful than you might first assume. (and we'll see that later) So what's the question here? The question is: what do 'a' and 'b' need to be.. in order for 'this' expression to be a solution.. ..to the Heat equation? So in other words: what are 'a' and 'b'.. (or what relationship do they satisfy)? Let's figure it out. So we plug it in to the Heat equation: We have 'u_t' equals? Well it's 'e^(ax+bt)' ..times (by the chain-rule)... ..the derivative of this inside function (with respect to t) So we have: partial of '(ax+bt)' (with respect to t) and that gives us simply: 'e^(ax+bt)' times 'b' Now we will compute 'u_xx' (but let's do 'u_x' first.) That gives us 'e^(ax+bt)' ..times ..partial derivative of '(ax+bt)' (now with respect to x) So that gives us: 'e^(ax+bt)' times 'a'. And similarly we would compute 'u_xx' to be: 'e^(ax+bt)' times 'a^2'. So together, this information tells us that this expression, this function, will be a solution to the Heat equation, if the following relationship is satisfied: So 'u_t' equals 'u_xx' which is the same saying that: 'e^(ax+bt)' times 'b' is equal to: 'e^(ax+bt)' times 'a^2' (okay, well, I can cancel 'these' guys) Let's cancel off this 'e^(ax+bt)' Now, maybe I should say something quickly about that cancellation.. these terms cannot be '0': if I 'exponentiate'.. anything at all.. I get something which is a non-zero, so it's perfectly legitimate to 'cancel' these terms.. (and so what i end up with is..) 'b' = 'a^2' So if you choose any 'a' and any 'b' that satisfy this relationship you get a solution of the Heat equation. For instance: 'a' could be '-1' and 'b' could be '1' (or they could both be '0') or maybe 'a' could be 'i' ( imaginary ) and 'b' could be '-1'. (you could think about that) I'd like to conclude this introduction with a quick comparison of solutions to ordinary differential equations and solutions to partial differential equations. So this will be just a 'comparison by example'. and a very simple one. (but when you're starting out ..'simple is good') So, let's start with the ODE which will be the 'Population equation'. now this ODE is wriiten 'd_P (by) d_t' = 'P'. Frequently there's a constant in front of this (solution) 'P'.. and we're going to leave it off just to keep things simple. Now a general solution to ODE is 'P(t)' = 'C' times 'e^t' the 'C' here is an arbitrary constant. And this a thing that you see very frequently when you solve ordinary differential equations: you find arbitrary constants in the solutions. In fact you often will find as many arbitrary constants in the general solution as the order of the ODE. So it's the number of derivatives that you find in the ODE - just one derivative here. (so just one arbitrary constant) Now let's look at the same equation but let's just make it a PDE. So we'll say ..a PDE that 'looks like' the Population equation. Okay, and what do I mean by that? Well I'll just write: 'u_t' = 'u' and here we're going to assume that 'u' is a function which depends on more than one independent variable. So 'u' " depends on " 'x' and 't'. So this is now a partial differential equation.. ..and looks very similar to this ordinary differential equation. Let's see what we can figure out about the general solution? First of all, notice that if I take the function (so I'll say 'question mark') if I take the function: 'u' = 'C(e^t)' okay so just like I took 'P'.. (Let me be explicit that this is a function 'x' and 't'.. ..so this is 'u' ..of ..'(x,t)' ) if I take: 'u(x,t)' = 'C(e^t)'.. (then) indeed this is a solution to this equation ..because when I take the partial derivative (with respect to t) ..and I plug that in ..I will find that I get a solution to the equation for any 'C' that I choose. But you may ask yourself.. ..why didn't I incorporate 'x' somehow? (I should be able to incorporate x) If you think about it for a while, you realize that the partial derivative (with respect to t) treats 'x' as a constant. So by plugging in 'x' anywhere in this equation it essentially acts like a constant. So what I could do is I take this 'C' and replace it with any function of 'x' at all. So let's call it 'F(x)'.. ,,where 'this' guy now is an arbitrary function of x. So 'arbitrary function' (is) appearing in this general solution. Check it and make sure that you believe that's the case: Take the partial derivative (with respect to t) ..and compare it to the original function. So, here in an ODE I had an 'arbitrary constant'.. here in a PDE I have an 'arbitrary function'.. appearing in the general solution. Now this is not a 'general theorem' but this is a phenomenon that you'll see very frequently. You'll find arbitrary functions appearing in 'general' solutions. So this just gives you a basic idea to the differences between solutions to an ODE and a PDE

Discovery

The existence of the Ca2+-stimulated Phosphodiesterase 1 was first demonstrated by Cheung (1970), Kakiuchi and Yamazaki (1970) as a result of their research on bovine brain and rat brain respectively.[1][3] It has since been found to be widely distributed in various mammalian tissues as well as in other eukaryotes. It is now one of the most intensively studied member of the PDE superfamily of enzymes,[3] which today represents 11 gene families,[1][4] and the best characterized one as well.[3]

Further research in the field along with increased availability of monoclonal antibodies has shown that various phosphodiesterase 1 isoenzymes exist and have been identified and purified. It is now known that phosphodiesterase 1 exists as tissue specific isozymes.[3]

Structure

The phosphodiesterase 1 isozyme family belongs to a Class I enzymes,[2][5] which includes all vertebrate phosphodiesterases and some yeast enzymes.[5] Class I enzymes all have a catalytic core of at least 250 amino acids whereas Class II enzymes lack such a common feature.[5]

Usually vertebrate PDEs are dimers of linear 50–150 kDa proteins.[5] They consist of three functional domains; a conserved catalytic core, a regulatory N-terminus and a C-terminus [3-5]. The proteins are chimeric and each domain is associated with their particular function.[2]

The regulatory N-terminus is substantially different in various phosphodiesterase types.[4][5] They are flanked by the catalytic core and include regions that auto-inhibit the catalytic domains. They also target sequences that control subcellular localization. In phosphodiesterase 1 this region contains a calmodulin binding domain.[4]

The catalytic domains of phosphodiesterase 1 (and other types of phosphodiesterases) have three helical subdomains: an N-terminal cyclin-fold region, a linker region and a C-terminal helical bundle. A deep hydrophobic pocket is formed at the interface of these subdomains. It is composed of four subsites. They are: a metal binding site (M site), core pocket (Q pocket), hydrophobic pocket (H pocket) and lid region (L region). The M site is placed at the bottom of the hydrophobic pocket with several metal atoms. The metal atoms bind to residues that are completely conserved in all phosphodiesterase family members. The identity of the metal atoms is not known with absolute certainty. However, some evidence indicate that at least one of the metals is zinc and the other is likely to be magnesium. The zinc coordination sphere is composed of three histidines, one aspartate and two water molecules. The magnesium coordination sphere involves the same aspartate along with five water molecules, one of which is shared with the zinc molecule. The reputed role of the metal ions include structure stabilization as well as activation of hydroxide to mediate catalysis.[4]

The domains are separated by "hinge" regions where they can be experimentally separated by limited proteolysis.[2]

The phosphodiesterase 1 isoenzyme family (along with the phosphodiesterase 4 family) is the most diverse one and includes numerous splice variant PDE1 isoforms. It has three subtypes, PDE1A, PDE1B and PDE1C which divide further into various isoforms.[1][2]

Localization

The localization of PDE1 isoforms in different tissues/cells and their location within the cells is as follows:

Isoform Tissue/cellular localization Intracellular localization
PDE1A (PDE1A) Smooth muscle, heart, lung, brain, sperm [2] Predominantly cytosolic [2]
PDE1A1 Heart, lung [2] Predominantly cytosolic [2]
PDE1A2 Brain [2] Predominantly cytosolic [2]
PDE1B1 (PDE1B) Neurons, lymphocytes, smooth muscle [2] brain, heart, skeletal muscle [1] Cytosolic [2]
PDE1B2 Macrophages, lymphocytes [2] Cytosolic [2]
PDE1C (PDE1C) Brain, proliferating human smooth muscle, spermatids [2] Cytosolic [2]
PDE1C1 Brain, heart, testis [6] -
PDE1C2 Olfactory epithelium [2] Cytosolic [2]
PDE1C4/5 mRNA is present in the testis [6] -

Table 1. Various PDE1s location in tissues and within cells.

Most PDE1 isoforms are reported to be cytosolic. However, there are instances of PDE1s being localized to subcellular regions but little is known about the molecular mechanisms responsible for such localization. It is thought to be likely that the unique N-terminal or C-terminal regions of the various isoforms allow the different proteins to be targeted to specific subcellular domains.[2]

Functional role

Phosphodiesterase1 catalyses the following chemical reaction:[7]

Hydrolytically removes 5-nucleotides successively from the 3-hydroxy termini of 3-hydroxy-terminated oligonucleotides

It hydrolyses both ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides, but it has low activity towards polynucleotides.

Intracellular second messengers such as cGMP and cAMP undergo rapid changes in concentration in a response to a wide variety of cell specific stimuli. The concentration of these second messengers is determined to a large extent by the relative synthetic activity of cyclase and degrative activity of cyclic nucleotide PDE.[3] PDE1 degrades both cGMP and cAMP.[8]

Binding of PDE to cGMP and cAMP, respectively

The various isoforms exhibit different affinities for cAMP and cGMP. PDE1A and PDE1B preferentially hydrolyse cGMP, whereas PDE1C degrades both cAMP and cGMP with high affinity. For example, in airway smooth muscles of humans and other species, generic PDE1 accounts for more than 50% of the hydrolytic activity of cyclic nucleotides.[9] It has been demonstrated that deletion and overexpression of PDE1 produces strong effects on agonist-induced cAMP signalling but has little effect on the basal cAMP level.[10] At cortical and thalamic inputs to the striatum, PDE1 activity regulates neurotransmitter release via cGMP.[11]

Pharmacology

Because of in vitro regulation by Ca2+/calmodulin, PDE1s are believed to function as a mechanism for integrating cell signalling pathways mediated by cGMP and cAMP with pathways that regulate intracellular calcium levels.[2] The precise function of PDE1 isozymes in various pathophysiological processes is not clear because most of the studies have been carried out in vitro. Therefore, it is essential to direct further research to in vivo studies.[3]

PDE1 has been implicated to play a role in a number of physiological and pathological processes:

  • PDE1A most likely serves to regulate vascular smooth muscle concentration and has been found to be up-regulated in rat aorta in response to chronic nitroglycerin treatment. It is also possible that it plays a role in sperm function.[8]
  • PDE1B knockout mice have increased locomotor activity and in some paradigms decreased memory and learning abilities. PDE1B is also involved in dopaminergic signalling and is induced in several types of activated immune cells.[8] PDE1B mRNA is induced in PHA or anti-CD3/CD28-activated human T-lymphocytes and participates in IL-13 regulation implicated in allergic diseases.[1]
  • PDE1C has been shown to be a major regulator of smooth muscle proliferation, at least in human smooth muscle. Nonproliferating smooth muscle cells (SMC) exhibit only low levels of PDE1C expression but it is highly expressed in proliferating SMCs. It can therefore be speculated that inhibition of PDE1C could produce beneficial effects due to its putative inhibition of SMC proliferation, an event that contributes importantly to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis.[8] Another likely roles of PDE1C is in olfaction [4], to regulate sperm function and neuronal signaling.[8]

Regulation

The distinguishing feature of PDE1 as a family is their regulation by calcium (Ca2+) and calmodulin (CaM).[12] Calmodulin has been shown to activate cyclic nucleotide PDE in a calcium-dependent manner and the cooperative binding of four Ca2+ to calmodulin is required to fully activate PDE1 [2]. The binding of one Ca2+/CaM complex per monomer to binding sites near the N-terminus stimulates hydrolysis of cyclic nucleotides. In intact cells, PDE1 is almost exclusively activated by Ca2+ entering the cell from the extracellular space. The regulation of PDE1 by Ca2+ and CaM has been studied in vitro and these studies have shown that eight methionine residues within the hydrophobic clefts of Ca2+-CaM are required for the binding and activation of PDE1. Mutations in the N-terminal lobe of CaM affect its ability to activate PDE1 so it is believed that the C-terminal lobe of CaM serves to target CaM to PDE1, while the N-terminal lobe activates the enzyme. The presence of an aromatic residue, usually a tryptophan, in the CaM-binding region of Ca2+-CaM-regulated proteins may also be required for binding to PDE1.[12]

Between different PDE1 isozymes there is a significant difference in affinity for Ca2+/CaM. In general, the PDE1 enzymes have high affinity for the complex but the affinity can be affected by phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of PDE1A1 and PDE1A2 by protein kinase A and of PDE1B1 by CaM Kinase II decreases their sensitivity to calmodulin activation.[1] This phosphorylation can be reversed by the phosphatase, calcineurin.[2] The phosphorylation of the isozymes is accompanied by a decrease in the isozymes affinity towards CaM, as well as an increase in the Ca2+ concentrations required for CaM activation of the isozymes.[3]

Inhibitors and their function

PDEs have been pursued as therapeutic targets because of the basic pharmacological principle that regulation of degradation of any ligand or second messenger can often make a more rapid and larger percentage change in concentration than comparable rates of synthesis. Another reason is that PDEs do not have to compete with very high levels of endogenous substrate to be effective since the levels of cAMP and cGMP in most cells are typically in the micromolar range.[2]

The availability of high-resolution crystal structures of the catalytic domains of PDEs makes the development of highly potent and specific inhibitors possible.[6]

Many compounds reported as PDE1 inhibitors do not interact directly with the catalytic site of PDE1 but interact during activation, either at the level of calmodulin binding sites such as compound KS505a or directly on Ca2+/calmodulin such as bepril, flunarizine and amiodarone.[1]

Those inhibitors that interact with the catalytic site occupy part of the active site, primarily around the Q pocket and occasionally close to the M pocket.[13] A major point of interaction is a conserved hydrophobic pocket that is involved in orienting the substrate purine ring for interaction with a glutamine residue that is crucial for the catalytic mechanism of the PDEs.[6]

The interactions of inhibitors can be split into three major types: interactions with the metal ions mediated through water, H-bond interactions with the protein residues involved in nucleotide recognition and most importantly the interaction with the hydrophobic residues lining the cavity of the active site. All known inhibitors seem to exploit these three types of interactions and hence these interactions should guide the design of new types of inhibitors.[13]

Initially PDE1 inhibitors were claimed to be effective vascular relaxants. With availability of purified cloned enzymes, however, it is now known that such inhibitors are in fact equally active against PDE5.[4] Those inhibitors include e.g. zaprinast, 8-methoxymethyl IPMX and SCH 51866.[1]

All therapeutically effective PDE inhibitors must be incorporated into the cell because all PDEs are localized in the cytoplasm and/or on intracellular membranes.[8]

Today, there is no real and effective specific PDE1 inhibitor that can be used to assess the functional role of PDE1 in tissues.[1]

Common inhibitors

Chemical structure of nimodipine
Chemical structure of vinpocetine

Nimodipine is a dihydropyridine that antagonizes/blocks specifically L-type Ca2+-channel, and was first described as a PDE1 inhibitor. This effect is not related to its calcium antagonist property since it inhibits, in micromolar range, basal and calmodulin stimulated purified PDE1. Since nimodipine at lower concentrations blocks the L-type calcium channel, it can only be used to estimate PDE1 participation in tissue and cell homogenates.[1]

Vinpocetine was described as a specific inhibitor of basal and calmodulin-activated PDE1. This effect leads to an increase of cAMP over cGMP.[1][14] It is mainly used as a pharmacological tool to implicate PDE1. Vinpocetine inhibits differently the various subtypes of PDE1 (IC50 from 8 to 50 μm) and it is also able to inhibit PDE7B. It can not be used as a specific tool to investigate the functional role of PDE1 due to its direct activator effects on BK (Ca) channels.[1] Vinpocetine crosses the blood–brain barrier and is taken up by cerebral tissue. It has been hypothesized that vinpocetine can affect voltage-dependent calcium channels.[14]

IC224 inhibits PDE1 (IC50 = 0.08 μM) with a selective ratio of 127 (ratio of IC50 value for the next most sensitive PDE and for IC50 value for PDE1). It was developed by ICOS corporation. If IC224 similarly inhibits basal and calmodulin-activated PDE1 subtypes, this compound could be very helpful to characterize PDE1 activity and to clearly investigate the various roles of PDE1 in pathophysiology.[1]

Inhibitors in diseases

Nearly all the phosphodiesterases are expressed in the CNS, making this gene family an attractive source of new targets for the treatment of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders.[6]

PDE1A2 has a potential role in neurodegenerative diseases, including:[4]

PDE1C could have a role in the regulation of insulin release [5] and may target proliferating smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic lesions or during restenosis.[4][15]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Lugnier C (March 2006). "Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) superfamily: a new target for the development of specific therapeutic agents". Pharmacol. Ther. 109 (3): 366–98. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.07.003. PMID 16102838.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Bender AT, Beavo JA (September 2006). "Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: molecular regulation to clinical use". Pharmacol. Rev. 58 (3): 488–520. doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.5. PMID 16968949. S2CID 7397281.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Kakkar R, Raju RV, Sharma RK (July 1999). "Calmodulin-dependent cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE1)". Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55 (8–9): 1164–86. doi:10.1007/s000180050364. PMID 10442095. S2CID 23724340.[permanent dead link]
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Jeon YH, Heo YS, Kim CM, et al. (June 2005). "Phosphodiesterase: overview of protein structures, potential therapeutic applications and recent progress in drug development". Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62 (11): 1198–220. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-4533-5. PMC 11139162. PMID 15798894. S2CID 9806864.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Dousa TP (January 1999). "Cyclic-3,5-nucleotide phosphodiesterase isozymes in cell biology and pathophysiology of the kidney". Kidney Int. 55 (1): 29–62. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00233.x. PMID 9893113.
  6. ^ a b c d e Menniti FS, Faraci WS, Schmidt CJ (August 2006). "Phosphodiesterases in the CNS: targets for drug development". Nat Rev Drug Discov. 5 (8): 660–70. doi:10.1038/nrd2058. PMID 16883304. S2CID 419810.
  7. ^ Khorana GH (1961). "Phosphodiesterases". In Boyer PD, Lardy H, Myrbäck K (eds.). The Enzymes. Vol. 5 (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press. pp. 79–94.
  8. ^ a b c d e f Bischoff E (June 2004). "Potency, selectivity, and consequences of nonselectivity of PDE inhibition". Int. J. Impot. Res. 16 (Suppl 1): S11–4. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901208. PMID 15224129.
  9. ^ Giembycz MA (June 2005). "Life after PDE4: overcoming adverse events with dual-specificity phosphodiesterase inhibitors". Curr Opin Pharmacol. 5 (3): 238–44. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2005.04.001. PMID 15907909.
  10. ^ Thevelein JM, de Winde JH (September 1999). "Novel sensing mechanisms and targets for the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae". Mol. Microbiol. 33 (5): 904–18. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01538.x. PMID 10476026.
  11. ^ Fieblinger, Tim; Perez-Alvarez, Alberto; Lamothe-Molina, Paul J; Gee, Christine E; Oertner, Thomas G (2022-08-03). "Presynaptic cGMP sets synaptic strength in the striatum and is important for motor learning". EMBO Reports. 23 (8): e54361. doi:10.15252/embr.202154361. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC 9346481. PMID 35735260.
  12. ^ a b Goraya TA, Cooper DM (July 2005). "Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent phosphodiesterase (PDE1): current perspectives". Cell. Signal. 17 (7): 789–97. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.12.017. PMID 15763421.
  13. ^ a b Card GL, England BP, Suzuki Y, et al. (December 2004). "Structural basis for the activity of drugs that inhibit phosphodiesterases". Structure. 12 (12): 2233–47. doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.10.004. PMID 15576036.
  14. ^ a b "Vinpocetine. Monograph". Altern Med Rev. 7 (3): 240–3. June 2002. PMID 12126465.
  15. ^ Matsumoto T, Kobayashi T, Kamata K (August 2003). "Phosphodiesterases in the vascular system". J Smooth Muscle Res. 39 (4): 67–86. doi:10.1540/jsmr.39.67. PMID 14692693.

External links

This page was last edited on 3 June 2024, at 06:11
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.