To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

The In-Laws (2003 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The In-Laws
Theatrical release poster
Directed byAndrew Fleming
Screenplay by
Based onThe In-Laws
1979 film
by Andrew Bergman
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyAlexander Gruszynski
Edited byMia Goldman
Music by
Production
companies
Distributed byWarner Bros. Pictures
Release date
  • May 23, 2003 (2003-05-23)
Running time
98 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$40 million
Box office$26.8 million[2]

The In-Laws is a 2003 American action comedy film starring Michael Douglas, Albert Brooks, Robin Tunney, Ryan Reynolds and Candice Bergen. The film is a remake of the original 1979 cult classic of the same name. Scenes for the 2003 film were shot on location in Chicago. The film was a box office failure and received mixed to negative reviews.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    195 959
    5 920
    8 804
  • The In-Laws (2003) - Original Theatrical Trailer
  • The In-Laws (2003) Official Trailer
  • Michael Douglas Funny Scene The In-Laws

Transcription

Plot

Steve Tobias is an undercover agent of the CIA whose son, Mark, is marrying Melissa Peyser. Her father is mild-mannered foot doctor, Jerry Peyser. When the two families meet for dinner, Peyser stumbles on to Steve Tobias' secret operation as Tobias tries to set up a deal to sell a Russian submarine, the Olga, to an arms smuggler in France as bait to catch arms smugglers. As Peyser's incidental involvement increases, he is suspected by the FBI of being part of a seemingly malicious deal. Peyser does not want to be involved in the deal or with Tobias' family but is either dragged in against his will or tricked into participating in wild escapades with Tobias. The two future fathers-in-law end up dodging bullets, jumping off buildings, and stealing jets together as they attempt to avoid capture by the FBI. After the wedding reception is ended by a last chase scene, they are finally left alone with only their children and wives to have a quiet marriage ceremony, presided over by the FBI agent who was chasing them.

Cast

Reception

Box office

The film was released in theaters on May 23, 2003, opening against Bruce Almighty in North America. It finished its first weekend in 5th place with $7,319,848.[3] It was a box office disappointment, ultimately recouping just under $27 million of its $40 million budget.[2][1]

Critical response

The In-Laws had a mixed to negative critical reception. Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a 33% score, based on 136 reviews, with an average rating of 5.00/10. The website’s critics consensus states: "Bigger and slicker than the original, but not necessarily better".[4] On Metacritic, it has a score of 46 out of 100 based on 32 critics’ reviews, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[5]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times awarded the film 2 out of 4 stars, writing "The In-Laws is an accomplished but not inspired remake of a 1979 comedy which was inspired and so did not need to be accomplished. The earlier movie was slapdash and at times seemed to be making itself up as it went along, but it had big laughs and a kind of lunacy. The remake knows the moves but lacks the recklessness."[6] Ebert felt the remake lacked the comedic chemistry of Alan Arkin and Peter Falk in the original film, adding "Comedy works better when the characters seem utterly unaware that they are being funny."[6] Michael Wilmington of the Chicago Tribune wrote, "You could say the same of Fleming, who's tended to work best when he's dealing with young protagonists, as in Dick, The Craft and Threesome. Fleming has a serious approach to comedy, visible here too, but drowned in the action and hoopla. He seems almost overwhelmed and the movie preposterously inflated."[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "The In-Laws". Bomb Report. Archived from the original on February 23, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  2. ^ a b "The In-Laws (2003)". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on November 12, 2017. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
  3. ^ "The In-Laws (Domestic Weekend)". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on February 23, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  4. ^ "The In-Laws (2003)". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on April 30, 2019. Retrieved July 23, 2019.
  5. ^ "The In-Laws (2003)". Metacritic. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  6. ^ a b Ebert, Roger (May 23, 2003). "The In-Laws". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on December 8, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  7. ^ Wilmington, Michael (May 23, 2003). "As a spotty remake, 'In-Laws' has multiple flaws". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on February 23, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.

External links

This page was last edited on 21 April 2024, at 13:46
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.