To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Proprietors of Locks and Canals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Proprietors of Locks and Canals on Merrimack River is a limited liability corporation founded on June 27, 1792,[1] making it one of the oldest corporations in the United States. Its named incorporators were Dudley Atkins Tyng, William Coombs, Joseph Tyler, Nicholas Johnson, and Joshua Carter.[2]

The company was founded to construct the Pawtucket Canal around the Pawtucket Falls on the Merrimack River, in East Chelmsford, Massachusetts. Over a mile long with four lock chambers, the Pawtucket Canal was finished in 1796. Although the canal allowed for lumber and other goods to be transmitted from New Hampshire to the shipyards of Newburyport, the competing Middlesex Canal, a direct route to Boston, opened just ten years later, ruining the Pawtucket's business.

In 1821, The Boston Manufacturing Company of Waltham, Massachusetts, purchased the charter of the Proprietors of Locks and Canals, incorporating it into the new Merrimack Manufacturing Company. In the early 1820s, the Pawtucket Canal became a major component of the Lowell power canal system with the founding of the textile industry at what became Lowell.[3] In 1822 Patrick Tracy Jackson appointed himself as agent of Proprietors of Locks and Canals, gaining the ability to determine "who could start what mill and where in Lowell, and for how much".[4]

In 1825, the corporation was reorganized again and separated from the Merrimack Manufacturing Company under the leadership of Kirk Boott. This allowed the city of Lowell to grow quickly, as many other manufacturing corporations were founded in Lowell to take advantage of the waterpower sold by the Proprietors of Locks and Canals. Paul Moody was one of their first chief engineers. In the mid-19th century, the company was under the leadership of James B. Francis, inventor of the Francis Turbine, who took over when George Washington Whistler left to work on Russia's railway system.[5]

Noah R. Harlow served as chief engineer and paymaster from 1856 until his death in 1892.[6]

In 1857, the Middlesex Mechanic Association recognized the work done by the Proprietors of Locks and Canals to explore the effects of burnettizing on preventing rapid decay of timbers, an effort essential for long-lasting waterway structures.[7] The corporation still exists today, housed in the same building as Boott Hydropower, LLC, which has a small power plant on the Northern Canal in Lowell.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    5 111 806
    515
    92 325
  • Facebook Fraud
  • The Card (4 of 5) (audiobook)
  • DUBLINERS by James Joyce - FULL Audio Book | Greatest Audio Books

Transcription

Have you heard of Virtual Bagel? Their Facebook page has over 4,000 likes. They use the page to promote their brilliant business model 'we send you bagels via the Internet -- just download and enjoy.' It sounds like a joke, and it is, sort of. This page was set up by BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones in 2012. He wanted to find out what is the worth of a like on a Facebook page, so he bought some likes for Virtual Bagel. Now there are two ways to buy 'likes', the legitimate way and the illegitimate way. The illegitimate way is to go to a website like BoostLikes.com purchase some likes. You can get 1000 for $70. Sites like these use clickfarms in developing countries like India, the Philippines, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Egypt, Indonesia and Bangladesh. Here employees are routinely paid just 1 dollar per thousand clicks of the like button. So Facebook explicitly forbids buying likes this way. Instead they offer the 'legitimate' way to pay for likes by advertising your page. Prominently displayed is a link to "Get more likes" with the promise: "Connect with more of the people who matter to you." And this is how Virtual Bagel got its 4000 likes. Rory Cellan-Jones paid 100 dollars to Facebook and the likes rolled in. He targeted his ad to the UK and the United States, but also to countries like Egypt, Indonesia and the Philippines. Now where do you think Virtual Bagel was most popular? I'll give you a hint, it wasn't the US or the UK. But within a day he had over 1600 likes mostly from developing countries. Now what was more problematic was the people who followed Virtual Bagel looked suspicious. For example there was one Cairo-based follower whose name was Ahmed Ronaldo. His profile consisted almost exclusively of pictures of Cristiano Ronaldo and he liked 3,000 pages. Cellan-Jones also observed that his new throng of fans was particularly disengaged, just as you'd imagine those from a click-farm would be. But he hadn't hired a click-farm, he had paid for Facebook ads. This story was reported in July 2012. In August, Facebook reported it had identified and deleted 83 million fake accounts (that was 9% of the total at the time). This resulted in noticeable drops for popular singers and celebrities. So did they delete all of the fake likes? Nope, not even close. I know because most of the likes on my Facebook page are not genuine. In May 2012, I received a number of emails from Facebook offering me $50 worth of free promotion of my page, which at the time had only 2,000 likes. My YouTube channel had twenty times that following so I thought surely this free 'paid' promotion could help me reach more of the people who mattered to me. And immediately I could see results. Within just a few days my likes had tripled, and they kept on growing, thousands per day. And after a few months I had about 70,000 Facebook likes, which matched my YouTube subscribers at the time. Now what was weird was my posts on Facebook didn't seem to be getting any more engagement than when I had 2,000. If anything, they were getting less engagement. I didn't understand why at the time, but I have since realized it's because most of those likes I was gaining through Facebook ads were not from people who were genuinely interested in Veritasium. How do I know? Well because fake likes behave very differently from real followers. Have a look at this graph of the engagement of my Facebook followers. Here I'm plotting countries as bubbles, so this is Canada and the size represents the number of likes I've received from that country. So this is the United States, it's a nice big bubble. Now I'm ranking these countries on the horizontal axis based on what percentage of those likes have engaged with my page this month. So as you can see roughly 30% Canadians and Americans have engaged with my page, but they're not as active as the Germans where over 40% of my likes have engaged, and they are not as active as the Austrians a small but passionate group of Veritasium fans at nearly 60% These are all of the other Western countries. So you can see that it's common for between 25% and 35% of my page likes to engage with my page every month. Now here is Egypt, where less than 1% of my likes have engaged with my page. Now this is India, the Philippines, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. That's a big followings, but no engagement. Together all of these countries make up 80,000 likes, that's roughly 75% of the total likes I had before the last video. And these are the profiles that followed me when I used Facebook advertising. And they are worse than useless. Here's why: When you make a post, Facebook distributes it to a small fraction of the people who like your page just to gauge their reaction. If they engage with it by liking, commenting, and sharing then Facebook distributes the post to more of your likes and even their friends. Now if you somehow accumulate fake likes, Facebook's initial distribution goes out to fewer real fans, and therefore it receives less engagement, and so consequently you reach a smaller number of people. That's how a rising number of fans can result in a drop in engagement. And from this Facebook makes money twice over -- once to help you acquire new fans, and then again when you try to reach them. I mean your organic reach may be so restricted by the lack of engagement, that your only option is to pay to promote the post. What's worse, there is no way to delete fake likes in bulk -- all you can do is target posts around them. And I should re-iterate I never bought fake likes. I used Facebook's legitimate advertising, but the results are as if I had paid for fake likes from a clickfarm. Now you might think the solution to all this is just to exclude countries with click-farms from your ad campaigns. But unfortunately the problem goes much deeper. Meet Virtual Cat, a virtual pet like none other. Its page is committed to supplying only the worst, most annoying drivel you can imagine. Only an idiot would like this page. And that's not just my opinion, that's actually what it says in the page description. And I should know because I wrote it. I created this page yesterday and I then paid $10 to advertise the page through Facebook targeted only to cat-lovers in the United States, Canada, Australia and the UK. Now I expected that because I had excluded all of the big click-farm countries and because the page is so terrible that I basically wouldn't get any likes. But within 20 minutes I had blown through my whole budget and I got 39 likes. So who are these people liking a blank page and costing me 25 cents a piece? All of the profiles were all from the places I had targeted, mostly the US, but there was something strange about them. All of these people liked a LOT of things, like hundreds and thousands things. And a lot of the things they liked were odd too. Like in one account this person liked T-mobile, AT&T and Verizon. They liked Jeep and Lexus and Mercedes and Volvo and Volkswagon. They like everything. Other accounts I saw, they liked kitchen scrubbers and they liked mouthwash. Who reports that on their Facebook page? It just baffles me. So the real mystery to me is why someone, somewhere would click on ads they didn't care about without making money from them. I mean I don't think these likes came from bots - they are too easy to identify and eliminate. And I also don't think for a second Facebook would pay click-farms to click on those ads to generate revenue for them, so it really seems like a mystery. And then, in this article I found what I think is the most reasonable hypothesis. Click-farms click the ads for free. In order to avoid detection by Facebook's fraud algorithms, they like pages other than the ones they've been paid for to seem more genuine. I mean you can imagine 1000 likes on a particular page coming from one geographic area in a short period of time would seem suspicious. But buried in a torrent of other 'like' activity? They would be impossible to identify. So workers at these click-farms will literally click anything. I mean where do you think Facebook's Security page is most popular? Dhaka, Bangladesh. What about Google? Dhaka. What about soccer star David Beckham? It's actually Cairo, but you take my point. So wherever you're targeting, advertising your page on Facebook is a waste of money. I wish Facebook would remove the fake likes from my page and all the others. But that would mean admitting that they have generated significant ad revenue from clicks that weren't genuine, which then suppressed the reach of pages who had low engagement, forcing those pages to pay again to reach inauthentic fans. So the truth is Facebook benefits by maintaining this status quo because the reality is nobody likes this many things.

References

  1. ^ "Towpath Topics - November 1967". Middlesexcanal.org. Retrieved 2013-05-25.
  2. ^ "An Act incorporating Dudley Atkins Tyng, Esq. and others, for the Purpose of rendering Merrimack River passable etc.", June 27, 1792, p. 382ff, in Private and Special Statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from the year 1780 etc. , 1, 1805.
  3. ^ ASME Landmark report Archived 2011-08-16 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ "Lowell Notes: Patrick Tracy Jackson" (PDF). National Park Service. Lowell National Historical Park. Retrieved 27 January 2018.
  5. ^ "University of Massachusetts Lowell Center Lowell History". library.uml.edu. Retrieved 2015-12-11.
  6. ^ Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1918, Volume 45, Part 1, page 369, "James Hayward Harlow Obituary." Accessed at Google Books on June 4, 2024
  7. ^ "Burnettizing. Award". Digital Commonwealth. University of Massachusetts Lowell, Center for Lowell History.

Archives and records

This page was last edited on 4 June 2024, at 19:37
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.