To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Nielsen realization problem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Nielsen realization problem is a question asked by Jakob Nielsen (1932, pp. 147–148) about whether finite subgroups of mapping class groups can act on surfaces, that was answered positively by Steven Kerckhoff (1980, 1983).

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    746
    1 293
    330
  • My Journey To Atheism Part I: Religious Indoctrination
  • Adi Da Samraj Gives self-Understanding: The Waterfall Leela
  • Engineering Solutions for a Seismically Resilient Seattle

Transcription

Statement

Given an oriented surface, we can divide the group Diff(S), the group of diffeomorphisms of the surface to itself, into isotopy classes to get the mapping class group π0(Diff(S)). The conjecture asks whether a finite subgroup of the mapping class group of a surface can be realized as the isometry group of a hyperbolic metric on the surface.

The mapping class group acts on Teichmüller space. An equivalent way of stating the question asks whether every finite subgroup of the mapping class group fixes some point of Teichmüller space.

History

Jakob Nielsen (1932, pp. 147–148) asked whether finite subgroups of mapping class groups can act on surfaces. Kravetz (1959) claimed to solve the Nielsen realization problem but his proof depended on trying to show that Teichmüller space (with the Teichmüller metric) is negatively curved. Linch (1971) pointed out a gap in the argument, and Masur (1975) showed that Teichmüller space is not negatively curved. Steven Kerckhoff (1980, 1983) gave a correct proof that finite subgroups of mapping class groups can act on surfaces using left earthquakes.

References

  • Kerckhoff, Steven P. (1980), "The Nielsen realization problem" (PDF), Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, New Series, 2 (3): 452–454, doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1980-14764-3, ISSN 0002-9904, MR 0561531
  • Kerckhoff, Steven P. (1983), "The Nielsen realization problem", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 117 (2): 235–265, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.353.3593, doi:10.2307/2007076, ISSN 0003-486X, JSTOR 2007076, MR 0690845
  • Kravetz, Saul (1959), "On the geometry of Teichmüller spaces and the structure of their modular groups", Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I, 278: 35, MR 0148906
  • Linch, Michele Regina (1971), ON METRICS IN TEICHMUELLER SPACE, MR 2620985 – via ProQuest
  • Masur, Howard (1975), "On a class of geodesics in Teichmüller space", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 102 (2): 205–221, doi:10.2307/1971031, ISSN 0003-486X, JSTOR 1971031, MR 0385173
  • Nielsen, Jakob (1932), "Untersuchungen zur Topologie der geschlossenen zweiseitigen Flächen. III.", Acta Math. (in German), 58 (1): 87–167, doi:10.1007/BF02547775, Zbl 0004.27501
This page was last edited on 5 February 2024, at 15:58
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.