To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Jan van Krimpen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jan van Krimpen (12 January 1892, in Gouda – 20 October 1958, in Haarlem) was a Dutch typographer, book designer and type designer. He worked for the printing house Koninklijke Joh. Enschedé.[1][2] He also worked with Monotype in England, who issued or reissued many of his designs outside the Netherlands.[3]

Van Krimpen was a leading figure of international reputation in book printing during his lifetime.[4][5] He designed books both in the Netherlands and for the Limited Editions Club of New York, amongst others.[6][7] His work has been described as traditional and classical in style, focusing on simplicity and high quality of book printing.[8][9]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/2
    Views:
    2 220
    521
  • Kunststof producten voor de professionele tuinbouw - Van Krimpen
  • Van Krimpen-Statema uitvaart

Transcription

Type designs

Haarlemmer, a text typeface designed by Van Krimpen in 1938.
Spectrum, a text typeface designed by Van Krimpen between 1941 and 1943.

Van Krimpen's type designs are elegant book typefaces, originally made for manual printing and the Monotype machine. Although a good few have been digitised (Romulus, Haarlemmer, Spectrum), the typefaces are only rarely used in publications. Van Krimpen was opposed to the idea of directly reviving type designs of the past, and his work is influenced by the structure of classical Roman square capitals in the upper case and chancery calligraphy of the Renaissance in italic. His approach of pursuing a personal path in type design was continued by Sem Hartz, his successor at Enschedé, and has been of interest to more recent Dutch designers such as Martin Majoor.[10][11]

An extensive review of van Krimpen's work is type designer Walter Tracy's Letters of Credit, a chapter of which assesses Van Krimpen's entire output. From his perspective as a designer who had worked on types for difficult uses such as newspapers and small-size printing, Tracy felt that van Krimpen's love of classical letterforms made his work sometimes interesting but often impractical for general use: "a person of knowledge, ability, and taste...the empirical attitude and the practical method were not, it seems, Van Krimpen's way...he worked from an inner vision, not from a broad view of practical realities and requirements." Tracy considered Spectrum "crisp and positive" and "the most practical" of Van Krimpen's types.[7] Van Krimpen had reservations about the quality of machine engraving of type punches and most of his designs were cut into metal by Enschedé's house punchcutter P.H. Rädisch, at least in the pilot sizes.[12][13]

Normally a punch-cutter like Rädisch would add quite some personal interpretation on the final result of the font. This was actually the fact with the first trial of the Lutetia-font. But van Krimpen did not accept this at all, he insisted that all punches were recut. Sem Hartz describes this as follows: "The designer, however, insisted on a recutting of the type, and although it certainly is flawless in its final form it has a slightly stilted look which is absent from its first form."[14]

Of special note is the Romulus 'superfamily', consisting of a seriffed font, a sloped roman, a chancery italic (Cancelleresca Bastarda), a sans-serif, and a Greek in a range of weights.[7][6] Such an extensive family would have been a first, comparable to today's Scala family by Majoor. The outbreak of the Second World War disrupted the project before completion. After the war, Van Krimpen was not interested in resuming it. The decision to use a sloped roman rather than a true italic was influenced by the theories of his friend Stanley Morison, who for a time suggested that italics were too disruptive to the flow of text and should be phased out except for decorative printing. Both Van Krimpen and Morison later moved away from the idea.

Foundry Type

Van Krimpen's Cancelleresca Bastarda typeface, in a text printed by Stanbrook Abbey.

These foundry types were designed by Jan van Krimpen:[15]

Of this font, there was the first trial made by Rädisch, and the punches and matrices of the second version controlled by van Krimpen. There were two sizes of open Capitals. Van Krimpen started to alter 36pt and 48 pt capitals taking some lead away from the surface. Using them as initials in printed texts by Enschedé. Later was decided to make matrices for this variants too.

In the summer of 1929 van Krimpen was visited by Porter Garnett, the owner of the Laboratory Press in Pittsburgh. Garnett was asked to print the Catalogue of the Frick Collection. He wanted to use the Lutetia, but he asked for some changes. This led to a change in the following characters: C E F G L Q e h i j . , : ; ( ) - ` ' [ ]. Van Krimpen was quite pleased with the change. But when Bert Clarke and David Way of Clarke & Way Inc., and The Thistle Press in New York around 1947 offered their version of the font for general use, Van Krimpen rejected the offer. The availability of an alternative version, in his eyes, would only lead to additional confusion.

  • Romanée (1928-1949, Enschedé)
  • Open Roman Capitals (1929, Enschedé)
  • Romulus type family[17]
    • Romulus (1931, Enschedé, also 1936 Monotype, sloped form is an oblique rather than a true italic)[6]
    • Cancelleresca Bastarda (1934, Enschedé)[18]
    • Romulus Sans (never released)
    • Romulus Greek
  • Van Dijck Roman (1935, Monotype); based on types believed to have been cut by Christoffel van Dijck. Van Krimpen's level of involvement in this project was apparently mostly that of a consultant.[19][20]
  • Haarlemmer (1938, Monotype); release cancelled due to the war[21][22]
  • Sheldon (1947), designed for a Bible made by Oxford University Press and named for Archbishop Gilbert Sheldon.[23]
  • Spectrum (1952 Enschedé, also 1955 Monotype)[24][6]

Some initials designed by van Krimpen for the Curwen Press have also been digitised by ARTypes of Chicago.[25] ARTypes also digitised some sets of van Krimpen initial designs that are no longer on sale.[26][27][28][29]

Van Krimpen was renowned for his perfectionism, and his temper. Monotype's archives preserve a letter to Stanley Morison which says "I do not want to be taken for the man who designed something so ridiculously poor as the sloped Romulus bold" that Monotype had produced without his involvement while Van Krimpen was trapped in the Netherlands during the war.[30] Some of his papers are held by the University of Amsterdam.[31]

Jan van Krimpen married three times. His first marriage was in 1916 with Nini Brunt (1891-1984), the daughter of a The Hague bookseller, whom he divorced in 1929. Van Krimpen's only child was his son Huibrecht, usually known as Huib van Krimpen (1917-2002), himself a typographer and a prolific writer about typography.

See also

References

Initials designed by Jan van Krimpen
  1. ^ Kuipers, Reinold (1 January 1995). "J. van Krimpen, the typographer Part One". Quaerendo. 25 (2): 115–135. doi:10.1163/157006995X00062.
  2. ^ Kuipers, Reinold (1 January 1995). "J. van Krimpen, the typographer". Quaerendo. 25 (3): 192–213. doi:10.1163/157006995X00026.
  3. ^ Dreyfus, John (1996). The Work of Jan van Krimpen. Washington, D.C.: Hartley and Marks / Lund Humphries. ISBN 9780881791129.
  4. ^ Van Velden, Dora (1 January 1974). "Notes to early work by Jan van Krimpen". Quaerendo. 4 (4): 317–329. doi:10.1163/157006974X00245.
  5. ^ Lommen, Mathieu (1 January 1994). "Jan van Krimpen and Bruce Rogers: two approaches to traditional typography in a modern perspective1". Quaerendo. 24 (3): 206–218. doi:10.1163/157006994X00171.
  6. ^ a b c d Williamson, Hugh (1956). Methods of Book Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 99–105 etc.
  7. ^ a b c Tracy, Walter. Letters of Credit. pp. 101–120.
  8. ^ Martijn F. Le Coultre; Ellen Lupton; Alston W. Purvis (October 2001). Wendingen - A Journal for the Arts, 1918-1932. Princeton Architectural Press. pp. 19–20. ISBN 978-1-56898-276-2.
  9. ^ Philip B. Meggs; Alston W. Purvis (14 April 2016). Meggs' History of Graphic Design. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 199–202. ISBN 978-1-119-13620-0.
  10. ^ Majoor, Martin. "My type design philosophy". Retrieved 12 September 2014.
  11. ^ "Juliana". Font Bureau. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  12. ^ Ovink, G. Willem (1973). "Review: Jan van Krimpen, A Letter to Philip Hofer". Quaerendo: 239–242. doi:10.1163/157006973X00237.
  13. ^ Ovink, G. Willem (1 January 1980). "Grandeurs and Miseries of the Punch-Cutter's Craft: a review of A to Z. Een autobiografie van P.H. Rädisch, staal-stempelsnijder". Quaerendo. 10 (2): 158–172. doi:10.1163/157006980X00149.
  14. ^ Sem Hartz, Essays, 1992, Serif Pers, Amsterdam, (edited by: Matthieu Lommen), pag. 33-38
  15. ^ Jaspert, W. Pincus, W. Turner Berry and A.F. Johnson. The Encyclopedia of Type Faces. Blandford Press Lts.: 1953, 1983, ISBN 0-7137-1347-X, pp. 2408–249
  16. ^ Unger, Ralph. "RMU Lutetia". MyFonts. RMU Fonts. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  17. ^ "DTL Romulus Text". Dutch Type Library. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  18. ^ Impallari, Pablo. "Cancelleresca Bastarda Impallari (open-source revival, in beta)". ArchLinux repository. Impallari Type. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  19. ^ Macmillan, Neil (2006). An A-Z of type designers. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 74. ISBN 9780300111514.
  20. ^ Hoeflake, Netty (1973). A tally of types (postscript on Van Dijck by Hoeflake) (New ed. with additions by several hands ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 114. ISBN 9780521097864.
  21. ^ "DTL Haarlemmer". DTL. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  22. ^ "Haarlemmer MT". MyFonts. Monotype. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  23. ^ Middendorp, Jan (2004). Dutch type. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers. p. 62. ISBN 9789064504600.
  24. ^ "Spectrum MT". MyFonts. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  25. ^ "Curwen Initials". MyFonts. ARTypes. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  26. ^ "Open Roman Capitals". MyFonts. ARTypes. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  27. ^ "Lutetia Open". MyFonts. ARTypes. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  28. ^ "Romulus Open". MyFonts. ARTypes. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  29. ^ "Romulus Capitals". MyFonts. ARTypes. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  30. ^ van Krimpen, Jan (24 April 2014). "Letter from van Krimpen to Morison". Monotype Archive. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  31. ^ "Beschrijving van het archief Jan van Krimpen ca. 1915-1958". Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved 17 September 2015.

Bibliography

  • John Dreyfus, The Work of Jan van Krimpen. A Record in Honour of his Sixtieth Birthday. With a foreword by Stanley Morison. Haarlem-Utrecht, Enschedé-De Haan, 1952
  • J. van Krimpen, On Designing and Devising Type. New York, The Typophiles 1957
  • Jan van Krimpen, A letter to Philip Hofer on certain problems connected with mechanical cutting of punches, a facsimile reproduction with an introduction and commentary by John Dreyfus. Boston, David R. Godine, 1972
  • R. Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style. Vancouver, Hartley & Marks, 2004.

External links

This page was last edited on 3 February 2024, at 04:24
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.