To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Grand Canyon: A Different View

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grand Canyon: A Different View
AuthorTom Vail
PublisherMaster Books
Publication date
June 2003
Pages96
ISBN978-0-89051-373-6
OCLC53820444
231.7/652 22
LC ClassBS658 .V33 2003

Grand Canyon: A Different View is a 2003 book edited by Tom Vail. The book features a series of photographs of the Grand Canyon illustrating 20 essays by creationists Steve Austin, John Baumgardner, Duane Gish, Ken Ham, Russell Humphreys, Henry Morris, John D. Morris, Andrew A. Snelling, Larry Vardiman, John Whitcomb, and Kurt Wise.[1] It presents the Young Earth creationist perspective that the canyon is no more than a few thousand years old and was formed by the Global Flood or Noachian flood of the Bible.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    905 157
    70 523
    44 546
  • How Was the Grand Canyon Formed?
  • Off Limits to Public, Grand Canyon Secret Location, Above Kincaid Cave, Kwagunt Rapids, On Scene
  • How did rapid catastrophic processes form the Grand Canyon? - Dr. Steve Austin

Transcription

[MUSIC] Pretty awesome, isn’t it? The Grand Canyon is one of the most spectacular natural wonders on Earth, 277 miles long, 18 miles wide at its widest, and more than a mile deep into the Earth’s crust… and unlike the Great Wall of China, you can actually see it from space. All the water in all of Earth’s rivers would only fill it halfway. It almost defies belief. The Colorado river, the river that made this canyon, it’s only about 100 meters wide, that's not very big as rivers go. The Mississippi, the Amazon are far, far bigger, and they've never made anything like this. So how did it happen? No one was around to see it form, but the Grand Canyon’s story is written in those beautiful rock layers. Geologists are kind of like time traveling detectives, they look for fingerprints here and there, retrace the footsteps to retell Earth’s story, as best we can anyway. Native Americans in this area call the canyon “Kaibab”, meaning “mountain lying down” or “upside-down mountain”. They didn’t know how right they were… because down there at the bottom of the canyon, the oldest rocks are mountains. The oldest rocks at the bottom of the canyon are named after the Hindu god Vishnu. About 1.8 billion years ago, the area that’s now the Grand Canyon was covered in mountains taller than the Himalayas. But over hundreds of millions of years, erosion wore them down into hills just tens of meters tall. From this point on, the evolution of the Grand Canyon doesn’t happen in a dry desert like you see today, it happens underwater. Ancient oceans filled this area, from a billion years ago to as recently as 80 million years ago. Water would rise, and fall, and rise and fall again, depositing sand, and mud, and even ancient seashells and compressing them into rock, piling layer upon layer, turning Earth’s crust into a colorful layer cake, just waiting to be cut. You might notice we’re not at sea level right now. 70 or 80 million years ago, this whole area took a tectonic elevator ride straight up, pushing those ancient layers into a high plateau. But there was still no river, and no canyon. Northeast of here, that same uplift created the Rocky Mountains, and their snow-covered peaks. Melting snow began to flow and pool up in this area. Small rivers joined together to make larger ones, some pooled up into lakes, some even changed direction, and about 5 or 6 million years ago, the Colorado River was born. That’s not that old in geological time, but this river is special. Even though it isn’t that big,it drops 10 feet for every mile it travels, carrying half a million tons of silt and sand and rocks downstream every day. It’s like liquid sandpaper. It cut the plateau backwards, the same way a waterfall wears away at a cliff, cutting a mile-deep scar like a hot knife through butter. "Excuse me, we're trying to find the Grand Canyon" Um, here's an idea! So that’s how it got deep, but how did the canyon get so wide? Well, gravity took over, rain and ice chipping away at the canyon walls, and as it fell, it was carried downstream. Fossils and rocks from this area have even been found downstream almost as far as the Gulf of California. And that’s pretty much how we got the canyon of today. If you want to turn a mountain upside down, all you need is time. This canyon is still changing, it's getting deeper and wider, and as we continue to study it, the story of this canyon will change too. There’s stories like this locked in Earth’s crust all over the planet, hidden from view, but that little river has opened this one to us. Stay curious.

Controversy

The book was approved for sale in Grand Canyon National Park bookstores in 2003, and on the web.[2] Vail, a river guide in the park, had recently converted to Christianity and adopted "'a different view' of the Canyon, which, according to a biblical time scale, can't possibly be more than about a few thousand years old." Vail continues to conduct tours of the canyon for creationists through an organization called Canyon Ministries.[3]

Wilfred Elders said that "The book is remarkable because it has 23 co-authors who comprise a veritable 'Who's Who' in creationism. Each chapter of Grand Canyon: A Different View begins with an overview by Vail, followed by brief comments by several contributors that 'have been peer reviewed to ensure a consistent and Biblical perspective.' This perspective is strict Biblical literalism."[4] He says that it is not a geological book but rather a new, slick proselytizing strategy, beautifully illustrated and multi-authored about a spectacular and world-famous geological feature.[5]

On January 25, 2004, David Shaver, chief of the Geologic Resources Division of the National Park Service (NPS), sent a memorandum to Chuck Fagan at the Office of Policy stating, in part, that the book "makes claims that are counter to widely accepted geologic evidence and scientific understanding about the formation and age of the Grand Canyon. In fact, it assaults modern science and well-documented geologic evidence of the canyon's history."[6] Later in 2004, the Grand Canyon National Park bookstore moved the book from the natural science section to the inspirational section as requested by the scientific organizations.[7]

In a letter to Joseph Alston, then superintendent of Grand Canyon National Park, the presidents of seven geoscience societies voiced their concerns: "The Grand Canyon provides a remarkable and unique opportunity to educate the public about earth science. In fairness to the millions of park visitors, we must clearly distinguish religious tenets from scientific knowledge."[8]

In response to the 2003 controversy, the NPS told reporters and members of Congress in February 2004 that it was doing a review of the book and would soon make a decision on it.[9] In December 2006 the NPS responded to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) which showed that no formal review had ever taken place.[10][11] PEER says that this was the only book approved for addition to the park bookstore in 2003; 22 books and other products were rejected.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^ From the table of contents page.
  2. ^ "Grand Canyon National Park bookstore". Archived from the original on January 1, 2007.
  3. ^ Wilgoren, Jodi (October 6, 2005). "Seeing Creation and Evolution in Grand Canyon". The New York Times.
  4. ^ Elders, Wilfred A. (2003). "Different Views of the Grand Canyon {abstract}". EOS, Transactions. American Geophysical Union. 84 (38): 384. doi:10.1029/2003EO380005.
  5. ^ Elders, Wilfred A. (2003). "Bibliolatry Revisited: A Review of Grand Canyon: a Different View".
  6. ^ "United States Department of the Interior Memo From David B. Shaver to Office of Policy (reproduced @PEER)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 28, 2007.
  7. ^ "Evolution Debate in Arizona / Grand Canyon National Park". citing October 15th Washington Post article
  8. ^ Sever, Megan (March 2004). "Creationism in a national park". Geotimes.
  9. ^ "Email from David Barna dated 02/02/2004" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on January 9, 2007.
  10. ^ "FOIA request response (no information found)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on January 15, 2007.
  11. ^ Dean, Cornelia (January 5, 2007). "Parks Agency Leaves Controversial Book on Shelf". The New York Times.
  12. ^ "PEER – News – How Old Is the Grand Canyon? Park Service Won't Say". Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. Archived from the original on February 17, 2014. Retrieved December 29, 2013.

External links

This page was last edited on 16 December 2023, at 22:23
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.