To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

List of stars in Delphinus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the list of notable stars in the constellation Delphinus, sorted by decreasing brightness.

Name B F Var HD HIP RA Dec vis.
mag.
abs.
mag.
Dist. (ly) Sp. class Notes
β Del β 6 196524 101769 20h 37m 32.87s +14° 35′ 42.7″ 3.64 1.26 97 F5IV Rotanev, Rotanen, Venator; spectroscopic binary
α Del α 9 196867 101958 20h 39m 38.25s +15° 54′ 43.4″ 3.77 −0.57 241 B9V Sualocin, Scalovin, Svalocin, Nicolaus; binary star; suspected variable, Vmax = 3.77m, Vmin = 3.80m
ε Del ε 2 195810 101421 20h 33m 12.76s +11° 18′ 12.0″ 4.03 −1.18 359 B6III Aldulfin, Deneb Dulfim, Deneb, Al Dhanab al Dulfim, Dzaneb al Delphin, Cauda Delphini;[1] suspected variable, Vmax = 3.95m, Vmin = 4.05m
γ2 Del γ2 12 197964 102532 20h 46m 39.52s +16° 07′ 29.2″ 4.27 1.81 101 K1IV binary star with γ1 Del
δ Del δ 11 197461 102281 20h 43m 27.55s +15° 04′ 28.9″ 4.43 0.45 203 A7IIIp d Del δ Sct variable, Vmax = 4.38m, Vmin = 4.49m, P = 0.1567924 d
ζ Del ζ 4 196180 101589 20h 35m 18.51s +14° 40′ 27.1″ 4.64 0.43 227 A3V suspected variable, Vmax = 4.64m, Vmin = 4.70m
ρ Aql ρ 67 192425 99742 20h 14m 16.59s +15° 11′ 50.9″ 4.94 1.58 153 A2V Tso Ke; recently moved into Delphinus due to proper motion
κ Del κ 7 196755 101916 20h 39m 07.59s +10° 05′ 10.1″ 5.07 2.68 98 G5IV+...
γ1 Del γ1 12 197963 102531 20h 46m 38.87s +16° 07′ 28.6″ 5.15 2.65 103 A2Ia+... binary star with γ2 Del
17 Del 17 199253 103294 20h 55m 36.68s +13° 43′ 17.6″ 5.19 −0.62 474 K0III suspected variable, Vmax = 5.16m, Vmin = 5.27m
η Del η 3 195943 101483 20h 33m 57.00s +13° 01′ 37.9″ 5.39 1.77 173 A3IVs suspected variable, Vmax = 5.37m, Vmin = 5.40m
ι Del ι 5 196544 101800 20h 37m 49.10s +11° 22′ 39.7″ 5.42 1.74 177 A2V spectroscopic binary
18 Del 18 199665 103527 20h 58m 25.96s +10° 50′ 21.7″ 5.51 1.19 238 G6III: Musica,[2] optical double, has a planet (b)
16 Del 16 199254 103298 20h 55m 38.55s +12° 34′ 06.6″ 5.54 1.61 199 A4V double star
13 Del 13 198069 102633 20h 47m 48.33s +06° 00′ 29.7″ 5.57 −0.42 513 A0V double star
θ Del θ 8 196725 101882 20h 38m 43.98s +13° 18′ 54.5″ 5.69 −2.32 1304 K3Ib
HD 200044 200044 103675 21h 00m 27.70s +19° 19′ 47.0″ 5.69 −0.62 596 M3III suspected variable, ΔV = 0.05m
HD 193472 193472 100256 20h 20m 00.19s +13° 32′ 53.2″ 5.96 1.18 294 A5m suspected variable
HD 196775 196775 101909 20h 39m 04.97s +15° 50′ 17.6″ 5.99 −2.01 1299 B3V double star
10 Del 10 197121 102080 20h 41m 16.21s +14° 34′ 58.4″ 6.01 0.13 488 K4III: suspected variable
15 Del 15 198390 102805 20h 49m 37.74s +12° 32′ 41.6″ 6.01 3.66 96 F5V double star
1 Del 1 195325 101160 20h 30m 17.95s +10° 53′ 45.3″ 6.03 −0.17 566 A1sh double star; emission-line star; suspected variable, Vmax = 5.92m, Vmin = 6.07m
HD 199223 199223 103301 20h 55m 40.64s +04° 31′ 57.7″ 6.04 0.82 361 G6III-IV double star
HD 194012 194012 100511 20h 22m 52.32s +14° 33′ 04.0″ 6.16 4.07 85 F8V
HD 193556 193556 100274 20h 20m 20.53s +14° 34′ 09.3″ 6.17 0.04 550 G8III
HD 193373 193373 100208 20h 19m 29.31s +13° 13′ 00.5″ 6.20 −0.73 791 M1III
HD 194953 194953 100969 20h 28m 16.77s +02° 56′ 13.7″ 6.20 0.47 456 G8III/IV
HD 198404 198404 102833 20h 49m 59.07s +05° 32′ 40.4″ 6.20 0.29 495 K0III double star
HD 195479 195479 101213 20h 30m 58.10s +20° 36′ 21.6″ 6.21 1.08 346 A1m triple star
EU Del EU 196610 101810 20h 37m 54.71s +18° 16′ 06.4″ 6.22 1.03 356 M6III semiregular variable, Vmax = 5.41m, Vmin = 6.72m, P = 58.63 d
HD 194688 194688 100807 20h 26m 23.15s +17° 18′ 56.1″ 6.23 −0.75 813 G8III
HD 194937 194937 100953 20h 28m 07.52s +08° 26′ 14.7″ 6.23 1.23 326 G9III
LU Del LU 197249 102158 20h 41m 58.16s +17° 31′ 17.0″ 6.24 0.63 432 G8III suspected variable
HD 201196 201196 104281 21h 07m 33.61s +15° 39′ 31.7″ 6.27 1.00 369 K2IV
HD 194526 194526 100762 20h 25m 44.10s +10° 03′ 21.9″ 6.32 −0.83 876 K5IIIvar
14 Del 14 198391 102819 20h 49m 48.24s +07° 51′ 51.0″ 6.32 0.32 517 A1Vs spectroscopic binary
HD 200430 200430 103891 21h 03m 01.78s +14° 43′ 48.1″ 6.33 −0.11 633 M1III suspected variable
HD 194578 194578 100781 20h 26m 01.58s +13° 54′ 42.0″ 6.35 −0.64 815 K5 suspected variable
HD 198070 198070 102631 20h 47m 47.86s +03° 18′ 23.2″ 6.38 0.60 467 A0Vn
HD 196885 196885 101966 20h 39m 51.85s +11° 14′ 58.0″ 6.39 3.80 108 F8IV: binary star; has a planet (b)
HD 195909 195909 101489 20h 33m 59.92s +04° 53′ 55.3″ 6.42 0.02 622 K0
HD 197076 197076 102040 20h 40m 45.07s +19° 56′ 05.2″ 6.43 4.82 68 G5V optical double
HD 194841 194841 100876 20h 27m 14.19s +20° 28′ 35.4″ 6.44 −2.09 1655 K0
HD 194616 194616 100779 20h 26m 01.15s +19° 51′ 55.6″ 6.45 −0.13 675 K0III
U Del U 197812 102440 20h 45m 28.23s +18° 05′ 24.2″ 6.74 −1.16 1240 M5II-III semiregular variable, Vmax = 6.14m, Vmin = 7.61m, P = 120 d
HD 195019 195019 100970 20h 28m 18.64s +18° 46′ 10.2″ 6.91 4.05 122 G3IV-V double star; has a planet (b)
Gliese 795 OQ 196795 101955 20h 39m 37.71s +04° 58′ 19.3″ 7.84 54.52 K5V triple star; BY Dra variable, ΔV = 0.04m
V Del V 198136 20h 47m 46.04s +19° 20′ 06.9″ 8.1 M6e: Mira variable, Vmax = 8.1m, Vmin = 17.0m, P = 527 d
DM Del DM 20h 39m 37.01s +14° 25′ 43.1″ 8.65 A2V β Lyr variable, Vmax = 8.58m, Vmin = 9.11m, P = 0.8446725 d
LS Del LS 199497 20h 57m 10.29s +19° 38′ 55.2″ 8.72 256.5 G5 W UMa variable, Vmax = 8.61m, Vmin = 8.76m, P = 0.363842 d
MR Del MR 195434 101236 20h 31m 13.46s +05° 13′ 08.5″ 8.77 158.3 K0 Algol and BY Dra variable, Vmax = 8.71m, Vmin = 9.01m, P = 0.521692 d
TX Del TX 102853 20h 50m 12.69s +03° 39′ 08.4″ 8.86 F8 BL Her variable, Vmax = 8.86m, Vmin = 9.51m, P = 6.165907 d
DX Del DX 102593 20h 47m 28.36s +12° 27′ 50.7″ 9.56 4200 A7IIIv RR Lyr variable, Vmax = 9.558m, Vmin = 10.291m, P = 0.4726191 d
W Del W 352682 101780 20h 37m 40.09s +18° 17′ 03.8″ 9.81 2200 A0Ve Algol variable, Vmax = 9.69m, Vmin = 12.33m, P = 4.8061 d
TY Del TY 21h 04m 21.98s +13° 12′ 53.5″ 10.08 A0 Algol variable, Vmax = 9.7m, Vmin = 10.9m, P = 1.19112689 d
HAT-P-23 20h 24m 30s +16° 45′ 44″ 11.94 1282 G5 Moriah; has a transiting planet (b)
WASP-2 20h 30m 54s +06° 25′ 46″ 11.98 K1V has a transiting planet (b)
BX Del BX 20h 21m 18.97s +18° 26′ 16.2″ 11.99 A0 BL Her variable, Vmax = 11.79m, Vmin = 12.57m, P = 1.091787 d
WASP-176 20h 54m 45.0s +09° 10′ 45″ 12.00 1885 has a transiting planet (b)
HR Del HR 20h 42m 20.35s +19° 09′ 35.3″ 12.1 A0 nova, Vmax = 3.6m, Vmin = 12.1m, P = 0.214165 d
HU Del HU 20h 29m 48.34s +09° 41′ 20.3″ 13.04 29.6 M6.0V+... flare star
He 2-467 LT 20h 35m 57.23s +20° 11′ 27.5″ 13.05 G6III Z And and rotating ellipsoidal variable, Vmax = 12.0m, Vmin = 13.4m, P = 476 d
CM Del CM 20h 24m 56.93s +17° 17′ 54.4″ 13.40 A0 nova-like star
V339 Del V339 20h 29m 30.68s +20° 46′ 03.8″ 16.86 nova, Vmax = 4.3m, Vmin = 17.6m, P = 1.19112689 d
WISE 2056+1459 20h 56m 28.90s +14° 59′ 53.3″ 22.6 Y0 brown dwarf
Table legend:

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    864 730
    3 634
    5 730
    3 701
    730
  • Naked Eye Observations: Crash Course Astronomy #2
  • Observing the Universe (2/3)
  • Autumn Constellations Song
  • THE CONSTELLATION SONG
  • A star explosion in the stellar system Messier101

Transcription

Hey, Phil Plait here. Welcome to episode 2 of Crash Course Astronomy: Naked Eye Observations. Despite the salacious title, nudity is not required. In fact, given that a lot of astronomical observations are done at night, you may want to bundle up. As it relates to astronomy, “naked eye” means no binoculars, no telescope. Just you, your eyeballs, and a nice, dark site from which to view the heavens. After all, that’s how we did astronomy for thousands of years, and it’s actually pretty amazing what you can figure out about the universe just by looking at it. Imagine you’re somewhere far away from city lights, where you have an unobstructed view of the cloudless sky. The Sun sets, and for a few minutes you just watch as the sky darkens. Then, you notice a star appear in the east, just over a tree. Then another, and another, and within an hour or so you are standing beneath an incredible display, the sky spangled with stars. What do you notice right away? First, there are a lot of stars. People with normal vision can see a few thousand stars at any given time, and if you want a round number, there are very roughly six to ten thousand stars in total that are bright enough to detect by eye alone, depending on how good your sight is. The next thing you’ll notice is that they’re not all the same brightness. A handful are very bright, a few more are a bit fainter but still pretty bright, and so on. The faintest stars you can see are the most abundant, vastly outnumbering the bright ones. This is due to a combination of two effects. One is that stars aren’t all the same intrinsic, physical brightness. Some are dim bulbs, while others are monsters, blasting out as much light in one second as the sun does in a day. The second factor is that not all stars are the same distance from us. The farther away a star is, the fainter it is. Interestingly, of the two dozen or so brightest stars in the sky, half are bright because they’re close to Earth, and half are much farther away but incredibly luminous, so they still appear bright to us. This is a running theme in astronomy and science in general. Some effects you see have more than one cause. Things aren’t always as simple as they seem. The ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus is generally credited for creating the first catalog of stars, ranking them by brightness. He came up with a system called magnitudes, where the brightest stars were 1st magnitude, the next brightest were 2nd magnitude, down to 6th magnitude. We still use a variation of this system today, thousands of years later. The faintest stars ever seen (using Hubble Space Telescope) are about magnitude 31 – the faintest star you can see with your eye is about 10 billion times brighter! The brightest star in the night sky — called Sirius, the Dog Star — is about 1000 times brighter than the faintest star you can see. Let’s take a closer look at some of those bright stars, like, say, Vega. Notice anything about it? Yeah, it looks blue. And Betelgeuse looks red. Arcturus is orange, Capella yellow. Those stars really are those colors. By eye, only the brightest stars seem to have color, while the fainter ones all just look white. That’s because the color receptors in your eye aren’t very light-sensitive, and only the brightest stars can trigger them. Another thing you’ll notice is that stars aren’t scattered evenly across the sky. They form patterns, shapes. This is mostly coincidence, but humans are pattern-recognizing animals, so it’s totally understandable that ancient astronomers divided the skies up into constellations — literally, sets or groups of stars — and named them after familiar objects. Orion is probably the most famous constellation; it really does look like a person, arms raised up, and most civilizations saw it that way. There’s also tiny Delphinus; it’s only 5 stars, but it’s easy to see it as a dolphin jumping out of the water. And Scorpius, which isn’t hard to imagine as a venomous arthropod. Others, well, not so much. Pisces is a fish? Yeah, OK. Cancer is a crab? If you say so. Although they were rather arbitrarily defined in ancient times, today we recognize 88 official constellations, and their boundaries are carefully delineated on the sky. When we say a star is in the constellation of Ophiuchus, it’s because the location of the star puts it inside that constellation’s boundaries. Think of them like states in the US; the state lines are decided upon by mutual agreement, and a city can be in one state or the other. Mind you, not every group of stars makes a constellation. The Big Dipper, for example, is only one part of the constellation of Ursa Major, the Big Bear. The bowl of the dipper is the bear’s haunches, and the handle is its tail. But, bears don't have tails! So astronomers might be great at pattern recognition, but they're terrible at zoology. Most of the brightest stars have proper names, usually Arabic. During the Dark Ages, when Europe wasn’t so scientifically minded, it was the Persian astronomer Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi who translated ancient Greek astronomy texts into Arabic, and those names have stuck with us ever since. However there are a lot more stars than there are proper names, so astronomers use other designations for them. The stars in any constellation are given Greek letters in order of their brightness, so we have Alpha Orionis, the brightest star in Orion, then Beta, and so. Of course, you run out of letters quickly, too, so most modern catalogs just use numbers; it’s a lot harder to run out of those. Of course, just seeing all those faint stars can be tough… which brings us to this week’s "Focus On." Light pollution is a serious problem for astronomers. This is light from street lamps, shopping centers, or wherever, where the light gets blasted up into the sky instead of toward the ground. This lights the up the sky, making fainter objects much more difficult to see. That’s why observatories tend to be built in remote areas, as far from cities as possible. Trying to observe faint galaxies under bright sky conditions is like trying to listen to someone 50 feet away whispering at you in a rock concert. This affects the sky you see as well. From within a big city it's impossible to see the Milky Way, the faint glowing streak across the sky that’s actually the combined light of billions of stars. It gets washed out with even mild light pollution. Your view of Orion probably looks like this: When from a dark site it looks like this: It’s not just people who are affected by this, either. Light pollution affects the way nocturnal animals hunt, how insects breed, and more, by disrupting their normal daily cycles. Cutting back light pollution is mostly just a matter of using the right kind of light fixtures outside, directing the light down to the ground. A lot of towns have worked to use better lighting, and have met with success. This is due in large part to groups like the International Dark-Sky Association, GLOBE at Night, The World at Night, and many more, who advocate using more intelligent lighting, and to help preserve our night sky. The sky belongs to everyone, and we should do what we can to make sure it’s the best possible sky we can see. Even if you don’t have dark skies, there’s another thing you can notice when you look up. If you look carefully, you might see that a couple of the brightest stars look different than the others. They don’t twinkle! That’s because they aren’t stars, they’re planets. Twinkling happens because the air over our heads is turbulent, and as it blows past, it distorts the incoming light from stars, making them appear to slightly shift position and brightness several times per second. But planets are much closer to us, and appear bigger, so the distortion doesn’t affect them as much. There are five naked eye planets (not counting Earth): Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Uranus is right on the edge of visibility, and people with keen eyesight might be able to spot it. Venus is actually the third brightest natural object in the sky, after the Sun and Moon. Jupiter and Mars are frequently brighter than the brightest stars, too. If you stay outside for an hour or two, you’ll notice something else that’s pretty obvious: the stars move, like the sky is a gigantic sphere wheeling around you over the course of the night. In fact, that’s how the ancients thought of it. If you could measure it, you’d find this celestial sphere spins once every day. Stars toward the east are rising over the horizon, and stars in the west are setting, making a big circle over the course of the night (and presumably, day). This is really just a reflection of the Earth spinning, of course. The Earth rotates once a day, and we’re stuck to it, so it looks like the sky is spinning around us in the opposite direction. There’s an interesting thing that happens because of this. Look at a spinning globe. It rotates on an axis that goes through the poles, and halfway between them is the Equator. If you stand on the Equator, you make a big circle around the center of the Earth over a day. But if you move north or south, toward one pole or the other, that circle gets smaller. When you stand on the pole, you don’t make a circle at all; you just spin around in the same spot. It’s the same thing with the sky. As the sky spins over us, just like with the Earth, it has two poles and an Equator. A star on the celestial Equator makes a big circle around the sky, and stars to the north or south make smaller ones. A star right on the celestial pole wouldn’t appear to move at all, and would just hang there, like it was nailed to that spot, all night long. And this is just what we see! Photographic time exposures show it best. The motions of the stars show up as streaks. The longer the exposure, the longer the streaks as the stars rise and set, making their circular arcs in the sky. You can see stars near the celestial equator making their big circles. And, by coincidence, there’s also a middling-bright star that sits very close to the north celestial pole. That’s called Polaris, the north or pole star. Because of that, it doesn’t appear to rise or set, and it's always to the north, motionless. It really is coincidence; there’s no southern pole star, unless you count Sigma Octans, a dim bulb barely visible by eye that’s not all that close to the south pole of the sky. But even Polaris isn’t exactly on the pole -- it’s offset a teeny bit. So it does make a circle in the sky, but one so small you’d never notice. By eye, night after night, Polaris is the constant in the sky, always there, never moving. Remember, the sky’s motion is a reflection of the Earth’s motion. If you were standing on the north pole of the Earth, you’d see Polaris at the sky’s zenith — that is, straight overhead — fixed and unmoving. Stars on the celestial equator would appear to circle the horizon once per day. But this also means that stars south of the celestial equator can’t be seen from the Earth’s north pole! They’re always below the horizon. So this in turn means that which stars you see depends on where you are on Earth. At the north pole, you only see stars north of the celestial equator. At the Earth’s south pole, you only see stars south of the celestial equator. From Antarctica, Polaris is forever hidden from view. Standing on the Earth’s equator, you’d see Polaris on the horizon to the north, and Sigma Octans on the horizon to the south, and over the course of the day the entire celestial sphere would spin around you; every star in the sky is eventually visible. While Polaris may be constant, not everything is. Sometimes you just have to wait a while to notice. And to that point, you’ll have to wait a while to find out what I mean by this because we’ll be covering that in next week’s episode. Today we talked about what you can see on a clear dark night with just your eyes: thousands of stars, some brighter than others, arranged into patterns called constellations. Stars have colors, even if we can’t see them with our eyes alone, and they rise and set as the Earth spins. You can see different stars depending on where you are on Earth, and if you’re in the northern hemisphere, Polaris will always point you toward north. Crash Course is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios. This episode was written by me, Phil Plait. The script was edited by Blake de Pastino, and our consultant is Dr. Michelle Thaller. It was co-directed by Nicholas Jenkins and Michael Aranda, and the graphics team is Thought Café.

See also

References

  • ESA (1997). "The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues". Retrieved 2006-12-26.
  • Kostjuk, N. D. (2002). "HD-DM-GC-HR-HIP-Bayer-Flamsteed Cross Index". Retrieved 2006-12-26.
  • Roman, N. G. (1987). "Identification of a Constellation from a Position". Retrieved 2006-12-26.
  • "SIMBAD Astronomical Database". Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2007-01-02.
  • Samus, N. N.; Durlevich, O. V.; et al. (2004). "Combined General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS4.2)". Retrieved 2007-01-03.
  • Gould, B. A. "Uranometria Argentina". Reprinted and updated by Pilcher, F. Archived from the original on 2012-02-27. Retrieved 2010-07-19.
  • "AAVSO Website". American Association of Variable Star Observers. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  • "Naming Stars". Retrieved 4 July 2018.
This page was last edited on 14 May 2023, at 12:43
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.