To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Southern Railway Co. v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Southern Railway Company v. United States
Argued March 9–10, 1911
Decided October 30, 1911
Full case nameSouthern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States
Citations222 U.S. 20 (more)
32 S. Ct. 2; 56 L. Ed. 72; 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1875
Holding
The Court held that under the Commerce Clause, the U.S. Congress can regulate safety on intrastate rail traffic because there is a close and substantial connection to interstate traffic.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Horace H. Lurton
Charles E. Hughes · Willis Van Devanter
Joseph R. Lamar
Case opinion
MajorityVan Devanter, joined by Unanimous
Laws applied
Safety Appliance Act, Commerce Clause

Southern Railway Company v. United States, 222 U.S. 20 (1911), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that under the Commerce Clause, the U.S. Congress can regulate safety on intrastate rail traffic because there is a close and substantial connection to interstate traffic.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    36 015
    33 932
    5 412
  • Southern Railway System "Via Sevier" - Historic American Trains - Railroads - WDTVLIVE42
  • Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1940's and 50's - Historic American Trains & Railraods - Ella73TV
  • Southern Railway #1401

Transcription

Background

Congress required all train cars to be equipped with couplers as a safety measure. Southern Railway argued that the requirement applied only to train cars crossing state lines, not to train cars that operated inside one state.

The Safety Appliance Act of March 2, 1893, 27 Stat. 531, c. 196:

...imposed upon every carrier "engaged in interstate commerce by railroad" the duty of equipping all trains, locomotives, and cars used on its line of railroad in moving interstate traffic, with designated appliances calculated to promote the safety of that traffic...

Decision

The Commerce Clause is plenary to protect persons and property moving in interstate commerce from all danger. No matter the source or destination, Congress may require all vehicles moving on lanes of interstate commerce to be so equipped with safety devices to avoid danger to persons and property in interstate commerce.

See also

References

  1. ^ Southern Railway Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20 (1911). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.

External links

This page was last edited on 18 December 2023, at 22:22
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.