To install click the Add extension button. That's it.
The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.
How to transfigure the Wikipedia
Would you like Wikipedia to always look as professional and up-to-date? We have created a browser extension. It will enhance any encyclopedic page you visit with the magic of the WIKI 2 technology.
Try it — you can delete it anytime.
Install in 5 seconds
Yep, but later
4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
Smyth, Attorney General, et al. v. Ames, et al.; Smyth, Attorney General, et al. v. Smith, et al.; Smyth, Attorney General, et al. v. Higginson, et al.
Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320U.S.591 (1944)
Smyth v. Ames, 171 U.S. 361 (1898), also called The Maximum Freight Case, was an 1898 United States Supreme Courtcase.[1] The Supreme Court voided a Nebraska railroad tariff law, declaring that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in that it takes property without the due process of law.[2] The Court defined the constitutional limits of governmental power to set railroad and utility rates by stating that regulated industries have the right to a "fair return". The ruling was later overturned in Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.[3][4]
The decision was unanimous and the majority opinion was written by Justice John M. Harlan.
YouTube Encyclopedic
1/3
Views:
23 619
85 045
1 104
E. P. Alexander on Pickett's Charge - Part 1 | Eyewitness Account/Official Report
Vintage Mugshots of American Criminals from the 1870's and 1880's: Part 3
O que é Nutrição Funcional? Não estamos falando de "alimento funcional"...
Transcription
Prior history
On April 12, 1893,[5] Nebraska passed a law, a so-called "maximum rate bill", establishing maximum rates for the transportation of freights within the state.[2] The Railroad Commissioners of Nebraska were empowered to reduce any freight rate.[5]
Several precedents had been set by the Supreme Court regarding state control over railways. Until Munn v. Illinois when the Granger Laws were declared constitutional, it had been held that railway property was protected from state authority by the Contract Clause of the Constitution, which states that no state shall pass any "Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts". However, in the Munn case, the Court ruled that all property was held subject to legislative regulation if it was "affected with a public interest". Further decisions built off the Munn decision, specifying that while the legislature may regulate property "affected by the public interest", they must exercise it reasonably by applying the used and useful principle, so as to not deprive citizens of their property without due process of law.[6]
The Supreme Court unanimously found the law unconstitutional. The court found that it is not enough to show a tariff – even if the tax is in the public interest – still leaves a company enough money to pay operating expenses and stock dividends.[8]
Effects of the decision
Businessmen were pleased by the decision, and believed it would give stability to railroad investments.[9] Others were unhappy.[10]
^"The central law journal". The Central Law Journal. St. Louis, MO: Soule, Thomas & Wentworth. 46 (24): 489. June 10, 1898. Retrieved February 18, 2009.