To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Reefs – Santa Cruz languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reef Islands – Santa Cruz
Reefs – Santa Cruz
Geographic
distribution
Solomon Islands
Linguistic classificationAustronesian
Proto-languageProto-Reefs – Santa Cruz (Proto-RSC)
Subdivisions
Glottologreef1242

The Reef Islands – Santa Cruz languages (usually shortened to Reefs – Santa Cruz, abbreviated RSC) are a branch of the Oceanic languages comprising the languages of the Santa Cruz Islands and Reef Islands:

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    5 208
    92 095
    4 694 416
    897 320
    677
  • Covid Helped World's Most Densely Populated Island | Remote Places Ep.3
  • Canary Island Santa Cruz de Tenerife :: BEACH SPAIN Walk Tours 4K
  • 15 Biggest Ship Collisions and Mistakes Caught On Camera
  • 15 Things You Didn’t Know About Trinidad and Tobago
  • Prehistoric Irrigation in Central Utah: More Than at First Glance with Dr. Steve Simms

Transcription

Background

The debate in Oceanic linguistics dated from the Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics in 1978, where two opposing papers were presented. Peter Lincoln argued that the Reefs – Santa Cruz languages were Oceanic,[1] while Stephen Wurm argued that they were Papuan languages.[2]

Classification

These languages were only definitively classified as part of the Oceanic subgroup of the Austronesian family after a series of papers that refuted the three major arguments for classifying them as either primarily Papuan languages or at least heavily influenced by a Papuan substrate.

  • Malcolm Ross and Åshild Næss (2007) demonstrated regular sound correspondences between the reconstructed ancestor Proto-Oceanic and RSC languages. Among other changes, RSC languages are characterized by a pervasive syncope of vowels and truncation of syllables.[3]
  • Åshild Næss (2006) showed that the "multiple noun classes" in RSC do not resemble Papuan-style gender systems, but do have parallels in other Oceanic languages of nearby Vanuatu.[4]
  • Åshild Næss and Brenda H. Boerger (2008) showed that the complex verbal structures of RSC are derived by normal erosion of verb morphology and grammaticalization of verb serialization commonly found in many Oceanic languages, and thus do not reflect a Papuan substrate.[5]
  • William James Lackey and Brenda H. Boerger (2021) revises the reconstruction made by Ross and Næss (2008), and outlines in detail some regular correspondences between RSC and Proto-Oceanic consonants that were overlooked, such as *s > t (and later t > s before /i/). They also conclude that the truncation of syllables in Proto-RSC was primarily driven by stress: words that contained a Proto-Oceanic final consonant, being oxytone, preserved their final syllable; likewise, syncope (word-medially) took place if the word originally ended in a final consonant, or was trisyllabic.[6]

Ross and Næss (2007) offer a retrospective conclusion:

How then did it come about that Stephen Wurm thought the RSC [Reefs – Santa Cruz] languages were Papuan? In small measure because the reconstruction of POc had in the 1970s not progressed to where it is today. In larger measure because the typological features he found in the RSC languages had yet to be documented in other Oceanic languages. And because the RSC languages had undergone phonological changes which rendered some cognates unrecognizable and led eventually to the replacement of others.

References

  1. ^ Lincoln, Peter C. "Reefs – Santa Cruz as Austronesian". Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings. Pacific Linguistics. pp. 929–967.
  2. ^ Wurm, Stephen. "Reefs – Santa Cruz: Austronesian, but ... !". Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings. Pacific Linguistics. pp. 969–1010.
  3. ^ Ross, Malcolm and Åshild Næss (2007). "An Oceanic Origin for Aiwoo, the Language of the Reef Islands?". Oceanic Linguistics. 46 (2): 456–498. doi:10.1353/ol.2008.0003. hdl:1885/20053.
  4. ^ Næss, Åshild (2006). "Bound Nominal Elements in Äiwoo (Reefs): A Reappraisal of the 'Multiple Noun Class Systems'". Oceanic Linguistics. 45: 269–296. doi:10.1353/ol.2007.0006.
  5. ^ Næss, Åshild and Brenda H. Boerger (2008). "Reefs – Santa Cruz as Oceanic: Evidence from the Verb Complex". Oceanic Linguistics. 47: 185–212. doi:10.1353/ol.0.0000. hdl:1959.13/1052427.
  6. ^ Lackey, William James and Brenda H. Boerger (2021). "Reexamining the Phonological History of Oceanic's Temotu subgroup". Oceanic Linguistics: er5–er17. doi:10.1353/ol.2021.0020.

Further reading

  • Cashmore, C. (1972) Vocabularies of the Santa Cruz Islands, British Solomon Islands Protectorate.
  • Simon J Greenhill, & Robert Forkel. (2019). lexibank/tryonsolomon: Solomon Islands Languages (Version v3.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3535809
This page was last edited on 22 January 2024, at 04:11
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.