To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Witchboard
Theatrical release poster
Directed byKevin Tenney
Written byKevin Tenney
Produced byGerald Geoffray
Starring
CinematographyRoy H. Wagner
Edited by
  • Daniel Duncan
  • Stephen J. Waller
Music byDennis Michael Tenney
Production
company
Paragon Arts International[1]
Distributed byCinema Group
Release date
  • December 31, 1986 (1986-12-31)
Running time
98 minutes
CountryUnited States[1][2]
LanguageEnglish
Budget$1.5–2 million[1][3]
Box office$7.4 million[4]

Witchboard is a 1986 American supernatural horror film written and directed by Kevin Tenney in his directorial debut, and starring Tawny Kitaen, Stephen Nichols, and Todd Allen. The plot centers on a college student who becomes entranced into using her friend's Ouija board alone after it was accidentally left behind at her party, resulting in her becoming terrorized by a malevolent spirit.

Tenney wrote the screenplay while a student at the University of Southern California, inspired after attending a party in which a friend brought a Ouija board for partygoers to use. The film focuses on the notion of "progressive entrapment," the process by which a malevolent entity or demon takes control of a human being, a theme that was also touched on in The Exorcist (1973) after a character dabbles with a Ouija board. Filming took place in 1985 in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and San Francisco.

Cinema Group gave Witchboard a limited theatrical release in the United States on December 31, 1986. Following favorable box-office returns, the release was expanded in the spring of 1987, and the film went on to gross $7.4 million. Although the critical response to the film was largely unfavorable, it has obtained a cult following since its release,[5] and was subject to significant critical analysis by academic Carol J. Clover in her 1992 non-fiction book, Men, Women, and Chainsaws. Two unrelated sequels, Witchboard 2: The Devil's Doorway and Witchboard III: The Possession, were released in 1993 and 1995 respectively.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    14 758
    67 176
    227 155
    8 155
    99 913
  • Witchboard 1986
  • Witchboard (1986) - Official Trailer
  • Witchboard 3
  • WITCHBOARD | Best of
  • Trailer -- Witchboard 1986

Transcription

Plot

At a house party in Fairfield, California, Brandon Sinclair uses his Ouija board with his ex-girlfriend Linda Brewster to contact the spirit of David, with whom he had communicated before. Her boyfriend, Jim Morar, insults David, which provokes him to slash the tires of Brandon's car. The next day, Linda uses Brandon's board that was left behind to contact David, who informs her where her lost engagement ring is. At the construction site where Jim works, his friend Lloyd is killed by fallen drywall. When Jim is questioned by Lieutenant Dewhurst at Lloyd's funeral, Linda contacts David about the accident, but he says that he did not cause it.

Linda begins to fall under progressive entrapment, where the spirit terrorizes the user enough to weaken them in order to possess them. She becomes increasingly preoccupied with communicating with David, and begins to experience nausea and other symptoms, leading her and Jim to believe she is pregnant. Brandon brings over psychic medium Zarabeth Crawford to contact David through a séance, and to exorcise him if necessary. Zarabeth channels David, who claims to be a ten-year-old boy. This further leads Linda to become protective of David and her communication with him. After the spirit leaves, a suspicious Zarabeth returns home to research the occurrence, but her throat is slashed before she is thrown through a window and lands on a sundial, impaling her to death. The next morning, Brandon hears about her death and suspects that David killed her, but Jim continues to be skeptical of his claims.

As Brandon leaves to seek information, Jim witnesses Linda violently thrown against the wall, rendering her unconscious. After she is brought to a hospital, doctors confirm Linda is not pregnant as they had suspected. Unnerved, Jim teams with Brandon to conduct research on David. The two find a newspaper article about a ten-year-old boy named David who drowned in a nearby lake. Jim and Brandon travel to the lake and use another board in an attempt to communicate with David, but soon learn that a different spirit, Carlos Malfeitor, has been terrorizing Linda all along. Seated on a dock, Jim is knocked unconscious when a stack of fishing barrels topples over him, and Brandon is killed by Malfeitor with a hatchet. Upon regaining consciousness, Jim grieves over Brandon's body. That night, he researches Malfeitor's biography, and learns that he was an axe murderer shot by police in his home in 1930—the same residence he and Linda live in.

After Linda discharges herself from the hospital, she is attacked by Malfeitor. The next day, Jim finds their home in disarray, before a possessed Linda attacks him. Dewhurst enters and accuses Jim of the murders, but Linda strikes him with a fire poker. Jim brandishes his revolver, and Linda tells him that he is the "portal", taunting him in an attempt to drive him to suicide. Instead, Jim shoots the board before he is pushed through a window and lands on a car.

After the events, Jim and Linda, now free from Malfeitor's influence, resume their lives and marry each other. Their landlady, Mrs. Moses, finds the board while cleaning out the home with her granddaughter, and wonders if it still works. The board is thrown into a box, where its planchette moves to the word "yes" by itself.

Cast

Production

Development

Tenney wrote the screenplay for Witchboard while studying filmmaking at the University of Southern California.[6] He drew inspiration for the story from a party he attended where a friend brought a Ouija board for partygoers to use.[6] While researching the history of the Ouija board, Tenney learned about the notion of "progressive entrapment", an element that figures briefly in The Exorcist (1973), in which the young Regan MacNeil becomes gradually "entrapped" by a demonic entity.[7][6] As some elements of the script were based on incidents he had heard of while researching experiences close friends and others had with Ouija boards, he believed the material would resonate with viewers being based in facts, despite it being fictitious.[7] Though Tenney never believed in the board himself, he admitted the board was "creepy".[7]

One of the central themes of the film was the "bromance" of Jim and Brandon, whose friendship involved a love triangle with the character of Linda.[7] Tenney viewed the film as being about the board, who he sees as a character, forcing Jim to reflect on his relationships with Linda and Brandon, the latter of whom he had a falling out with. Once he knew this was the story, it was easy for him to work it around with the incidents he had researched about.[7] In writing the characters, he drew from his own background to make them "three-dimensional," and thought it would be interesting to see Jim's disestablished friendship with Brandon come back together.[7] The character of Jim was based on Tenney himself, and he wrote him to be a construction worker from when he, his brother Dennis Michael Tenney, and their friend James W. Quinn worked in construction before moving to Los Angeles.[7] He stated in interviews that despite it being a horror film, he sought to create a character-driven story.[7]

When Tenney's friend, Rolan Carol, had to drop out of university due to financial issues, he found a job at a commodities firm where the owner, Walter Josten, was getting bored of commodities.[7] Rolan mentioned Tenney's script to Josten, who had an interest in filmmaking.[7] Tenney and his friend, Gerald Geoffray, then pitched the film to Josten, who was impressed by the idea, and agreed to help finance the project.[7] Tenney dropped out of his program at the University of Southern California, four units shy of earning his master's degree, to begin shooting the film.[7]

Casting

Todd Allen was cast as Jim, as Tenney felt he was the only one that was true to the role.[7] Initially, Allen was worried that he lost the role when he saw Tenney laughing while sitting in the auditioning room, but he made him laugh because it reminded him of the way he talked and acted.[7] He received the benefit of returning with the filmmakers to read the actresses that auditioned for the role of Linda, which Tawny Kitaen had read when he was not there.[7]

Casting producer Rebecca Boss and Tenney found Kitaen ideal for the part as everyone the latter knew at his office, who were all male, noticed her the most.[7] She had flown to New York prior to shooting so Tenney called up her agent about making a deal, and she flew back to arrive on set when filming began.[7] When she met Allen, they both became very intimate with their relationship.[7] Tenney saw that she brought an "appeal" that affected everyone at the time, which was something he initially did not see.[7]

Photographer J.P. Luebsen was hired to play Carlos Malfeitor, the villain, when he met Tenney through a friend at an Independence Day party.[7] Whenever he was on set, Kitaen mentioned to him about being completely distant so that she could build herself up to be terrified of him.[7] Other cast members include Quinn, Kenny Rhodes, and Kathleen Wilhoite. Although Wilhoite was the first to audition for Sarah "Zarabeth" Crawford, she initially did not respond to Tenney about the part, but later accepted it when they re-met.[7] Rhodes stated that Witchboard was the only film in his career where he did not recall auditioning.[7] The costumer gave him a bandanna to "toughen up" his role, which he kept as he was a Bruce Springsteen fan.[7]

Filming

Filming took place partly at the historic Higgins-Verbeck-Hirsch Mansion in Los Angeles

Though set in Tenney's hometown of Fairfield in Northern California, financial restraints mandated that the film be shot in Southern California.[8] Principal photography took place in the summer of 1985, at the Higgins-Verbeck-Hirsch Mansion in Windsor Square, Los Angeles, and Big Bear Valley in San Bernardino, California. Additional photography occurred in San Francisco.[9] Filming at Big Bear Lake occurred in August 1985, as well as at the Big Bear public library.[10]

The film was shot under the working title Ouija, but had to be re-titled during production after board game conglomerate Parker Brothers, who owned the trademark name "Ouija", attempted to prevent one of their boards from being used or mentioned in the film.[7] The errors and omissions carrier did not approve of the filmmakers having already shot footage using one of their Ouija boards, requiring the production company to put up $50,000 bond to prevent any potential litigation. Though there was no lawsuit, Josten stated that this should have been cleared before they started filming.[7] The film's production company received the insurance to change the title to Witchboard and were allowed to pay the bond, as well as to integrate the board footage with an alternate board footage as shown when Jim and Brandon are at Big Bear.[7] However, the filmmakers were divided about the title change, with many preferring Ouija while others felt that Witchboard was a "cooler" title.[7]

Shooting the shower scene was difficult for Kitaen as she did not trust Tenney nor the camera crew to shoot the scene, but had faith in cinematographer Roy H. Wagner to do it when she saw his wedding ring.[7] The crew used effects when the spirit turns on hot blazing water in the shower that Linda was trapped in, using breakaway glassed shower doors, and a fog machine to represent the hot water's moisture.[7] Kitaen became more comfortable when the set was cleared to only the director and second-camera loader assistant, but this was a big uproar as all of the men had to temporarily leave the set.[7]

On set, there were numerous running gags that Wagner was mostly involved in.[7] In one, Kitaen devastatingly believed on-set that her poodle was accidentally run over by the props truck, but she was relieved to find that the dog was safe and it was only a gag prop with hair similar to her dog that was laid on the road.[7] At the time, they used another gag whereas since Kitaen was dating O. J. Simpson at the time and he visited her on set occasionally, they would call the production office under a pseudonym to speak with her.[7] Other gags involved rocking Kitaen's trailer back and forth, flipping the outhouses upside down with actors inside, and locking the crew in rooms where they could not get out to set on time.[7]

There also, however, was a fair share of eerie occurrences on set. Some of the crew, mostly those that had come in earlier, had significant problems inside the 637 Lucerne Blvd house such as the crew bumping into objects that were not there, as well as objects that moved that no one else around could have moved during that time frame.[7] Wagner especially felt a strong presence at the staircase where someone was walking behind him, and numerous occurrences where the cast and crew heard whispering and talking.[7]

The last scene shot was of Jim being pushed out of the window, which was done in one take at a distant park, using a built replica of the window. Since there was a crane arm behind Allen, he could not flail his arms around and instead blocked it out with his shoulders.[7]

Effects

The filmmakers hired Tassilo Baur to handle the special-effects for Witchboard. The nightmare sequence of Linda being decapitated by Malfeitor was shot with a stand-in ducking their head, with a Styrofoam head connected to a poll placed on top with a wig that matched Kitaen's hairstyle. Luebsen was nervous about using a real axe since he was swinging it very close to the stand-in.[7] Baur explained despite they used a real axe, they had also used prop axes for safety reasons as well as to improve their performances.[7] Baur also had some props that were hinged so that they precisely hit a specific spot.[7]

Allen was initially dismissive that the scene where Lloyd throws a carpenter's hatchet near Jim's head did not work well, but Tenney reassured him.[7] The scene was originally planned to be shot with an FX man shooting the hatchet directly, but it was the film's cinematographer Roy H. Wagner that suggested they shoot it in reverse, thus also showing the scene to Allen to see how he can act it out in reverse if it was real.[7] They also had the fake hatchet put into a piece of balsa wood, and they yanked it out with a wire.[7]

The scene where Lloyd is killed from fallen sheetrock was cut repeatedly, mostly due to Quinn's comedic personality on-set repeatedly making Allen laugh.[7] Since they used a dummy for the sheetrock to fall and when it fell, it caused the dummy's legs to slightly fling up, which made Quinn hysterically laugh.[7] When the sheetrock fell down, it caused a very loud noise to which Allen's reaction on screen was real, as he felt it sounded almost equivalent to a gunshot.[7] Baur, accompanied with special-effects assistant Mick Strawn, practiced dropping the sheetrock from a floor above with sheets of fake-sheetrock and two actual ones on both sides, and did this until they could drop it reliably to make it look convincing.[7]

Release

Box office

Witchboard began its run with a 15-screen limited theatrical release on December 31, 1986, in several small U.S. cities, including Spokane, Washington;[11] Buffalo, New York; Anchorage, Alaska; Columbus, Ohio; and El Paso, Texas.[1] The film grossed $95,435 during its opening weekend,[4] and went on to earn a total of $416,336 over the following four weeks.[1] Due to the favorable box-office returns in these smaller markets, the film's distributor, Cinema Group, expanded its theatrical release to 1,100 screens nationwide on March 13, 1987.[7] The film grossed $2.7 million during its wide opening weekend.[3] Through its course, the film's final box office gross was $7,369,373.[4]

The Samuel Goldwyn Company acquired the film for international distribution,[1] and released it theatrically in England in May 1987.[12][13][14]

Critical response

Contemporaneous

John H. Richardson of the Los Angeles Daily News criticized the film's performances and writing, noting, "There's very little tension and almost no slice-and-dice. The few gore effects are terrible ... The only thing that makes you want to forgive Witchboard is the clumsy earnestness of its execution."[15] Caryn James of The New York Times criticized the film as "cheaply made," writing, "The very best I can say is that Witchboard should encourage struggling film makers. Watch it and think, I can do better than that!"[16] Desmond Ryan of The Philadelphia Inquirer similarly panned the film, referring to it as "luridly fake" and "a timid "exorcise" in inanity."[17] The San Bernardino Sun's William Wolf praised Kathleen Wilhoite's performance in the film, noting that she "injects some personality into the role, however trashy it is. That's more than you can say for the rest of the cast and the characters they play."[18] David Inman of The Courier-Journal awarded the film one out of four stars, but conceded, "For folks who like their scares straight and their movies without much else, Witchboard provides exactly that."[19] Henry Edgar of the Virginia Daily Press also panned the film as being unintentionally humorous, commenting that it "is so awful it unintentionally qualifies as a comedy by taking itself so seriously you can't help laughing."[20] The Montreal Gazette's Bruce Bailey awarded the film one-and-a-half stars and criticized it for its lack of originality, noting that it "boldly goes where everybody else has gone before."[21]

Writing for the Great Falls Tribune, Eleanor Ringel noted that the film begins as a "fairly efficient horror movie ... but after a careful, unnecessarily complicated buildup, the film falls apart."[22] The Miami News's Deborah Wilker echoed a similar sentiment, noting that, "midway through this nonsense, you give up hoping that Witchboard will emerge as one of those so-bad-it's-good horror flicks. At first the potential seems to be there, but as it unfolds, Witchboard becomes just plain dopey."[23] Malcolm Johnson of the Hartford Courant similarly criticized the film, writing that it "plumbs new depths of tedium and incompetence ... unfortunately, none of this is quite flamboyant enough to rise to the heights of camp."[24]

Alternately, Candice Russell of the Sun-Sentinel favorably compared the film to Poltergeist (1982) and Rosemary's Baby (1968), praising it as an "intense, atmospheric chiller [that] breeds suspicion of things unseen and misunderstood...  The payoff for the mayhem isn't much, but the events leading up to it more than suffice. Witchboard scares, as intended."[25] Rick Bentley of The Town Talk also gave the film a favorable review, referring to it as "a cut above average" and "not afraid to make fun of itself."[26] Michael Wilmington's review of the film for the Los Angeles Times noted that it "is smarter, and better acted, than much of its bloody competition," but "not crazy or original enough to stand too far above them."[27]

Reviewing the film following its British theatrical release, Tim Fernandez of The Southport Observer described it as "fairly routine stuff by horror standards, but certainly capable of conjuring up a shock or two if you've got a sufficiently vivid imagination."[28]

Retrospective

In the years since its release, Witchboard developed a cult following,[5] and was subject to significant analysis in Carol J. Clover's horror film studies book Men, Women, and Chainsaws (1992), in which she argued for the film's complex treatment of gender politics.[29]

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, Witchboard holds a 50% approval rating based on 16 critic reviews, with an average rating of 5.3/10.[30]

TV Guide awarded the film three out of five stars, writing, "First-time feature director-writer Kevin S. Tenney imbues his picture with a surprisingly slick sense of style and employs some clever camerawork when the narrative warrants it, refusing to bore the viewer with the endless evil-point-of-view shots favored by so many other horror directors."[31] AllMovie awarded the film two out of five stars, specifying, "Though it is not the most original or dynamic movie of its type, Witchboard succeeds on its own terms because it concentrates on craftsmanship."[32]

Home media

Witchboard was released on VHS in the United States by Continental Video on June 17, 1987,[33] and sold approximately 80,000 units that year.[8] By the end of the year, it had charted at number 18 on the U.S. Billboard Top 40 Video Rentals, between Stand by Me and Something Wild.[8] It was released on VHS in the United Kingdom through Guild Home Video in the fall of 1987.[34]

Anchor Bay Entertainment released the film on DVD in August 2004, which is now out of print.[35] On February 4, 2014, Scream Factory, a subsidiary of Shout Factory released the film on Blu-ray and DVD as a combo pack.[36]

Sequels and remake

The film spawned two sequels, Witchboard 2: The Devil's Doorway (1993) and Witchboard III: The Possession (1995).[37] In 2024, a remake of the same name is scheduled to be released.[38]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f "Witchboard". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. American Film Institute. Archived from the original on June 4, 2019.
  2. ^ "Witchboard". British Film Institute. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022.
  3. ^ a b Carroll, Margaret (April 1, 1987). "Bewitched by movie biz". Chicago Tribune. p. 97 – via Newspapers.com.
  4. ^ a b c "Witchboard". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  5. ^ a b Campisi 2012, p. 94.
  6. ^ a b c Campisi 2012, p. 148.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw Tenney, Kevin S.; Kitaen, Tawny; Nichols, Stephen; Allen, Todd; Wilhoite, Kathleen et al. (2014). Progressive Entrapment: The Making of Witchboard (Blu-ray featurette). Scream Factory. OCLC 1242988985.
  8. ^ a b c Wade, Tony (March 10, 2017). "'Witchboard,' by Fairfield's Kevin S. Tenney, debuted 30 years ago". Daily Republic. Archived from the original on January 8, 2023.
  9. ^ "Witchboard". Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021.
  10. ^ Olson, Steve (August 29, 1985). "Explosion on Big Bear Lake...film next summer". The Grizzly. p. A7 – via Newspapers.com.
  11. ^ "Luxury Theatres". Spokane Chronicle. December 31, 1986. p. 21 – via Newspapers.com.
  12. ^ "Cannon Southport". Formby Times. May 7, 1987. p. 12 – via Newspapers.com.
  13. ^ "Leisure Guide: Cinemas". Liverpool Echo. May 8, 1987. p. 31 – via Newspapers.com.
  14. ^ "At the Cinema". Accrington Observer. May 8, 1987. p. 12 – via Newspapers.com.
  15. ^ Richardson, John H. (March 21, 1987). "'Witchboard' is short on gore, long on bore". Los Angeles Daily News. p. 13 – via The Greenville News at Newspapers.com.
  16. ^ James, Caryn (March 15, 1987). "Love Triangle in 'Witchboard'". The New York Times. p. 001061.
  17. ^ Ryan, Desmond (March 16, 1987). "'Witchboard' is a dull 'exorcise' in inanity". The Philadelphia Inquirer. p. 12 – via The Dispatch at Newspapers.com.
  18. ^ Wolf, William (March 15, 1987). "'Witchboard' should be called Witch-bored". The San Bernardino Sun. p. F4 – via Newspapers.com.
  19. ^ Inman, David. "'Witchboard': Movie review". The Courier-Journal – via Newspapers.com.
  20. ^ Edgar, Henry (March 14, 1987). "Nothing's good in 'Witchboard,' but it's almost funny by accident". Daily Press. p. 32 – via Newspapers.com.
  21. ^ Bailey, Bruce (March 14, 1987). "Witchboard boring no matter how you read the signs". Montreal Gazette. p. H-5 – via Newspapers.com.
  22. ^ Ringel, Eleanor (March 29, 1987). "'Witchboard' falls apart". Great Falls Tribune. p. 28F – via Newspapers.com.
  23. ^ Wilker, Deborah (March 14, 1987). "'Witchboard' misses point". The Miami News. Miami, Florida. p. 9 – via Newspapers.com.
  24. ^ Johnson, Malcolm L. (March 18, 1987). "'Witchboard' is lacking spirit". Hartford Courant. p. C5 – via Newspapers.com.
  25. ^ Russell, Candace (March 13, 1987). "Supernatural thriller avoids familiar traps". Sun-Sentinel. p. 7 – via Newspapers.com.
  26. ^ Bentley, Rick. "'Witchboard' a Cut Above Average". The Town Talk. p. C-9 – via Newspapers.com.
  27. ^ Wilmington, Michael (March 16, 1987). "Standard Stuff In 'Witchboard'". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 8, 2023.
  28. ^ Fernandez, Tim (May 8, 1987). "Lingering nightmare". The Southport Observer. p. 13 – via Newspapers.com.
  29. ^ Clover 1992, pp. 67–107.
  30. ^ "Witchboard (1986)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  31. ^ "Witchboard". TV Guide. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  32. ^ Guarisco, Donald. "Witchboard - Review". AllMovie. Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  33. ^ "Coming Attractions". New York Daily News. June 16, 1987. p. 114 – via Newspapers.com.
  34. ^ Grabham, Eddia (September 11, 1987). "Mystery of the harem". Aldershot News. p. 74 – via Newspapers.com.
  35. ^ "Witchboard". DVD Empire. Archived from the original on July 21, 2018.
  36. ^ "Witchboard". Scream Factory. Retrieved September 12, 2018.
  37. ^ Paszylk 2009, p. 186.
  38. ^ Navarro, Meagan (2023-07-22). "Witchboard – New Trailer for Remake Teases Chuck Russell's Return to Horror". Bloody Disgusting. Retrieved 2023-07-23.

Sources

External links

This page was last edited on 15 October 2023, at 19:02
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.