To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

How to transfigure the Wikipedia

Would you like Wikipedia to always look as professional and up-to-date? We have created a browser extension. It will enhance any encyclopedic page you visit with the magic of the WIKI 2 technology.

Try it — you can delete it anytime.

Install in 5 seconds
4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
Great Wikipedia has got greater.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Washington Outer Beltway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Washington Outer Beltway was a proposed freeway that would have extended further out than the Capital Beltway and encircled Washington, D.C. through the states of Maryland and Virginia. Most of the route was canceled in the 1980s. Parts of it have been built as the Fairfax County Parkway in Virginia,[1] as well as Interstate 370 and the Intercounty Connector in Maryland.[2]

History

Initial plans were developed in the 1950s for the proposed 122-mile (196 km) Washington Outer Beltway.[3] The National Capital Park and Planning Commission issued a Comprehensive Plan for the Nation's Capital and Its Environs in 1950. The comprehensive plan included three different circular roads in and around the District of Columbia. The original Outer Beltway had been planned to pass south of the corporate limits of the City of Rockville, as shown on a map published in The Washington Post in 1951 with the caption "Ring Road suggested by Bureau of Public Roads".[4] In 1953, the portion of the Outer Beltway between Montgomery County and Prince George's County was included in the Master Plan of Highways of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. It was later included in the Commission's General Plan in 1957, and the Commission's On Wedges and Corridors plan in 1964.[3]

In the 1960s, an "outer circumferential highway" was proposed between 5 and 10 miles (8.0 and 16.1 km) outside the Capital Beltway.[3] In Virginia, by the time of a 1965 plan,[5] it was to run through southern and western Fairfax County, crossing the Potomac River at Mason Neck and north of Great Falls, and passing generally west of State Route 123 (Ox Road) and east of SR 645 (Clifton Road, Stringfellow Road, and Lees Corner Road). The straight part of the current Fairfax County Parkway between south of Franklin Farm Road and north of Baron Cameron Avenue is built where the beltway would have been.[6][7] By contrast, a 1964 plan proposed by a consultant for Prince William County showed a 162-mile (261 km) freeway passing by Quantico, Manassas, Leesburg, Poolesville, upper Montgomery County, Fort Meade, southeastern Prince George's County, and La Plata.[8][9]

The original proposed routing in Maryland was south and east of the current Intercounty Connector alignment.[10] The new route was motivated in part by a desire to move the routing of the proposed bridge over the Potomac River upstream from the area of River Bend to Watkins Island.[11] Virginia residents and the United States Department of the Interior objected to the proposed bridge over the Potomac River because they wanted to create state and federal parks along the river in order to protect sugar maple trees, vegetation, and bald eagles. Because of these concerns, the Maryland State Roads Commission moved the proposed Outer Beltway to a route north of Rockville and eliminated a new bridge crossing the Potomac River.[3]

The Montgomery County Planning Board accepted the state's newly proposed route in 1970, but the Montgomery County Council rejected it, and Prince George's County and Virginia dropped it from their plans.[3] During the 1970s, attention was focused on the Metrorail system, and environmental concerns temporarily pushed the Outer Beltway onto the back burner. In the 1980s and 1990s, when the plan was revived as the Western Transportation Corridor in Virginia, the route was shifted further west.[12]

In 1975, the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments endorsed a request from the State Highway Administration "for federal support of a $1.1 million planning and engineering study of the first 8-mile [13 km] segment of the road" (then called the Outer Beltway),[3] which was to "run from the Baltimore-Washington Parkway near Beltsville westward to a point near Interstate Rte 70S at Gaithersburg."[13] By 1976, Maryland's Secretary of Transportation no longer supported state financial support of the Outer Beltway, although Montgomery County still supported it in concept.[3] In 1980, the state of Maryland dropped the Washington Outer Beltway from its plans except for the Intercounty Connector.[14]

Techway proposal

The Techway is a proposal for a limited-access highway across the Potomac River between Fairfax County, Virginia, and Montgomery County, Maryland.[15] The project's name refers to connecting the high-tech firms in Herndon and Reston, Virginia, with the biotechnology companies in Gaithersburg and Rockville, Maryland.[16] The Techway proposal would construct a limited-access highway and bridge linking Virginia State Route 28 north of Washington Dulles International Airport to the western terminus of I-370 in Gaithersburg, Maryland. To avoid criticism that such a project would encourage urban sprawl, the proponents advocated having very few interchanges on the route and emphasizing its use in making Dulles Airport and the associated office buildings in its vicinity more convenient to residents of northern Montgomery County that currently use the American Legion Memorial Bridge.

In 2000, Congress authorized $2,000,000 to conduct a feasibility study of the Techway.[17] Congressman Frank Wolf, one of the primary sponsors of the study, asked that the study be canceled the next year because homes in his Congressional district would have to be destroyed in order to build the Techway.[17][18][19] U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta agreed to cancel the study, saying it would be a waste of money to continue studying a bridge that would never be built.[20] Virginia Governor James S. Gilmore III asked Mineta to reconsider, but the study was cancelled.[21]

In 2004, a Virginia Department of Transportation traffic study of the American Legion Bridge showed that a significant portion of bridge users traveled between points west of that bridge, reviving the Techway concept.[18] In addition, the Techway project was also discussed in connection with Maryland Route 200 that will extend I-370 to the east to US 1. The combination of the Techway and this other extension would go a long way to form a Western Bypass of Washington, D.C. for north-south traffic on I-95. Also in 2004, the Montgomery County Council unanimously passed a resolution opposing any bridge, citing concerns about destruction of existing neighborhoods, damage to parkland along the Potomac River, the need to protect the county's 90,000-acre (360 km2) Agricultural Reserve,[22] and its conflicting with the master plan for Potomac.[23]

As of 2011, the Techway project is not funded and not under active study.

See also

References

  1. ^ O'Donoghue, Julia (September 16, 2010). "The End Of The Road". The Burke Connection.
  2. ^ Byrne, Michael (March 26, 2009). "Maryland's Highway To Nowhere?". City Paper. Baltimore, Maryland.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Spiers, John (Summer 2011). "The Long and Winding Road: A History of the Intercounty Connector, 1950–2006". The Montgomery County Story. 54 (1).
  4. ^ Roberts, Chalmers (June 14, 1951). "Need of Belt Highway Shown, With D.C. Hub". The Washington Post. p. B4.
  5. ^ "Review of Transportation Guidance in Previous Comprehensive Plans" (PDF). p. 14. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2007. Retrieved April 5, 2012. shows an earlier plan in Prince William County to the south
  6. ^ "Northern Virginia Regional Plan" (PDF). Virginia Department of Highways. 1965. p. 15. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2007. Retrieved April 5, 2012.
  7. ^ Northern Virginia Major Thoroughfare Plan. Virginia Department of Highways. 1969.
  8. ^ Eisen, Jack (April 22, 1964). "Third Belt Freeway Envisioned for D.C.: Originator of Plan". The Washington Post. p. B10. ProQuest 142270114.
  9. ^ Kopper, Philip (June 18, 1964). "3d Beltway Endorsed by Plans Group". The Washington Post. p. B1. ProQuest 142232793.
  10. ^ "New Routes Proposed for Beltway in County". The Washington Post. August 7, 1965. p. B3.
  11. ^ "Watkins Span Backed for Outer Belt". The Washington Post. May 17, 1969. p. C3.
  12. ^ "Western Transportation Corridor Study Purpose and Need Statement". Virginia Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on August 22, 2004. Retrieved April 5, 2012.
  13. ^ Eisen, Jack (February 24, 1975). "Segment of Outer Beltway is Endorsed by COG Board". The Washington Post. p. C6.
  14. ^ "Transportation" (PDF). Aspen Hill Master Plan. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. April 1994. p. 84. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 10, 2007. Retrieved June 15, 2007.
  15. ^ Vause, Mary (October 24, 2006). "Dems Unite after Contentious Primary - Republican challengers emphasize fiscal responsibility and traffic projects". The Potomac Almanac.
  16. ^ Drummond, Daniel F. (May 16, 2001). "'Techway' bridge plan misunderstood, federal agency says". The Washington Times. p. C1.
  17. ^ a b "2003 Year in Review: The Techway". The Potomac Almanac. January 8, 2004.
  18. ^ a b Ginsberg, Steven (May 11, 2004). "Traffic Study Renews 'Techway' Debate". The Washington Post. p. B01. Retrieved August 1, 2010.
  19. ^ "Cancelled Techway Bridge study sparks battle". Fleet Owner. September 12, 2001. Retrieved August 1, 2010.
  20. ^ "Potomac Bridge Study Will Not Be Revived". Richmond Times-Dispatch. Associated Press. June 8, 2001. p. B3.
  21. ^ Drummond, Daniel F. (June 1, 2001). "Gilmore urges Techway review - Asks Mineta to revive study". The Washington Times.
  22. ^ Cetron, Ari (September 28, 2005). "Three Men and a Bridge - Each of the major candidates for governor express support for controversial Techway bridge". The Burke Connection.
  23. ^ Scofield, Alex (June 30, 2004). "Council Restates Opposition to 'Techway' Bridge". The Potomac Almanac.
This page was last edited on 3 May 2023, at 02:14
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.
Contact WIKI 2
Introduction
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy