To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

Vulgar auteurism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vulgar auteurism is a movement that emerged in early 2010s cinephilia and film criticism associated with championing or reappraising filmmakers, mostly those working in the horror, sci-fi and action genres and whose work has otherwise received little attention or negative reception in the critical mainstream.[1][2] It became a controversial topic in the cinephile community following the publication of an article in the Village Voice in 2013 and has been described as "a critical movement committed to assessing the 'unserious' artistry of popcorn cinema with absolute seriousness."


According to film critic Peter Labuza, vulgar auteurism "seems to have been an unconscious movement before it ever had a name", as the earliest criticism identified as exhibiting "vulgar auteurism" was published in the Canadian film magazine Cinema Scope in 2006 and 2007.[3] Cinema Scope writer Andrew Tracy coined the term in his 2009 article, "Vulgar Auteurism: The Case of Michael Mann".[4] Initially pejorative,[4] the term was repurposed by MUBI user John Lehtonen.[4] Over the years which followed, MUBI's online film magazine began to publish more and more articles defending genres and directors that were unpopular with the critical mainstream.

It derives its name[5] from the auteur theory, a key component of film criticism which posits that the director is the author ("auteur") of a film and that films should be analyzed in terms of how they fit into a director's larger body of work.[6] Also known as "auteurism," the auteur theory was introduced by French critics associated with the film magazine Cahiers du cinéma during the 1950s and popularized in the United States in the 1960s by Andrew Sarris.[7]

In 1981, J. Hoberman coined the term "vulgar modernism"[8] to describe the "looney" fringes of American popular culture (e.g. the animators Tex Avery and Chuck Jones, MAD Magazine, TV pioneer Ernie Kovacs and the films of Frank Tashlin).[9][10][11]

Several critics, including Richard Brody of The New Yorker and Scott Foundas of Variety, have drawn parallels between the earliest French and American proponents of the auteur theory and vulgar auteurism. However, many commentators on the movement consider vulgar auteurism to be distinct from the classical auteur theory, pointing to its concern with visual style over theme. The question of whether vulgar auteurism is a legitimate separate movement or a subset of the auteur theory is a point of disagreement among film critics.

Vulgar auteurist ideas gained currency when one of the movement's leading proponents,[12] critic Ignatiy Vishnevetsky, became the co-host of the television program Ebert Presents: At the Movies, produced by Roger Ebert. However, while "vulgar auteurist" criticism was becoming popular, the term and the movement to which it corresponded remained obscure until the publication of an article by Calum Marsh, "Fast & Furious & Elegant: Justin Lin and the Vulgar Auteurs", in The Village Voice on May 24, 2013.[13][14]

Controversy and criticism

Marsh's article was immediately controversial.[13] While some took issue with the films and filmmakers being championed by the proponents of vulgar auteurism, others took issue with the idea that vulgar auteurism was a movement distinct from the auteur theory.[4]

Former Village Voice critic Nick Pinkerton has been associated with vulgar auteurism, as he has written essays in praise of directors championed by the movement and whose 2012 article "The Bigger and Better Mousetraps of Paul W. S. Anderson" has been described as vulgar auteurist.[13][14] However, Pinkerton has been critical of the movement; in an article written in response to Marsh's, he decried the term "vulgar auteurism" as "a shameless attention grab", arguing that "no persuasive argument has yet been made for why the phrase should be vitally necessary to modify old, fuddy-duddy Auteurism."[15] He further objected to the argument that film critics routinely panned the works of directors included within the movement, writing, "Fast & Furious 6, which we're assured is scorned by critics the world over, currently stands at 61% at Metacritic, above The Great Gatsby (54%), and within striking distance of arty jazz like Simon Killer and Post Tenebras Lux."[15]

Author Soraya Roberts, in her article "Indie Cinema Is Now Genre Cinema" wriiten for the website Defector, stated that "Vulgar auteurism has given way to capital auteurism."[16]

Notable directors

Notable "vulgar auteur"/"vulgar auterist" films

See also

Related movements

Related genres

Similar debates


  1. ^ Brunsting, Joshua (2013-06-11). "What Vulgar Auteurism Gets Wrong". CriterionCast. Retrieved 2022-09-15.
  2. ^ Tracy, Andrew (2013-05-31). "Trash Humping: On "Vulgar Auteurism"". Cinema Scope. Retrieved 2022-09-15.
  3. ^ Foundas, Scott. "'Pompeii' doesn't suck: Paul W.S. Anderson and Vulgar Auteurism". Variety.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Labuza, Peter (June 3, 2013). "Expressive Esoterica in the 21st Century—Or: What Is Vulgar Auteurism?". Archived from the original on 2014-02-13. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
  5. ^ a b Brody, Richard. "A Few Thoughts on Vulgar Auteurism". The New Yorker.
  6. ^ a b c d Vulgar auteurism and Justin Lin|Westword
  7. ^ Why It's OK to Love Bad Movies - Google Books (ch. "The Good, The Bad and the Good-Bad")
  8. ^ Japanese Film and the Challenge of Video - Google Books (pg.1981)
  9. ^ Vulgar Modernism - Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism
  10. ^ Vulgar Modernism - Artfourm International
  11. ^ Film Theory - Google Books (pg.171)
  12. ^ Patches, Matt (February 21, 2014). "The Other Paul Anderson: The Psychotic Action Vision of 'Pompeii' Director Paul W.S. Anderson". Grantland.
  13. ^ a b c Singer, Matt. "Some Refined Discussion About Vulgar Auteurism".
  14. ^ a b Kenigsberg, Ben. "From the Wire: Pinkerton's Notes on Vulgar Auteurism". Indiewire.
  15. ^ a b Pinkerton, Nick. "BOMBAST #96". SundanceNow. Archived from the original on 2014-03-02. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
  16. ^ Indie Cinema Is Now Genre Cinema|Defector
  17. ^ Monster Hunter Review: Paul W.S. Anderson Crafts a Hyperkinetic, Faithful Videogame Adaptation|The Film Stage
  18. ^ New to Streaming: To the Wonder, Monster Hunter, Nomadland, Test Pattern & More|The Film Stage
  19. ^ The Never-ending Quest to Adapt 'Resident Evil' - The Ringer
  20. ^ a b c Why It's OK to Love Bad Movies - Google Books (ch.5, pg.168)
  21. ^ a b c d e Daily | "What Is Vulgar Auteurism?" - Keyframe
  22. ^ a b c d e f The Elusive Auteur - Google Books
  23. ^ a b c Direct Action: how stars like Scott Adkins are landing more hits direct to viewers · Journal · A Letterboxd Magazine · Letterboxd
  24. ^ a b c d Mortal Kombat Shouldn’t Forget the Pulpy Fun of Paul W.S. Anderson’s Original - The Escapist
  25. ^ a b c d e f Vulgar Auteurism Needs to Drop the "Vulgar" - PopQptiq
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h i j FilmSlot: Vulgar Auteurism: As Low As It Goes - Filmkrant
  27. ^ a b c d e f Obsessed With the Image: Vulgar Auteurism and Post-Cinematic Affect in the Late Films of Tony Scott by Ethan Cartwright|Chapman University
  28. ^ a b c Start your engines: Seventh ‘Furious’ film provides winning shot of adrenaline - Columbia Daily Tribune
  29. ^ a b c Film Criticism in the Digital Age - Google Books (ch."The Persistence of Auteurism")
  30. ^ a b c d e f Vulgar Auteurism-Film Theory
  31. ^ a b Fresh blood: Three Great Directors of Direct-to-Video Action|Balder and Dash|Roger
  32. ^ The artistic genius of Michael Bay –
  33. ^ The Michael Bay 'Ambulance' Movie Review Drinking Game - Rolling Stone
  34. ^ a b c d e f Review: Pieta - Slant Magazine
  35. ^ "Vulgar Auteurism": Out with the New, In with the Old|Antenna
  36. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Vulgar Auteurism: A Guide Or: The "Mann-Scott-Baysians" - MUBI
  37. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m For Love of the Vulgar - MUBI
  38. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt Vulgar Auteurs - Google Podcasts
  39. ^ a b c d The 10 Most Underrated American Independent Films of The 1990s - Page 2 - Taste of Cinema
  40. ^ Director Jaume Collet-Serra Knows What Makes Liam Neeson an Incredible Action Hero|GQ
  41. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Melbourne Cinematheque June Round-up: Fast And Cheap With Roger Corman - ScreenAnarchy
  42. ^ Review: 'Elvis' + 'Top Gun: Maverick' - OnlySky Media
  43. ^ 'Dressed to Kill' and 'The Hunger': So Lethal, So Very Fashionable
  44. ^ The Golden Age of TV: Rise of the Television Auteur|Facets Features
  45. ^ Army of Milla: Resident Evil and Modern Auteurism-End of Cinema
  46. ^ Secret Defense: Roland Emmerich's "Anonymous" on Notebook|MUBI
  47. ^ Why Clint Eastwood Can't Buy Into The Idea Of An 'Auteur' Director|/Film
  48. ^ Ms.45 - NOW Magazine
  49. ^ a b CLASS OF 1999 — Brattle Theatre Film Notes
  50. ^ Walter Hill on his EIFF retrospective-The Skinny
  51. ^ a b c d e f g Dreams for the Dreamers as They Are in Their Tortured Dreams - Bright Wall/Dark Room
  52. ^ Elvis|Cinema St Louis
  53. ^ Vern Tells It Like It Is: Those Damn Vulgarians-Vern's Reviews on the Films of Cinema
  54. ^ The rise and fall of auteur theory - Film Stories
  56. ^ Back to "Basic" on Notebook|MUBI
  57. ^ The Noteworthy: R.I.P. Nagisa Oshima (1932-2013), The Formative Years of Cinema, Foreign Languages on Notebook|MUBI
  58. ^ a b The Encyclopedia of Japanese Horror Films - Google Books (pg.12)
  59. ^ Sound And Vision: Russel Mulcahy - ScreenAnarchy
  60. ^ Joshua Reviews Athina Rachel Tsangari's Chevalier (PIFF 2016) -
  61. ^ "Gods of Egypt Director Alex Proyas Hates Film Critics". /Film. 2016-02-29. Retrieved 2019-07-25.
  62. ^ a b Smearing the Senses: Tony Scott, Action Painter on Notebook|MUBI
  63. ^ Tony Scott: A Moving Target—Movement A on Notebook|MUBI
  64. ^ 35 Years On, Why I've Never Lost That Loving Feeling For 'Top Gun'|WBUR
  65. ^ "Heaven's Gate" and Film Maudit Culture - Film at Lincoln Center
  66. ^ It's time to take a serious look at Zack Snyder-Little White Lies
  67. ^ Zack Snyder's Worst to Best Movies|The Artifice
  68. ^ Here's 10 of Quentin Tarantino's Best Movie Characters, Ranked - MovieWeb
  69. ^ a b c The 15 Best Music Videos Made by The World's Greatest Filmmakers - Inverse
  70. ^ The Medium Must Be the Message: The Matrix and the Future of Cinema|In Review Online
  71. ^ M3GAN @ Movie Theaters Across Seattle - The Ticket
  72. ^ a b John Waters' Multiple Maniacs|EDGE United States
  73. ^ a b The Expendables 2 is Idiotic and Brain Dead in All the Right Ways — Nathan Rabin's Happy Place
  74. ^ a b A Dreadful Mike Myers Is in Netflix's Top 10 -
  75. ^ John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum - Paste
  76. ^ The Not-So-Savage Messiahs - MUBI
  77. ^ Vulgar Auteurism - Movie List on (archived via Wayback Machine)
  78. ^ Film Society unveils new season, from silents to sex thrillers - Chicago Tribune
  79. ^ For Criterion Consideration: Miami Vice - Criterion
  80. ^ "The Director of 'Dumb & Dumber' Is This Year's Oscar Frontrunner (Really)". Decider. 2018-11-21. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
This page was last edited on 25 November 2023, at 10:09
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.