To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Virginia Circuit Court

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Virginia Circuit Courts are the state trial courts of general jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Circuit Courts have jurisdiction to hear civil and criminal cases. For civil cases, the courts have authority to try cases with an amount in controversy of more than $4,500 and have exclusive original jurisdiction over claims for more than $25,000. In criminal matters, the Circuit Courts are the trial courts for all felony charges and for misdemeanors originally charged there. The Circuit Courts also have appellate jurisdiction for any case from the Virginia General District Courts (the trial courts of limited jurisdiction in Virginia) claiming more than $50, which are tried de novo in the Circuit Courts.[1]

The state has 120 courts divided among 31 judicial circuits.[2] Judges of the Virginia Circuit Courts are appointed by the legislature, and serve an eight-year term, after which they may be reappointed. The only mandatory qualification for appointment as a Circuit Court Judge is having been admitted to the Virginia State Bar for at least five years. Each Circuit Court has at least one judge, and possibly more, although trials are before a single judge.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    1 814
    1 048
    3 039
    391 948
    10 072
  • ✪ Virginia Circuit Court Records Preservation Program: Twenty Years of Service and Partnership
  • ✪ A Conversation With Judge Alex Kozinski
  • ✪ 3rd Circuit Court Jury Orientation
  • ✪ Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19
  • ✪ The Arrest is Only the Beginning - How Virginia Drug Courts Succeed (2012)

Transcription

This year the Library of Virginia and circuit court clerks throughout the commonwealth are celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the Virginia State Courts Records Preservation Program. This program was created to address the presentation needs of some of the most important records in the state. Virginia's one hundred and twenty circuit court clerk's offices are a treasure trove of state and local history. and contain some of the nation's oldest and most vital legal records. However, these records are also under constant threat from natural and man-made disasters, format and technology obsolescence, and require constant monitoring and caring to insure their presentation for future generations. This effort can only be achieved with cooperation between states and local governments. The Virginia Circuit Courts Records Program is really a model up what a partnership between a locality and the state of Virginia shoudl be. It's been highly effective and it's been one that those of us at the Library of Virginia have valued tremendously, and we certainly hope the circuit court clerks have as well. It's also been a program that's been a model other states have looked to hoping to emulate the successes of the program. The Circuit Court Records Program uses all of the traditional methods and approaches um um... of the archival field. Archivist take the old bundles of court records open them up for the first time in many cases, flat file them, organize them, arrange them, describe them, create finding aids to them, and conserve those that are need of protection. They also um...perform or copy their records for presentation-- microfilming, which is so important should anything ever happened to the paper. Those traditional methods work effectively and have opened up these records to scores of researchers, but even more importantly we've been able to use digital technologies up to make the records available in ways that when the proper began twenty years ago were just unthinkable. The chancery records database and index project is a prime example of that. Accessing digital records online is almost taking for granted today, but it wasn't long process to get there. The Library of Virginia started conducting site surveys in clerk's offices as early as the 1920s to assess the condition of the records in the clerk's care. We then started a program to create photostatic copies of record books to make the important information they contained more widely available to the public. During the nineteen forties and fifties, the Library partnered with clerks and Geological Society of Utah to implement the program that allowed clerks to have their records microfilmed in their offices. A Library-sponsored microfilming program was put in place in the nineteen seventies and eighties which allowed courts to have the historic record books microfilmed and also allow them to set up a system to film their day-forward recordings. Still, much more was needed to improve access to records and to protect their longevity. In 1989 and 1990, the Library of Virginia and the Virginia State Historical Records Advisory Board completed surveys of repositories of historical record in the commonwealth. The findings revelaed that the greatest need for preservation measures in the state is in the circuit court clerks offices. Backed by these findings former state archivist, WIllis H. Manor, the Virginia Court Clerks Association, and key legislators built support for the passage of the bill that would establish a Circuit Court Records Preservation Program. The circuit court records preservation or CCRP Program, is funded by the collection of a $1.50 records preseervation fee attached to all land transaction recordings, and it carries out three main functions: processing, indexing, and reformatting of all records transferred to the Library of Virginia; maintaining and duplicating Circuit Court security microfilm; and allocating records preservation grants to the clerk's offices. The first grnats were awarded to clerks' offices in 1992 and directly addressed the preservation issues identified in the initial surveys of the clerk's offices. These often pertain to the most basic needs of maintaining their building structures. Many court houses have been victim to fire flood over the years, resulting in burned or water-damaged records, but the risk to the buildings themsleves needed to be mitigated before any of the records could be identified for individual treatment. "The program here's always been a cooperative program between the Library and the clerks. uh... My first exposure to the grant program uh... that portion of the preservation program was through review of the grants that came in quarterly to the Library. Some of the issues that they those grants were addressing were long-time issues of record preservation and access. It surprised me that the very earliest grants that we got were for security and fire suppression systems and video monitoring of the record room. Those were important things for the clerks to be interested in, for sure." In some cases it has been determined that a locality simply cannot provide an adequate security storange for their precious early manuscript records. In this case, the Library of Virginia offers its state-of-the-art presentation storage facilities-- the downtown Richmond location and the Virginia State Records Center located in the Eastern Henrico County. It currently holds over 25,000 cubic feet of archival paper records Storage of archival records is provided without cost to localities that require it, and the buildings are staffed by archivists to process and index the records. Since the inception of the program, archivists have preserved hundreds of thousands of pages of Circuit Court Records. The Library also maintains a media vault, that stores over 250,000 reels of security microfilm, provides duplication services for the clerk's offices, and insures the long-term preservation of Circuit Court Records. The State Records Center also houses a blast freezer, which is essential to address immediate treatment requirements of wet and pest-ridden records. This equipment has saved countless records from further damage. In the past, these records would have simply been lost. "I think one of the benefits and the strengths of the program really is in its flexibility. We have a number of clerks who have decided for whatever reason to keep all the records in their offices, and we certainly can help the clerks that way--through the the actual grant program. We also have a lot of clerks who decide to send a lot of their historical, archival records to the archives in Richmond, and we have a team of professional archivists who will work on those records. So I think what one of the real benefits, to one of the real strong points of the program itself, is that we can help clerks however they choose to preserve their permanent records." Preservation work is also taking place in the Library of Virginia's downtown facility at 800 East Broad Street. There is a full-service conservation lab, staffed by the Etherington Conservation Services, which provides the Library with ready access to knowledgable professional staff that regularly performs treatments on Circuit Court items slated for reformatting. Cleaning, repairing, and tape removal all ensure the future of life of the documents, while also greatly improving image quality while the documents are filmed and scanned. A full range of high quality microfilming services is provided on site by Backstage Library Works, a firm that also serves as the Library's digital reformatting vendor. Digital reformatting has been a major part of court records preservation since 2005. Thanks to the Library of Virginia's Chancery Record Index and and digital Chancery Inniative, a mass court records digitization project unique amongst a state archives. To date, over seven billion Chancery documents from fifty-seven localities have been scanned. The grant program also provides scanning of additional records in clerks' offices. An example is the is the Land Record Collection in Portsmouth Virginia. "We had a grant for over $147,000 that allowed us to digitize our records from 1857 to 1970. Which made us, at that point, have every record that we have in the land records side of the house in a digital format. We could not have done that without the assistance from the grant program and the Library of Virginia. Our citizens have benefited greatly from this, as well as many of the title companies and the attorneys who do land record recordations within our office. It tied in very nicely with secure remote access, which was mandated by the Virginia General Assembly. And so many of our customers who now have access to my land records-- through secure remote access-- they are able to search from home all of our records, from the beginning of book one to the current." The online Chancery Records Index has also proved a very useful tool for researchers to identify record collections that have been processed and indexed, but not yet digitally scanned. These records, once located through the index, can be viewed in their original manuscript form in the Library of Virginia's secure manuscript reading rooms. If they have been microfilmed, they can also be viewed on digital film readers in the spacious, modern microfilm reading rooms. The Library of Virginia has an unparalleled collection of city and county microfilm. It is only part of the reason why it is one of the most heavily visited state archives in the country, drawing researchers from around the world. But there is still so much more work to be done to make all the hisotrical records in Virginia readily available to those who need them. "Going forth, the Circuit Court Records Preservation Grants Program that's going to continue to be indispensable to clerk's offices as they fulfill their mission to preserve the public record. And without the help of the Library of Virginia, clerks will not be able to meet needs of the public as well as they could with the program. And that public includes title examiners to use the records for business reasons, geneologists, history enthusiasts, and scholars. All of those groups of people have used the records that have been preserved by the grants program over the past twenty years. And that need is going to continue. One of the reasons it's going to continue is becasue the work is not done because there are so many items, for instance, that have to be conserved. There are older court records that are very valuable, that shed a light on the past, that haven't been conserved yet. In clerk's offices around the state, in many ways, while much has been done to work is just beginning." The Circuit Court Records Preservation Program will continue to face many challenges ahead, such as keeping up with changing technologies and responding to natural disastrous while still maintaining traditional conservation standards. Working together, the Library of Virginia and many dedicated circuit court clerks across the commonwealth are up to the task.

Contents

Jurisdiction and venue

The Circuit Courts are courts of general jurisdiction, meaning that they can hear all manner of civil and criminal matters, with limited exceptions. The original jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts over civil matters extends only to those matters valued at over $4,500. For actions alleging a lower amount in controversy, jurisdiction lies with the Virginia General District Court (GDC). However, the Circuit Courts can hear appeals from the GDC for matters valued over $50. Such appeals are heard de novo. The Circuit Courts do not, however, have jurisdiction over rate cases or workers' compensation cases. The former are committed to the jurisdiction of the State Corporation Commission, the latter by the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission. The Circuit Courts have exclusive original jurisdiction in domestic relations matters (such as divorce, annulment, and child custody), and over the probate of wills.[3]

Personal jurisdiction

The GDC must also be able to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant, which may be premised on the defendant's physical presence in the jurisdiction, or on the occurrence of some element of the cause of action in the jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is predicated on Virginia's long-arm statute, which generally permits Virginia courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over a party that resides in Virginia, or transacts substantial business in Virginia, or who caused an actionable injury in Virginia. With respect to domestic relations matters, personal jurisdiction attaches to a person who bears or fathers a child in Virginia. For purposes of A party may waive a lack of personal jurisdiction, but may also appear in court to contest personal jurisdiction without thereby waiving the issue.

Venue

In terms of venue, where personal jurisdiction lies in multiple districts, the appropriate venue for the case to be heard is set forth by Virginia statutes, which divides possible venues as "Category A" (preferred) and "Category B" (permissible), and requires that Category B venue may only be used where no Category A venue is available. For example, in a dispute over the ownership of land, Category A venue lies where the land is located. Where the dispute involves a request for injunctive relief, venue lies in the place where the activity to be enjoined is occurring or is anticipated to occur.

Category B venue is much more expansive. It generally lies where the defendant resides or has their principal place of employment, or has a registered office or registered agent, or where some part of the action arose.[4] It also lies in any place where the cause of action, or a part thereof, arose. Various other considerations arise where there are multiple parties, or out of state parties.

Virginia Circuit Court civil procedure

Initiating litigation

Litigation is initiated by the filing of a complaint, which is then served on the defendant with a summons, pursuant to the rules governing service of process in Virginia.

General rules of pleading

Virginia requires "fact pleading," meaning that the pleadings must set forth all of the facts alleged by the plaintiff upon which the cause of action is based, and these facts must "inform the opposing party as to the true nature of the claim." The facts must be set forth in numbered paragraphs, although a party asserting negligence need not specify which negligent conduct is alleged to have caused the injury. It is not necessary to allege jurisdiction or venue, although it is necessary to specify the relief sought in a "prayer for relief," and within the prayer to specify the dollar amount sought in damages in an ad damnum clause. A prayer for punitive damages must be identified in a separate paragraph. Documents (such as a contract alleged to have been breached) may be annexed to the pleadings, and are thereby incorporated into them. If a document that should be attached to the pleadings is omitted, the defendant can file a "motion craving oyer", which requests the annexation of that document. If granted, the document will be attached to, and will become part of, the complaint itself.

An attorney filing documents with the court, including pleadings, must sign the documents. The attorney thereby certifies that he has read them, that they are grounded in fact or law as determined by a good-faith investigation, and that they are not being filed for the purposes of harassment or delay. An attorney who violates these rules can be held liable for the costs and attorney's fees incurred by the other party in responding to the document. A document that is not signed by the attorney may be stricken. Where a party is not represented by counsel, the party must sign the documents himself, and thereby make the foregoing certifications.

Alternative pleading is permitted, so a party may plead inconsistent facts as to different parties, and leave it to the jury to determine which proposed set of facts were the true facts of the case, so long as all causes of action arise from the same transaction or occurrence. If an unrelated claim is joined, however, this claim will be stricken as a misjoinder.

Amendments to the pleadings

Virginia pleading practice differs from that of federal courts and many other states in that it offers no amendments to the pleadings as of right. If a plaintiff files an amended complaint, and the defendant responds to that pleading, both the filing and the response are a legal nullity. A party must instead seek and receive leave to amend before any amended pleading will be accepted, even if that amended pleading is filed before any response to the initial pleading has been received. However, Virginia courts are generally liberal in allowing parties to amend, absent undue delay or prejudice to a party.

Responding to the complaint

Once service has been effected, the defendant has 21 days to file a responsive pleading. The pleading may simply be an answer, or the defendant may file a demurrer, a motion to dismiss, an objection to venue, a motion for a bill of particulars, or a statement of the defendant's grounds of defense. If the defendant objects to personal jurisdiction, the defendant must make a special appearance to assert either that the court lacks personal jurisdiction, or that service of process was never made. Such a motion can not be joined with any other motion. An objection based on service that was made, but was made in a faulty manner, is called a motion to quash process, and can be filed in conjunction with a pleading responsive to the merits of the case. A defendant's objections to venue must state not only why the venue chosen is improper, but must also indicate where proper venue would lie (although a court maintains the power to transfer even if the objection to venue is defective). The defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff, a cross-claim against any co-defendant, or an impleader against a third party who the defendant feels should be brought in as a co-defendant. However, there is no such thing as a compulsory counterclaim in Virginia; a cause of action that a defendant has against the plaintiff may be brought as a counterclaim, or may be brought in an entirely separate case. A third party may also seek to enter the case by filing an intervention.

The demurrer

A demurrer challenges the sufficiency of a claim for affirmative relief, and can address misjoined claims, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and most importantly a failure to state a cause of action through a failure to allege some fact which is necessary for the claim to prevail. New facts may not be raised in a demurrer, so if the demurrer relates to a term in a contract which was not annexed to the original complaint, the defendant must first compel annexation of the contract through a motion craving oyer, and may file the demurrer once that annexation has occurred. A demurrer may be filed before or at the same time as an answer is filed, but not afterward, except with the permission of the court. If the demurrer is sustained, it is usually done so without prejudice and giving the plaintiff a set time to respond by filing an amended complaint which cures the defects of the original complaint.

Special pleas

Affirmative defenses asserted in Virginia are called "special pleas". A special plea alleges additional facts which would obviate the case, such as the passage of a statute of limitations, failure of a contract to meet the statute of frauds, or res judicata as to the action.

The defendant may also raise equitable defenses such as failure of consideration or unconscionability, which operate to diminish the value of the plaintiff's claim. This is referred to as "common law recoupment". By statute, Virginia has established that such defenses can be raised in response to a contractual damages claim, and that the defendant may even recover damages in excess of the plaintiff's claim. Under the statute, however, the court lacks the power to order reform or rescission of the contract.

The answer

The defendant may simply answer the claims raised by the plaintiff in a pleading which specifically responds to each of the plaintiff's allegations in corresponding numbered paragraphs.

Certain matters, when raised as a defense, must be sworn to by the defendant. These include claims that handwriting is not genuine, that an agency, partnership, or corporate relationship does not exist, or that the defendant does not own or operate property or an instrumentality at issue in the claim. Furthermore, in contract claims, the plaintiff may file an affidavit with the claim averring the amount of damages claimed, that the amount is justly due, and specifying a date from which interest should accrue. The defendant must then plead under oath that the plaintiff is not entitled to the damages sought, and if the plaintiff objects to the defendants failure to make such a plea within seven days, the objection will result in summary judgment for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff need not respond to anything in the answer, as it is presumed that all allegations in the answer are denied. The only exception is where the defendant demands a response to new matters raised in the answer.

Non-trial resolutions

Nonsuit

A nonsuit occurs where the plaintiff seeks voluntary dismissal of the case without prejudice prior to a resolution. In Virginia, one nonsuit may be taken as of right, so long as it filed before certain significant events have occurred in the case. It must be filed before any demurrer or special plea has been fully argued, and before any motion to strike evidence has been granted. In a jury trial, it can not be filed when the jury is retired from the bar, and is deliberating; it may be filed if the jury returns from deliberations deadlocked, resulting in a mistrial. In a bench trial, a nonsuit must be filed before the case has been submitted to the court for decision.

If the plaintiff chooses to refile the claim, this must be done within six months of the original nonsuit being granted. Although the plaintiff may obtain one nonsuit as a matter of right, the court retains the discretion to grant additional nonsuits with notice to the other parties. The court's order must specify the number of previous nonsuits, and the plaintiff must therefore inform the court of all previous nonsuits in requesting another.

If a counterclaim or crossclaim had been filed, a nonsuit could still be taken by the plaintiff with the agreement of the defendant, or if the defendant's claim could be adjudicated independently. The plaintiff can not use the nonsuit as a means to change venue to another Virginia state court – if the plaintiff seeks to refile the suit, he must refile in exactly the same court unless that court lacked jurisdiction or venue, or must show good cause to litigate elsewhere. However, a nonsuit does not prohibit the plaintiff from refiling the same suit in another state, or in a federal court in Virginia. The decision of the court to allow the plaintiff to take a nonsuit is not appealable, unless the defendant had objected to the nonsuit before the trial court.

Default and default judgment

In Virginia, default is filed automatically if the defendant fails to respond in any way within 21 days of service of process being effected. A defendant that defaults thereby waives further notice of proceedings (unless the defendant has an attorney of record), and waives the right to a jury trial in any further proceedings. However, entry of a default does not by itself resolve the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff must then move for a default judgment against the defendant. Where the case is premised on liquidated damages, such as a breach of a promissory note, then judgment will be entered in that amount. If damaged are unliquidated, however, the plaintiff must move for a hearing on damages, which will be decided by the court unless the plaintiff demands a jury on the damages claim. A defendant who has defaulted may still appear at the damages hearing to contest the amount of damages, but can not challenge liability.

Summary judgment

Summary judgment is rarely granted in Virginia courts because it is easy for either party to raise a triable issue of fact. Unlike federal courts, where claims must be accompanied by an affidavit in order to raise a fact issue, Virginia courts treat the pleadings themselves as allegations of fact sufficient to create a genuine issue for resolution by a trial. Summary judgment in Virginia is not available in divorce and annulment cases.

Rules specific to the Circuit Court

Discovery and trial

Either party may seek discovery on any topic that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, irrespective of whether the discovered materials would be admissible at trial, or even whether they are calculated to lead to admissible information. Deadlines to respond to discovery requests are usually 21 days. Parties may propound a maximum of 30 interrogatories on one another (including subparts), but there is no set limit on the number of depositions that can be taken, or the number of times a single witness may be deposed. An attorney may also issue a subpoena duces tecum. Where a witness to a case is about to leave the jurisdiction, a deposition of that witness may be taken within 21 days of filing a case; otherwise, a court order would be required to take early depositions. Alternately a party could seek perpetuation of the testimony of the witness pursuant to a verified petition filed in the jurisdiction in which the defendant resides.

Discovery is somewhat narrower in cases of divorce, habeas corpus, eminent domain.

Jury trial

Right to a jury

There is no Seventh Amendment right to jury trials in state courts, but the state provides for jury trials to the same extent as in federal courts. This means that juries are available to try cases at law, but usually not in equity. However, a party may request a jury to decide facts regarding the facts of an equitable matter. If the contested matter is a special plea, then the decision of the jury is binding, but where there is a conflict of evidence as to other matters, the jury is merely advisory.

A jury must be specifically requested by a party, and this demand must be made within ten days following service of process of the last pleading to raise an issue capable of being tried to a jury. If neither party requests a jury, then both will have been deemed to waive the right, and the case may be tried by the judge alone. However, the judge may still elect to empanel a jury to decide questions of fact.

Jury selection

Juries in Virginia are generally made of five people where the amount in controversy is $25,000 or less, or seven people where the amount in controversy is more than $25,000. Each side receives three peremptory challenges, which may not be exercised in a racially or sexually discriminative manner, along with an unlimited number of challenges for cause. Usually, more jurors then are needed are empaneled in case a juror must be excused. An unusual procedure exists whereby the parties can agree to have a three-person jury. In that case, each side will be permitted to select one juror, and those two jurors select the third from among the jury pool. Objections to jury instructions must be raised before the instructions are read to the jury.

Trial practice

The court generally has a great deal of discretion in terms of giving the jury access to evidence and exhibits, but is barred by statute from allowing the jury to read the pleadings, and also may not personally opine on the credibility of the witnesses. The judge may also grant a motion to sequester non-party witnesses, thereby prohibiting them from watching the testimony of other witnesses, although the judge retains discretion to permit a sequestered witness to testify even if that witness did improperly view other testimony.

Evidence is presented at trial through testimony presented ore tenus – that is, oral testimony presented by a witness live and on the stand – or through depositions. Where equitable claims are tried, testimony is most frequently by deposition, unless the court has opted to empanel an advisory jury, in which case oral testimony is the norm.

In Virginia, the jury must render a unanimous verdict, and anything less than a unanimous jury constitutes a hung jury and therefore a mistrial, unless the parties agree otherwise in advance. The jury may award no more than the amount sought in the complaint, which acts as a ceiling to the verdict. After rendering a verdict, jury members may be questioned to determine if any misconduct occurred, but the reasoning by which the verdict was reached may not be questioned.

Bench trial

A bench trial is conducted with the judge hearing all witnesses and deciding on their credibility. The judge may appoint a commissioner to hear evidence and make recommendations if the parties and the court agree to it, or if the court finds good cause on the facts of the case to have one.

Post-trial practice

Virginia has a motion called a "motion to strike the evidence", which functions exactly the same as a motion for judgment as a matter of law in most other courts. Such a motion is made at the close of evidence (before the jury deliberates, if there is a jury). Where such a motion is granted, summary judgment will be entered. Where a contrary jury verdict is entered, a party may also file a "motion to set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence", and unlike many other courts, Virginia courts may entertain this motion even if no equivalent pre-verdict motion has been made.

Once a judgment has been entered by the court (or a decree has been issued, if the case is in equity), the court retains jurisdiction over the case for 21 days. This period is referred to as the time for which the case is "in the breast of the court", and during this time the court has complete discretion to suspend, vacate, or amend its judgment or decree. After 21 days, jurisdiction lapses, even if the court is considering post-judgment motions. However, a party may file a "bill of review" to correct errors on the face of the record for up to six months, and a judgment obtained by a fraud on the court may be vacated for up to two years after entry of the judgment.

While the case is in the breast of the court, either party may move for a new trial based on any among a wide range of bases, particularly misconduct on the part of some party. Such a motion may also be premised on the discovery of new evidence, if the moving party can allege that its failure to present that evidence at the original trial was not due to a lack of diligence. A party may also seek a new trial if the damages returned are so high, or so low, as to "shock the conscience". In such a case, the judge may order a new trial as to all issues if damages were inseparable from liability, or as to damages alone if liability was well established. Alternately, the judge could order additur or remittitur, requiring the other party to either accept a stated award of a higher or lower amount, or face a new trial. The party against whom the additur or remittitur is pressed may accept the change without protest, accept with protest and appeal the order, or reject the change and have a new trial. If the latter option is taken, the protesting party may later appeal the court's decision to require a new trial. Where additur is ordered, however, both parties must accept the increased amount.

Appellate jurisdiction

The Circuit Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from the General District Court for civil matters in excess of $50, and for all criminal and traffic cases. Cases thus appealed are re-tried de novo (because the GDC does not generate a record to be reviewed for error). The appellant in the Circuit Court will then be entitled to a jury trial, even if they were not entitled to one in the GDC. If the case is a criminal case or traffic infraction, the appellant will automatically receive a jury trial in the Circuit Court unless they affirmatively waive this right. For civil cases on appeal, the appellant must request a jury; if no such request is made, then the appeal will be heard by a Circuit Court judge alone. Cases heard in the GDC may not be directly appealed to any court other than the Circuit Court, although the decisions of the Circuit Court are subject to further appellate review. In determining whether the matter exceeds $50, the Circuit Court looks to the recovery achieved by the plaintiff. If, for example, the plaintiff seeks $3,000 and recovers $2,960, the plaintiff will have no right to appeal, but the defendant will (having been assessed a judgment well in excess of $50). On retrial in the Circuit Court brought about by an appeal from the defendant, the plaintiff may seek leave to amend to increase the claim to an amount in excess of the $25,000 limitation of the GDC.

The Circuit Court also has appellate jurisdiction in certain administrative law matters and can also review the actions of certain local government agencies, such as a Board of Zoning Appeals, by writ of certiorari. By statute, the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond has jurisdiction over administrative appeals that are to be heard in a Circuit Court if venue is not otherwise proper in any specific circuit.

Appeals from the Circuit Court

An appeal from the Circuit Court may be taken to the Court of Appeals of Virginia in limited cases (domestic relations and certain administrative matters), but appeals of general civil judgments are directed to the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Virginia Supreme Court. An appeal may only be taken from a decision to which the appealing party objected with reasonable certainty at the time that the decision was made.

In order to perfect an appeal, the appellant must file a notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Circuit Court within thirty days of the appealable judgment or decree. A post-judgment motion does not extend the time for an appeal unless the Circuit Court has suspended the judgment. A copy of the notice of appeal must be mailed or otherwise delivered to counsel for all parties, stating that the appellant will file either a written summary of the trial, or a transcript which the appellant certifies has been ordered from the court reporter. If a written summary is used instead of a transcript, the appellant must file this document with the Clerk of the Circuit Court within 55 days of the decision which is being appealed. The Clerk of the Circuit Court will then prepare a record containing all pleadings, exhibits, and orders, and will transmit that to the higher court.

The appellant must also post a supersedeas bond if they wish to prevent the other party from collecting on any judgment that was awarded in the trial court; an appealing plaintiff must post an appeal bond, but only after the appeal has been granted. A petition for appeal must be filed with the Virginia Supreme Court within three months of the decision under appeal. The Virginia Supreme Court may deny the petition, or it may grant the petition and will then send a Certificate of Appeal to all parties.

Criminal matters may be appealed to the Court of Appeals, but death penalty cases are appealed directly to the Virginia Supreme Court.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Virginia Circuit Courts". Courts.state.va.us. Archived from the original on April 27, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
  2. ^ "Circuit Courts". Courts.state.va.us. Retrieved 2008-12-17.
  3. ^ Va. Code. Ann. §64.1–75.
  4. ^ Va. Code. Ann. §8.01-261, −262.

External links

This page was last edited on 12 September 2016, at 10:59
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.