To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Venus of Tan-Tan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Venus of Tan-Tan" (replica), Museum of Human Evolution, Burgos, Spain.

The Venus of Tan-Tan (supposedly, 500,000–300,000 BP) is an alleged artifact found in Morocco. It and its contemporary, the Venus of Berekhat Ram, have been claimed as the earliest representations of the human form.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    956
    11 067
    207 020
  • Simbolismo Ancestral 14/44 - Venus de Tan Tan - Prof. Manuel Lafarga
  • Venus paleolíticas 🔴 ♀️ 🔴 Estatuillas de arte mueble prehistórico
  • POR QUÉ ES TAN FAMOSA LA VENUS DE SAMOTRACIA / VICTORIA NIKÉ

Transcription

Description

The Venus of Tan-Tan was described by Robert G. Bednarik.[1] The quartzite object is 6 centimetres (2.4 in) long, 2.6 centimetres (1.0 in) wide, and 1.2 centimetres (0.47 in) thick, weighing 10 grams (0.35 oz). It was discovered in 1999 during an archaeological survey by Lutz Fiedler, state archaeologist of Hesse, Germany, in a river terrace deposit on the north bank of the Draa River, near the bridge of the N1 national route over the Draa, about 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) to the northeast of the Moroccan town of Tan-Tan.

No dating of the artifact nor of the deposit as a whole has been performed. Both are attributed to the Middle Acheulean, which occurs between 500,000 and 300,000 BP in this region.

The object, including its "arms" and "legs", was created by natural geological processes. The horizontal grooves on both sides of the object seem to be formed partly naturally partly artificially (by percussion). The object also contains traces of pigment, which seems to be iron and manganese according to preliminary study.

Interpretation

According to Bednarik,[1][2] the object has a general human-like shape. It is assumed that this shape was recognized by early humans and the object was taken as a manuport. Then its horizontal grooves were accentuated by carving with a stone tool, emphasizing the artifact's anthropomorphous character. Possibly, a pigment was applied to further accentuate the human-like form.

Controversy

To date, the findings of Bednarik have not been re-examined by other scholars and, thus, his statements have been neither confirmed nor rejected. Professor Stanley Ambrose, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, has expressed an opinion (based on Bednarik's work and without studying the object directly) that the rock's shape was a result of natural weathering.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Bednarik, Robert G. (2003). "A Figurine from the African Acheulian". Current Anthropology. 44 (3): 405–413. doi:10.1086/374900. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 144123409.
  2. ^ Bednarik, Robert G. (2003). "The earliest evidence of palaeoart". Rock Art Research. 20 (2): 89–135.
  3. ^ Rincon, Paul (23 May 2003). "'Oldest sculpture' found in Morocco". BBC News. Retrieved 2021-04-07.

External links

28°26′28″N 11°06′14″W / 28.44111°N 11.10389°W / 28.44111; -11.10389

This page was last edited on 18 November 2023, at 23:40
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.