To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Universelles Leben e.V. v. Germany

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Universelles Leben e.V. v. Germany (application No. 29745/96) was a case decided by the European Commission of Human Rights in 1996.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    2 503
    11 585
    1 652 441
  • Esoterik&Spiritualität: ECKHART TOLLE - LEBEN AUS DER FÜLLE DES SEINS (DVD / Vorschau)
  • Deutsch lernen (B2/C1) | Autismus – Gefühle lesen lernen
  • Why our IQ levels are higher than our grandparents' | James Flynn

Transcription

Facts

Universelles Leben, the German branch of Universal Life, filed a request in German court for an interim injunction prohibiting the German Government from including a reference to the applicant association in a publication on "So-called youth sects and psycho-groups in the Federal Republic of Germany"[1] until a final court's decision on prohibiting the reference. The interim injunction was granted by the Cologne Administrative Court.

After a government appeal of the injunction, the North Rhine-Westphalia Administrative Court of Appeal dismissed UL's request. It found that the documents produced by UL, in particular on the replacement of medical treatment by religious belief, showed a degree of danger for the general public justifying a reference to the applicant association in the envisaged publication including a warning about its activities.[2]

Decision

The commission considered that "a State ... is entitled to convey, in an objective, but critical manner, information on religious communities and sects, if such information does not pursue aims of agitation or indoctrination endangering the freedom of religion" and that "the reference to the applicant association in the intended publication does not have any direct repercussions on the religious freedom of the association or its members". Therefore it held that there was no interference with the applicant association's rights to freedom of religion under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

References

  1. ^ Schäfer, Danny; Schwarzer, Corinna (2012). Freedom of Religion or Belief. Anti-Sect Movements and State Neutrality: A Case Study: Fecris. 12. Jahrgang (2012). LIT Verlag Münster. ISBN 9783643998644.
  2. ^ Richardson, James T. (2012-12-06). Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe. Springer. ISBN 9781441990945.

External links

This page was last edited on 11 September 2023, at 05:40
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.