To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

United Kingdom First Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

United Kingdom First Party
LeaderRobin Page[1]
Founded2009[1]
Dissolved2010[1]
Ideology
National affiliationAlliance for Democracy
ColoursRed, white and blue
Website
www.ukfp.org

The United Kingdom First Party was a small short-lived populist, Eurosceptic[2] British political party, founded in 2009. It fielded candidates in three English regions for the 2009 European parliamentary elections: the East Midlands, the East of England and the South East.[3]

The party agreed to work with the Popular Alliance during the election, in order to achieve the two parties' goals, with each party saying it had similar backgrounds and goals.[2]

It disbanded in 2010 after its failure in the European parliamentary elections. It was voluntarily deregistered in April 2010.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/2
    Views:
    1 255 039
    20 385 072
  • The story behind the Boston Tea Party - Ben Labaree
  • Ben and Holly's Little Kingdom | Dinner Party! - Full Episode | Kids Adventure Cartoon

Transcription

You've probably heard of the Boston Tea Party, something about a bunch of angry colonists dressed as Native Americans throwing chests of tea into the water. But the story is far more complicated, filled with imperial intrigue, corporate crisis, smuggling, and the grassroots origins of the American Revolution. The first thing you need to know about tea in the 1700's is that it was really, really popular. In England, each man, woman, and child consumed almost 300 cups of this stuff every year. And, since the English colonized America, Americans were crazy about tea too. By the 1760's, they were drinking over a million pounds of tea every year. So, when Britain wanted to increase taxes on tea in America, people were not happy, mostly because they had no say in tax decisions made in London. Remember that famous phrase, "No taxation without representation"? The American colonists had long believed that they were not subject to taxes imposed by legislature in which they lacked representation. In fact, rather than paying the taxes, they simply dodged the tax collectors. Since the east coast of America is hundreds of miles long and British enforcement was lax, about 3/4 of the tea Americans were drinking was smuggled in, usually from Holland. But the British insisted that Parliament did have the authority to tax the colonists, especially after Britain went deeply into debt fighting the French in the Seven Years' War. To close the budget gap, London looked to Americans, and in 1767 imposed new taxes on a variety of imports, including the American's beloved tea. America's response: no thanks! They boycotted the importation of tea from Britain, and instead, brewed their own. After a new bunch of British customs commissioners cried to London for troops to help with tax enforcement, things got so heated that the Red Coats fired on a mob in Boston, killing several people, in what was soon called the Boston Massacre. Out of the terms of the 1773 Tea Act, Parliament cooked up a new strategy. Now the East India Company would sell the surplus tea directly through hand-picked consignees in America. This would lower the price to consumers, making British tea competitive with the smuggled variety while retaining some of the taxes. But the colonists saw through the British ploy and cried, "Monopoly!" Now it's a cold and rainy December 16, 1773. About 5,000 Bostonians are crowded into the Old South Meeting House, waiting to hear whether new shipments of tea that have arrived down the harbor will be unloaded for sale. When the captain of one of those ships reported that he could not leave with his cargo on board, Sam Adams rose to shout, "This meeting can do no more to save the country!" Cries of "Boston Harbor a teapot tonight!" rang out from the crowd, and about 50 men, some apparently dressed as Native Americans, marched down to Griffin's Wharf, stormed aboard three ships, and threw 340 tea chests overboard. An infuriated British government responsded with the so-called Coercive Acts of 1774, which, among other things, closed the port of Boston until the locals compensated the East India Company for the tea. That never happened. Representatives of the colonies gathered at Philadelphia to consider how best to respond to continued British oppression. This first Continental Congress supported destruction of the tea, pledged to support a continued boycott, and went home in late October 1774 even more united in their determination to protect their rights and liberties. The Boston Tea Party began a chain reaction that led with little pause to the Declaration of Independence and a bloody rebellion, after which the new nation was free to drink its tea, more or less, in peace.

Policies

The party placed its opposition to British membership of the European Union in the context of a desire to reduce "the cost, the scope and the number of layers of government".[4] It set out a brief summary of its policies, with an undertaking to develop them further after the European elections, influenced by the outcome, towards simpler taxation, smaller government and less centralisation.

The party also stated that it believed in freedom for Britain to negotiate its own trade deals individually or as part of a trade bloc, free speech and the ability to hold politicians to account through referendums.[5]

European Parliament election, 2009

Candidates for the European Parliament in 2009 included the journalist and former presenter of One Man and His Dog, Robin Page, and the former UK Independence Party chairman Petrina Holdsworth.

The candidates pledged to serve only one term, not to employ family members, to publish their accounts and refuse invitations to "sit on committees of the European Parliament nor attend the plenaries in Brussels and Strasbourg except in the case of a vote which the party leadership regards as of critical importance to British interests".[6]

At the 2009 European election, UK First received 74,000 votes – 0.5% of the national vote – and none of its candidates were elected.

MEP candidate list, 2009

Eastern Region South East Region East Midlands Region
Robin Page Petrina Holdsworth Ian Gillman
Bruce Lawson Martin Haslam David Noakes
John West John Petley Christopher Elliot
Peter Cole Mariann French
Len Baynes Nadine Platt

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d "United Kingdom First Registration summary". Electoral Commission. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  2. ^ a b c "Two parties from very similar backgrounds" (PDF). Popular Alliance/United Kingdom First Party. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 February 2012. Retrieved 2 June 2009.
  3. ^ "Our candidates". United Kingdom First Party. Retrieved 2 June 2009.[dead link]
  4. ^ "Policies". United Kingdom First Party. Archived from the original on 23 May 2009. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  5. ^ "What we stand for". United Kingdom First Party. Archived from the original on 8 June 2009. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
    - "Our policies in brief". United Kingdom First Party. Archived from the original on 23 May 2009. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  6. ^ "MEP Statement". United Kingdom First Party. Archived from the original on 24 February 2012. Retrieved 2 June 2009.

External links

This page was last edited on 16 May 2023, at 08:25
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.