| Unilever v Central Food | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Submitted 7 December 1998 Decided 26 September 2000 | |
| Full case name | Unilever Italia SpA v Central Food SpA. |
| Case number | C-443/98 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2000:496 |
| Language of proceedings | Italian |
| Nationality of parties | Italy |
| Court composition | |
| Judge-Rapporteur C. Gulmann | |
| President G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias | |
Judges
| |
| Advocate General F.G. Jacobs | |
| Legislation affecting | |
| Article 177 of the EC Treaty; Council Directive 83/189/EEC, as amended by Directive 94/10/EC of the European Parliament | |
Unilever Italia SpA v Central Food (2000) C-443/98 is an EU law case, concerning the conflict of law between a national legal system and European Union law.
Facts
Unilever sold olive oil to Central Food, which refused to pay on the ground the oil did not comply with Italian law. This was a ‘technical regulation’ under Directive 83/189. Unilever claimed damages for breach of contract. The question was referred to the European Court of Justice, whether the Directive precluded enforcement of the contract.
Judgment
The European Court of Justice upheld Unilever's claim that the law could not be applied. The Directive was a procedural bar to adopting national legislation.
See also
Notes
This page was last edited on 19 May 2023, at 02:41