Unfair prejudice in United States evidence law may be grounds for excluding relevant evidence.[1] "Unfair prejudice" as used in Rule 403 is not to be equated with testimony that is simply adverse to the opposing party.[2] Virtually all evidence is prejudicial or it is not material. The prejudice must be "unfair".[3]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:73 2259071 520 991
-
Corrupt New Jersey, U.S.A. court judge - www.CorruptionCripples.com
-
Admissible evidence
-
Who Are the Racists: Conservatives or Liberals?
Transcription
Notes
- ^ Federal Rules of Evidence 403
- ^ "Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons". Cornell Law School.
- ^ Dollar v. Long Mfg., N.C. Inc., 561 F.2d 613, 618 (5th Cir. 1977)
External links