To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Unauthorized biography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1882 edition of Domestic Manners and Private Life of Sir Walter Scott (1834) by James Hogg, an early unauthorized biography.
1882 edition of Domestic Manners and Private Life of Sir Walter Scott (1834) by James Hogg, an early unauthorized biography.

An unauthorized biography is a biography written without the subject's permission or input.[1] The term is usually restricted to biographies written within the subject's lifetime or shortly after his or her death; as such, it is not applied to biographies of historical figures written long after their deaths.[2]

Unauthorized biographies are not necessarily unwelcomed by their subjects, and in fact some unauthorized autobiographies have been criticized for displaying overeager admiration for them;[3][4] however, unauthorized autobiographies have a wider reputation for fueling controversy and painting unflattering portraits of their subjects.[5]

Unauthorized biographies marked for revealing scandalous or embarrassing content are often called tell-alls, especially if they take the form of memoirs; tell-all biographies written by friends or family members of the subject are sometimes called kiss-and-tells. Due to the potential stigma associated with the phrase "unauthorized biography", unauthorized biographies written by journalists and intended to present a fairer portrait of the subject are sometimes called investigative biographies.

Unauthorized biographies may be considered more objective but less reliable than other biographies, because they are not subject to the subject's (subjective) approval (and therefore may contain accurate information that the subject would not have authorized), but are also not privy to information or corrections known only to the subject or the subject's close friends and family.[6]

The subjects of unauthorized biographies are almost always public figures.[7] Rarely do public figures succeed in preventing the release of unauthorized biographies.[8] Unauthorized biographies of people who are not deemed public figures may be considered violations of the right to privacy and subject to legal action.[9] As Ted Schwarz (1992) writes:

Interesting people totally unknown to the general public are usually considered private individuals, even when married to someone famous. Writing about them without their permission may be considered invasion of privacy, a situation that seldom arises with politicians, entertainers, and others who are obvious public figures.[7]

Speaking of U.S. courts, Lloyd Rich (2002) writes:

Courts maintain a strong duty to protect First Amendment speech as they have an overriding concern and fear that placing "prior restraints" on speech could lead to a "chilling effect" on other speech. Because of this deference to the First Amendment and the presumption against prior restraints, a court will usually not permit an injunction that prevents the publication and/or distribution of an unauthorized biography but instead will only permit monetary damages to be awarded to remedy the unlawful acts of the author and publisher.[8]

The legality of unauthorized biographies varies by country. Brazil enacted a short-lived law in 2014 requiring permission from biographies' subjects before publication.[10][11][12]

While unauthorized biographies often receive significant news coverage, their writers tend to face "media disdain" due to the perception that their work is gossipy, voyeuristic, and busybodyish.[13]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    118 380
    18 823
    717
  • ✪ Unauthorized Biography of D!ck Cheney ::: full HQ
  • ✪ David Paulides Unauthorized Biography
  • ✪ Ol' Strom: An Unauthorized Biography of Strom Thurmond

Transcription

References

Citations

  1. ^ Reitz 2014; Berger 2016, p. 268; Klems 2009.
  2. ^ Reitz 2014; Hoberman 2001, p. 111.
  3. ^ Peck, Gustav (1950). "Review: John L. Lewis: An Unauthorized Biography". The American Political Science Review. 44 (4): 1019–1021. doi:10.2307/1951307. JSTOR 1951307.
  4. ^ Widmer, Kingsley (1979). "Review: Always Merry and Bright: The Life of Henry Miller – An Unauthorized Biography by Jay Martin". Criticism. 21 (3): 279–281. JSTOR 23102638.
  5. ^ Hoberman 2001, p. 111; Stall, Harry & Spalding 2004, p. 288.
  6. ^ Reitz 2014; Stall, Harry & Spalding 2004, p. 288; Berger 2016, p. 268; Goodall 2018; Margolis 2010.
  7. ^ a b Schwarz 1992, p. 503.
  8. ^ a b Rich 2002.
  9. ^ Schwarz 1992; Rich 2002.
  10. ^ Marques, Simone (2014). "Brazil's Banned Biographies: When Public Figures Want to Control the Message". X Index. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
  11. ^ "Brazil Ends Controversial Ban on Unauthorised Biographies". ABC. 2015. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
  12. ^ "Brazil Overturns 'Ban' on Unauthorised Biographies". BBC News. 2015. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
  13. ^ Hoberman 2001; Kelley 2010; Vincent 2010; Scott 1996.

Bibliography

This page was last edited on 16 August 2019, at 09:09
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.