To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Typographic unit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A ruler showing 4 scales (from the top down): Inches, Points, Picas, and Agates
Diagram of font metrics showing where letters and symbols would be placed relative to each other. The letters would change size according to the font type, typographic unit and dimension used.

Typographic units are the units of measurement used in typography or typesetting. Traditional typometry units are different from familiar metric units because they were established in the early days of printing. Though most printing is digital now, the old terms and units have persisted.

Even though these units are all very small, across a line of print they add up quickly. Confusions such as resetting text originally in type of one unit in type of another will result in words moving from one line to the next, resulting in all sorts of typesetting errors (viz. rivers, widows and orphans, disrupted tables, and misplaced captions). Before the popularization of desktop publishing, type measurements were done with a tool called a typometer.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    6 905
    1 086 509
    456
    2 146
    2 865
  • More about Typography
  • a defense of the imperial measurement system
  • DETI: Module 1—Simon Johnston: “Teaching Typographic Identities” (Classroom)
  • All caps letter spacing – How to fix it with tracking & kerning ★ 1K Special
  • Подробнее о типографике

Transcription

Hi, and welcome to the TranslatorsCafe.com channel. In this video we will talk about typography — a topic covered in the TranslatorsCafe.com Unit Converter website article. We will discuss typefaces and fonts and how they influence our perception of printed text. We will also talk about font sizes, leading, tracking and kerning. Finally, we will discuss what units are used to measure various quantities in typography. Typography is the study of type. It is concerned with the appearance of letters, including their shape, size, and color, as well as other features used to enhance the appearance and readability of text. Typography emerged around the invention of the printing press in the mid fifteenth century. Computers opened up typography to everyone and now we can say that any computer user does typography. Arranging letters on the page well and following the principles of good typography can impact the reader and strengthen the message that the designer is trying to convey. Bad typography, on the other hand, can make the text difficult to read. Fonts are classified into different types, such as serifs and sans serifs. Serifs are fonts with decorative elements. These decorative elements are called serifs as well. Sans serifs are simply fonts without serifs. In the illustration the first letter in blue is in a serif font Bodoni. Here one of the four serifs is marked in red. The other letter in yellow is in a sans-serif font, Futura. The term comes from the French word sans, which is spelled as s-a-n-s and means "without". Other classifications divide fonts based on their historic origins. The main groups in this classification include old type, transitional type, modern type, and modernized type. The old style or old face includes the oldest fonts. Transitional types are the ones that historically followed the oldest ones; modern types are fonts that were designed after the transitional types and until about the 1820s. Modernized or modernized old style types include modern fonts that imitate the true old style but are designed in the modern times. There are also other groups in this classification. Each group of fonts differs in several design elements such as their thickness, contrast between thick and thin lines, and the shape of the serifs. Other classifications also exist. Typography is concerned with manipulating size and font types to make pages with a pleasing and easy to read appearance. There are several conventions for specifying the size of letters. For some of these conventions the same size of letters in two different fonts may not mean that they have the same linear dimensions. We will discuss this later in the video. Despite these inconsistencies, size does help designers to know how much space a given text takes up on a page, and as such is a useful measure in desktop publishing. While centimeters or inches can be employed, units called pixels are also used. Each pixel represents a dot or a square. Pixels put together in a pattern make up an image on the screen. In typography size of letters and characters is measured with the help of a basic standardized unit, pica. Sometimes pica is used directly, for example to measure margins and column sizes. However, often instead of pica, the units derived from it, such as points and pixels, are used. There are several conventions for calculating pica. of length, and even in cases when pica is tied to the inch, its value differs depending on the historical definition of the inch in a given country. Computer pica is measured as 1/6 of an inch. Points are generally derived from pica. PostScript is one of the formats that uses the computer typography units. These units are used by most computers for measuring text displayed on the screen and for home printing. The size of the letters is measured using the following dimensions: • The ascender line marks the top of the letter; • The mean line is at the top of the main body of the letter, this is also known as median; • The baseline is at the bottom of the main body of the letter; • The descender line marks the bottom of the letter; • The x-height is the size of the main body of the letter. Traditionally it equals to the height of the letter x, hence its name; • Finally, the body size is the size of the led block that was historically used for printing each letter. Points are the units conventionally used to determine the size of the font. For example, much of the academic writing and business correspondence is done in sizes between point 10 and point 12. The actual size in inches or millimeters refers to the value called body size. Historically this is the physical height of the lead block used for printing with the printing press — it has a single letter on it. Pixels are the units for measuring the size of digital images. We will talk about them a bit later. Now let us talk about several terms used in typography: leading, kerning and tracking. Leading is the distance between the successive lines of text. The term comes from thin lead strips that were inserted between the lines to increase the vertical distance between them. Because the strips were made from lead, the word is pronounced as "ledding", not "leeding". Tracking or letter-spacing means increasing or decreasing the space between all letters in one line or in the whole block of text. Kerning is the process of adjusting the spacing between individual characters to achieve a visually pleasing result. In our example kerning was adjusted between the letters A and V as well as between W and A. In some cases in web design, points can be defined based on the physical measurements of pica relevant to units of length, for example inches, as I explained earlier. However, both points and picas can also be defined relative to the size of a pixel, as defined by a particular website. In this case this pixel is called a reference pixel or CSS pixel. The units that I outlined earlier mainly denote the height of each letter. There are also two typographic units, which measure the width of letters. They are called Em and En spelled as e-m and e-n. Em equals the size of the character in points, while en is half of an em. Historically, the size of em was defined as the width of the capital letter M, hence its name. Although today this is not an accurate definition anymore, because M is different for the numerous fonts that are in use today. Em and en are often used to measure the length of dashes. In English, en dash is used to indicate range. For example, in the phrase "use 3--4 table spoons of sugar", we will use the shorter en dash. The longer em dash will be used as punctuation, for example in this phrase: "the summer was short, but the winter — long". Indentation and column width can also be measured with em and en units. Displays, Pixels and Viewing Angle Standard pixels are substituted by reference pixels when the target audience uses devices that are viewed from unusual distances or that have screens of unconventional sizes. The reference pixel is the visual angle of one pixel on a device that has a pixel density of 96 dpi and a distance of an arm's length between the eye and the screen. For a nominal arm's length of 28 inches, the visual angle is therefore about 0.0213 degrees. For reading at arm's length, 1px thus corresponds to about 0.26 mm or 1/96 of an inch. At the same time, for reading at a distance of 3.5 m or 12 feet, a reference pixel equals to 1.3 mm. People have long noticed the correlation between the size of the screen, the distance from the screen, the size of a pixel, and how big this pixel appears to the human eye. To relate all of them in an easy-to-understand way, the concepts of visual angle and Pixels Per Degree were introduced. The variable, Pixels Per Degree or PPD, also known as angular resolution, represents the total number of pixels that we want to appear on the screen per a given distance formed by the viewing angle of one degree. In the illustration, the yellow angle D is one degree. Well, it is not actually one degree in this picture because it would be hard to see the diagram with such a small angle, but please imagine that it is. The value Pixels Per Degree represents the number of pixels that can be lined up along the red line E and also along the red line F in the illustration. In our example PPD is three pixels. You can see two grey pixels and one dark grey pixel, making a total of three. Display manufacturers usually calculate the PPD so that the pixels are small enough to blend in and to produce a continuous image. It is usually much higher than in our illustration. Apple, for example, claims to keep the PPD for their displays no lower than 53.53, sometimes as high as 79 PPD. Knowing the PPD one can calculate the size of one pixel by using the distance from the eye to the display and the visual angle. In our example the distances are 10 and 20 inches — the approximate distances for a smartphone and a computer display respectively. The visual angle is the angle at which the distance that is covered within this angle on the screen covers one pixel. In the illustration this distance in one pixel is represented as green lines B and C. The visual angle in this illustration is marked in orange. Using these tools, we can easily calculate pixel sizes not only for standard displays but also for those that are viewed at unusual distances or are of unusual sizes. If you are interested to know more, you can find more information on the W3C website. Critique Many designers argue that the currently used typographic systems based on picas and points are far from ideal. Critique includes problems that arise from having to use this system in conjunction with the metric or the imperial units that designers use for images and page sizes. This is a problem because the typographic unit system is not tied accurately to the metric or the imperial units. Another problem is that the letters of the same point size but from different fonts appear to have different sizes. This is because the size expressed in points corresponds to the body size, not to the size of the body of the letter, which is the x-height as I explained earlier. This makes it difficult for the designer to keep consistency through the document. For example, in the illustration, all three words are written with the same size in points, yet their x-height is very different because I used different fonts for them. Some designers propose to use the x-height as the font size size and to stop using the body size to address this issue. Thank you for watching. If you liked this video, please don't forget to subscribe to our channel!

Development

In Europe, the Didot point system was created by François-Ambroise Didot (1730–1804) in c. 1783. Didot's system was based on Pierre Simon Fournier's (1712–1768), but Didot modified Fournier's by adjusting the base unit precisely to a French Royal inch (pouce), as Fournier's unit was based on a less common foot.

(Fournier's printed scale of his point system, from Manuel Typographique, Barbou, Paris 1764, enlarged)

However, the basic idea of the point system – to generate different type sizes by multiplying a single minimum unit calculated by dividing a base measurement unit such as one French Royal inch – was not Didot's invention, but Fournier's.[note 1] In Fournier's system, an approximate French Royal inch (pouce) is divided by 12 to calculate 1 ligne, which is then divided by 6 to get 1 point. Didot just made the base unit (one French Royal inch) identical to the standard value defined by the government.

In Didot's point system:

  • 1 point = 16 ligne = 172 French Royal inch = 15 62541 559 mm   0.375 971 510 4 mm, however in practice mostly: 0.376 000 mm, i.e. + 0.0076%.

Both in Didot's and Fournier's systems, some point sizes have traditional names such as Cicero (before introduction of point systems, type sizes were called by names such as Cicero, Pica, Ruby, Long Primer, etc.).

  • 1 cicero = 12 Didot points = 16 French Royal inch = 62 50013 853 mm   4.511 658 124 6 mm, also in practice mostly: 4.512 000 mm, i.e. + 0.0076%.

The Didot point system has been widely used in European countries. An abbreviation for it that these countries use is "dd", employing an old method for indicating plurals. Hence "12 dd" means twelve didot points.

In Britain and the United States, many proposals for type size standardization had been made by the end of 19th century (such as Bruce Typefoundry's mathematical system that was based on a precise geometric progression). However, no nationwide standard was created until the American Point System was decided in 1886.

The American Point System was proposed by Nelson C. Hawks of Marder Luse & Company in Chicago in the 1870s, and his point system used the same method of size division as Fournier's; viz. dividing 1 inch by 6 to get 1 pica, and dividing it again by 12 to get 1 point. However, the American Point System standardized finally in 1886 is different from Hawks' original idea in that 1 pica is not precisely equal to 16 inch (neither the Imperial inch nor the US inch), as the United States Type Founders' Association defined the standard pica to be the Johnson Pica, which had been adopted and used by Mackellar, Smiths and Jordan type foundry (MS&J), Philadelphia. As MS&J was very influential in those days, many other type foundries were using the Johnson Pica.[note 2] Also, MS&J defined that 83 Picas are equal to 35 centimeters. The choice of the metric unit for the prototype was because at the time the Imperial and US inches differed in size slightly, and neither country could legally specify a unit of the other.

The Johnson Pica was named after Lawrence Johnson who had succeeded Binny & Ronaldson in 1833. Binny & Ronaldson was one of the oldest type foundries in the United States, established in Philadelphia in 1796. Binny & Ronaldson had bought the type founding equipment of Benjamin Franklin's (1706–1790) type foundry established in 1786 and run by his grandson Benjamin Franklin Bache (1769–1798). The equipment is thought to be that which Benjamin Franklin purchased from Pierre Simon Fournier when he visited France for diplomatic purposes (1776–85).

The official standard approved by the Fifteenth Meeting of the Type Founders Association of the United States in 1886 was this Johnson pica, equal to exactly 0.166 inch.[citation needed] Therefore, the two other – very close – definitions, 1200 / 7227 inch and 350 / 83 mm, are both unofficial[citation needed].

Monotype wedges used in England and America were based on a pica = .1660 inch. But on the European continent all available wedges were based on the "old-pica" 1 pica - .1667 inch. These wedges were marked with an extra E behind the numbers of the wedge and the set. These differences can also be found in the tables of the manuals.

In the American point system:

  • 1 pica = exactly 0.1660 inch (versus 0.1666 = 16 inch for the DTP-pica) = 4.216 400 mm.
  • 1 point = 112 Johnson pica = exactly 0.013 83 inch = 0.351 36 mm.

The American point system has been used in the US, Britain, Japan, and many other countries.

Today, digital printing and display devices and page layout software use a unit that is different from these traditional typographic units. On many digital printing systems (desktop publishing systems in particular), the following equations are applicable (with exceptions, most notably the popular TeX typesetting system and its derivatives[2]).

  • 1 pica = 16 inch (British/American inch of today) = 4.233 mm.
  • 1 point = 112 pica = 172 inch = 127360 mm = 0.3527 mm.

Fournier's original method of division is now restored in today's digital typography.[citation needed]

Comparing a piece of type in didots for Continental European countries – 12 dd, for example – to a piece of type for an English-speaking country – 12 pt – shows that the main body of a character is actually about the same size. The difference is that the languages of the former often need extra space atop the capital letters for accent marks (e.g. Ñ, Â, Ö, É), but English rarely needs this.

Metric units

The traditional typographic units are based either on non-metric units, or on odd multiples (such as 3583) of a metric unit. There are no specifically metric units for this particular purpose, although there is a DIN standard sometimes used in German publishing, which measures type sizes in multiples of 0.25 mm, and proponents of the metrication of typography generally recommend the use of the millimetre for typographical measurements, rather than the development of new specifically typographical metric units. The Japanese already do this for their own characters (using the kyu, which is q in romanized Japanese and is also 0.25 mm), and have metric-sized type for European languages as well. One advantage of the q is that it reintroduces the proportional integer division of 3 mm (12 q) by 6 & 4.

During the age of the French Revolution or Napoleonic Empire, the French established a typographic unit of 0.4 mm, but except for the government's print shops, this did not catch on.

In 1973, the didot was restandardized in the EU as 0.375 (= 38) mm.[citation needed] Care must be taken because the name of the unit is often left unmodified. The Germans, however, use the terms Fournier-Punkt and Didot-Punkt for the earlier ones, and Typografischer Punkt for this metric one. The TeX typesetting system uses the abbreviation dd for the earlier definition, and nd for the metric new didot[2]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Actually, Sebastien Truchet (1657–1729) had invented a similar type sizing system before Fournier implemented his point system. Truchet's system was applied to the types of the Imprimerie Royale, the romains du roi. It is thought that Fournier knew about Truchet's scheme that was based on the standard French Royal inch and a very fine unit of 1204 ligne. For further information on Truchet's system, refer to James Mosley's "The New Type Bodies of the Imprimerie Royale", pp. 400–408, Vol. 3, The Manuel Typographique of Pierre-Simon Fournier le jeune, Darmstadt 1995. and Jacques André's "Truchet & Types" [1].
  2. ^ Regarding the background of the adoption of the Johnson Pica, Mr. Richard L. Hopkins, author of Origin of The American Point System says: "The major issue then was the expense involved in re-tooling literally hundreds of molds in each foundry to make them all conform to the new system. If they could avoid just a few sizes being altered, it would save hundreds of thousands of dollars. That is why the MS&J (Johnson) pica was adopted."

Select bibliography

  • Boag, Andrew. "Typographic measurement: a chronology", Typography papers, no. 1, 1996, The Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, The University of Reading, Reading 1996.
  • Bruce's Son & Company, Specimen of Printing Types, incl. Theo. L. DeVinne's "The Invention of Printing", New York 1878.
  • Carter, Harry. Fournier on Typefounding, The Soncino Press, London 1930.
  • Fournier, Pierre Simon, The Manuel Typographique of Pierre-Simon Fournier le jeune, Vols. I–III, Ed. by James Mosley, Darmstadt 1995.
  • Fournier, Pierre Simon. Modèles des Caractères de l'Imprimerie, including James Mosley's introduction, Eugrammia Press, London 1965.
  • Fournier, Pierre Simon. Manuel Typographique, Vols. I & II, Fournier & Barbou, Paris 1764–1766.
  • Hansard, T. C. Typographia, Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, London 1825.
  • Hopkins, Richard L. Origin of The American Point System, Hill & Dale Private Press, Terra Alta 1976.
  • Hutt, Allen. Fournier, the complete typographer, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ 1972.
  • Johnson, John. Typographia, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green, London 1824.
  • Jones, Thomas Roy, Printing in America, The Newcomen Society of England, American Branch, New York 1948.
  • MacKellar Smiths & Jordan. One Hundred Years, Philadelphia 1896.
  • Mosley, James. "French Academicians and Modern Typography: Designing New Types in the 1690s", Typography papers, no. 2, 1997, The Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, The University of Reading, Reading 1997.
  • Moxon, Joseph. Mechanick Exercises On The Whole Art Of Printing, Oxford University Press, London 1958.
  • Ovink, G. Willem. "From Fournier to metric, and from lead to film", Quaerendo, Volume IX 2 & 4, Theatrum Orbis Terrarum Ltd., Amsterdam 1979.
  • Smith, John. The Printer's Grammar, L. Wayland, London 1787.
  • Yamamoto, Taro. pt – Type Sizing Units Converter, http://www.kt.rim.or.jp/~tyamamot/pt.htm Tokyo 2001.

References

  1. ^ Radics, Vilmos; Ritter, Aladár (1984). Make-up and typography. International Organization of Journalists. p. 13. ISBN 9789630231367. Retrieved 25 November 2016. The typometer is an instrument for measuring typographical denominations: type sizes, column width and depth, slugs, type area, etc.
  2. ^ a b Wikibooks:LaTeX/Lengths

External links

This page was last edited on 3 November 2023, at 19:48
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.