| Tuaua v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Decided | June 5 2015 |
| Holding | |
| People born in American Samoa are not entitled to birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | |
Tuaua v. United States is a court case, originally filed in 2012,[1] in which a group of American Samoans sued the State Department and the Obama administration. They sued to force the government to recognize American Samoans' birthright citizenship, arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that anyone born in the United States is automatically granted citizenship.[2]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/2Views:1 3162 888
-
Congressional Delegate Eni F. H. Faleomavaega: On the citizenship status of American Samoans
-
Fagogo O Samoa - 2020 SF Bay Area
Transcription
Background
The case originated as a complaint filed in 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, by American Samoan and U.S. national Leneuoti Tuaua, who was prohibited from becoming a police officer in California because he was not a U.S. citizen.[3]
The case was docketed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in 2013. Briefs were filed on May 12, 2014, and an oral argument was made on February 9, 2015.[4] On June 5, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled 3–0 to deny birthright citizenship to American Samoans, ruling that the guarantee of such citizenship to citizens in the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to unincorporated U.S. territories.[5]
On February 1, 2016, attorneys filed a petition requesting that the Supreme Court of the United States review the Appeals Court's decision.[6]
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court denied certiorari,[7] meaning the case will not be heard, and the lower court's ruling stands.
Subsequent cases
In Fitisemanu v. United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled 2–1 to reverse a lower courts decision that stated that American Samoans are entitled to birthright citizenship and to overturn the Insular Cases.[8] Despite Justice Gorsuch showing his willingness to overrule the Insular Cases in his concurrence in United States v. Vaello Madero,[9] the case was similarly denied certiorari on October 17, 2022.
See also
References
- ^ Levine, Stephen (June 1, 2016). Pacific Ways: Government and Politics in the Pacific Islands. Victoria University Press. pp. 31–. ISBN 9781776560264. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
- ^ Levy, Pema (February 23, 2015). "Obama Administration Using Century-Old Racist Case Law to Block Citizenship". Mother Jones. Retrieved February 17, 2016.
- ^ Newkirk, Vann R., II (March 30, 2016). "Testing Territorial Limits". The Atlantic. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "About Tuaua v. United States". We the People Project. Retrieved February 17, 2016.
- ^ Levy, Pema (June 5, 2015). "A Federal Appeals Court Just Denied Birthright Citizenship to American Samoans Using Racist Caselaw". Mother Jones. Retrieved February 17, 2016.
- ^ Wang, Frances Kai-Hwa (February 2, 2016). "American Samoa Citizenship Case Arrives at Supreme Court". NBC News. Retrieved February 17, 2016.
- ^ "Order List" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. June 13, 2016. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
- ^ "Fitisemanu v. United States, No. 20-4017 (10th Cir. 2021)". Justia Law. Retrieved June 20, 2022.
- ^ Neil, Gorsuch (April 21, 2022). "United States v. Vaello Madero" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved June 20, 2022.
External links
This page was last edited on 13 April 2024, at 23:26