To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Treaty of Constantinople (1700)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Treaty of Constantinople or Istanbul was signed on 13 July 1700 between the Tsardom of Russia and the Ottoman Empire. It ended the Russo-Turkish War of 1686-1700. Russian tsar Peter the Great secured possession of the Azov region and freed his forces to participate in the Great Northern War. The treaty was superseded by the Treaty of the Pruth in 1711, after the Ottoman Empire became involved in this war.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    2 648 974
    3 576 687
    63 397
  • Venice and the Ottoman Empire: Crash Course World History #19
  • The Renaissance: Was it a Thing? - Crash Course World History #22
  • Greek War of Independence (1821-1830)

Transcription

Hi, I'm John Green, This is CrashCourse: World History and today we’re going to talk about a relationship. No, not you, college girlfriend. No, not that kind of relationship either. No. STAN, THIS IS A HISTORY CLASS. We’re gonna talk about the relationship between a city, Venice, and an empire, the Ottomans, and in doing so we will return t o an old theme in this show: How studying history can make you a better boyfriend and/or girlfriend. Probably or, but I’m not here to judge. Mr. Green, no offense, but you don’t really seem like an expert in how to get girls to like you. Here’s something amazing, Me From the Past. You know that girl, Sarah, in 10th grade who’s super super smart? Yeah, she’s really hot. She’s like three or four leagues hotter than I am. YEAH, I MARRIED HER. So shut up and listen. [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] [music intro] Ten minutes from now, I’m hoping you’ll understand how one mutually beneficial relationship, between the Venetians and the Ottomans, led to two really big deals: The European Renaissance and Christopher Columbus. Not like his birth, I mean he wasn’t like a half-Ottoman, half-Venetian baby, his travels! So Venice is a city made up of hundreds of islands at the northern tip of the Adriatic Sea, but walking around it, you can’t help but feel that the city is essentially a collection of floating buildings tied together by some canals. If ever there was a place where geography was destiny, it was Venice. Venice was literally built for ocean-going trade. As you can imagine, they didn’t have a lot of natural resources— except for fish and mustaches— [sweet!] so if they wanted to grow, they’d have to rely on trade. Let’s go to the Thought Bubble. So first, Venetians became experts in shipbuilding. Remember that when the Crusaders needed ships for their crazy Fourth Crusade? They headed to Venice, because the Venetians were famous for merchant ships like the Galley and the Cog. Not only could they build ships; they could also sail them to pleasant locales like Constantinople and the Levant, so the Venetians formed trade treaties, sometimes called concessions, with the Byzantines, and then when Constantinople fell to the Ottomans and became Istanbul, the Venetians were quick to make trade treaties with their new neighbors, famously saying that while Istanbul had been Constantinople, the matter of Constantinople getting the works was nobody’s business but the Turks. But even before the Ottomans, Venice had experience trading with the Islamic world: It initially established itself as the biggest European power in the Mediterranean thanks to its trade with Egypt’s sultan in the outlandishly lucrative pepper business. Can’t blame the Europeans, really. This stuff is delicious. Oh, like actual pepper? Oh, well that’s cool, too, especially since it masks the taste of spoiled meat, which most meat was in the days before refrigeration. Due to some awkward… Crusades… the Egyptian merchants were not so welcome in … Europe. But they had all the pepper, because the Egyptians imported it from India and controlled both the overland and oversea access to the Mediterranean. And when others cited moral or religious opposition to trade, the Venetians usually found a way …which is why the whole freaking town is made of marble. Thanks, Thought Bubble. To avoid the sticky situation of having to consort with the heathen Egyptians, the Venetians employed a handy story. This is the Piazza San Marco, the #1 Destination in the Entire World for People Who Like to Be Pooped on by Pigeons. It’s also home to this church, which includes some bronze horses you may remember that were looted from Constantinople. And it contains the body of St. Mark, the author of the Gospel According to St. Mark, who had once been the bishop of Alexandria, in Egypt. So naturally, he died there and was buried there in Egypt, but the Venetians claimed him as their own because apparently one time he visited Venice, and these two merchants hatched a very clever plan. They went to Alexandria on business, stole St. Mark’s body and then hid it in a shipment of pork, which the Muslims didn’t check v ery carefully, because, you know, they were disgusted by it. You can even see a version of this on the mosaics in the Basilica of St. Mark complete with the Muslims shouting an Arabic version of “ewww gross.” Then, forever after, the Ventians were like, “Listen, we HAVE to trade with these guys. We use it as a secret way to ferry saint bodies out of Egypt. We don’t WANT to become fantastically wealthy. It’s just a necessary byproduct of our saint-saving.” So what did Venice import? Lots, but notable for us, they imported a lot of grain, because if you have ever been to Venice, Then you might have noticed that it is basically made out of marble and therefore difficult to farm. The Ottomans, on the other hand, had abundant grain, even before they conquered Egypt and its oh-so-fertile Nile River in 1517. Also, while trade was certainly the lynchpin of Venice’s economic success, they had a diverse economy. They also produced things like textiles and glass. And in fact Venice is still known for its glass, but they couldn’t produce it without a special ash that they used to make the colors. And you’ll never guess where the ash came from. The Ottomans. Am I making you a better boyfriend yet? You have to add to your partner’s life. You have to color their glass. That sounds like a euphemism. but it’s not-- BACK TO HISTORY. One last thing about Venice that makes it special, at least for its time. Venice was a republic, not a monarchy or, god forbid, an empire So its leaders were elected, and had to answer to the populace, well at least the property-owning male populace. The ruler was the doge and he got to live in a very nice house and wear a funny hat. The Sultan of the Ottoman empire also got to live in a nice house and wear a funny hat, [not unlike Caddyshack-era pro golfers] but there the similarities end. To begin, the Ottomans were an empire that lasted from around 1300 CE until 1919, making it one of the longest-lasting and richest empires in world history. The Ottomans managed to blend their pastoral nomadic roots with some very un-nomadic empire building, and some really impressive architecture, like this and this and this, making them very different from, wait for it, the Mongols. [Screaming horns of fur-collared mayhem ensue] The empire, or at least the dynasty, was founded by Osman Bey, and Ottoman is a Latinization of Osmanli, which basically means like the House of Osman. No, Stan, House, y-, yes. Oh my Gosh. The Ottomans were greatest in the 15th and 16th centuries under two famous sultans: First, Mehmet the Conqueror ruled from 1451 to 1481 and expanded Ottoman control to the Balkans, which is why there are Bosnian Muslims today. But Ottoman expansion reached its greatest extent under [counted 4 ottomans during height of our living room empire…] Suleiman the Magnificent, who ruled from 1520-1566. He took valuable territory in Mesopotamia and Egypt, thus securing control over the western parts of the Asian trade – both overland and oversea. He also defeated the king of Hungary and laid siege to Vienna in 1526. And he turned the Ottomans into a huge naval power. Also, judging from his hat, he had the largest brain in human history. [Or an alien from the movie Mars Attacks! Hmm...] The Ottomans basically controlled about half of what the Romans controlled, but it was much more valuable because of all the Indian Ocean trade you’ll remember from last week. So all this land brought a lot of wealth, but it needed to be ruled. The Ottomans could have followed the Roman model, where you send out generals and nobles to rule over conquered territories, or they could’ve demanded the allegiance of client kings like the Persians, or developed a civil service system like the Chinese, but instead, they created an entirely new ruling class, a system some historians call a slave aristocracy. So if you are a King, one of your main problems is hereditary nobles, because they always want to replace you, and they don’t want to give you your money, & they want their ugly sons to marry your gorgeous daughters, etc. One way to deal with this problem is to make them part of the government so they feel included and shut up. Another way is to kill them. [Not very sportsman-like there, Vizzini.] That’s what they usually do in Russia. I’m whispering so Putin doesn’t hear me. Ahh! Putin! [Much less scary when all topless and wanna-beefcakey atop a horse] The Ottomans just bypassed the problem of hereditary nobles altogether by creating both an army and a bureaucracy from scratch so they would be loyal only to the Sultan. How? The devshirme, a program in which they kidnapped Christian boys, converted them to Islam, and raised them either to be members of an elite military force called the Janissaries, or bureaucrats who would collect taxes and advise the Sultan. Incidentally, which of those gigs would you prefer? Because I think that says a lot about you as a person. Either way, you weren’t allowed to have kids, which prevented the whole hereditary nobles problem, and also ensured that the Ottoman government would contain quite a lot of Eunuchs. [Professional Euchre players?] Originally eunuchs probably only served as harem guards, for obvious reasons, [Harem girls love to play Euchre during their idle time?] but emperors quickly realized that they would be more reliable than nobles as advisors and administrators because their loyalties were less likely to be divided. Oh, it’s time for the Open Letter? An Open Letter to Eunuchs, But first, let’s see what’s in the secret compartment today. Oh, its a blow up globe. See what quitting smoking will get you Me From the Past? Hey there Ottoman Eunuchs, How’s it hanging? I’m just kidding, that was mean. Listen, there’ve been eunuchs all around this great planet of ours. But you’re special. I’m not going to give you the details why, because they’re horrifying. I’m just going to put a link to an article in the video info. You started out being harem guards, Ottoman Eunuchs, which is kind of an obvious gig for you, but then you expanded. As had happened in China, you made yourselves indispensable, and you were often the center of palace intrigue. In fact, few people in the Ottoman Empire were as wealthy and important as many of you were. Way to turn lemons into lemonade. [Perhaps making an omelet from broken eggs is more fitting?] I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have brought up lemons. […or the huevos. Sorry!] Best wishes, John Green This system eventually broke down as Janissaries (who had guns) lobbied to be allowed to have families. But until that happened, the Ottomans system using a mix of eunuchs and slave administrators to run everything worked incredibly well. But to return to the relationship between the Ottomans and the Venetians: After the Ottomans captured Egypt, they pretty much controlled the flow of trade through the Mediterranean, but the Venetians had and centuries of experience as mariners, and also lots of boats. Speaking of ships, I ship these guys: [But not as much as Damon and Elena] So the Ottomans were content to let the Venetians do all the like, trading and carrying of goods, and they just made their money from taxes. And that worked because both Venice and the Ottomans added value to the other. Healthy relationships— listen up, Me From the Past— aren’t about extracting value; they have to be mutually beneficial to work. And boy, was that a mutually beneficial relationship. For instance, Venice became super rich, and being super rich was a prerequisite for the European Renaissance because all that art and learning required money, which is why Venice was a leading city at the beginning of the Renaissance before being eclipsed by Florence, Rome, and I don’t know, say Rotterdam. Also, this relationship established firm connections between Europe and Islamic world, so ideas could flow again— especially old Greek ideas Muslims had preserved and built upon. I mean, I guess those connections had existed for a long time, but Crusades aren’t a great way to exchange ideas. But perhaps the most crucial result of the Venetian and Ottoman control of trade was that it forced other Europeans to look for different paths to the riches of the East. And that fueled huge investments in exploration. The Portuguese sailed south and east around the tip of Africa, and the Spanish went west, believing that the Indies and China were much closer than they turned out to be. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan Muller, our script supervisor is Danica Johnson. The show is written by my high school history teacher Raoul Meyer and myself. Our graphics team is ThoughtBubble, Last week’s Phrase of the Week was: "Unfortunately they didn't have pizza." If you want to suggest future phrases of the week or guess at this week’s you can do so in comments where you can also ask questions about today's video that will be answered by our team of historians. Thanks for watching CrashCourse. And as we say in my hometown, don’t forget Context is everything. [giddily glides gracefully out of frame]

Background

Sultan Mustafa II

As a member of the anti-Ottoman alliance ("Holy League"), the Tsardom of Russia had fought against the Ottoman Empire in the eastern theater of the Great Turkish War (Russo-Turkish War (1686–1700)). When the other members of the league — the Holy Roman Empire, the Republic of Venice and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth - had reached their war aims, they concluded a peace with the Ottoman sultan Mustafa II at Karlowitz (1699), which completely ignored Russian interests.[1] The respective negotiations had begun in 1698, when Russia was still campaigning in the lower Dnjepr area and the Strait of Kerch, connecting the Sea of Azov to the Black Sea.[2] Russian tsar Peter the Great joined the negotiations in person and concluded a two-years truce with the Ottoman Empire in Karlowitz (Sremski Karlovci) on 25 December 1698 (O.S.)[3] / 26 January 1699.[2] At this stage, a final Russo-Ottoman settlement was prevented by the discrepancy between Peter's demands, which included protection of the Christians in the Ottoman Balkan provinces, and the military position of Russia,[3] as well as the lack of support by the other Holy League members.[1]

In the fall, the tsar sent Yemelyan Ignatievich Ukraintsev to the sultan's court, the Porte at Constantinople (Istanbul), to negotiate a peace.[4] Ukraintsev arrived on a Russian war ship, the 46-gun frigate Krepost in the early fall of 1699.[4] The primary Russian objectives were Ottoman recognition of the Russian war gains around Azov and a free access to the Black Sea for Russia's commercial vessels.[4] When the negotiations progressed slowly[4] and Peter the Great came under time pressure to attack the Swedish Empire in the Great Northern War (see below),[5] he urged Ukraintsev to come to a peace soon, and the Russian condition of Black Sea access was dropped.[4]

Terms

Tsar Peter the Great

The treaty was concluded on 3 July (O.S.) / 13 July 1700[3] in Constantinople.[4] The Tsardom of Russia and the Ottoman Empire agreed on a truce set to expire in thirty years.[4] The sultan recognized Russia's possession of the Azov area,[2] including Asov and the newly built fortresses of Taganrog,[3] Pavlovsk[citation needed], and Mius.[6] Russia dropped her claims to the Kerch Strait,[2] but was relieved from paying the annual tribute to the Crimean Khanate[7] paid since the occupation of Muscovy by the Golden Horde.[3] The fortresses along the Dnieper river, razed by Russian forces, were returned to the Ottoman Empire.[3] The lower Dniepr area, south of the Zaporozhian Sich, and the area between Perekop and Miuskiy Gorodok was declared a demilitarized zone.[2] The sultan asserted that his subordinates, the Crimean Tatars, would not attack Russia; in turn, the tsar promised that his subordinates, the Don Cossacks and Zaporozhian Cossacks, would not attack the Ottoman Empire.[2]

Both parties promised not to build any fortifications along the border. The Ottoman Empire also promised to free Russian prisoners of war. The sultan further allowed free passage for Russian pilgrims to the Holy Land and a Russian diplomatic representation in Constantinople.[8]

Impact of the Great Northern War

The treaty's conclusion and its supersession in 1710 was closely tied to the Great Northern War, which had started shortly before its conclusion. Peter the Great had negotiated a three-front assault on the Swedish Empire with his allies August the Strong of Saxony and Poland–Lithuania and Frederik IV of Denmark-Norway: Peter was to attack Swedish Ingria, August was to attack Swedish Livonia, and Frederik was to attack Sweden's ally Holstein-Gottorp.[9] Peter's attack however was conditional, it was agreed that it would only start after the Russo-Ottoman peace was concluded.[9] As a consequence, the Russian attack was delayed to a point where Denmark-Norway was already defeated when Peter the Great marched his army out of Moscow,[10] enabling Sweden to face the Russian attack on Ingria and successfully repulse it.[11]

The Ottoman Empire became involved in the war nine years later, when Charles XII of Sweden was defeated by Peter the Great in the Battle of Poltava and subsequently encamped the remnants of his army in Ottoman Bender.[12] This led to another confrontation between the sultan and the tsar, culminating in an Ottoman declaration of war and the unsuccessful Russian Pruth Campaign.[12] As a consequence, the treaty of Constantinople was superseded by the Treaty of the Pruth (1711), by which Azov was returned to the sultan and subsequently razed,[12] and the Treaty of Adrianople (1713), which restored peace between the Russian and Ottoman empires scheduled to last twenty-five years.[13] Though the sultan declared war on Peter three times in the time between Pruth and Adrianople, no actual fighting occurred,[13] thus the Pruth treaty effectively ended the Ottoman intervention in the Great Northern War.[12]

Sources

References
  1. ^ a b Anderson (2000), p. 212
  2. ^ a b c d e f Davies (2007), p. 187
  3. ^ a b c d e f Torke (1997), p. 110
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Phillips (1995), p. 102
  5. ^ Frost (2000), p. 228; Torke (1997), p. 110
  6. ^ Davies (2007), p. 199.
  7. ^ Davies (2007), p. 187; Torke (1997), p. 110
  8. ^ Oliva (1969), p. 57
  9. ^ a b Frost (2000), p. 228
  10. ^ Frost (2000), p. 229
  11. ^ Frost (2000), p. 230
  12. ^ a b c d Frost (2000), p. 294
  13. ^ a b Frost (2000), p. 295
Bibliography
  • Anderson, Matthew Smith (2000). Europe in the eighteenth century, 1713-1789. General history of Europe (4 ed.). Longman. ISBN 0-582-35744-6.
  • Davies, Brian L. (2007). Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700. Warfare and history. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-23986-9.
  • Frost, Robert I (2000). The Northern Wars. War, State and Society in Northeastern Europe 1558-1721. Longman. ISBN 978-0-582-06429-4.
  • Oliva, Lawrence Jay (1969). Russia in the era of Peter the Great. New insights in history. Prentice-Hall.
  • Phillips, Edward J. (1995). The founding of Russia's navy. Peter the Great and the Azov Fleet, 1688-1714. Contributions in military studies. Vol. 159. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-29520-4.
  • Torke, Hans-Joachim (1997). Einführung in die Geschichte Russlands (in German). C.H.Beck. ISBN 3-406-42304-3.

External links

This page was last edited on 20 December 2023, at 15:00
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.