To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time. 4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds # Time-invariant system Block diagram illustrating the time invariance for a deterministic continuous-time single-input single-output system. The system is time-invariant if and only if y2(t) = y1(t – t0) for all time t, for all real constant t0 and for all input x1(t). Click image to expand it.

In control theory, a time-invariant (TI) system has a time-dependent system function that is not a direct function of time. Such systems are regarded as a class of systems in the field of system analysis. The time-dependent system function is a function of the time-dependent input function. If this function depends only indirectly on the time-domain (via the input function, for example), then that is a system that would be considered time-invariant. Conversely, any direct dependence on the time-domain of the system function could be considered as a "time-varying system".

Mathematically speaking, "time-invariance" of a system is the following property:: p. 50

Given a system with a time-dependent output function $y(t)$ , and a time-dependent input function $x(t)$ , the system will be considered time-invariant if a time-delay on the input $x(t+\delta )$ directly equates to a time-delay of the output $y(t+\delta )$ function. For example, if time $t$ is "elapsed time", then "time-invariance" implies that the relationship between the input function $x(t)$ and the output function $y(t)$ is constant with respect to time $t:$ $y(t)=f(x(t),t)=f(x(t)).$ In the language of signal processing, this property can be satisfied if the transfer function of the system is not a direct function of time except as expressed by the input and output.

In the context of a system schematic, this property can also be stated as follows, as shown in the figure to the right:

If a system is time-invariant then the system block commutes with an arbitrary delay.

If a time-invariant system is also linear, it is the subject of linear time-invariant theory (linear time-invariant) with direct applications in NMR spectroscopy, seismology, circuits, signal processing, control theory, and other technical areas. Nonlinear time-invariant systems lack a comprehensive, governing theory. Discrete time-invariant systems are known as shift-invariant systems. Systems which lack the time-invariant property are studied as time-variant systems.

• 1/5
Views:
224 762
104 190
145 952
43 325
6 249
• Time-Invariant and Time-Variant Systems
• Signals & Systems - Time Variant & Time Invariant
• Time-Invariant and Time-Variant Systems (Solved Problems) | Part 1
• Time Invariance: Conceptual Introduction
• What is a Linear Time Invariant (LTI) System?

## Simple example

To demonstrate how to determine if a system is time-invariant, consider the two systems:

• System A: $y(t)=tx(t)$ • System B: $y(t)=10x(t)$ Since the System Function $y(t)$ for system A explicitly depends on t outside of $x(t)$ , it is not time-invariant because the time-dependence is not explicitly a function of the input function.

In contrast, system B's time-dependence is only a function of the time-varying input $x(t)$ . This makes system B time-invariant.

The Formal Example below shows in more detail that while System B is a Shift-Invariant System as a function of time, t, System A is not.

## Formal example

A more formal proof of why systems A and B above differ is now presented. To perform this proof, the second definition will be used.

System A: Start with a delay of the input $x_{d}(t)=x(t+\delta )$ $y(t)=tx(t)$ $y_{1}(t)=tx_{d}(t)=tx(t+\delta )$ Now delay the output by $\delta$ $y(t)=tx(t)$ $y_{2}(t)=y(t+\delta )=(t+\delta )x(t+\delta )$ Clearly $y_{1}(t)\neq y_{2}(t)$ , therefore the system is not time-invariant.
System B: Start with a delay of the input $x_{d}(t)=x(t+\delta )$ $y(t)=10x(t)$ $y_{1}(t)=10x_{d}(t)=10x(t+\delta )$ Now delay the output by $\delta$ $y(t)=10x(t)$ $y_{2}(t)=y(t+\delta )=10x(t+\delta )$ Clearly $y_{1}(t)=y_{2}(t)$ , therefore the system is time-invariant.

More generally, the relationship between the input and output is

$y(t)=f(x(t),t),$ and its variation with time is

${\frac {\mathrm {d} y}{\mathrm {d} t}}={\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}+{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} x}{\mathrm {d} t}}.$ For time-invariant systems, the system properties remain constant with time,

${\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}=0.$ Applied to Systems A and B above:

$f_{A}=tx(t)\qquad \implies \qquad {\frac {\partial f_{A}}{\partial t}}=x(t)\neq 0$ in general, so it is not time-invariant,
$f_{B}=10x(t)\qquad \implies \qquad {\frac {\partial f_{B}}{\partial t}}=0$ so it is time-invariant.

## Abstract example

We can denote the shift operator by $\mathbb {T} _{r}$ where $r$ is the amount by which a vector's index set should be shifted. For example, the "advance-by-1" system

$x(t+1)=\delta (t+1)*x(t)$ can be represented in this abstract notation by

${\tilde {x}}_{1}=\mathbb {T} _{1}{\tilde {x}}$ where ${\tilde {x}}$ is a function given by

${\tilde {x}}=x(t)\forall t\in \mathbb {R}$ with the system yielding the shifted output

${\tilde {x}}_{1}=x(t+1)\forall t\in \mathbb {R}$ So $\mathbb {T} _{1}$ is an operator that advances the input vector by 1.

Suppose we represent a system by an operator $\mathbb {H}$ . This system is time-invariant if it commutes with the shift operator, i.e.,

$\mathbb {T} _{r}\mathbb {H} =\mathbb {H} \mathbb {T} _{r}\forall r$ If our system equation is given by

${\tilde {y}}=\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}$ then it is time-invariant if we can apply the system operator $\mathbb {H}$ on ${\tilde {x}}$ followed by the shift operator $\mathbb {T} _{r}$ , or we can apply the shift operator $\mathbb {T} _{r}$ followed by the system operator $\mathbb {H}$ , with the two computations yielding equivalent results.

Applying the system operator first gives

$\mathbb {T} _{r}\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}=\mathbb {T} _{r}{\tilde {y}}={\tilde {y}}_{r}$ Applying the shift operator first gives

$\mathbb {H} \mathbb {T} _{r}{\tilde {x}}=\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}_{r}$ If the system is time-invariant, then

$\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}_{r}={\tilde {y}}_{r}$ 