To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Third Era of Northern Domination

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Third Era of Northern Domination
Bắc thuộc lần thứ ba
北屬吝次𠀧
602–905 or 938
Northern Vietnam as the southernmost Jiaozhou with capital Jiaozhi (Hanoi) under the Sui dynasty
Northern Vietnam as the southernmost Jiaozhou with capital Jiaozhi (Hanoi) under the Sui dynasty
StatusProvince of Sui dynasty, Tang dynasty,  Zhou dynasty, Southern Han dynasty
Autonomous polity under the Khúc clan (after 905)
CapitalSongping
Đại La
Emperor 
• 602–604
Emperor Wen of Sui (first)
• 618–626
Emperor Gaozu of Tang
• 917–938
Emperor Gaozu of Southern Han (last)
Jiedushi 
• 905
Dugu Sun
• 905–907
Khúc Thừa Dụ (Autonomous period)
• 907–917
Khúc Hạo
• 923–937
Dương Đình Nghệ
• 937–938
Kiều Công Tiễn (Last)
History 
602–605
• Sui dynasty annexed kingdom of Vạn Xuân
602
• Vietnam under Tang dynasty
618
679
854–866
• End of Tang rules
880
905 or 938
CurrencyCash coins
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Early Lý dynasty
Ngô dynasty
Today part ofVietnam
China

The Third Era of Northern Domination refers to the third period of Chinese rule in Vietnamese history. The era starts from the end of the Early Lý dynasty in 602 to the rise of the local Khúc family and other Viet warlords in the early 10th century, finally ending in 938 after the defeat of the Southern Han armada by the Viet leader Ngô Quyền. This period saw three Chinese imperial dynasties rule over what is today northern Vietnam: Sui, Tang and Wu Zhou. The Sui dynasty ruled northern Vietnam from 602 to 618, and briefly reoccupied central Vietnam in 605. The successive Tang dynasty ruled northern Vietnam from 621 to 690, and again from 705 to 880. Between 690 and 705, the Tang dynasty was briefly interrupted by the Wu Zhou dynasty which maintained Chinese rule over Vietnam.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    4 055 804
    613 496
    4 103 682
    5 235 967
    694 419
  • Communists, Nationalists, and China's Revolutions: Crash Course World History #37
  • World War II: Crash Course European History #38
  • Reconstruction and 1876: Crash Course US History #22
  • Imperialism: Crash Course World History #35
  • Expansion and Consequences: Crash Course European History #5

Transcription

Hi, I’m John Green, and this is Crash Course World History and today we’re going to return— sadly for the last time on Crash Course— to China. By the way, Stan brought cupcakes. That’s good. I wish I could draw some parallel between this and China, but I got nothing. It’s just delicious. I’ll sure miss you, piece of felt Danica cut out in the shape of China using blue because we felt red would be cliché. Mr. Green, Mr. Green, Mr Green! You don’t get to talk until you shave the mustache, Me From The Past. So the 20th century was pretty big for China because it saw not one but two revolutions. China’s 1911 revolution might be a bigger deal from a world historical perspective than the more famous communist revolution of 1949, but you wouldn’t know it because 1. china’s communism became a really big deal during the cold war, and 2. Mao Zedong, the father of communist China, was really good at self-promotion. Like, you know his famous book of sayings? Pretty much everyone in China just had to own it. And I mean, HAD TO. [makes sense; staff only allowed to read John Green books] [best] [intro music] [intro music] [intro music] [intro music] [intro music] [ever] So as you know doubt recall from past episodes of Crash Course, China lost the Opium wars in the 19th century, resulting in European domination, spheres of influence, et cetera, all of which was deeply embarrassing to the Qing dynasty and led to calls for reform. One strand of reform that called for China to adopt European military technology and education systems was called self strengthening, and it was probably would have been a great idea, considering how well that worked for Japan. But it never happened in China-- well, at least not until recently. Instead, China experienced the disastrous anti-Western Boxer Rebellion of 1900, which helped spur some young liberals, including one named Sun Yat Sen, to plot the overthrow of the dynasty. Oh, it’s already time for the Open Letter... [unscoffingly skids across unscoured set] An open letter to Sun Yat Sen. Oh, but first, let’s see what’s in the secret compartment today. Oh, more champagne poppers? [seriously, more champagne poppers?] Stan, at this point aren’t we sort of belaboring the fact that China invented fireworks? Wow! That is innovation at work right there. We used to not be able to fire off one of these, and now we can fire off six at a time if you count the two secret ones from behind me. [strangest. job. ever.] Dear Sun Yat Sen, you were amazing! I mean the Republic of China calls you the father of the nation, the People’s Republic of China calls you the forerunner of the democratic revolution. You’re the only thing they can agree on. You lived in China, Japan, the United States, you converted to Christianity, you were a doctor, you were the godfather of an important science fiction writer. [not important enough to help "Cordwainer" catch on as a popular baby name, however] But the infuriating thing is that you never actually got much of a chance to rule China, and you would have been great at it. I mean, your three principles of the people, Nationalism, Democracy, and the People’s Livelihood, are three really great principles. I mean the problem, aside from you not living long enough is that you just didn’t have a face for Warhol portraits. [Warhol thought anyone who had $25k had a face for his portraits, but point taken] Huh, it’s too bad. Best wishes, John Green. So the 1911 revolution that led to the end of the Qing started when a bomb accidentally exploded, at which point the revolutionaries were like, “we’re probably going to be outed, so we should just start the uprising now.” The uprising probably would’ve been quelled like many before it except this time the army joined the rebellion, because they wanted to become more modern. The Qing emperor abdicated, and the rebels chose a general, Yuan Shikai, as leader, while Sun Yat Sen was declared president of a provisional republic on Jan 1, 1912. A new government was created with a Senate and a Lower House, and it was supposed to write a new constitution. And after the first elections, Sun Yat Sen’s party, the Guomindang were the largest, but they weren’t the majority. So Sun Yat Sen deferred to Yuan, which turned out to be a huge mistake because he then outlawed the Guomindang party and ruled as dictator. But when Yuan Shikai died in 1916, China’s first non-dynastic government in over 3000 years completely fell apart. Localism reasserted itself with large-scale landlords with small-scale armies ruling all the parts of China that weren’t controlled by foreigners. You might remember this phenomenon from earlier in Chinese history, first during the Warring States period and then again for three hundred years between the end of the Han and the rise of the Sui. So the period in Chinese history between 1912 and 1949 is sometimes called the Chinese Republic, although that gives the government a bit too much credit. The leading group trying to re-form China into a nation state was the Guomindang, but after 1920 the Chinese Communist Party was also in the mix. And for the Guomindang to regain power from those big landlords and reunify China, they needed some help from the CCP. Now if an alliance between Communists and Nationalists sounds like a match made in hell, well, yes. It was. That said, the two did manage to patch things up for a while in the early 1920s, you know, for the sake of the kids. But then Sun Yat Sen died in 1925 and the alliance fell apart in 1927 when Guomindang leader Chaing Kai Shek got mad at the communists for trying to foment socialist revolution, to which the communists were like, “But that’s what we do, man. We’re communists.” Anyway, this turned out to be a bad break up for a bunch of reasons, but mainly because it started a civil war between the Communists and the Nationalists. We’re not going to get into exhausting detail on the civil war but Spoiler alert: the Communists won. But there are a few things to point out: First, even though Mao [pronounced like Maori] emerged victorious, he and the communists were almost wiped out in 1934 except that they made a miraculous and harrowing escape, trekking from southern China to the mountains in the north in what has become famously known as the Long March, a great example of historians missing an opportunity since it could easily have been called the Long Ass March, as it featured donkeys. Second, for much of the time the Gomindang was trying to crush the CCP, significant portions of China were being occupied and/or invaded by Japan. Thirdly, the Communists were just better at fighting the Japanese than the Nationalists were. In spite of the fact that Chiang Kai Shek had extensive support from the U.S. And each time the Nationalists failed against the Japanese, their prestige among their fellow Chinese diminished. It wasn’t helped by Nationalist corruption, or their collecting onerous taxes from Chinese peasants, or stories about Nationalist troops putting on civilian clothes and abandoning the city of Nanking during its awful destruction by the Japanese army in 1937. Meanwhile, the Communists were winning over the peasants in their northwestern enclave by making sure that troops didn’t pillage local land and by giving peasants a greater say in local government. Now, that isn’t to say everything was rosy under Mao’s communist leadership, even at its earliest stages. By the way, That is an actual chalk illustration. Very impressed. [thanks, boss.] In a preview of things to come, in 1942 Mao initiated a “rectification” program. Which basically meant students and intellectuals were sent down into the countryside to give them a taste of what “real China” was like in an effort to re-educate them. We try to be politically neutral here on Crash Course, but we are always opposed to intellectuals doing hard labor. [lolzer] But anyway, within four years of the end of World War II the Communists routed Chiang Kai Shek’s armies and sent them off to Taiwan. and these military victories paved the way for Mao to declare the People’s Republic of China on October 1, 1949. so once in power, Mao and the PRC were faced with the task of creating a new, socialist state. And Mao declared early on that the working class in China would be the leaders of a “people’s democratic dictatorship.” Oh democratic dictatorships. You’re the BEST. It’s all the best parts of democracy, and all the best parts of dictatorship. You get to vote, but there’s only one choice. It takes all the pesky thinking out it. The PRC promised equal rights for women, rent reduction, land redistribution, new heavy industry and lots of freedoms. Including freedoms of “thought, speech, publication, assembly, association, correspondence, person, domicile, moving from one place to another, religious belief, and the freedom to hold processions and demonstrations.” Yeah, NO. Even putting aside the PRC’s failure to protect any of those rights, Mao’s China wasn’t much fun if you were a landlord or even if you were a peasant who’d done well. Land redistribution and reform meant destroying the power of landlords, often violently. But centralizing power and checking individual ambition proved difficult for the government, and it was made harder by China’s involvement in the Korean War, which helped spur the first mass campaign of Mao’s democratic dictatorship. Designed to encourage support for the War, the campaign was called the “Resist America and Aid Korea campaign,” [name's a bit clunky, innit?] and it resulted in almost all foreigners leaving China. A second campaign, against “counterrevolutionaries” was much worse. People suspected of sympathizing with the Guomindang, or anyone insufficiently communist, was subject to humiliation and violence. Between October 1950 and August 1951 28,332 people accused of being spies or counterrevolutionaries were executed in Guandong city alone. A third mass campaign, the “Three Anti Campaign” w as aimed at reforming the Communist party itself. And the final mass campaign, the Five Anti Campaign was an assault on all bourgeois capitalism, which effectively killed private business in China. Very few of the victims of this last campaign actually died, but capitalism was weakened and state control bolstered. OK, let’s go to the Thought Bubble. Mao and the CCP set out to turn China into an industrial powerhouse by following the Soviet model. We haven’t really talked about this, but under the Soviet system, Russia was able to accomplish massive industrialization-- not to mention tens of millions of deaths from starvation-- through centralized planning and collectivization of agriculture, following what were known as Five Year Plans. The Chinese adopted the model of Five Year Plans beginning in 1953 and the first one worked, at least as far as industrialization was concerned. In fact, the plan worked even better than expected, with industry increasing 121% more than projected. In order for this to work though, the peasants had to grow lots of grain and sell it at extremely low prices. This kept inflation in check, and saving was encouraged by the fact that... ...the Five Year Plan didn’t have many consumer goods, so there was nothing to buy. For urban workers, living standards improved and China’s population grew to 646 million. So far, Mao’s plan seemed to be working, but there was no way that China could keep up that growth, especially without some backsliding into capitalism. So Mao came up with a terrible idea called the Great Leap Forward. Mao essentially decided that the nation could be psyched up into more industrial productivity. Among many other bad ideas, he famously ordered that individuals build small steel furnaces in their backyard to increase steel production. This was not a good idea. First off, it didn’t actually increase steel production much. Secondly, it turns out that people making steel in their backyard who know nothing about making steel… Make Bad Steel. But the worst idea was to pay for heavy machinery from the USSR with exported grain. This meant there was less for peasants to eat— and as a result, between 1959 and 1962, 20 million people died, probably half of whom were under the age of 10. Jeez,Thought Bubble, that was sad. And then in happier news came the Cultural Revolution! Just kidding, it sucked. By the middle of the sixties, Mao was afraid that China’s revolution was running out of steam, and he didn’t want China to end up just a bureaucratized police state like, you know, most of the Soviet bloc. and The Cultural Revolution was an attempt to capture the glory days of the revolution and fire up the masses, and what better way to do that than to empower the kids. Frustrated students who were unable find decent, fulfilling jobs jumped at the chance to denounce their teachers, employers, and sometimes even their parents and to tear down tradition, which often meant demolishing buildings and art. The ranks of these “Red Guards” swelled and anyone representing the so-called “four olds” —old culture, old habits, old ideas, and old customs— was subject to humiliation and violence. Intellectuals were again sent to the countryside as they were in 1942; millions were persecuted; and countless historical and religious artifacts were destroyed. But the real aim of the Cultural Revolution was to consolidate Mao’s revolution, and while his image still looms large, it’s hard to say that China these days is a socialist state. Many would argue that Mao’s revolution was extremely short-lived, and that the real change in China happened in 1911. That’s when the Chinese Republic ended 3,000 years of dynastic history and forever broke the cyclical pattern the Chinese had used to understand their past. I mean at least in some senses, those Nationalist revolutionaries literally put an end to history. That sense of living in a truly New World has made many great and terrible things possible for China but the legacy of China’s two revolutions is mixed at best. China, for instance, made most of the camera we use to film this video. And China made most of the computers we use to edit. [i see what you did there, Stanny] But no one in the People’s Republic of China will legally be able to watch this video, because the government blocks YouTube. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan Muller. Our script supervisor is Meredith Danko. Our associate producer is Danica Johnson. The show is written by my high school history teacher Raoul Meyer and myself, and our graphics team is [not Secretly Canadian] Thought Bubble. Last week’s phrase of the week was "Disco Golf Ball." If you want to guess at this week’s phrase of the week or suggest future ones, you can do so in comments, where you can also ask questions about today's videos that will be answered by our team of historians. If you like Crash Course, make sure you’ve subscribed. Thanks for watching, and as we say in my hometown, Don’tForget The easiest time to add insult to injury is when signing somebody's cast.

History

Sui rule

By late AD 500s, Jiaozhou (northern Vietnam) was ruled autonomously by a regime of localized Chinese Early Lý dynasty.[1] As the Sui dynasty consolidated power in China, Lý Phật Tử acknowledge Sui overlordship in 589. In 602 when Ly Phat Tu openly rebelled, Emperor Wen of Sui deployed General Liu Fang and 27,000 troops, conquering the region.[2][3] In 605, Yang Jian pushed further south, invaded the Cham Simhapura kingdom in central Vietnam, briefly set up an administration and divided the country into 3 counties: Tỷ Ảnh, Hải Âm and Tượng Lâm.[4]

Liu Fang was nominated as the viceroy of Jiaozhou. He died while returning from Champa to the north and Qiu He (丘和) replaced him to rule the land. However, in 618, Emperor Gaozu of Tang overthrew the Sui dynasty and established the Tang dynasty. Qiu He first submitted to Xiao Xian's empire in 618, then to the Tang emperor in 622, incorporating northern Vietnam into the Tang dynasty.[5] A local ruler of Jiuzhen (today's Thanh Hóa), Lê Ngọc, stayed loyal to Xiao Xian and fought against the Tang for another three years.

Tang rule

In 627, Emperor Taizong launched an administrative reform which reduced the number of provinces. In 679, Jiaozhou province was replaced with the Protectorate General to Pacify the South (Annan Duhufu). This administrative unit was used by the Tang to govern non-Chinese populations on the frontiers, similar to the Protectorate General to Pacify the West in Central Asia and the Protectorate General to Pacify the East in northern Korea.[6] Every four years, the "southern selection" would choose aboriginal chiefs to be appointed to fill positions of the fifth degree and above. Taxation was more moderate than within the empire proper; the harvest tax was one-half the standard rate, an acknowledgement of the political problems inherent in ruling a non-Chinese population.[7] Native girls of Vietnam: Tais, Viets and others were also targeted by the slave traders.[8] The women of Viet tribes were most likely used as everyday household slaves and handmaidens during most of the Tang.[9]

For the first time since the Han dynasty, Chinese schools were built, and dykes were constructed to protect the capital city of Songping (later Đại La). The Red River delta was the largest agricultural plain in the empire's south, with roads connecting Champa and Zhenla to the south and the southwest, and sea routes connected to the Indian Ocean.[10][11][12] Buddhism flourished in Annan, although the Tang's official religion was Daoism. At least 6 monks from northern Vietnam traveled to China, Srivijaya, India and Sri Lanka during the Tang period.[13] Very few natives engaged in the Confucian scholarship and civil service examination.[14]

Revolts and notable events

In 687, the Li chief Lý Tự Tiên rebelled against Tang authority due to the governor of Annan, Liu Yanyou, doubled the taxes. Liu Yanyou killed Lý but couldn't stop the rebellion and was killed. Cao Xuanjing marched into Annan, put down the rebellion, and executed the rebel leader Đinh Kiến.[15]

In 722, Mai Thúc Loan from Jiude (today Hà Tĩnh Province) led a large insurrection against Chinese rule. Styling himself "Swarthy Emperor" or "Black Emperor" (Hắc Đẽ), he rallied 400,000 people from 23 counties to join, and also allied with Champa and Chenla, an unknown kingdom named Jinlin ("Gold Neighbor") and other unnamed kingdoms.[16][17] A Tang army of 100,000 under general Yang Zixu, including a multitude of mountain tribesmen who had remained loyal to the Tang, marched directly along the coast, following the old road built by Ma Yuan.[16] Yang Zixu attacked Mai Thúc Loan by surprise and suppressed the rebellion in 723. The corpses of the Swarthy Emperor and his followers were piled up to form a huge mound and were left on public display to check further revolts.[18][19] Later from 726 to 728, Yang Zixu suppressed other rebellions of Li and Nung peoples led by Chen Xingfan and Feng Lin in the north, who proclaimed the title "Emperor of Nanyue", causing another 80,000 deaths.[17][19]

Because of the An Lushan rebellion in 755, the Annan Protectorate's name was briefly changed to Zhennan Protectorate (guarded south).[20] In 767, the northern Vietnam coast was invaded by Shailendra/Javanese army but was driven back by Chinese general Zhang Boyi.[21] In 785, chieftains of the indigenous, Đỗ Anh Hàn and Phùng Hưng, rebelled due to Tang governor Gao Zhengping's doubling of taxes. Tang forces retook Annan in 791.[22][21] In 803 and 809, Champa raided southern Annan.[23] Troops working on garrison fortifications also revolted.[24] From 803 to 863, local rebels killed or expelled no fewer than six protector-generals of Annan.[24] In 820, Dương Thanh seized Songping and killed the protectorate general. Dương Thanh was unpopular due to his cruelty and put to death by the locals soon after, however the region continued to experience disorders for the next 16 years.[25]

Nanzhao invasion

Nanzhao Kingdom

In 854, the new governor of Annan, Li Zhuo, provoked hostiles and conflicts with the mountain tribes by reducing the salt trade and killing powerful chieftains, resulting in the defection of prominent local leaders to the Nanzhao Kingdom. The local chief Lý Do Độc, the Đỗ clan, the warlord Chu Đạo Cổ, as well as others, submitted or allied with Nanzhao.[26][27] In 858 they sacked the capital of Annan. In the same year the Tang court responded by appointing Wang Shi as the military governor of Annan, aiming to restore order, strengthen the defense of Songping.[28] Wang Shi was recalled to deal with the rebellion of Qiu Fu in Zhejiang in late 860. Northern Vietnam then degenerated back to chaos and turmoil. The new Chinese military governor, Li Hu, executed Đỗ Thủ Trừng, a prominent local chief, thus alienating many of the powerful local clans of Annan.[29] The Nanzhao army was initially welcomed by the locals, and their joint force captured Songping in January 861, forced Li Hu to flee.[30] The Tang managed to retake the region in summer 861. In spring 863 Nanzhao and rebels numbered 50,000 under generals Yang Sijin and Duan Qiuqian launched the Siege of Songping. The city fell in late January as the Chinese army withdrew north.[31][32] The Protectorate of Annan was abolished.[33]

The Tang launched a counterattack in September 864 under Gao Pian, an experienced general who had fought the Türks and the Tanguts in the north. In winter 865–866, Gao Pian recaptured Songping and northern Vietnam, and expelled Nanzhao from the region.[34] Gao punished local people who had allied with Nanzhao, executed Chu Đạo Cổ and 30,000 local rebels.[35] In 868 he renamed the region to "The Peaceful Sea Army" (Jinghai guan). He rebuilt the citadel Sin Songping, named it Đại La, repaired 5,000 meters of damaged city wall and reconstructed 400,000 bays for its residents.[34] He was well respected even by the later Vietnamese.[36]

End of Chinese rule

The Tang continued campaigning against local chieftains in Annan in 874 and 879. In 877, troops deployed from Annan in Guangxi mutined. In 880, the army in Annan mutinied, took the city of Đại La, and forced the military commissioner Zeng Gun to flee, ending de facto Chinese control in Vietnam.[37]

By 880, power was transferred to the local Sino-indigenous elites who governed in the name of Tang. At that point the region was probably still very diverse in terms of ethno-linguistics with a predominance of Kra-Dai and Austroasiatic-speaking peoples, who have since been marginalized by Chinese and Vietnamese histories, as historian and archaeologist John N. Miksic speculates. In 905, a leader named Khúc Thừa Dụ came to power as commissioner for Tĩnh Hải quân (Jinghai guan).[38] The Khúc's origins are unknown but they manipulated the Later Liang dynasty court in the north to maintain their own autonomy. In 930, the emperor of Southern Han Liu Yan attacked Jinghai and removed the Khuc family from power.[39] In late 931, Duong Dinh Nghe, a noble from Aizhou (Thanh Hoa) who was much less sinicized than the Khucs revolted and ousted Southern Han. However Duong Dinh Nghe was assassinated in 937 by a leader of a pro-Chinese faction bent on restoring the sinified leadership he had displaced. Ngo Quyen, son-in-law of Duong, quickly overthrew of the revanchist leaders and defeated the meddling Southern Han fleet in the Battle of Bạch Đằng River in late 938.[40] In 939, he claimed himself king (vua), and chose the ancient town of Co Loa as the court's capital.[41] The Jinghai Circuit became a de facto independent state, and it could be considered that Vietnamese history came into its own at that point.[42]

List of governors

Viceroy of Jiaozhou

  • Liu Fang
  • Qiu He (-619) under Sui (619-626) under Tang
  • Li Daliang
  • Li Shou
  • Li Daoxing
  • Li Dao’an
  • Li Jian

Duhu of Annam

Abe no Nakamaro served as a Chinese governor of northern Vietnam from 761 to 767.
  • Liu Yanyou 681-687
  • Guo Chuke
  • Abe no Nakamaro 761-767 (Duhu of Zhennan)
  • Wu Chongfu 777-782
  • Li Mengqiu 782
  • Zhang Ying 788
  • Pang Fu 789
  • Gao Zhengping 790-791
  • Zhao Chang 791-802
  • Pei 802-803
  • Zhao Chang 804-806
  • Ma Zong 806-810
  • Zhang Mian 813
  • Pei Xingli 813-817
  • Li Xianggu 817-819 - killed by Yang Qing
  • Yang Qing 819-820 - rebelled and killed by Gui Zhongwu
  • Gui Zhongwu 819-820
  • Pei Xingli 820
  • Gui Zhongwu 820-822
  • Wang Chengbian 822
  • Li Yuanxi 822-826
  • Han Yue 827-828
  • Zheng Chuo 831
  • Liu Min 833
  • Han Wei 834
  • Tian Zao 835
  • Ma Zhi 836-840
  • Wu Hun 843
  • Pei Yuanyu 846-847
  • Tian Zaiyou 849-850
  • Cui Geng 852
  • Li Zhuo 853-855
  • Song Ya 857
  • Li Hongfu 857-858
  • Wang Shi 858-860 (military Jinglueshi during Nanzhao invasions)
  • Li Hu 860-861
  • Wang Kuan 861-862
  • Cai Xi 862-863 (military Jinglueshi)
  • Song Rong 863 (de jure Jinglueshi, Annam invaded by Nanzhao)
  • Zhang Yin 864 (de jure Jinglueshi, Annam invaded by Nanzhao)

Jiedushi of Jinghai

  • Gao Pian 864-866
  • Wang Yanquan 866
  • Gao Xun 868-873
  • Zeng Gun 878-880 (abandoned post due to a rebel)
  • Jing Yanzong (敬彥宗)
  • Gao Maoqing 882-883
  • Xie Zhao (謝肇) 884-?
  • An Youquan 897-900
  • Sun Dezhao 901-?
  • Zhu Quanyu 905
  • Dugu Sun 905

Independent Jiedushi

Culture and religion

Gold-gilded box contains sacred Śarīra, made in 6nd year of Zhenguan-貞觀 (632), from Nhạn Tháp pagoda, Nghệ An.

Revival of direct Tang control over northern Vietnam for two centuries resulted in a hybrid Tang-indigenous culture, political and legal structures.[43] Local sinicized elites used Chinese script, and ordinary people and tribesmen adopted personal names and name styles that corresponded to Vietnamese personal names until now.[44] A large number of Chinese officers and soldiers were sent to northern Vietnam, some of whom married Vietnamese women and settled down.[43] Buddhism thrived in northern Vietnam throughout the Tang era. Some of Chinese monks came and taught Chinese Buddhism in Annan. Wu Yantong (d. 820), a prominent Chinese monk in northern Vietnam, brought a new sect of Chan Buddhism that survived for about five centuries.[43] Vietnamese women had large roles and status in religious life and society.[45] Buddhist texts were written in Chinese, and recited with Vietnamese pronunciation.[43] Vietnamese temples and monasteries differed with Chinese and other East Asian countries in their role as the đình, the village spiritual center, where village elders met.[43]

Indigenous Confucianist scholarly elites remained very relatively small.[13] In 845, a Tang official reported to the throne that "Annan has produced no more than eight imperial officials; senior graduates have not exceeded ten." Liêu Hữu Phương was the only recorded student from Northern Vietnam to have passed the classical exams in 816 in the Tang capital of Chang'an. He succeeded on his second attempt and became a librarian at the imperial court.[13]

See also

References

Citations

  1. ^ Holcombe 2019, p. 303.
  2. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 162.
  3. ^ Wright 1979, p. 109.
  4. ^ Schafer 1967, p. 74.
  5. ^ Walker 2012, p. 179.
  6. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 171.
  7. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 188.
  8. ^ Schafer 1967, p. 56.
  9. ^ Schafer 1967, p. 57.
  10. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 174.
  11. ^ Kiernan 2019, pp. 111–112.
  12. ^ Holcombe 2019, p. 304.
  13. ^ a b c Kiernan 2019, p. 109.
  14. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 111.
  15. ^ Taylor 1983, pp. 188–189.
  16. ^ a b Taylor 1983, p. 192.
  17. ^ a b Schafer 1967, p. 63.
  18. ^ Walker 2012, p. 180.
  19. ^ a b Taylor 1983, p. 193.
  20. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 197.
  21. ^ a b Schafer 1967, p. 64.
  22. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 212.
  23. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 177.
  24. ^ a b Kiernan 2019, p. 114.
  25. ^ Schafer 1967, p. 65.
  26. ^ Wang 2013, p. 121.
  27. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 118.
  28. ^ Taylor 1983, pp. 241–242.
  29. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 243.
  30. ^ Wang 2013, p. 123.
  31. ^ Kiernan 2019, pp. 120–121.
  32. ^ Schafer 1967, pp. 67–68.
  33. ^ Schafer 1967, p. 68.
  34. ^ a b Wang 2013, p. 124.
  35. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 123.
  36. ^ Paine 2013, p. 304.
  37. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 124.
  38. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 126.
  39. ^ Clark 2009, p. 170.
  40. ^ Taylor 1983, p. 268.
  41. ^ Clark 2009, p. 171.
  42. ^ Kiernan 2019, p. 131.
  43. ^ a b c d e Walker 2012, p. 184.
  44. ^ Salmon 2004, pp. 209–211.
  45. ^ Salmon 2004, p. 209.

Bibliography

  • Clark, Hugh (2009), "The Southern Kingdoms between the T'ang and the Sung, 907–979", in Twitchett, Denis; Fairbank, John K. (eds.), The Sung Dynasty and Its Precursors, 907-1279, Part 1, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–205
  • Dutton, George E. (2012), Sources of Vietnamese Tradition, Columbia University Press
  • Holcombe, Charles (2019), "Foreign relation", in Dien, Albert E.; Knapp, Keith (eds.), The Six Dynasties, 220–589, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 296–308
  • Kasimin, Amran (1991), Religion and social change among the indigenous people of the Malay Peninsula, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, ISBN 9-8362-2265-0
  • Kiernan, Ben (2019). Việt Nam: a history from earliest time to the present. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-190-05379-6.
  • Paine, Lincoln (2013), The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World, United States of America: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  • Salmon, Claudine (2004), "Tang-Viet society as reflected in a Buddhist bell inscription", in Shing, Müller; Höllmann, Thomas O. (eds.), Archäologie und Frühe Texte, Germany: Harrassowitz, pp. 195–216, ISBN 978-3-447-05060-9
  • Schafer, Edward Hetzel (1967), The Vermilion Bird, Los Angeles: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-01145-8
  • Taylor, Keith Weller (1983), The Birth of the Vietnam, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-07417-0
  • Walker, Hugh Dyson (2012), East Asia: A New History, ISBN 978-1-477-26516-1
  • Wang, Zhenping (2013). Tang China in Multi-Polar Asia: A History of Diplomacy and War. University of Hawaii Press.
  • Wright, Arthur F. (1979), "The Sui dynasty (581–617)", in Twitchett, Denis Crispin; Fairbank, John King (eds.), Sui and T'ang China, 589-906 AD, Part One. Volume 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–149
Preceded by Period of the History of Vietnam
602–905/938
Succeeded by
This page was last edited on 2 December 2023, at 01:13
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.