To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

There is no chronological order in the Torah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is no chronological order in the Torah (Hebrew: אין מוקדם ומאוחר בתורה, literally "There is no early and late in the Torah") is an expression used by many Bible commentators when they encounter events which are out of chronological order. In rabbinic analysis, the issue of chronological order is related to the issue of semichut parshiyot (whether one can learn from one section of the Biblical text about another section which is adjacent to it).

Sources

Seemingly, the expression was first used in the Baraita on the Thirty-two Rules, which is traditionally attributed to Eliezer ben Jose (a 2nd-century tanna).[1] However, according to modern scholar Moshe Zucker, this work was in fact only written in the 10th century.[2]

The term first appears in the Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael,[3] and also in the Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon,[4] Sifre on Numbers,[5] and the Jerusalem Talmud.[6]

The Babylonian Talmud proves that "There is no chronological order in the Torah" from the fact that Numbers 9:1 occurred on the first day of Nisan, while the earlier verse Numbers 1:1 occurred on the first day of Iyyar, a month later. In the ensuing discussion, Rav Pappa limits the application of the rule to cases of different matter, but within a single topic he says the Torah's narrative must be chronological.[7] Later commentators disagree over the definition of a "matter": Rashi defines it as a parashah, while Rabbeinu Hananel defines it as a single topic of discussion.

The first Bible commentator to use the term was Rashi, who used it frequently, as did Ibn Ezra and the Torah Temimah. In contrast, Nachmanides argued that the Torah's order is generally chronological. Raavan argued that the principle only applies in the Torah, and not in the Nevi'im or Ketuvim. Yoel Bin-Nun argued that the Torah is chronological except where it specifies otherwise.[8]

Examples

The commandments in Leviticus 25 are stated as being given to Moses "on Mount Sinai",[9] seemingly earlier in time than the ritual commandments of Leviticus chapters 1–24. Ibn Ezra explains that Leviticus 25 was indeed given before the ritual commandments, but was recorded later due to its thematic connection to the passages around it (Leviticus 18 and 26).[10] In contrast, Nachmanides asserts that the passage is in chronological order, as only at this point did Moses relay to the people the commands he had previously been given on Mount Sinai.[11]

References

  1. ^ Baraita on the Thirty-two Rules, rules 31 and 32. This work is printed after Kitzur Klalei HaTalmud at the end of Tractate Berachot in the Vilna Shas.
  2. ^ Moshe Zucker, "LePitaron Baayat 32 Middot uMishnat R' Eliezer", PAAJR 23 (1954), p. 1-39
  3. ^ Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael, Shirah 7
  4. ^ Mekhilta of Rabbi Shimon chapter 15
  5. ^ Sifre on Numbers, Behaalotecha 64
  6. ^ Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 7a and elsewhere
  7. ^ Pesachim 6b
  8. ^ היום השמיני ויום הכיפורים, footnote 3
  9. ^ Leviticus 25:1
  10. ^ Ibn Ezra, Leviticus 25:1
  11. ^ Ramban, Leviticus 25:1
This page was last edited on 20 June 2023, at 10:29
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.