To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth
AuthorBlake Gumprecht
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Published1999
PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press[1]
Media typePrint
Pages369 pp[1]
ISBN978-0-8018-6047-8

The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth is a 1999 non-fiction book by American writer Blake Gumprecht.[1][2]

Overview

An investigative look into the history of the Los Angeles River and the crucial role it played in the settlement and growth of Los Angeles.

Article

A December 8, 2003, article by writer Charlie LeDuff for The New York Times entitled Los Angeles by Kayak: Vistas of Concrete Banks was accused of drawing from The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth. One week later, on December 15, 2003, The New York Times appended a clarification:[3]

An article last Monday about the Los Angeles River recounted its history and described the reporter's trip downriver in a kayak. In research for the article, the reporter consulted a 1999 book by Blake Gumprecht, "The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth." Several passages relating facts and lore about the river distilled passages from the book. Although the facts in those passages were confirmed independently—through other sources or the reporter's first hand observation—the article should have acknowledged the significant contribution of Mr. Gumprecht's research.

Editors' Note, December 15, 2003

LeDuff discussed various accusations made against his reporting in a March 11, 2008 interview with essayist Dan Schneider.[4]

References

External links


This page was last edited on 23 July 2023, at 20:47
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.