To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

The Fool of Quality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title page to volume five of the first edition

The Fool of Quality; or, The History of Henry, Earl of Moreland (176570), a picaresque and sentimental novel by the Irish writer Henry Brooke, is the only one of his works which has enjoyed any great reputation.[1] The somewhat shapeless plot is an account of the doings of young Harry Clinton, who, rejected by his decadent and aristocratic father, is educated on enlightened principles by his philanthropic uncle. Thus equipped to fight the evils of the world the innocent yet wise hero does his best to better the lot of the unfortunate Hammel Clement and his family, and other deserving cases, in the intervals between the author’s frequent philosophical digressions and commentaries on the action.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    2 913
  • FOOL / ahhh... feat. 三角k (pro.WATT a.k.a ヨッテルブッテル)

Transcription

Influences

The Fool of Quality, it has been said, was

more deeply stamped with the seal of Rousseau — the Rousseau of the second Discourse and of Émile — than is any other book of the period…Before we can find anything approaching to this keenness of feeling, this revolt against the wrongs of the social system, we have to go forward to the years immediately succeeding the outbreak of the French revolution.[2]

It was also strongly influenced by John Locke's On Education, by the writings of the Christian mystic Jakob Böhme, and by the spirit of the Methodist movement.[3]

Publication history and reception

The Fool of Quality was privately published in 5 volumes in 1765-1770, and a revised edition was published by Edward Johnston in 1776. Reviews were at first unfavourable, but critics quickly came to appreciate the novel's virtues.[4] In 1781 a two-volume version was published under the title The History of Henry, Earl of Moreland, abridged and modified by John Wesley, and with a preface by him in which he wrote that the book

perpetually aims at inspiring and increasing every right affection; at the instilling gratitude to God and benevolence to man. And it does this, not by dry, dull, tedious precepts, but by the liveliest examples that can be conceived; by setting before your eyes one of the most beautiful pictures that ever was drawn in the world.[5]

The writer Thomas Day, author of The History of Sandford and Merton, was profoundly influenced by The Fool of Quality; indeed his biographer claims it was the book that appealed to him above all others.[6] Charles Kingsley, whose novel Yeast owes a considerable debt to The Fool of Quality, prepared his own edition of it in 1859. He considered the book "more pure, sacred and eternal than anything since the Faerie Queene".[7] In modern times The Fool of Quality's rambling and digressive structure, and the sentimental extravagances which it shares with other novels of sensibility, have prevented it from reaching a wide readership. Many would agree with the critic who, in 1806, noted that

an unnatural elevation is given to the most trifling circumstances and sentiments; every emotion is a rapture or an agony, every person seems to be the deity of the moment who attracts all eyes and all hearts; in short, we are in another world.[8]

Walter Allen went so far as to call it "one of the worst novels ever written, but a remarkable book".[9]

Notes

  1. ^ H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (eds.) The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography vol. 7, p. 897. A. W. Ward and A. R. Waller (eds.) The Cambridge History of English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913) vol. 10, p. 60: "He lives, indeed, by The Fool of Quality, and by that alone".
  2. ^ A. W. Ward and A. R. Waller (eds.) The Cambridge History of English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913) vol. 10, p. 59.
  3. ^ Margaret Drabble (eds.) The Oxford Companion to English Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) p. 372; George Sampson The Concise Cambridge History of English Literature (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1957) p. 495; A. W. Ward and A. R. Waller (eds.) The Cambridge History of English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913) vol. 10, p. 59.
  4. ^ Margaret Drabble (ed.) The Oxford Companion to English Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) p. 372; Catalogue entry at Copac; Markman Ellis The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) p. 130.
  5. ^ J. T. Gilbert A History of the City of Dublin (Dublin: James Duffy, 1861) vol. 3, p. 338.
  6. ^ George Warren Gignilliat, Jr. The Author of Sandford and Merton: A Life of Thomas Day, Esq (New York: Columbia University Press, 1932) p. 264.
  7. ^ Margaret Drabble (eds.) The Oxford Companion to English Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) p. 372.
  8. ^ Thomas Reynell, in Leigh Hunt (ed.) Classic Tales, Serious and Lively: With Critical Essays on the Merits and Reputation of the Authors (London: John Hunt & Carew Reynell, 1806-1807) vol. 1, p. 228.
  9. ^ Walter Allen The English Novel: A Short Critical History (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958) p. 86.

External links

This page was last edited on 17 March 2023, at 14:38
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.