To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Temporary Committee on the ECHELON Interception System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Temporary Committee on the ECHELON Interception System was a Committee of the European Parliament that was set up in 2000 to investigate the global surveillance network ECHELON. The committee issued its final report in 2001.[1]

Background

On 15 June 2000, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament proposed setting up a temporary committee on the ECHELON interception system. The goal of the committee was to confirm the existence of ECHELON and to assess the compatibility of such a system with European law.[2]

The committee was chaired by the Portuguese politician Carlos Coelho. It began investigating the ECHELON system in late 2000.[3]

Final report

In 2001, the committee concluded that the ECHELON surveillance system "almost certainly" existed, but it also acknowledged that beyond stepping up diplomatic pressure on the Five Eyes to abide by privacy laws, there is not much that the European Union could do to evade their surveillance.[4]

In its final report, the committee noted the following two features of the ECHELON surveillance network that is described as "unusual":

The first such feature attributed to it is the capacity to carry out quasi-total surveillance. Satellite receiver stations and spy satellites in particular are alleged to give it the ability to intercept any telephone, fax, Internet or e-mail message sent by any individual and thus to inspect its contents. The second unusual feature of ECHELON is said to be that the system operates worldwide on the basis of cooperation proportionate to their capabilities among several states (the UK, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), giving it an added value in comparison to national systems: the states participating in ECHELON (UKUSA states) can place their interception systems at each other’s disposal, share the cost and make joint use of the resulting information.[5]

However, due to opposition from major political parties, the report failed to attract much public attention. Carlos Coelho, a Portuguese politician who served as the committee's chairman, remarked that "everyone has chosen to forget this report and its conclusions".[6]

Controversy

The committee was first proposed by the European Green Party. However, the original plan was scrapped due to opposition from major political groups in the European Parliament.[7] According to critics, the committee has been unable to fully investigate the ECHELON system.[8]

Premature cancellation of delegation trip

In May 2001, as the committee was finalizing its report on ECHELON, a delegation was sent to Washington, D.C. to investigate the surveillance network, with planned trips to meet U.S. officials from various government bodies including the following agencies and departments:

All meetings were cancelled by the U.S. government and the committee was forced to end its trip prematurely. According to a BBC correspondent, "the Americans deny the very existence of the network and, not surprisingly, cold-shouldered the EU delegation".[9]

Several EU member states such as Britain and the Netherlands declined to contribute to the report and refused to co-operate with their parliaments to investigate the ECHELON system.[10]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ruuda, Marit (16 May 2001). "Echelon committee suspicions grow". EUobserver. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  2. ^ "Setting up a temporary committee on the ECHELON interception system". European Parliament. 29 June 2000. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  3. ^ "Echelon committee starts work". European Parliament. 14 September 2000. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  4. ^ Leyden, John (6 July 2001). "Europe should tackle home-grown Echelons, says MEP". The Register. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  5. ^ "Report on the existence of a global system for the interception of private and commercial communications (ECHELON interception system) (2001/2098(INI))". European Parliament. 11 July 2001. Retrieved 10 September 2013.
  6. ^ "Echelon and the European Parliament". European Parliament. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  7. ^ Buuren, Jelle (5 July 2000). "European Parliament votes against inquiry committee on Echelon". Heise Online. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  8. ^ Buuren, Jelle (9 June 2000). "Greens: European Parliament is obstructing inquiry on Echelon". Heise Online.
  9. ^ Roxburgh, Angus (11 May 2001). "EU investigators 'snubbed' in US". BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  10. ^ Hemmer Pihl, Luise (28 May 2001). "Danish parliament denies existence of Echelon". EUobserver. Retrieved 28 January 2014.

External links

This page was last edited on 23 April 2024, at 16:29
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.