To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Technical, Administrative and Supervisory Section

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TASS
Technical, Administrative and Supervisory Section
Merged intoManufacturing Science and Finance
Founded21 May 1913 (1913-05-21)
Dissolved1988
HeadquartersOnslow Hall, Richmond upon Thames[1]
Location
  • United Kingdom
Members
170,751 (1980)[1]
PublicationThe Draughtsman
TASS News and Journal[1]
Parent organization
Amalgamated Union of Engineering Workers (1970–1985)
AffiliationsTUC, CSEU, IMF, LMTU, Labour
Banner of AUEW-TASS

The Technical, Administrative and Supervisory Section (TASS) was a British trade union.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    85 739
    1 524 434
    508 462
  • Episode 144: Administrative Management and Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management
  • Learn how to manage people and be a better leader
  • Principles of Management - Lecture 01

Transcription

Although his work wasn't widely known in the United States until 1949, Henri Fayol is considered to be one of the fathers of modern management. Often referred to as the administrative theory, Fayol believed that the success of an enterprise was more dependent on the administrative ability of its leaders than on their technical ability. He came to this conclusion after reflecting on his own experiences as the managing director of a French steelmaker known as Comambault. You see Fayol was hired on as managing director, which was basically the equivalent of CEO, to oversee the liquidation of Comambault. Instead, Fayol put together a detailed plan on how to bring Comambault back to financial solvency. Within twelve years, Comambault had risen from its almost certain demise, and became one of the most valuable firms in all of France. While reflecting on his experiences, Fayol realized this success wasn't due to his engineering background, but rather his ability to manage people and get work done through others. In addition to founding the functions of management, which we now know as planning, organizing, leading, and controlling, Fayol developed the 14 principles of management. These principles were what Fayol believed would help organizations engage in effective management. And many of these principles have become common practices in organizations today. The first principle of management is the division of work, commonly referred to as the division of labor. Fayol believed that by separating work into smaller tasks it would allow workers to develop an expertise in a certain area. Since workers would perform only a series of specific tasks instead of a larger collection, it is rather safe to say that over time workers would become more proficient in these tasks. In addition, some workers are not suited for certain tasks. So by divided the work into a smaller set of tasks workers can be placed in areas where they can ultimately excel. The second principle is one of authority and responsibility. Fayol claimed that a managers authority should be consistent with his level of responsibility. While authority is viewed as the right to give orders, responsibility is seen as being accountable. Thus someone with authority in an organization, at least according to Fayol, should also be held accountable for the orders that are given. The third principle is discipline. Discipline is often described as the practice of training people to obey rules. In the case of Fayol's administrative theory, discipline involves creating clear rules and procedures for employees at all levels of the organization to follow. These rules were meant to establish order as well as insure good behavior in the workplace. And in order to establish an incentive for employees to follow these rules, Fayol advocated that penalties should be used. The fourth principle of management is unity of command. Fayol believed that unity of command represented the single most fundamental principle in all of these principles of management. From this principle, Fayol claimed that all of the other principles originated. Fayol strongly believed that no one can serve two masters at the same time. What this often does is cause confusion amongst the workers and conflict among supervisors as they struggle over who's direction should be followed. So Fayol argued that each worker should report to and receive orders from just one supervisor. This would reduce misunderstandings and ultimately lead to an environment in which all employees knew exactly what was expected of them. The fifth principle of management is unity of direction. Instead of individuals and teams pursuing their own goals that may be in conflict with one another, Fayol claimed that the entire organization should be pursuing a common goal or objective. Getting everyone in the organization working towards the same goal is absolutely critical to an organization's success. Somewhat in line with this principle is the sixth principle of management, which is the subordination of individual interests to general interests. Successful organizations require all individuals to put aside their own self-interests and pursue only what is in the best interest of the group. So any one interest of an individual should certainly not take priority over the interests of the organization as a whole. The seventh principle of management is renumeration. Renumeration represents fairness in the pay practices of an organization. Fayol believed that variables such as labor supply, cost of living, business profitability, and general business conditions should all be considered when establishing a worker's rate of pay. If organization's do not maintain fair and equitable pay practices it will make it more difficult to encourage workers to abandon their own interests for the sake of those of the team. The eighth principle of management is one of centralization. Centralization represents the degree to which decision-making authority is concentrated in the hands of a few people, or spread throughout the organization to employees at different levels. A centralized organization by its very nature establishes that only a few key individuals have the authority to make decisions. Opposite to a centralized organization is one that is decentralized, which means that decision-making authority is given to employees at lower levels of the organization within certain boundaries. Although Fayol agreed that a centralized form of distributing authority allowed for more accurate decisions to be made since those who may lack experience are prevented from making decisions, he also believed that employees should given some freedom so that they can show what he called initiative. Since all organizations vary in terms of size and scope, Fayol claimed that the degree of centralization or decentralization used is largely dependent on the organization itself. However Fayol did claim that organizations should only use a level of centralization that was absolutely necessary, and instead focus on allowing individual workers with the freedom necessary to show individual initiative. The ninth principle of management is the scalar chain. The scalar chain represents the organization's hierarchy, which is commonly illustrated through an organization chart. The presence of a scalar chain allows employees to be familiar with where they stand in the organizational hierarchy, as well as who they report to and who they should approach if they have questions. The tenth principle of management is order. For the sake of efficiency and coordination, Fayol claimed that there should be a place for everything and everything should be in it's place. The creation of a clean and orderly work environment is important to productivity, but also has implications for safety on the job. The eleventh principle of management is Equity. Fayol believed that an important element to successful management in an organization was the equitable treatment of workers by management. If management intends to achieve long-lasting commitment from workers, it's important that workers are treated fairly. Otherwise, workers may not pursue the goals of the organization or expend the appropriate amount of effort to achieve those goals. The twelfth principle of the management is stability of tenure of personnel. This principle refers to management's task of minimizing employee turnover. Turnover, whether voluntary or not, can be very costly to an organization. In addition to recruiting, selection, and training costs, organization's also have to deal with disruptions in output that can be caused by employee turnover. So in order to minimize these issues, Fayol claimed that management should make every attempt to retain productive workers. The thirteenth principle of management is initiative, which represents investing in the development of an organization's workers. Fayol believed that management should encourage worker initiative, meaning the undertaking of new responsibilities. This allows workers to acquire new skills, while also freeing up management to perform other tasks. The fourteenth and final principle of management as established by Henri Fayol is what is often referred to as the spirit of cooperation. This principle refers to managements responsibility to improve morale and promote a sense of unity. In order to accomplish this, Fayol emphasized the importance of teamwork as well as communication in an organization. Together these fourteen principles constituted effective management practices. And although it has been over one hundred years since Fayol wrote of these principles in his book entitled General and Industrial Management, these principles are still widely agreed upon and followed today. But perhaps an even greater contribution to modern day management was Fayol's insistence that the success of an organization was determined more so by the administrative ability of its leaders as opposed to their technical ability. As a result, focus began to shift towards training and educating managers for the administrative demands of today's organizations. Well that's all for this video. In our next video, we'll discuss the work of German sociologist Max Weber. For questions please leave them in the comment box below and I'll do my best to get back to those in a timely fashion. And remember to subscribe to Alanis Business Academy to have our latest videos sent to you while you sleep. Thanks for watching.

History

The union was founded in 1913 by 200 draughtsmen, as the Association of Engineering and Shipbuilding Draughtsmen (AESD). It expanded rapidly, and had more than 14,000 member by the end of the decade. Although it declined during the Great Depression, it retained most of its members by offering unemployment benefit, and by 1939 established a new high of 23,000 members, this rising to 44,000 by the end of World War II and over 75,000 by 1968. From 1960, it accepted technicians in ancillary roles, changing its name to the Draughtsmen's and Allied Technicians' Association (DATA).[2]

In 1970, DATA amalgamated with the Amalgamated Union of Engineering and Foundry Workers (AUEFW) and Constructional Engineering Union (CEU) to form the Amalgamated Union of Engineering Workers (AUEW). The former members of DATA formed the Technical and Supervisory Section of the new union. At the 1973 Representative Council Conference it was agreed to rename it the Technical, Administrative and Supervisory Section (TASS).

In 1985, after considerable problems within the AUEW, TASS broke away to become an independent union.

TASS absorbed the National Union of Gold, Silver and Allied Trades (NUGSAT) in 1981, the National Union of Sheet Metal Workers, Coppersmiths, Heating and Domestic Engineers in 1983, the Association of Patternmakers and Allied Craftsmen in 1984, the Tobacco Workers' Union in 1986, and the National Society of Metal Mechanics in 1987.

In 1988, it merged with the Association of Scientific, Technical and Managerial Staffs (ASTMS) to become the Manufacturing Science and Finance Union (MSF). MSF in turn merged with the AEEU to form Amicus in 2002. This resulted in TASS and the former AUEW (by then part of the AEEU) being re-united within one union.

Election results

The union sponsored Labour Party candidates in each Parliamentary election from 1950 onwards.

Election Constituency Candidate Votes Percentage Position
1950 general election Bristol West Edward Bishop 12,677 30.0 2[3]
South Buckinghamshire Cyril Dee 11,389 23.9 2[3]
1951 general election Exeter Edward Bishop 18,576 40.7 2[4]
South Buckinghamshire Cyril Dee 14,170 31.4 2[4]
1955 general election Bromsgrove Lester George 22,287 44.8 2[5]
South Gloucestershire Edward Bishop 20,034 47.4 2[5]
1959 general election Glasgow Cathcart James Jarvie 21,169 40.8 2[6]
Wembley South Edward Mackenzie 12,166 32.6 2[6]
1964 general election Chislehurst Ronald Huzzard 20,736 41.2 2[7]
Newark Edward Bishop 26,171 54.4 1[7]
Tynemouth Albert Booth 25,894 43.7 2[7]
1966 general election Barrow-in-Furness Albert Booth 23,485 60.3 1[8]
Newark Edward Bishop 27,402 56.7 1[8]
1968 by-election Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 21,394 49.6 1
1970 general election Barrow-in-Furness Albert Booth 22,400 56.1 1[9]
Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 28,959 54.9 1[9]
Newark Edward Bishop 26,455 51.2 1[9]
Oldham East James Lamond 17,020 51.1 1[9]
Feb 1974 general election Barrow-in-Furness Albert Booth 19,925 46.1 1[10]
Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 33,724 60.0 1[10]
Newark Edward Bishop 31,586 53.8 1[10]
Oldham East James Lamond 18,548 48.2 1[10]
Oct 1974 general election Barrow-in-Furness Albert Booth 21,607 51.4 1[11]
Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 28,663 53.7 1[11]
Newark Edward Bishop 26,598 47.9 1[11]
Oldham East James Lamond 19,054 52.8 1[11]
1979 general election Barrow-in-Furness Albert Booth 22,687 53.2 1[12]
Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 29,426 50.2 1[12]
Dundee West Ernie Ross 23,654 47.3 1[12]
Newark Edward Bishop 25,960 43.0 2[12]
Oldham East James Lamond 18,248 50.7 1[12]
1983 general election Barrow-in-Furness Albert Booth 17,707 34.7 2[13]
Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 22,231 45.6 1[13]
Chorley Ivan Taylor 17,586 30.5 2[13]
Dundee West Ernie Ross 20,288 43.4 1[13]
Oldham Central and Royton James Lamond 18,611 41.4 1[13]
Preston Stan Thorne 21,810 46.7 1
Stockport Peter R. Ward 12,731 29.0 2[13]
Stockton North Frank Cook 18,339 37.1 1[13]
1987 general election Bassetlaw Joe Ashton 25,385 48.1 1
Dundee West Ernie Ross 24,916 53.4 1
Glasgow Springburn Michael Martin 25,617 73.6 1
Oldham Central and Royton James Lamond 21,759 48.1 1
Stockton North Frank Cook 26,043 49.2 1

Leadership

General Secretaries

1913: L. Blair[14]
1918: Peter Doig[14]
1945: James Young[14]
1952: George Doughty[14]
1974: Ken Gill

Assistant General Secretaries

1919: David Manteklow[14]
1920: David Manteklow and James Young[14]
1929: Post vacant[14]
1946: John Holland[14]
1956: J. Dickinson[14]

Deputy General Secretaries

1968: Ken Gill
1973: John Forrester
1979: Eric Winterbottom
1983: Barbara Switzer

References

  1. ^ a b c Eaton, Jack; Gill, Colin (1981). The Trade Union Directory. London: Pluto Press. pp. 106–113. ISBN 0861043502.
  2. ^ Peter Armstrong et al, White Collar Workers Trade Unions and Class, pp. 163–164.
  3. ^ a b "List of Parliamentary Labour candidates and election results, February 23rd, 1950". Report of the Conference of the Labour Party: 179–198. 1950.
  4. ^ a b Labour Party, Report of the Fiftieth Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 184–203.
  5. ^ a b Labour Party, Report of the Fifty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 255–275.
  6. ^ a b Labour Party, Report of the Fifty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 179–201.
  7. ^ a b c Labour Party, Report of the Sixty-Third Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 158–180.
  8. ^ a b Labour Party, Report of the Sixty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 308–330.
  9. ^ a b c d Labour Party, Report of the Sixty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 289–312.
  10. ^ a b c d Labour Party, Report of the Seventy-Third Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 371–390.
  11. ^ a b c d Labour Party, Report of the Seventy-Third Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 391–411.
  12. ^ a b c d e Labour Party, Report of the Seventy-Eighth Annual Conference of the Labour Party, pp. 406–431.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g General Election Guide. BBC Data Publications. 1983. ISBN 094635815X.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i Mortimer, J. E. (1960). A History of the Association of Engineering and Shipbuilding Draughtsmen. London: Macgibbon and Kee.

External links

This page was last edited on 17 February 2022, at 03:00
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.