To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Perfect obstruction theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In algebraic geometry, given a Deligne–Mumford stack X, a perfect obstruction theory for X consists of:

  1. a perfect two-term complex in the derived category of quasi-coherent étale sheaves on X, and
  2. a morphism , where is the cotangent complex of X, that induces an isomorphism on and an epimorphism on .

The notion was introduced by Kai Behrend and Barbara Fantechi (1997) for an application to the intersection theory on moduli stacks; in particular, to define a virtual fundamental class.

Examples

Schemes

Consider a regular embedding fitting into a cartesian square

where are smooth. Then, the complex

(in degrees )

forms a perfect obstruction theory for X.[1] The map comes from the composition

This is a perfect obstruction theory because the complex comes equipped with a map to coming from the maps and . Note that the associated virtual fundamental class is

Example 1

Consider a smooth projective variety . If we set , then the perfect obstruction theory in is

and the associated virtual fundamental class is

In particular, if is a smooth local complete intersection then the perfect obstruction theory is the cotangent complex (which is the same as the truncated cotangent complex).

Deligne–Mumford stacks

The previous construction works too with Deligne–Mumford stacks.

Symmetric obstruction theory

By definition, a symmetric obstruction theory is a perfect obstruction theory together with nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form.

Example: Let f be a regular function on a smooth variety (or stack). Then the set of critical points of f carries a symmetric obstruction theory in a canonical way.

Example: Let M be a complex symplectic manifold. Then the (scheme-theoretic) intersection of Lagrangian submanifolds of M carries a canonical symmetric obstruction theory.

Notes

References

  • Behrend, Kai (2005). "Donaldson–Thomas invariants via microlocal geometry". arXiv:math/0507523v2.
  • Behrend, Kai; Fantechi, Barbara (1997-03-01). "The intrinsic normal cone". Inventiones Mathematicae. 128 (1): 45–88. arXiv:alg-geom/9601010. Bibcode:1997InMat.128...45B. doi:10.1007/s002220050136. ISSN 0020-9910. S2CID 18533009.
  • Oesinghaus, Jakob (2015-07-20). "Understanding the obstruction cone of a symmetric obstruction theory". MathOverflow. Retrieved 2017-07-19.

See also

This page was last edited on 4 May 2023, at 21:32
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.