To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Suspect (1960 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suspect
Directed byJohn Boulting
Roy Boulting
Written byNigel Balchin
Roy Boulting (additional scenes)
Jeffrey Dell (additional scenes)
Based onnovel A Sort of Traitors by Nigel Balchin
Produced byJohn Boulting
Roy Boulting
StarringTony Britton
Virginia Maskell
Peter Cushing
CinematographyMax Greene
Edited byJohn Jympson
Production
company
Charter Film Productions
Distributed byBritish Lion Film Corporation
Release dates
  • 15 November 1960 (1960-11-15) (London, England)
Running time
81 minutes
CountryEngland
LanguageEnglish
Budget£25,000[1] or $150,000[2]

Suspect (U.S. title: The Risk) is a 1960 British 'B'[3] thriller film directed by Roy Boulting and John Boulting and starring Tony Britton, Virginia Maskell, Peter Cushing, Ian Bannen and Donald Pleasence.[4] It was based on the 1949 novel A Sort of Traitors by Nigel Balchin.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    943 768
    878
    2 383
  • The Suspect (1944)
  • Suspect with a wealth of British character actors | Available on Blu-ray, DVD, and Digital
  • The Suspect 1944 Charles Laughton

Transcription

Plot

Professor Sewell is a scientist whose team discovers a way to eliminate diseases such as bubonic plague. The government blocks their plans to publish their results, fearing the work may be used for germ warfare. While Sewell reluctantly accepts this decision, young scientist Bob Marriott does not, and enlists the help of the sinister Brown, introduced to him by his assistant Lucy's ex-fiancé.

Cast

Production

The film was made at Shepperton Studios on a limited budget in seventeen days.[5] Sets were designed by art director Albert Witherick.

Critical reception

InThe Monthly Film Bulletin Penelope Houson wrote:

Suspect, we are told, was made by the Boulting Brothers "as an experiment in raising the level of the supporting feature". Its shooting schedule was 17 days, which is short for a British picture but would be nothing out of the ordinary by American standards, and its budget was limited. Sadly, with these laudable ambitions, Suspect resembles nothing so much as a prestige TV play. It leans as heavily on dialogue, its range of sets is not much more extensive, and its camera technique is restricted to the plain and conventional. Its subject matter, another of Nigel Balchin's stories of career scientists, with ministerial and security interventions, is approached with an air of superficial knowingness which breaks down quickly under pressure. The security men are too flippantly treated; Whitehall, however cynically viewed, is found to know best; and whatever questions of scientific independence the film might seem to be raising in its dialogue are dodged for a pistols and fisticuffs climax and a comic chimpanzee fade-out. A better standard of low budget film-making is badly needed, but the way to it is not by making pictures which look as though they have strayed from television.[6]

Variety wrote:

Modest, well-made dualer deliberately shot on a shoestring. ... The old theory that a second feature can get away with being shodlily written, directed and produced s not true. The challenging Boulting Brothers set out to prove it vith this deliberately designed dualer. Suspect, shot in 17 days, skimps on nothing except possibly running time. ... There's nothing pretentious about this film, but it is entertaining and literate. In the hands of less experienced people, both technicians and thesps, weaknesses might show up through lack of development of characters. But here there are a number of top-notch performances. Tony Britton, as the weak young man; Donald Pleasance, as an insidious spy; Virginia Maskell, the femme link in the research team, Kenneth Griffith, Raymond Huntley and Peter Cushing could hardly be bettered. Thorley Walters, as an apparently vague security officer, adds to his fast growing reputation as a character actor while Ian Bannen, as the embittered ex-pilot who engineers the near-treason, enhances his rep as one of Britain's most significant young actors. Lensing, artwork and editing are all satisfactory. There's no sense in hailing Suspect as anything more than a competent and useful program filler. But if talent can continue to be harnessed to move in swiftly, snap up temporary studio space, and turn out little pix like Suspect then there's some sanity in a world of million-dollar efforts. May it happen more often, for here's a "TV play" which has just that extra polish and knowhow that distiguishes the small box from the big screen.[7]

The Times wrote, "the film is produced and directed by Mr. Roy and Mr. John Boulting; they have made a workmanlike job of what was a workmanlike book".[8]

The Radio Times Guide to Films gave the film 2/5 stars, writing: "This story of spies at a chemical research lab betrays its secret through casting. Nominal stars Tony Britton and Virginia Maskell are awful, and you soon wish splendid supports Peter Cushing, Donald Pleasence, Raymond Huntley and lan Bannen had more to do. The Boulting brothers fail to create the claustrophobia that might have intensified the climate of suspicion, and the casting of Spike Milligan in an espionage drama is the only real talking point."[9]

TV Guide wrote, "at times it is highly crafted, and the careful planning behind the production comes through well. However, the rapid shoot and low budget occasionally give this the look of a made-for-television film, and despite the tautness of the direction, the story is merely a routine thriller."[10]

Leslie Halliwell said: "Entertaining but fairly routine spy melodrama, shot on an experimental low budget but confined to lower berth bookings."[11]

References

  1. ^ Egg-Heads who Really Tick Author: Patrick Gibbs Date: Saturday, Nov. 12, 1960 Publication: The Daily Telegraph (London, England) Issue: 32837 page 11
  2. ^ "Runaway". Variety. 10 January 1962. p. 54.
  3. ^ Chibnall, Steve; McFarlane, Brian (2009). The British 'B' Film. London: BFI/Bloomsbury. p. 59. ISBN 978-1-8445-7319-6.
  4. ^ "Suspect". British Film Institute Collections Search. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
  5. ^ "Suspect 1960-title=Suspect-work=britmovie.co.uk - Britmovie - Home of British Films". britmovie.co.uk.
  6. ^ "Suspect". The Monthly Film Bulletin. 27 (312): 167. 1 January 1960 – via ProQuest.
  7. ^ "Suspect". Variety. 220 (13): 20. 23 November 1960 – via ProQuest.
  8. ^ "SUSPECT (1960 Drama/Suspense)". pleasence.com.
  9. ^ Radio Times Guide to Films (18th ed.). London: Immediate Media Company. 2017. p. 898. ISBN 9780992936440.
  10. ^ "The Risk". TVGuide.com.
  11. ^ Halliwell, Leslie (1989). Halliwell's Film Guide (7th ed.). London: Paladin. p. 981. ISBN 0586088946.

External links

This page was last edited on 21 February 2024, at 22:05
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.