To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Standards of Learning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Standards of Learning (SOL) is a public school standardized testing program in the Commonwealth of Virginia. It sets forth learning and achievement expectations for core subjects for grades K-12 in Virginia's Public Schools. The standards represent what many teachers, school administrators, parents, and business and community leaders believe schools should teach and students should learn. The Virginia Department of Education, schools, and school systems routinely receive essential feedback on the effectiveness of implementation and address effective instructional strategies and best practices. The Standards of Learning is supportive of the [1] No Child Left Behind Act, which was signed into law by then-President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. They address student achievement in four critical areas: (1) English, (2) mathematics, (3) science, and (4) history/social studies. Students are assessed in English and mathematics in grades 3-8 and upon completion of certain high school level courses. Science and history SOL are administered in grades 4, 5, and 8 and at the end of completing high school courses in these respective subjects.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    665
    1 036
    56 662
  • World Class Standards for Preparing Teachers of Mathematics
  • Common Core Mathematics Standards
  • The Mathematics Standards: Key Changes and Their Evidence

Transcription

A few years ago we actually did an international study with 17 countries and some 900 programs across those countries trying to look at how teacher preparation was done both for middle school teachers in for elementary or primary school teachers and so we studied these teachers we found out what they took while they were in their preparation and the very end up their preparation we actually tested them on their mathematics knowledge well one of the things that we're able to do with this data is we actually could look at those top 39 programs and to look at what the requirements were now these programs were the ones that had the highest they were the top 10 percent in terms of performance on that test we gave them Of those--looking at those 39 we came to understand that there was virtually all of those future teachers in those thirty nine programs took a set of nine courses 6 university level mathematics courses two courses that dealt with pedagogy of teaching mathematics and a third course which deals with school mathematics We found that only a third of them, roughly about 31 percent actually, met the international benchmark in their preparation so that's not that encouraging even though we have some programs that do do this we have a lot of programs that are not doing this and the correspondingly then only about a third of our teachers reaching that international benchmark We're able to follow-up two years after they've been out from their teacher preparation they were teaching mathematics in various schools around the country we followed up with them and ask them a question which was how confident do you believe you are academically to be able to teach a list of topics and we found there was a very strong relationship between not just what they knew as demonstrated by their score on that test when they left teacher preparation but also the coursework they took so that those that had more coursework consistent with the international benchmark not only had an impact on their knowledge and the test but also impacted on their confidence in terms of their teaching so we have we are having our teacher preparation prepare teachers with the level of mathematics knowledge that varies from the very top to developing countries so that striking that the bottom 25 percent of the institutions are producing over sixty percent of our future teachers. So the story I think that's really important for the lower middle school teacher preparation is what you teach, what expectations you have for those teachers while they're studying how much mathematics that's required how much pedagogy is required that's what makes a difference we now know that that is related not only to their knowledge that they come out and they demonstrate for us on a test but also to the degree of confidence that they have in the teaching of those topics some two years out that's that's a very important finding I think and suggest that what we need is to think about standards for teacher preparation we have some of the best programs in the world but the students of those or ones that are comparable at least in some sense go to the to the better schools and to the higher SCS schools and those institutions who have the worst track record essentially more predominantly go to our low SES schools are high poverty schools and that seems to be, certainly something that was related to concerns about the achievement gap and whether the system is equitable and providing equal opportunities for all students. This would suggest this only exacerbatesthe differences we know that exist in curriculum as well.

History

In 1992, Virginia attempted adopting an education plan known as the Common Core of Learning. A largely parent-driven grassroots movement opposed the Common Core of Learning, arguing that it held no meaningful education plan and seemed to be putting more emphasis on behavioral issues than education issues. After a debate at Huguenot High School, the Common Core of Learning was discarded, to be later replaced by the Standards of Learning. The SOL were created through a process involving parents, teachers, and common citizens.[1]

The SOL became the springboard for adhering to the new No Child Left Behind Act, which was enacted in January 2002. They were used as the basis for evaluation of administration, teachers, and students in public schools.

Establishing standards

In June 1995, the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) approved the Standards of Learning in four core content areas: mathematics, science, English, and history & social sciences. In September 1997, the Board of Education established new Standards of Accreditation (SOA) for public schools in Virginia that link statewide accountability tests to the SOL and hold students, schools, and school divisions accountable for results.

The results of the SOL directly affect the schools that administer them as much as the students. If a certain passing rate is not met each year, the school can lose its accreditation.[2] This sets higher standards for employment and puts more responsibility on teachers and administrators to focus on areas of learning that are fundamental to the Standards of Learning. The published results of the testing also help parents who are looking for schools with high achievement for their children, putting further pressure for success on school administrators and teachers.

Before the SOL was implemented, the tests required to graduate affected the student, not the school. To graduate from high school, a student only needed to pass a sixth grade level test.[3] As a result, 24-25% of new college freshmen needed remedial help. This level of literacy was unacceptable for the demands of the 21st century. The SOL set the bar higher for test-oriented education and performance-driven results.

Results over ten years

In 1998, the first year of SOL testing, only 2 percent of the Virginia Commonwealth's public schools met the standard for full accreditation. The percentage of schools meeting the state's accreditation standards increased to 6.5 percent in 1999, 22 percent in 2000, 40 percent in 2001, 64 percent in 2002, 78 percent in 2003, and 84 percent in 2004.

In October 2005, the state reported that 92 percent of the Commonwealth's 1,834 schools received accreditation ratings for 2005–2006, with students meeting or exceeding state achievement objectives on Standards of Learning (SOL) tests and other statewide assessments in the four core academic areas.[4]

The VDOE stopped reporting statewide results in 2006. However, complete results of all assessments in grades 3-8 and end-of-course tests for fall, spring, and summer may be found on the School Report Cards.

Standards of Accreditation

On January 14, 2010, the Board of Education announced that personal learning plans will be created for each middle and high school student to align the student's course of study with academic and career goals. This revision was made to the Regulations Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia.[5] The Virginia Department of Education has posted fact sheets detailing the timeline for changes, accreditation ratings, diploma requirements, and other documentation related to the SOL. Annual reports regarding the condition and needs of public education in the Commonwealth of Virginia are also located on the Virginia Government Website.

Scoring

A student must get a raw score of 400 or higher on their SOL(s) in order to pass the test. A student's advancement to the next grade is not contingent on passing any SOL tests. Passing with a raw score of 500 is considered advanced/proficient. A perfect score is 600. 399 or below is considered failure.[6]

The scores are scaled and do not correlate to the percentage of correct answers (a passing score of 400 does not indicate a student got 66% of the questions correct). Each test has its own scale and may not be the same as another SOL test.[7]

For students in grades 7–8, SOL scores are correlated to Lexile measures.[8] A Lexile measure can be used to match readers with targeted text and monitor growth in reading ability. For more information concerning the SOL(s) and Lexile measures, visit http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/scoring/lexile/index.shtml

Several tests have been updated to the more advanced computer adaptive test (CAT) model, in which students are given a question, and based on whether or not the student got the answer correct or not, a computer gives the student either an easier or harder question. By using this model, many students have noticed worse scores on the tests. It remains controversial.

Controversy

The initial creation of the SOL caused extensive debate around both the validity of the tests and the administration of the process. Debate became more heated by the Department of Education's and the Secretary of Education's refusal to reveal information about tests or how the tests were created. The Department of Education was concerned that releasing actual tests would encourage "teaching to the test," while parents and educators were concerned that tests would be poorly written and not test the targeted subject material.[9]

Because teachers and administrators are evaluated based on students' SOL performance, there has also been concern that teachers will focus their teaching on SOL subject matter and omit much of the overall learning that is necessary in school.

Every year, many teachers and administrators from schools around the state are invited to provide feedback on the tests. However, many teachers feel that the feedback process is just for show, and most report seeing no changes in new SOL's.[citation needed]

See also

  • NAEP, National Assessment of Educational Progress

References

  1. ^ "SOLs: Fact and Fiction". Archived from the original on 2008-10-25. Retrieved 2009-11-18.
  2. ^ "Virginia Standards of Learning and the No Child Left Behind Act". 5 April 2007.
  3. ^ "SOLs: Fact and Fiction". Archived from the original on 2008-10-25. Retrieved 2009-11-18.
  4. ^ Press Release - September 2, 2005 at the Wayback Machine (archived 29 November 2022)
  5. ^ (8 VAC-20-131-5 et seq)
  6. ^ "SOL Scoring". Archived from the original on 2009-01-16. Retrieved 2009-09-11.
  7. ^ SOL Test Cut Score Explanation
  8. ^ "The Lexile Framework for Reading". www.lexile.com. Archived from the original on 2012-09-05.
  9. ^ We'll teach shining shoes: Virginia school divisions responds to state-mandated standards

External links

This page was last edited on 7 June 2024, at 16:14
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.