To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Sir Hugh Paterson, 1st Baronet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sir Hugh Paterson
Bannockburn House
Born1659
Dunglass, Dunbartonshire, Scotland
Died21 December 1701
Bannockburn, Stirlingshire, Scotland
NationalityScottish
Known forBaronet of Bannockburn
SpouseBarbara Ruthven (born 1663)

Sir Hugh Paterson, 1st Baronet of Bannockburn (c. 1659 – 1701), was a Scottish baronet and landowner.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/2
    Views:
    37 721
    4 517 288
  • David, The Lictors Returning to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons
  • Your Family Tree Explained

Transcription

SPEAKER 1: We're at the Musee du Louvre, and we're looking at Jacques-Louis David's Brutus and his Sons. SPEAKER 2: This is one of my favorite paintings by David, and dates to the very year of the revolution itself, 1789. SPEAKER 1: And it was tied beautifully to the revolutionary sentiment in subject. SPEAKER 2: Brutus has led the revolution against the kings in Rome. This is in ancient Rome. Brutus has discovered that his sons have committed treason in attempting to restore the monarchy to Rome. SPEAKER 1: So Brutus, as judge, has taken the extraordinary step of sentencing his own family to death for their treason, putting the state above his own personal family, above his own feelings, above his own needs. SPEAKER 2: And that's the thing that we also see in the Oath of the Horatii. The triumph of reason, of being moral and virtuous, over personal feelings and personal priorities. SPEAKER 1: But this is also a painting about the cost of that. It's not blind patriotism. There is a true emotional power and cost there, and it's tragic. SPEAKER 2: And Brutus sits in shadow, under a statue of Rome, holding this edict in his hand. His feet crossed beneath him, his hand up. He's obviously in thought. His back turned to the body of his sons, who we see being carried in behind him. While his wife and children, who form the other half of the composition, call out, fully illuminated, shielding their eyes, passing out. They can't believe what Brutus has done. SPEAKER 1: Brutus is quiet, he's calm, he's resigned, even if there is a kind of deep tragedy there. The women on the other side and the children have given in to their emotions. SPEAKER 2: In many ways, this fits in with ideas that were around during the revolution that only men really have the capability of sacrificing for the state, of being true citizens, because only men could rise above their emotions and their personal concerns to think about these greater goods. SPEAKER 1: That stoicism seems to be echoed in the very architecture of this space. We have a fairly complex classical environment-- Doric columns, the most pared down. And this is the truest of Greek architecture. But then that's softened, especially in the sphere of the women, in that that's draped with cloth, the softer material. This is a painting that's clearly informed by David's research into classical architecture, into classical furnishings. SPEAKER 2: And the figures themselves resemble ancient Greek and Roman sculpture, the way that the drapery clings to their bodies. The importance of anatomy here is so clear. Of a clarity of space, of a clarity of line. The colors are subdued, but the light comes in really strongly and illuminates these figures. And we have dramatic, powerful gestures. And you're right. This is sacrifice and virtue, but simultaneously the terrible emotional cost of that, not just for Brutus's family, but for Brutus, too. And it's fascinating to me that this painting was made the very year of the revolution, because it seems to speak to the virtues that were required for the revolution. The idea of sacrificing for the greater good. The idea that the revolution brings in ideals of equality before the law. So that even though Brutus is the leader, he's not going to excuse his sons. SPEAKER 1: Tragically, the revolution would turn against its own sons. And this becomes almost a foreshadowing of what will happen. Of course, in that case, you have the excesses of Robespierre and others, where the virtues that are expressed in this early painting by David are turned away from. In some tragic way, this painting does foreshadow the collapse and, in a sense, failure of the revolution.

Life

He was born circa 1659.[1]

Sir Hugh's father had acquired the Bannockburn estate from Andrew Rollo, 11th Laird of Duncrub and 3rd Lord Rollo. Paterson built much of the current house, and it is little changed since his time.[2]

The Patersons were staunch Royalists and James VII gave Hugh the title of Baronet of Bannockburn.[3] After Hugh Paterson's death on 21 December 1701, his son, the Second Baronet attainted his Baronetcy by being an open and fierce Jacobite, but he lived on at Bannockburn House.

In a brief stay at the house, Charles Edward Stuart met the 2nd Baronet's niece, Clementina Walkinshaw, who would eventually be the Young Prince's lover and mother of his daughter.[4][5]

Family

He married Barbara Ruthven (c.1663–1695), daughter of Sir William Ruthven of Dunglass and Katherine Douglas, daughter of the 1st Marquess of Douglas. His son and successor, Sir Hugh Paterson, 2nd Baronet married Jane Erskine, daughter of the Earl of Mar and sister of James Erskine, Lord Grange bringing both Hugh and Jane into contact with James' notorious wife, Rachel Chiesley, Lady Grange.[6] His daughter Katherine married John Walkinshaw, and was the mother of Clementina Walkinshaw, who became Prince Charles Edward Stuart’s mistress.

See also

References

  1. ^ The Complete Baronetage, London, 1983., Cokayne, George Edward, Reference: IV 342
  2. ^ "Bannockburn House, Bannockburn | Buildings at Risk Register for Scotland". buildingsatrisk.org.uk. Retrieved 1 February 2014.
  3. ^ "baronetage/baronetsP1". leighrayment.com. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008. Retrieved 2 April 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  4. ^ Kybert, Susan Maclean (1988). Bonnie Prince Charlie:An Autobiography. London: Unwin. p. 186.
  5. ^ "The families of Bannockburn House | Bannockburn Scotland Community Website,Bannockburn 2014". bannockburn.co.uk. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
  6. ^ Grant's Old and New Edinburgh vol.2 p.249
Baronetage of Nova Scotia
New creation Baronet
(of Bannockburn)
1686–1701
Succeeded by
This page was last edited on 18 June 2023, at 14:45
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.