To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Ship-to-Shore Connector

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ship-to-Shore Connector
Dessin d'un Ship-to-Shore Connector.jpg
Ship-to-Shore Connector concept image
TypeAir-cushioned landing craft
Place of originUnited States
Service history
In serviceIn development
Production history
Unit costUS$47.5m (FY15)[1]
US$55.5m[1] (inc R&D) (FY15)
No. built73 planned,[1] 9 under contract.[2]
Specifications

Payload capacity74 tons[3] or
145 Marines[4] or
108 casualty personnel[4]
Maximum speed Over 35 knots[5]

The Ship-to-Shore Connector (SSC), also known as the LCAC 100 class,[6] is a system proposed by the United States Navy as a replacement for the Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC).[7] It will offer an increased capacity to cope with the growing weight of equipment used by the United States Army and Marine Corps.[5] As of 2015, the program is forecast to cost a total of US$4.054B for 73 hovercraft.[1]

History

Several proposals have been made to replace the LCAC. In 2003, the Navy Transformation Roadmap set out plans to start R&D on a "Heavy Lift LCAC" project in 2005, but this was superseded by the LCAC(X) "LCAC Replacement Tactical Assault Connector".[8] In August 2010, the US Navy issued a Request For Proposals for a contract to design and build 72 SSCs.[9] The contract would be worth up to US$4 billion.[10] A contract for detailed design work and construction of the first test and training craft, was expected to be awarded in 2011.[7]

Proposals

On July 6, 2012, the US Navy awarded Textron, Inc of New Orleans, LA a $212.7M fixed-priced incentive-fee contract for the detail design and construction of a Ship-to-Shore Connector test and training craft. The contract also includes the option for the production of eight additional craft; this option would increase total value of the contract to $570.4M.[13] Textron began fabrication of the first nine SSCs in mid-November 2014. These will be delivered in 2017 and achieve initial operating capability (IOC) in 2020.[4] Textron can produce as many as 12 SSCs per year.[14]

Design

Although the design will be broadly similar to the LCAC, there will be several significant differences:

  • Two-person fly-by-wire cockpit[9] with joystick controls[2]
  • More powerful, more efficient engines
  • Extensive use of composites and aluminum alloys[5] for corrosion resistance[2]
  • Advanced skirt instead of a deep skirt for less drag and reduced craft weight[4]

The four Rolls-Royce MT7 gas turbines that will be used to power each Ship-to-Shore Connector are derivatives modelled after the design of the Rolls-Royce T406 used in the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey.[15] The cores of the two engines types are identical, which should provide some relief in spare parts storage to those ships that will operate both the (tiltrotor) aircraft and the hovercraft.[16] Top speed will be 50 kn (58 mph; 93 km/h). A simpler and more efficient drivetrain using one gearbox is on each side for less parts and maintenance and higher reliability.[2]

The SSC has a designed lifetime of 30 years.[17]

The 10th SSC to be delivered will have the capability to launch vehicles into the water rather than need to go all the way to the beach, after which that ability will be retrofitted to the previous nine vessels.[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d "GAO-15-342SP DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs" (PDF). US Government Accountability Office. March 2015. p. 121. Retrieved 16 July 2015.
  2. ^ a b c d Osborn, Kris (January 20, 2014). "Navy Buys New Landing Craft Air Cushion for Amphibs". Military Advantage. Monster. Retrieved January 20, 2014.
  3. ^ "Navy To Seek Bids in June for LCAC Replacement". 2010-05-07. Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  4. ^ a b c d Textron Starts Work on New Navy Hovercraft - News.USNI.org, 18 November 2014
  5. ^ a b c "SSC Requirements" (PDF). 2010-05-04. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-22. Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  6. ^ Landing Craft Air Cushion
  7. ^ a b "Textron Marine & Land Systems, L-3 Communications add Alcoa Defense to SSC Team - MarketWatch". Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  8. ^ "Heavy Lift Landing Craft Air Cushioned (HLCAC)". Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  9. ^ a b "Seabasing Counters Area Denial". Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  10. ^ a b "Alcoa Joins Forces with Textron - Zacks.com". 2010-09-14. Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  11. ^ "Marinette Marine to build ship-to-shore connector". 2010-09-15. Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  12. ^ "Rugged Hovercraft Seeks Aggressive Engine: The GE38 Gas Turbine Engine".
  13. ^ U.S. Navy Announces Textron was rewarded in July 2012.
  14. ^ Textron: Ship-to-Shore Connector Will Be Simpler To Operate, More Maintainable Than Current LCACs - News.USNI.org, 21 January 2016
  15. ^ Benbow, Dana Hunsinger. "Rolls-Royce to produce engines for Navy's new hovercraft fleet." Indianapolis Star, 22 October 2012.
  16. ^ Thisdell, Dan. "Rolls-Royce Osprey engines to go directly to hovercraft application." Flight International, 23 October 2012.
  17. ^ "Defense Dept. Contracts for Dec. 19, 2012."
  18. ^ Future Marine Corps Missions Depend on New Ship-To-Shore Connectors - Nationaldefensemagazine.org, 16 July 2014

External links

This page was last edited on 7 June 2020, at 12:27
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.