To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Ross Gray (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ross Gray
Member of Parliament
for Lambton West
In office
January 1929 – June 1945
Preceded byWilliam Thomas Goodison
Succeeded byJoseph Warner Murphy
Personal details
Born
Ross Wilfred Gray

(1897-01-05)5 January 1897
Moore Township, Ontario
Died11 December 1968(1968-12-11) (aged 71)
Political partyLiberal
Spouse(s)Gertrude K. Wiley
m. 10 October 1925[1]
Professionbarrister

Ross Wilfred Gray (5 January 1897 – 11 December 1968) was a Liberal party member of the House of Commons of Canada. He was born in Moore Township in Lambton County, Ontario and became a barrister by career.

Gray attended Sarnia Collegiate then Osgoode Hall Law School then attended Harvard University for post-graduate studies. He served with the Canadian Field Artillery from 1916 to 1919. From 1924 to 1927, he was a member of the Sarnia Board of Education.[1]

He was first elected to Parliament at the Lambton West riding in a by-election on 14 January 1929 then re-elected there in 1930, 1935 and 1940. Gray was defeated by Joseph Warner Murphy of the Progressive Conservative party in the 1945 election.

By-election on 14 January 1929
Party Candidate Votes
Liberal Ross Gray acclaimed


1930 Canadian federal election: Lambton
Party Candidate Votes
Liberal Ross Gray 7,868
Conservative Wilfred Smith Haney 7,314
1935 Canadian federal election: Lambton
Party Candidate Votes
Liberal Ross Gray 8,335
Conservative Russell Gilbert Woods 4,636
Reconstruction Frank James Miller 2,094
1940 Canadian federal election: Lambton
Party Candidate Votes
Liberal Ross Gray 8,671
National Government William Howard Kenny 7,864
1945 Canadian federal election: Lambton
Party Candidate Votes
Progressive Conservative Joseph Warner Murphy 8,450
Liberal Ross Gray 7,831
Co-operative Commonwealth George H. Stirrett 2,560

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    2 448 943
    29 213
    1 426 554
  • Gerrymandering Explained
  • Billionaire Ken Griffin on Investing, Citadel and Life/Career
  • Three Minute Philosophy - Immanuel Kant

Transcription

Queen Lion of the Animal Kingdom is giving more democracy to her citizens by adding a legislative branch to the government. The citizens each get one vote and are divided into ranges. Each range will elect one representative to send to the newly created Jungle Council. To best understand how this system works, lets look at a small colony where there are just two political parties: Buffalo & Jackalope. This colony is divided into four ranges. In the first election Jackalope candidates win two of them and buffalo candidates win the rest. All is well for several election cycles until the Animal Kingdom Census taker comes round and shows that the population has both moved and grown. To better represent the larger population a new seat is added to the Jungle council so the ranges' boundaries must be re-drawn. This is where the trouble begins. Re-drawing electoral boundaries is a huge political problem. To help them, the representatives of the Jungle Council hire a weaselly consultant to figure out where the new boundaries should go. If Weasel draws rectangular boundaries everything is OK because the jungle council will, as close as possible, reflect how the citizens vote. However, Weasel doesn't do this. Instead he tells the Buffalo Party that, for a price, he can turn their slim majority into a landslide victory in the election. With a super-majority on the Jungle Council the Buffalo wouldn't have to listen to those pesky Jackalope filibusters anymore, so the Buffalo gladly pay up. How can Weasel deliver on his promise? It's depressingly simple: by packing together as many jackalope voters into one range as possible and spreading the rest of them out, The Buffalo Party can win an additional seat without any voters switching allegiance. What Weasel and the Buffalo have done is called 'gerrymandering'. The intensional changing of electoral boundaries for their benefit. Several election cycles later the under-represented and disgruntled Jackalope party approaches Weasel and asks if he can manipulate the ranges to be in their favor instead of the Buffalos'. Indeed he can. Using the same trick, Weasel packs Buffalo voters into a few ranges and spreads the rest among the Jackalope supporters. After the election the Jackalopes, who represent a minority of the voters are now, nonetheless, the majority party on the Jungle Council. This is the terrible power of Gerrymandering: Weasel can take the exact same voters and get either party to win the election. Unsurprisingly, Weasel's business grows and eventually every colony in the Animal Kingdom pays him to gerrymander their ranges. With so many clients, Weasel now uses his computer test hundreds of thousands of range combinations with elaborate statistical models of voter behavior to get the results he needs. Queen Lion has seen what Weasel is up to and banishes him from her kingdom. But, the census taker reminds her that ranges still need to be re-drawn as the population changes. So how is it going to be decided? Queen Lion suggests the obvious solution: a bi-partisan committee must agree on all new range boundaries. This seems like a good idea. After all, if both parties have to agree on the ranges, then they must end up being fair to everyone. But, after a few election cycles using this solution, Queen Lion notices that she always sees the same faces on the Jungle Council. Representatives almost never get defeated in their elections. It turns out that the interests of the representatives and the interests of the citizens are not the same. Citizens want elections where the candidates have to earn their vote. These are close elections where either candidate has a chance of winning. But, representatives don't want close elections, they want safe elections. Elections where they run in a range that is filled with supporters. Because the representatives are in change of the boundaries they make the safest ranges possible. So, bi-partisan committees are not enough. To truly fix gerrymandering there are three options: The first is to set up a politically independent commission of appointed experts or judges to draw the boundaries. Independent commissions are much better than bi-partisan committees, but still not ideal because they usually group similar areas together so the elections are uncompetitive. And there is always the possibility that the independent commission is not as independent as it appears. The second option is to let math decide the boundaries. There are a number of ways to mathematically divide an area into equally populous ranges. The simplest example of this is called the 'shortest split-line method'. Find the shortest line that splits the voters in twain and repeat as necessary until all the ranges are made. This is much better than an 'independent' commission, but it does have the problem of occasionally producing skewed election results just through pure bad luck of where the boundaries are drawn. But by publishing the algorithm used, all citizens can check the results and be confident that there is no intensional bias in the system. The last solution is an unexpected one: hire back the weasel and embrace gerrymandering. But this time, pay him make the winners most closely match the voters as a whole. While it seems unsavory, this is actually the best way to avoid disproportionate representation which is, by far, the the worst problem of gerrymandering. But, considering these three solutions leaves Queen Lion grumpy. The first two are improvements, but still may result in uncompetitive elections or disproportionate results while the third just feels wrong. Gerrymandering to avoid the problems of gerrymandering is... odd. Remembering what she learned about voting before, she realizes all this gerrymandering is really just a symptom of a more fundamental problem: the method by which each citizen gets only one vote and elects only one representative. There are ways to eliminate gerrymandering and restore competitive elections to make her citizens happy, but to do that Queen Lion is going to have to make some big, fundamental changes to her democracy.

References

  1. ^ a b Normandin, A. L. (1941). The Canadian Parliamentary Guide.

External links


This page was last edited on 9 February 2024, at 02:24
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.