To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Regulation of transcription in cancer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Generally, in progression to cancer, hundreds of genes are silenced or activated. Although silencing of some genes in cancers occurs by mutation, a large proportion of carcinogenic gene silencing is a result of altered DNA methylation (see DNA methylation in cancer). DNA methylation causing silencing in cancer typically occurs at multiple CpG sites in the CpG islands that are present in the promoters of protein coding genes.

Altered expressions of microRNAs also silence or activate many genes in progression to cancer (see microRNAs in cancer). Altered microRNA expression occurs through hyper/hypo-methylation of CpG sites in CpG islands in promoters controlling transcription of the microRNAs.

Silencing of DNA repair genes through methylation of CpG islands in their promoters appears to be especially important in progression to cancer (see methylation of DNA repair genes in cancer).

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    449 891
    2 119 124
    40 661
    44 219
    10 430
  • Regulation of transcription | Biomolecules | MCAT | Khan Academy
  • Gene Regulation and the Order of the Operon
  • TRANSCRIPTIONAL FACTORS: Gene regulation and the role of oestrogen explained.
  • EPIGENETICS and GENE EXPRESSION A-level Biology. How methyl and acetyl groups control transcription
  • Transcription factors | general transcription factors | transcription factor networks | Molbio

Transcription

Voiceover: So what makes a cell that's located inside of your nose responsible for smelling, say, a slice of pizza look and act differently from a cell that lines your gut and is responsible for absorbing the nutrients from that pizza? They have the exact same DNA so the differences can't be attributed to that fact alone. The answer actually lies in the expression of that DNA, which genes are actively transcribed and which ones aren't and there are several ways in which gene regulation occurs at the level of transcription and so we're going to be talking about the main ones here. Now let's draw out a hypothetical gene here and associated with this gene is a sequence upstream so towards the three prime region of the antisense strand, also called the template strand. And this sequence is called the promoter and there is another sequence in between the promoter and the gene called the operator. The operator is the sequence of DNA to which a transcription factor protein combined and the promoter is the sequence of DNA to which the RNA polymerase binds to start transcription. Now first off in prokaryotes we have what are called general transcription factors, which are a class of proteins that bind to specific sites on DNA to activate transcription. General transcription factors plus RNA polymerase and another protein complex called the mediator multiple protein complex constitute the basic transcriptional apparatus, which positions RNA polymerase right at the start of a protein coding sequence or a gene and then releases the polymerase to transcribe the messenger RNA from that DNA template. Now there's another type of DNA binding protein called activators and these enhance the interaction between RNA polymerase and a particular promoter, encouraging the expression of the gene and activators can do this by increasing the attraction of RNA polymerase for the promoter through interactions with sub units of the RNA polymerase or indirectly by changing the structure of the DNA. An example of an activator is the catabolite activator protein or CAP and this protein activates transcription of the lac operon in E. coli. In the case of the lac operaon and E. coli, cyclic adenosine monophosphate or cAMP is produced during glucose starvation and so this cAMP actually binds to the catabolite activator protein or CAP which causes a confirmational change that allows the CAP protein to bind to a DNA site located adjacent to the promoter and then this activator, the CAP, then makes a direct protein to protein interaction with RNA polymerase that recruits the RNA polymerase to the promoter. Now enhancers are sites on the DNA that are bound to by activators in order to loop the DNA in a certain way that brings a specific promoter to the initiation complex and as the name implies this enhances transcription of the genes in a particular gene cluster. And while enhancers are usually what are called cis-acting, cis meaning the same or acting on the same chromosome, an enhancer doesn't necessarily need to be particularly close to the gene that it acts on and sometimes it's not even located on the same chromosome. Enhancers don't act on the promoter region itself, but are actually bound by activator proteins and these activator proteins can interact with that mediator complex I mentioned earlier which recruits RNA polymerase and the general transcription factors which then can lead to transcription of the genes. So here I've drawn a little schematic of what it might look like to have the enhancer actually change the structure of the DNA so that the DNA is now looping around. Here you still have your promoter sequence, the operator sequence, the gene sequence, and the enhancer sequence, and having the DNA looped in such a way so that you could then recruit RNA polymerase, the transcription factors, the mediator protein complex, and then you have transcription begin of this gene here. Now let's talk about repressors. Repressors are proteins that bind to the operator, impending RNA polymerase progress on the strand and thus impeding the expression of the gene. Now if an inducer, which is a molecule that initiates gene expression, is present, then it can actually interact with the repressor protein in such a way that causes it to detach from the operator and then this frees up RNA polymerase to then transcribe the gene further down on the DNA strand. One example of a repressor protein is the repressor protein associated again with the lac operon operator, which prevents the transcription of genes used in lactose metabolism unless lactose, which is the inducer molecule, is present as an alternative energy source. Now silencers are regions of DNA that are bound by repressor proteins in order to silence gene expression and this mechanism is very similar to that of the enhancer sequences that I just talked about. And similarly, silencers can be located several bases upstream or downstream from the actual promoter of the gene and when a repressor protein binds to the silencer region of the DNA, RNA polymerase is prevented from binding to the promoter region. Now a few notes about the differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes when it comes to transcriptional regulation. In prokaryotes, the regulation of transcription is really needed for the cell to be able to quickly adapt to the ever-changing outer environment that it is sitting in. The presence, the quantity, the type of nutrients actually determines which genes are expressed and in order to do that, genes must be regulated in some sort of fashion so a combination of activators, repressors, and rarely enhancers, at least in the case of prokaryotes, determines whether a gene is transcribed. In eukaryotes, transcriptional regulation tends to involve a combination of interactions between several transcription factors which allows for a more sophisticated response to multiple conditions in the environment. And another major difference between eukaryotes and prokaryotes is the fact that eukaryotes have a nuclear envelope which prevents the simultaneous transcription and translation of a particular gene and this adds an extra spacial and temporal control of gene expression.

CpG islands in promoters

In humans, about 70% of promoters located near the transcription start site of a gene (proximal promoters) contain a CpG island.[1][2] CpG islands are generally 200 to 2000 base pairs long, have a C:G base pair content >50%, and have regions of DNA where a cytosine nucleotide is followed by a guanine nucleotide and this occurs frequently in the linear sequence of bases along its 5′ → 3′ direction.[3][4]

Genes may also have distant promoters (distal promoters) and these frequently contain CpG islands as well. An example is the promoter of the DNA repair gene ERCC1, where the CpG island-containing promoter is located about 5,400 nucleotides upstream of the coding region of the ERCC1 gene.[5] CpG islands also occur frequently in promoters for functional noncoding RNAs such as microRNAs.[6]

Transcription silencing due to methylation of CpG islands

In humans, DNA methylation occurs at the 5′ position of the pyrimidine ring of the cytosine residues within CpG sites to form 5-methylcytosines. The presence of multiple methylated CpG sites in CpG islands of promoters causes stable inhibition (silencing) of genes.[7] Silencing of transcription of a gene may be initiated by other mechanisms, but this is often followed by methylation of CpG sites in the promoter CpG island to cause the stable silencing of the gene.[7]

Transcription silencing/activation in cancers

In cancers, loss of expression of genes occurs about 10 times more frequently by transcription silencing (caused by promoter hypermethylation of CpG islands) than by mutations. As Vogelstein et al. point out, in a colorectal cancer there are usually about 3 to 6 driver mutations and 33 to 66 hitchhiker or passenger mutations.[8] In contrast, in colon tumors compared to adjacent normal-appearing colonic mucosa, there are about 600 to 800 heavily methylated CpG islands in promoters of genes in the tumors while these CpG islands are not methylated in the adjacent mucosa.[9][10][11]

Using gene set enrichment analysis, 569 out of 938 gene sets were hypermethylated and 369 were hypomethylated in cancers. Hypomethylation of CpG islands in promoters results in increased transcription of the genes or gene sets affected.[11]

One study[12] listed 147 specific genes with colon cancer-associated hypermethylated promoters and 27 with hypomethylated promoters, along with the frequency with which these hyper/hypo-methylations were found in colon cancers. At least 10 of those genes had hypermethylated promoters in nearly 100% of colon cancers. They also indicated 11 microRNAs whose promoters were hypermethylated in colon cancers at frequencies between 50% and 100% of cancers. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small endogenous RNAs that pair with sequences in messenger RNAs to direct post-transcriptional repression. On average, each microRNA represses or inhibits transcriptional expression of several hundred target genes. Thus microRNAs with hypermethylated promoters may be allowing enhanced transcription of hundreds to thousands of genes in a cancer.[13]

Transcription inhibition and activation by nuclear microRNAs

For more than 20 years, microRNAs have been known to act in the cytoplasm to degrade transcriptional expression of specific target gene messenger RNAs (see microRNA history). However, recently, Gagnon et al.[14] showed that as many as 75% of microRNAs may be shuttled back into the nucleus of cells. Some nuclear microRNAs have been shown to mediate transcriptional gene activation or transcriptional gene inhibition.[15]

DNA repair genes with hyper/hypo-methylated promoters in cancers

DNA repair genes are frequently repressed in cancers due to hypermethylation of CpG islands within their promoters. In head and neck squamous cell carcinomas at least 15 DNA repair genes have frequently hypermethylated promoters; these genes are XRCC1, MLH3, PMS1, RAD51B, XRCC3, RAD54B, BRCA1, SHFM1, GEN1, FANCE, FAAP20, SPRTN, SETMAR, HUS1, and PER1.[16] About seventeen types of cancer are frequently deficient in one or more DNA repair genes due to hypermethylation of their promoters.[17] As summarized in one review article, promoter hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene MGMT occurs in 93% of bladder cancers, 88% of stomach cancers, 74% of thyroid cancers, 40%-90% of colorectal cancers and 50% of brain cancers.[citation needed] Promoter hypermethylation of LIG4 occurs in 82% of colorectal cancers. This review article also indicates promoter hypermethylation of NEIL1 occurs in 62% of head and neck cancers and in 42% of non-small-cell lung cancers; promoter hypermetylation of ATM occurs in 47% of non-small-cell lung cancers; promoter hypermethylation of MLH1 occurs in 48% of squamous cell carcinomas; and promoter hypermethylation of FANCB occurs in 46% of head and neck cancers.[citation needed]

On the other hand, the promoters of two genes, PARP1 and FEN1, were hypomethylated and these genes were over-expressed in numerous cancers. PARP1 and FEN1 are essential genes in the error-prone and mutagenic DNA repair pathway microhomology-mediated end joining. If this pathway is over-expressed, the excess mutations it causes can lead to cancer. PARP1 is over-expressed in tyrosine kinase-activated leukemias,[18] in neuroblastoma,[19] in testicular and other germ cell tumors,[20] and in Ewing's sarcoma,[21] FEN1 is over-expressed in the majority of cancers of the breast,[22] prostate,[23] stomach,[24][25] neuroblastomas,[26] pancreatic,[27] and lung.[28]

DNA damage appears to be the primary underlying cause of cancer.[29][30] If accurate DNA repair is deficient, DNA damages tend to accumulate. Such excess DNA damage can increase mutational errors during DNA replication due to error-prone translesion synthesis. Excess DNA damage can also increase epigenetic alterations due to errors during DNA repair. Such mutations and epigenetic alterations can give rise to cancer (see malignant neoplasms). Thus, CpG island hyper/hypo-methylation in the promoters of DNA repair genes are likely central to progression to cancer.[31][32]

See also

References

  1. ^ Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag DL (2006). "A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (5): 1412–1417. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.1412S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510310103. PMC 1345710. PMID 16432200.
  2. ^ Deaton AM, Bird A (2011). "CpG islands and the regulation of transcription". Genes Dev. 25 (10): 1010–1022. doi:10.1101/gad.2037511. PMC 3093116. PMID 21576262.
  3. ^ Okugawa Y, Grady WM, Goel A (2015). "Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers". Gastroenterology. 149 (5): 1204–1225.e12. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.011. PMC 4589488. PMID 26216839.
  4. ^ Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M (1987). "CpG islands in vertebrate genomes". J. Mol. Biol. 196 (2): 261–282. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9. PMID 3656447.
  5. ^ Chen HY, Shao CJ, Chen FR, Kwan AL, Chen ZP (2010). "Role of ERCC1 promoter hypermethylation in drug resistance to cisplatin in human gliomas". Int. J. Cancer. 126 (8): 1944–1954. doi:10.1002/ijc.24772. PMID 19626585. S2CID 3423262.
  6. ^ Kaur S, Lotsari-Salomaa JE, Seppänen-Kaijansinkko R, Peltomäki P (2016). "MicroRNA Methylation in Colorectal Cancer". Non-coding RNAs in Colorectal Cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 937. pp. 109–122. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42059-2_6. ISBN 978-3-319-42057-8. PMID 27573897.
  7. ^ a b Bird A (2002). "DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory". Genes Dev. 16 (1): 6–21. doi:10.1101/gad.947102. PMID 11782440.
  8. ^ Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA, Kinzler KW (2013). "Cancer genome landscapes". Science. 339 (6127): 1546–1558. Bibcode:2013Sci...339.1546V. doi:10.1126/science.1235122. PMC 3749880. PMID 23539594.
  9. ^ Illingworth RS, Gruenewald-Schneider U, Webb S, Kerr AR, James KD, Turner DJ, Smith C, Harrison DJ, Andrews R, Bird AP (2010). "Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome". PLOS Genet. 6 (9): e1001134. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001134. PMC 2944787. PMID 20885785.
  10. ^ Wei J, Li G, Dang S, Zhou Y, Zeng K, Liu M (2016). "Discovery and Validation of Hypermethylated Markers for Colorectal Cancer". Dis. Markers. 2016: 2192853. doi:10.1155/2016/2192853. PMC 4963574. PMID 27493446.
  11. ^ a b Beggs AD, Jones A, El-Bahrawy M, El-Bahwary M, Abulafi M, Hodgson SV, Tomlinson IP (2013). "Whole-genome methylation analysis of benign and malignant colorectal tumours". J. Pathol. 229 (5): 697–704. doi:10.1002/path.4132. PMC 3619233. PMID 23096130.
  12. ^ Schnekenburger M, Diederich M (2012). "Epigenetics Offer New Horizons for Colorectal Cancer Prevention". Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 8 (1): 66–81. doi:10.1007/s11888-011-0116-z. PMC 3277709. PMID 22389639.
  13. ^ Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2009). "Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs". Genome Res. 19 (1): 92–105. doi:10.1101/gr.082701.108. PMC 2612969. PMID 18955434.
  14. ^ Gagnon KT, Li L, Chu Y, Janowski BA, Corey DR (2014). "RNAi factors are present and active in human cell nuclei". Cell Rep. 6 (1): 211–221. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.013. PMC 3916906. PMID 24388755.
  15. ^ Catalanotto C, Cogoni C, Zardo G (2016). "MicroRNA in Control of Gene Expression: An Overview of Nuclear Functions". Int J Mol Sci. 17 (10): 1712. doi:10.3390/ijms17101712. PMC 5085744. PMID 27754357.
  16. ^ Rieke DT, Ochsenreither S, Klinghammer K, Seiwert TY, Klauschen F, Tinhofer I, Keilholz U (2016). "Methylation of RAD51B, XRCC3 and other homologous recombination genes is associated with expression of immune checkpoints and an inflammatory signature in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, lung and cervix". Oncotarget. 7 (46): 75379–75393. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12211. PMC 5342748. PMID 27683114.
  17. ^ Jin B, Robertson KD (2013). "DNA Methyltransferases, DNA Damage Repair, and Cancer". Epigenetic Alterations in Oncogenesis. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 754. pp. 3–29. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9967-2_1. ISBN 978-1-4419-9966-5. PMC 3707278. PMID 22956494.
  18. ^ Muvarak N, Kelley S, Robert C, Baer MR, Perrotti D, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Civin C, Scheibner K, Rassool FV (2015). "c-MYC Generates Repair Errors via Increased Transcription of Alternative-NHEJ Factors, LIG3 and PARP1, in Tyrosine Kinase-Activated Leukemias". Mol. Cancer Res. 13 (4): 699–712. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0422. PMC 4398615. PMID 25828893.
  19. ^ Newman EA, Lu F, Bashllari D, Wang L, Opipari AW, Castle VP (2015). "Alternative NHEJ Pathway Components Are Therapeutic Targets in High-Risk Neuroblastoma". Mol. Cancer Res. 13 (3): 470–482. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0337. PMID 25563294.
  20. ^ Mego M, Cierna Z, Svetlovska D, Macak D, Machalekova K, Miskovska V, Chovanec M, Usakova V, Obertova J, Babal P, Mardiak J (2013). "PARP expression in germ cell tumours". J. Clin. Pathol. 66 (7): 607–612. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201088. PMID 23486608. S2CID 535704.
  21. ^ Newman RE, Soldatenkov VA, Dritschilo A, Notario V (2002). "Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase turnover alterations do not contribute to PARP overexpression in Ewing's sarcoma cells". Oncol. Rep. 9 (3): 529–532. doi:10.3892/or.9.3.529. PMID 11956622.
  22. ^ Singh P, Yang M, Dai H, Yu D, Huang Q, Tan W, Kernstine KH, Lin D, Shen B (2008). "Overexpression and hypomethylation of flap endonuclease 1 gene in breast and other cancers". Mol. Cancer Res. 6 (11): 1710–1717. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0269. PMC 2948671. PMID 19010819.
  23. ^ Lam JS, Seligson DB, Yu H, Li A, Eeva M, Pantuck AJ, Zeng G, Horvath S, Belldegrun AS (2006). "Flap endonuclease 1 is overexpressed in prostate cancer and is associated with a high Gleason score". BJU Int. 98 (2): 445–451. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06224.x. PMID 16879693. S2CID 22165252.
  24. ^ Kim JM, Sohn HY, Yoon SY, Oh JH, Yang JO, Kim JH, Song KS, Rho SM, Yoo HS, Yoo HS, Kim YS, Kim JG, Kim NS (2005). "Identification of gastric cancer-related genes using a cDNA microarray containing novel expressed sequence tags expressed in gastric cancer cells". Clin. Cancer Res. 11 (2 Pt 1): 473–482. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.473.11.2. PMID 15701830.
  25. ^ Wang K, Xie C, Chen D (2014). "Flap endonuclease 1 is a promising candidate biomarker in gastric cancer and is involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis". Int. J. Mol. Med. 33 (5): 1268–1274. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2014.1682. PMID 24590400.
  26. ^ Krause A, Combaret V, Iacono I, Lacroix B, Compagnon C, Bergeron C, Valsesia-Wittmann S, Leissner P, Mougin B, Puisieux A (2005). "Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in neuroblastomas detected by mass screening" (PDF). Cancer Lett. 225 (1): 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.035. PMID 15922863. S2CID 44644467.
  27. ^ Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Maitra A, Olsen M, Lowe AW, van Heek NT, Rosty C, Walter K, Sato N, Parker A, Ashfaq R, Jaffee E, Ryu B, Jones J, Eshleman JR, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Kern SE, Hruban RH, Brown PO, Goggins M (2003). "Exploration of global gene expression patterns in pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cDNA microarrays". Am. J. Pathol. 162 (4): 1151–1162. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63911-9. PMC 1851213. PMID 12651607.
  28. ^ Nikolova T, Christmann M, Kaina B (2009). "FEN1 is overexpressed in testis, lung and brain tumors". Anticancer Res. 29 (7): 2453–2459. PMID 19596913.
  29. ^ Kastan MB (2008). "DNA damage responses: mechanisms and roles in human disease: 2007 G.H.A. Clowes Memorial Award Lecture". Mol. Cancer Res. 6 (4): 517–524. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0020. PMID 18403632.
  30. ^ Bernstein, C; Prasad, AR; Nfonsam, V; Bernstein, H. (2013). "Chapter 16: DNA Damage, DNA Repair and Cancer". In Chen, Clark (ed.). New Research Directions in DNA Repair. Rijeka. p. 413. ISBN 978-953-51-1114-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  31. ^ O'Hagan HM, Mohammad HP, Baylin SB (2008). "Double strand breaks can initiate gene silencing and SIRT1-dependent onset of DNA methylation in an exogenous promoter CpG island". PLOS Genetics. 4 (8): e1000155. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000155. PMC 2491723. PMID 18704159.
  32. ^ Cuozzo C, Porcellini A, Angrisano T, et al. (July 2007). "DNA damage, homology-directed repair, and DNA methylation". PLOS Genetics. 3 (7): e110. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030110. PMC 1913100. PMID 17616978.
This page was last edited on 3 December 2023, at 22:58
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.