To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

REAL Women of Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

REAL Women of Canada
AbbreviationRWOC
Formation1983
TypeSocially Conservative activist organization in Canada.
Legal statusActive
PurposeAdvocate Group and Public Voice, Educator and Network
HeadquartersOttawa, Ontario
Region served
Canada
Official language
English
French
AffiliationsAn official sponsor of World Congress of Families
WebsiteOfficial website of REAL Women of Canada

REAL Women of Canada (French: Vraies Femmes du Canada) is a socially conservative advocacy group in Canada. The organization was founded in 1983.

REAL stands for "Realistic, Equal, Active, for Life". The group believes that the nuclear family is the most important unit in Canadian society, and that the fragmentation of the Canadian family is a primary cause of social disorder. It lobbies the Government of Canada in favour of legislation to promote what it believes to be the Judeo-Christian-Islamic model of family life, and to support homemaking. REAL is also opposed to feminism, abortion and LGBT rights (and same-sex marriage in Canada as well).

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    25 350
    4 223
    78 302
  • Department of History | World War I, Episode 3 | Women at War
  • Beverley K. Jacobs - Restoring the Balance: Aboriginal Women's Issues in Canada
  • History of Canada Documentary

Transcription

PROFESSOR KATHRYN MCPHERSON When war broke out in 1914 there's no expectation that Canadian women would serve in any active combat role in the military, but it was expected that women would play a key role in the domestic war-time economy and interestingly, women were well poised to do this because for the twenty years or so before the war broke out Canadian women had been forming all sorts of organizations. Some of them were very local and others were much more national/international which were poised to take action during the war and they did. So this network of women's organizations leapt into action. PROFESSOR MOLLY LADD-TAYLOR Women in the United States as in Canada became very involved in a number of aspects of war work. With their victory gardens in their backyard, with the diet and with conserving materials and so there was a big effort around "food will win the war". They actually had to produce supplies so women knit and they sewed and they canned fruit to be sent overseas. They also volunteered to be farmerettes to take off the harvest so to replace the many, many men who had left the agricultural regions to enlist. Canadian women also raised money. In 1917, the IODE collected 1.5 million dollars to send to the Red Cross and other agencies that were providing supplies for Canadian troops. As the war progressed we were responsible for collecting something called Sphagnum Moss which is a natural product that the Red Cross wanted for dressings - 20 million by the end of the war. And this was all produced by the volunteer labor - mostly women - going out collecting and drying and packaging it and sending it overseas. Nobody really anticipated when war broke out that the amount of first aid supplies and medical attention that was going to be needed was really unanticipated. There were a number of ways that women were able to take advantage of the war as a way to get government to recognize women's contribution to society. 3,000 Canadian women trained as voluntary aid detachments. They took Red Cross courses, Saint John's Ambulance courses and about 1,700 of those women went overseas to serve. Canadian Nurses served in hospitals in Africa, in the Middle East as well as in military hospitals at the Western Front and they did a range of things so there certainly was a strong administrative role the Canadian nurses had to fill. They had to get the hospital set up manage the supplies, take care of paperwork of tracking all these injured men that came through. They're also especially in the Eastern theatre of war was a problem with sanitation and dysentery so there was a disturbing number of soldiers that died from non-military battles. Some nurses were decorated who survived the war and then nurses who were killed during the war were also decorated. Over 30 nurses were killed during the war including 14 Canadian nurses who died when the Llandovery Castle ship was torpedoed. Another important element of Canadian Nurses' experience in the war was that they were given officer status. They couldn't carry guns but otherwise they had officer status and that meant were technically in command of the male soldiers that they oversaw. They were understood to be in this elite corps of the Canadian military. Neither the American nor the British services offered that status to their nurses. PROFESSOR JENNIFER STEPHENS War provides states with a very powerful incentive to improve public education, to improve public health and to living standards. Women, on average, really benefited in a lot of ways from the First World War. This is partly because there had been a strong women's movement prior to the war and they took advantage of the war years. During the war, most suffragettes who had been peace activists prior to the war, the vast majority ended up siding with the war. Certainly the senior commanders were increasingly concerned about the poor state of health, the malnutrition, the rotting teeth, the illiteracy... And the United States Children's Bureau declared the second year of the war, 1918, to be Children's Year and involved a massive mobilization campaign where women all over the country ended up participating in infant health clinics. So although on the one side we can see this as a sort of standardization imposing a certain notion of health and beauty throughout the population, there's a lot of evidence that women faced with high rates of infant and also maternal mortality were really seeking this kind of health care and the activities of the Children's Bureau during the First World War led to the passage of the Sheppard-Towner Act in 1921 which was the first federal social welfare measure passed in the United States providing healthcare for women and children. Feminist pacifists were frustrated by the enthusiasm that many in the women's movement showed for the war. The war fractured the women's movement in important ways. In her 1945 autobiography Nellie McClung, who was one of Canada's foremost and most articulate and most often quoted in the press. Feminists recalled "The Fall of 1914 blurs in my memory like a troubled dream. The war dominated everything. Some of my friends were pacifists and resented Canada's participation in a war of which we knew so little. Chief among the Empire's defenders among the women was Miss Cora Hind. Her views were clear-cut and definite. We were British and must follow the tradition of our fathers. She would have gone herself if women were accepted. Miss Hind saw only one side of the question and there were times when I envied her though I resented her denunciation of those who thought otherwise. The old crowd began to break up and our good times were over."

Interventions

The group has intervened in Supreme Court of Canada cases including R. v. Morgentaler (1993) and M. v. H. (1999). In R. v. Sullivan (1991) it argued that a fetus is a person and the only thing different between a fetus and a baby is a short amount of time.

Objectives

According to its website, its aims are to emphasize the importance of the family and legally promote what it refers to as a "Judeo-Christian" understanding of marriage and a nuclear family, to promote homemaking, and to oppose abortion and assisted suicide.

Part of their economic policies to help meet their objectives are increased tax relief for single-income families, families with children, and individuals with children.

REAL Women is similar in political and social outlook to Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum and to Concerned Women for America in the United States.

The organization has also criticized individuals who have spoken out against Uganda's criminalization of homosexual relations.[1] On August 7, 2013, the group issued a statement criticizing Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird for speaking out on LGBT human rights issues in both Uganda and Russia as part of Canada's foreign policy.[2]

History

In January 1983, Judy Erola, the federal cabinet minister for the status of women, proposed scrapping the tax exemption for dependent spouses, including mothers at home raising young children. Seeing this change as anti-family, persons active in the anti-abortion campaign began to speak out in opposition.[3] On September 3, 1983, a group of Ontario women formed what would become known as REAL Women: Realistic, Equal, and Active for Life.[4] REAL Women was dissatisfied with how feminist organizations addressed women's issues, and said that many housewives felt disparaged and attacked by these organizations.[4] REAL Women was formed as an anti-feminist counterweight to the National Action Committee on the Status of Women.[5][6][7] A press conference was held in 1984 officially announcing their formation. The group claimed initially to have 10,000 members, however this was later discredited.[4] The year following their formation, the group held its first national conference, claiming to have 20,000 members, though this could not be verified.[5]

REAL Women said it represented a silent majority of women within Canada. They promoted male-led, single-breadwinner families, and believed that women should be homemakers, mothers and wives.[3] Their views and beliefs greatly differed from the stance taken by the National Action Committee on the Status of Women and its umbrella organizations, and the group argued against the equality guarantees already enacted in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:[8] they denounce the equal rights clause in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and feminist movements and organizations, and they argue that government spending and funding of these feminist organizations is undermining traditional gender and family relations.[3] 1987 its president Lynne Scime stated that "REAL women want to look at issues such as how a woman can pick a husband to fulfill her needs".[3] They believed that women are naturally nurturing, emotional and dependent beings, suited to motherhood. They use the slogan "equal but different" while pushing for increased tax credits for stay-at-home mothers, .[3] and have made suggestions on how to augment the options and resources available to families.[3]

REAL is directly opposed to issues that organizations such as the National Action Committee advocatet. One is abortion, which REAL opposes, claiming it is murder. In addition, the group opposes the idea of the universal childcare model, as they believe that governmental childcare represents a loss of parental control and increases the influence of the state on the family. They argue that the funding would be better spent on things such as courses on parenting skills.[3] REAL also oppose laws guaranteeing equal pay for women, believing that this would reduce the income disparity between genders, draw women into the paid labour force, and incentivize the economic position of female-led households. They believe this represents a major threat to family values, demeans women and breaks down the traditional family. They also believe that women taking men's jobs will destroy the free market economy.[3] Other viewpoints they oppose include programs to reduce family violence, which they claim encourage hatred toward men; no-fault divorce; and human rights protections for gays and lesbians.[3] The overarching goal of REAL Women is to support the way of life traditionally associated with the 1950s nuclear family and arch-conservative values.[4] Their belief is that their activism contributes to women's equality and will improve their lives.[4] Their monthly newsletter, Reality, mirrors the American conservative movement. It regularly attacks feminists such as Flora MacDonald as well as feminist campaigns.[8]

REAL Women of Canada endorsed Derek Sloan as candidate in the 2020 Conservative leadership election.[9]

Archives

There is a REAL Women of Canada archival deposit at Library and Archives Canada.[10] The archival reference number is R11007. The deposit covers the date range 1970 to 2015. It contains 16.7 meters of textual records; 2 videocassettes; 5 photographs.

References

  1. ^ "Women's group slams Baird over anti-gay laws stance". CBC News. Aug 7, 2013. Retrieved 8 August 2013.
  2. ^ "John Baird’s defence of gay rights ‘offensive,’ women’s group says". Toronto Star, August 7, 2013.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Erwin, Lorna. "R.E.A.L. Women, Anti-feminism and the Welfare State." Resources for Feminist Research 17 (1988): 147-49. Print.
  4. ^ a b c d e Pal, Leslie A. Interests of the State. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University, 1993. Print. p144
  5. ^ a b MacIvor, Heather. Women and Politics in Canada. Broadview, 2001. Print. p145
  6. ^ Yasmeen Abu-Laban (January 2009). Gendering the Nation-State: Canadian and Comparative Perspectives. University of British Columbia Press. ISBN 9780774858342. Retrieved 13 November 2010. Groups such as REAL Women (Realistic, Equal, Active for Life) in Canada and Women Who Want to Be Women in Australia (now Endeavor Forum) highlighted through their names an implied contrast with equality seekers, who were not real women. Although the initial impetus for the formation of such groups was opposition to abortion, they have taken up a much broader range of issues, opposing feminist influence on government and promoting "family values."
  7. ^ Tom Warner (January 2002). Never Going Back. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 9780802084606. Retrieved 13 November 2010. They swiftly branched out into Canada to assert a leadership role in the family values movement in this country. Following groups led by Schlafly and Bryant, anti-feminist women in Canada created REAL Women (Realistic, Equal, Active for Life) in 1983. It believes the 'family is the most important unit in Canadian society,' the fragmentation of which 'is one of the major causes of disorder in society today.' Among REAL Women's stated objectives have been support for 'legislation which upholds the Judeo-Christian values of marriage and family life' and for the 'right to life of all innocent individuals from conception to natural death.'
  8. ^ a b Vickers, Jill, Pauline Rankin, and Christine Appelle. Politics as If Women Mattered: a Political p240
  9. ^ Sloan, Derek. "Real Women of Canada Endorses Derek Sloan as #1 choice for CPC leader". Twitter. @DerekSloanCPC. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
  10. ^ "REAL Women of Canada fond description at Library and Archives Canada". Retrieved June 22, 2020.

External links

This page was last edited on 14 February 2024, at 01:25
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.