Quasiperfect Equilibrium  

A solution concept in game theory  
Relationship  
Subset of  Sequential equilibrium, normalform trembling hand perfect equilibrium 
Significance  
Proposed by  Eric van Damme 
Used for  Extensive form games 
Example  Mertens' voting game 
Quasiperfect equilibrium is a refinement of Nash Equilibrium for extensive form games due to Eric van Damme.^{[1]}
Informally, a player playing by a strategy from a quasiperfect equilibrium takes observed as well as potential future mistakes of his opponents into account but assumes that he himself will not make a mistake in the future, even if he observes that he has done so in the past.
Quasiperfect equilibrium is a further refinement of sequential equilibrium. It is itself refined by normal form proper equilibrium.
YouTube Encyclopedic

1/3Views:1 5625 128148 171

On the Equilibrium Payoff Set in Repeated Games with Imperfect Private Monitoring

Holdup Game; and Stackelberg outcome

Mark Blyth  A Brief History of How We Got Here and Why
Transcription
Mortens' voting game
It has been argued by JeanFrançois Mertens^{[2]} that quasiperfect equilibrium is superior to Reinhard Selten's notion of extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium as a quasiperfect equilibrium is guaranteed to describe admissible behavior. In contrast, for a certain twoplayer voting game no extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium describes admissible behavior for both players.
The voting game suggested by Mortens may be described as follows:
 Two players must elect one of them to perform an effortless task. The task may be performed either correctly or incorrectly. If it is performed correctly, both players receive a payoff of 1, otherwise both players receive a payoff of 0. The election is by a secret vote. If both players vote for the same player, that player gets to perform the task. If each player votes for himself, the player to perform the task is chosen at random but is not told that he was elected this way. Finally, if each player votes for the other, the task is performed by somebody else, with no possibility of it being performed incorrectly.
In the unique quasiperfect equilibrium for the game, each player votes for himself and, if elected, performs the task correctly. This is also the unique admissible behavior. But in any extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium, at least one of the players believes that he is at least as likely as the other player to tremble and perform the task incorrectly and hence votes for the other player.
The example illustrates that being a limit of equilibria of perturbed games, an extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium implicitly assumes an agreement between the players about the relative magnitudes of future trembles. It also illustrates that such an assumption may be unwarranted and undesirable.
References
 ^ Eric van Damme. "A relationship between perfect equilibria in extensive form games and proper equilibria in normal form games." International Journal of Game Theory 13:113, 1984.
 ^ JeanFrançois Mertens. "Two examples of strategic equilibrium." Games and Economic Behavior, 8:378388, 1995.