To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Posthumous citizenship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posthumous citizenship is a form of honorary citizenship granted by countries to immigrants or other foreigners after their deaths.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    1 012
  • English professor Brian Norman, Ph.D., discusses his new book "Dead Women Talking"

Transcription

Hi, my name’s Brian Norman. I’m an associate professor of English at Loyola University of Maryland, where I also direct the African, African American Studies Program. My new book is called “Dead Women Talking: Figures of Injustice in American Literature,” published by the Johns Hopkins University Press. Well, generally, dead women are pretty quiet, same thing goes for dead men, but in American Literature, they’re actually quite chatty. Once you start looking for them, all over American Literature, you’ll find dead women who talk. You’ll see them in writing by Emily Dickenson, Henry James, William Faulkner, more contemporary writers such as Tony Morrison, Tony Kushner, Alice Walker, uh, they’re all over the place, they’re also all over the place in contemporary culture. You see there’s a posthumous narrator on Desperate Housewives, they’re all over the place in Six Feet Under, The Lovely Bones, Drop Dead Diva, and so, basically, I’m trying to figure why these women who are dead are nonetheless talking, and that’s what the book attempts to answer. Well, nowadays, we’re pretty used to seeing things like zombies, vampires, revenants, possessions, but the women who are dead and talking in my book seem to be somewhat different, and, um, partly, I’m trying to figure out what makes them different, and so, partly, it’s that they have bodies and they’re inserting themselves into the contemporary community among the living, and they don’t see themselves as necessarily any different from the rest of us. They’re hanging around, they’re chatting. They want to be recognized as formal members of a community, which is, to say, citizenship. And so, I ended up finding out that what these dead women sought was something potentially quite more disturbing then these more familiar characters, which is posthumous citizenship. Well, partly, I just noticed that the novels I was teaching in classes, the novels that I was drawn to and had generated such good discussions, just happened to feature these recurring, this recurring trope of dead women, and once I started putting them all together, I started to notice that there was an actual literary tradition that develops over time from the mid-19th century, in the sort of crevices where gothic literature meets realistic literature, and now, up through the 21st century, they’re all over the place, and I think they’re actually doing something quite difficult and quite profound. I think they’re helping us to address pasts, especially unjust past that were prematurely buried. Probably the best example is Beloved. Uh, it is set about a generation after slavery, uh, and just after the end of reconstruction, but, clearly, the legacy of slavery lives on, and so too a hundred years later, the time when Tony Morrison writes the novel, we’re still trying to figure out how to address this, the legacy of our slave past. There are more dead women who are talking than dead men, and I think partly it’s also that, in American literature and culture, women tend to be the bearers of history, the bearers of cross-generational continuity. And, also, the concepts of voice and silence also very much have gendered components. So, silence has often been the mark of oppression, and, uh, much of the feminist movement throughout American culture and history has been one of coming into voice. So the fact that some of these women are talking at all in itself is noteworthy because many of them were quite silent in life. Probably the best example is Addie Bundren from William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying, who doesn’t, who says almost nothing while she’s alive. I think her one line is “you cash” as she looks at her older son building her coffin through the window of her death bed. But once she dies, she is quite chatty; she has a very long and revealing chapter. You find out about adultery, blasphemy, and sadism. It’s really quite steaming. One of my goals when I was writing about each of these novels was to sort of finally answer the question, finally answer questions that had perplexed me. For instance, Addie Bundren in As I Lay Dying, one of the ongoing jokes throughout the novel is that she starts to smell, around day 9, in the hot Mississippi sun; her corpse is really quite powerful, as they might say. And so I was trying to think about, what would happen if we started to think about other forms of speech. I had already done that when I was looking at The Fall of the House of Usher, where we encounter Madeline Usher, who never really says any words, she just sort of wails, so is a wail a form of speech, I ask then. Well, by the time we get up to William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying, Addie Bundren, while we are listening to her posthumous chapter, I think the form of speech that’s most heard in her community is, um, the rotting stench of her own corpse, and, in fact, that’s quite a loud stench, you might say. It’s actually the job of the living to address unjust pasts. Probably the most respectful thing we can do for the dead is to let them rest in peace, let them be quiet, not do our job for us and address these pasts that we, ourselves, need to address.

Israel

In the late 1940s, Mordechai Shenhavi, one of the early supporters of the creation of an Israeli national memorial authority whose efforts would eventually lead to the building of Yad Vashem, made the first proposal to grant honorary posthumous Israeli citizenship to all of the victims of the Holocaust. Israeli legal experts looked into the idea, but the government eventually decided to move ahead with the building of the memorial first, leaving the idea of posthumous citizenship to be resolved later.[1] There were voices of opposition to Shenhavi's plan, such as Jacob Blaustein of the American Jewish Committee, and as a result, the Israeli government at the time chose not to make a blanket grant of posthumous citizenship but instead granted it only upon application by a relative or friend of one of the dead.[2]

However, in 1985, Israel granted posthumous citizenship to all the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust. After the Knesset approved the decision, the Israeli Minister for Education, Yitzhak Navon, signed a proclamation granting posthumous citizenship to all the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust.[3][4]

Netherlands

Dutch nationality law makes no provision for a posthumous grant of citizenship. In 2004, a television programme about Anne Frank sparked public interest in granting her posthumous citizenship. Frank had moved to the Netherlands with her family while a young girl, and her father became a Dutch citizen after her death. A spokeswoman for Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk stated that the ministry was trying to find a way in which this could be accomplished, but expressed her doubt that it would be possible. However, the proposal did not enjoy universal support; Patricia Bosboom of the Anne Frank House museum stated, "She was as Dutch as you can be. Giving her citizenship would add nothing", while David Barnouw of the Dutch Institute for War Documentation described it as insulting to other victims of the Holocaust.[5] In the end, Frank was not granted citizenship under the proposal.[6]

United States

In the United States, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 101–249 (8 U.S.C. §§ 14401441) allows the next-of-kin of non-U.S. citizens who died due to injuries sustained while on active duty with the United States Armed Forces to request that the Secretary of Homeland Security grant posthumous citizenship to the deceased. That is an honorary status which does not confer any immigration benefits to the decedent's relatives.[7] In the 2000s and 2010s, there were roughly 30,000 to 40,000 service members who were not U.S. citizens; by 2007, a total of 59 non-citizens who had died on active duty had been granted posthumous citizenship.[8][9] The process of gaining posthumous citizenship is not automatic and requires the submission of an application form, but family members of soldiers killed on duty have suggested making the grant of posthumous citizenship automatic instead, and a number of members of Congress have sponsored bills to that end.[9][10]

There have also been calls for the granting of posthumous citizenship to other individuals or groups. In 2004 and again in 2007, Congressman Steve Israel sponsored a bill to grant posthumous citizenship to Anne Frank. Her cousin Bernhard Elias expressed misgivings about the idea, stating that Anne herself had wanted to be Dutch, and others including Emory University Institute for Jewish Studies director Deborah Lipstadt stated that the United States should not have the right to claim Frank's legacy after having rebuffed the efforts of her family and thousands of other Jewish refugees from Europe to immigrate to the United States in the early years of World War II.[6][11]

In 2013, Daniel Swalm, the grandson of a Minnesota woman who had lost US citizenship under Section 3 of the Expatriation Act of 1907 for marrying a Swedish immigrant and died without regaining her citizenship, began lobbying Congress for posthumous citizenship to women like his grandmother.[12] He contacted his senator Al Franken, who in 2014 sponsored a resolution (S.Res. 402) expressing regret for the passage of the 1907 Act.[13][14]

References

  1. ^ Young, James E. (2007). "Mandating the National Memory of Catastrophe". In Sarat, Austin; Douglas, Lawrence; Umphrey, Martha Merrill (eds.). Law and Catastrophe. Stanford University Press. p. 143.
  2. ^ Novick, Peter (2000). The Holocaust in American Life. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 317.
  3. ^ "Holocaust Victims Given Posthumous Citizenship by Israel". Los Angeles Times. 1985-05-09. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  4. ^ Holocaust Victims to Receive Posthumous Israel Citizenship
  5. ^ "Dutch lawmakers want to give Anne Frank posthumous citizenship". Haaretz. 2004-10-05.
  6. ^ a b Demirjian, Karoun (2007-04-02). "Posthumous honor sought for Anne Frank: U.S. citizenship". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2014-04-14.
  7. ^ "N-644, Application for Posthumous Citizenship". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. 2013-01-19. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  8. ^ Jonsson, Patrik (2005-07-05). "Noncitizen soldiers: the quandaries of foreign-born troops". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  9. ^ a b "Immigrant U.S. Soldier Granted Posthumous Citizenship". ABC News. 2014-04-08. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  10. ^ Amaya, Hector (2013-05-06). "Mediating Belonging, Inclusion, and Death". Citizenship Excess: Latino/as, Media, and the Nation. NYU Press. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  11. ^ Vitello, Paul (2007-02-26). "A Push for Citizenship to Honor Anne Frank, but It's No Easy Sell". The New York Times. Retrieved 2014-04-15.
  12. ^ Rosario, Ruben (2013-03-23). "He wants grandma's citizenship restored". TwinCities.com. Retrieved 2014-04-14.
  13. ^ Itkowitz, Colby (2014-04-03). "Franken: So sorry for that terrible law 100 years ago". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2014-04-14.
  14. ^ Sandretsky, Lareesa (2014-04-07). "After a century, Minn. woman in line to receive posthumous apology from the U.S. government". Minnesota West-Central Tribune. Retrieved 2014-04-14.
This page was last edited on 16 January 2023, at 12:27
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.