To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Point of view (philosophy)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In philosophy, a point of view is a specific attitude or manner through which a person thinks about something.[1] This figurative usage of the expression dates back to 1730.[1] In this meaning, the usage is synonymous with one of the meanings of the term perspective[2][3] (also epistemic perspective).[4]

The concept of the "point of view" is highly multifunctional and ambiguous. Many things may be judged from certain personal, traditional or moral points of view (as in "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"). Our knowledge about reality is often relative to a certain point of view.[2]

Vázquez Campos and Manuel Liz Gutierrez suggested to analyse the concept of "point of view" using two approaches: one based on the concept of "propositional attitudes", the other on the concepts of "location" and "access".[5]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    42 176
    586
    522 460
    2 497 076
    7 049 467
  • Partial and Holistic Perspective
  • Doing Philosophy | distinguish a holistic perspective from partial point of view
  • PHILOSOPHY - History: Aristotle on the Purpose of Life [HD]
  • Becoming Who You Really Are - The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche
  • What is Philosophy?: Crash Course Philosophy #1

Transcription

Analysis

Margarita Vázquez Campos and Antonio Manuel Liz Gutiérrez in their work, "The Notion of Point of View", give a comprehensive analysis of the structure of the concept. They point out that despite being crucial in many discourses, the notion has not been adequately analyzed, though some important works do exist.[2] They mention that early classical Greek philosophers, starting from Parmenides and Heraclitus discussed the relation between "appearance" and reality, i.e., how our points of view are connected with reality.[6] They specifically point out Ludwig Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. They consider Wittgenstein's theory of "pictures" or "models" (Wittgenstein used the German word Bild, which means both "picture" and "model") as an illustration of the relationship between points of view and reality.[7]

Propositional attitudes

The internal structure of a point of view may be analysed similarly to the concept of a propositional attitude. A propositional attitude is an attitude, i.e., a mental state held by an agent toward a proposition. Examples of such attitudes are "to believe in something", "to desire something", "to guess something", "to remember something", etc. Vazques Campos and Gutierrez suggest that points of view may be analyzed as structured sets of propositional attitudes.[8] The authors draw on Christopher Peacocke's Sense and Content.[3]

Within this approach one may carry out ontological classification of various distinctions, such as individual vs. collective points of view, personal vs. non-personal, non-conceptual vs. conceptual, etc.[3]

Location and access

Whereas propositional attitudes approach to analyze points of view internally, the "location/access" approach analyzes points of view externally, by their role. The term "access" refers to the statement of Liz Gutierrez that "points of views, or perspectives, are ways of having access to the world and to ourselves", and the term "location" is in reference to the provided quotation of Jon Moline that points of view are "ways of viewing things and events from certain locations". Moline rejects the notion that points of view are reducible to some rules based on some theories, maxims or dogmas. Moline considers the concept of "location" in two ways: in a direct way as a vantage point, and in an extended way, the way how a given vantage point provides a perspective, i.e., influences the perception.[9]

This approach may address epistemological issues, such as relativism, existence of the absolute point of view, compatibility of points of view (including "faultless disagreement"), possibility of a point of view without a bearer, etc.[3]

See also

  • Anekantavada – Jain doctrine about metaphysical truths that emerged in ancient India
  • Paradigm – Set of distinct concepts or thought patterns
  • Perspectivism – Philosophical principle that perspectives and epistemology are always linked
  • Reality tunnel – Theory of personal perception
  • Umwelt – Biological foundations central to the study of communication and signification
  • Worldview – Fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society
  • Value system – Personal value, basis for ethical action

Notes

  1. ^ a b "Point of View". Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House Inc. 2024. Retrieved 16 January 2024.
  2. ^ a b c Campos, Gutiérrez, p. 2
  3. ^ a b c d Manuel Liz & Margarita Vázquez, "Two approaches to the notion of Point of View", extended abstract for: 14th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Archived 2015-09-20 at the Wayback Machine, July 19–26, 2011 (retrieved August 31, 2015)
  4. ^ Clayton Littlejohn, John Turri (eds.), Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion, Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 220.
  5. ^ Manuel Liz, p. 110
  6. ^ Campos-Gutiérrez, p. 7
  7. ^ Campos, Gutiérrez, p. 14
  8. ^ Campos, Gutiérrez, p. 17
  9. ^ Moline, Jon, "On Points of View", American Philosophical Quarterly, 1968, vol. 5, 191–298. (as cited by Manuel Liz)

References

Further reading

  • Moore, A., Points of View, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997

External links

This page was last edited on 12 March 2024, at 02:34
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.