To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions, US No. C78-679A (1981), is a precedent-setting case that established fair-use protections for publication of registered trademarks in sexually explicit parodies in the United States.[1] Screw magazine, owned by Milky Way Productions, depicted a figure resembling the Pillsbury Dough Boy in various lewd sexual acts, including fellatio and sexual intercourse. The parody also featured Pillsbury's barrelhead trademark and two lines from the refrain of a two-stanza song entitled "The Pillsbury Baking Song." The picture was published in the February 20, 1978 issue of SCREW.

The Pillsbury Company filed an initial complaint several weeks after the original publication of the cartoon contending that the manner in which the magazine presented the picture implied that the plaintiff, Pillsbury, placed it in the magazine as an advertisement. The plaintiff alleged several counts of copyright infringement, federal statutory, common law trademark infringement, violations of the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and of the Georgia "anti-dilution" statute, and several counts of tortious tarnishment of its marks, trade characters, and jingle. The judge presiding in the case, William Clark O'Kelley, issued a temporary injunction against the defendant on April 21, 1978, which the defendant disobeyed.[2]

In its final decision, the Atlanta Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia held that the pictures were editorial or social commentary and, thus, protected under fair use.[3] It's unclear whether the defendant would have prevailed under 2006's Trademark Dilution Revision Act.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    26 190 420
    1 545 015
    4 618 347
  • Ice Cream Sandwiches | How It's Made
  • FAMOUS GRAVE TOUR - Viewers Special #13 (Abraham Lincoln, Prince, etc.)
  • Major Payne | "What Are You Lookin' At, Ass Eyes?"

Transcription

References

  1. ^ a b Lim, Eugene (2012). "Of Chew Toys and Designer Handbags: A Critical Analysis of the "Parody" Exception under the U.S. Trademark Dilution Revision Act". Campbell Law Review.
  2. ^ O'Kelley, William (December 24, 1981). "The Pillsbury Company v. Milky Way Productions, Inc. et al" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ Greenstone, Richard. "Protection of Obscene Parody as Fair Use". Richard J. Greenstone Attorneys & Counselors At Law. Archived from the original on January 15, 2015. Retrieved January 14, 2015.
This page was last edited on 24 March 2024, at 01:15
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.