To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Peter Eccles (mathematician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peter Eccles
Born
Peter John Eccles

(1945-09-06) 6 September 1945 (age 78)
Blackpool, Lancashire
NationalityBritish
OccupationMathematician
Academic background
EducationClare College, Cambridge (1964–1968), Victoria University of Manchester (1968–1971)
Alma materVictoria University of Manchester
Doctoral advisorMichael George Barratt
Academic work
DisciplineMathematics
Sub-disciplineTopology
InstitutionsUniversity of Manchester (Emeritus Professor), Semitone Studios (Owner)
Main interestsMultiple points of immersions of manifolds in Euclidean space,.
Notable worksIntroduction to Mathematical Reasoning: Numbers, Sets and Functions (1997), The Presence in the Midst: Reflections on Discernment (2009)

Peter John Eccles (born 6 September 1945) is a British mathematician and emeritus professor of mathematics at the University of Manchester. Eccles specialises in homotopy theory and its applications to different topology. Eccles taught a wide variety of pure mathematics throughout his career, and published the book Introduction to mathematical reasoning [1] in 1997.

In addition to his mathematical publications, Eccles has been active in the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) nationally and internationally throughout his adult life and was invited to give the 2009 Swarthmore Lecture, which was published as The presence in the midst: reflections on discernment.[2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    264 684
    590
    6 165
  • Introduction to Higher Mathematics - Lecture 1: Problem Solving 101
  • Peter Rowlett and Advanced Noughts and Crosses
  • An introduction to Cambridge Mathematics

Transcription

hello everyone and welcome to the newest correspond project polygraph introduction to higher mathematics math one fifty i'm very excited to be teaching this course and i look forward to sharing the beauty and arsonists of mathematics with all of you first of all let me introduce myself my name is bill short-term and i live in marietta georgia like some of you taking this course per watching these videos i consider myself an aspiring polygraph i've never been satisfied with dedicated my life to just one topic but rather have always a reveled in studying many things and seeing how they're all connected that being said math has always been a particular passion of mine because of how it so often seems to link everything together i graduated from georgia tech in two thousand eight with a bachelor of science and international affairs and modern language i concentrated in japanese and of travel to japan twice so far elsa speak spanish in fact i've always been interested in languages linguistics so i studied the workings of many other languages from french to chinese to ancient egyptian to even quite gna s for my current profession i've been teaching tutoring in math since two thousand nine and i'm about to pursue my master of arts in teaching so i can teach math at a high school or perhaps university level i've also unpublished a couple times in our local math teacher associations periodical reflections and i'm soon going to have an animated lessened featured on ted and showing a more intuitive way to do matrix most look asian one other particular interest of my name is closely related to math it's music i play both piano and viola and i think composing music since i was in elementary school most recently i've contributed music to a number of video games enough about me let's talk about us and what we're going to be doing in this course the purpose of this course is to help you build a strong foundation in mathematics you'll be developing your abstract thinking skills which will include learning how to write proofs one thing i'd like to point out is that this course requires absolutely no knowledge of calculus in fact some of the topics you encounter here will be quite beneficial to if you take calculus after this course because calculus rests upon the foundations that will build especially in the properties of real numbers in fact a goal for this course is that the topics will talk about and the skills to develop will prepare you for more advanced math courses you may take in your future studies as we progress for this course we're going to cover a number of topics that serve as some of the underpinnings of mathematics as a whole among these topics are set theory relations and functions number theory abstract algebra cardinality and real analysis note that as this is a ten-week course will only be hitting highlights of certain topics like number theory abstract algebra and real analysis these are very rich topics which we could devote an entire class however what we will be going to deeply into them what we will be discussing is why they're important and how they contribute to the cohesiveness of mathematics will also see what we might call the adhesive massive mathematics seen how math applies to topics such as physics computer science crypt hundred feet and music these connections will help cultivate a more complete understanding of the topics will discuss will delve a bit into the history of mathematics and meet the unique people who made all of what we're talking about possible anyway without further ado let's go to our first lecture problem solving one oh one so before we talk about how to solve problems we have to ask ourselves the question just what is a problem many students believe they know what the problem is math they claim they've been doing them all their lives i can't speak for the rest of the world but at least in the united states this is often not the case in my country what all the masquerade zoos problems would be better turned exercises these amount a little more than reading assessments usually called a work problem translating it into arithmetic doing one or two computations and arriving at the correct answer take a look at this so-called word problem johnny goes out with four of his friends the each by a slice of pizza for two dollars how much was the total bill this word problem is nothing more than a contrived way to ask the question what is five times too some they say there's a slight challenge because some students may see the word for i think the question dear supposed to do what is four times too but in reality that's rather lame attempt at making a question more challenging however before i turn this into a rant on the american educational system let's consider what a problem should be the national council of teachers of mathematics or n_c_t_a_ m sets of guidelines and what it considers worthwhile mathematical tasks the standard say that the math teachers should pose tasks that engage students intellect stimulate students to make connections and develop a coherent framework for mathematical reasoning and are based on knowledge of the range of ways a diverse students learn mathematics this begins to give us a better idea of what makes a good problem they should have answers that are not immediately obvious and there may be more than one valid way to approach them for example consider class learning about arian perimeter on one hand and exercise might look like this find the area and perimeter of each triangle this task just requires you to apply the formulas for air imprimatur a couple times now very interesting is that on the other hand true problem might instead look like this suppose he had sixty four meters offense with which you're going to build a pen for your large dog bones waterson different ends you can make a few years all the fencing what is the pen with the least play space what is the biggest pen you can make the one that allows bones the most play space which would be best for running the questions asked constitute through problems because they asked questions that require investigation conjecture in and critical thinking there are many ways to go about solving such a problem think about how you might eccles some of these questions good problems should also foster student's ability to reason and communicate mathematically mathematics is an ongoing human activity and as a social species is one that is often best tackle together this is why by the way hopefully encourage you to collaborate with each other for the homework or be assigning for this course discuss things reason out and don't be afraid to voice your concerns opinions and ideas now that we've established what a problem really is it's time to talk about how to go about solving them as we've seen mathematical problems often have many ways to tackle them but it's useful to study what most effective problem-solving strategies have in common so i'm going to introduced him problem solving framework adapted from a book i highly recommend called thinking mathematically by mason burton and stacy don't think of this is a step-by-step process that must be followed to the letter one's own problems but more of a suggested guideline for how to focus our efforts the problem solving process can generally be broken up into three parts and entreaties an attack face and a review face no matter how you tend to solve problems these three phases are also present some varying degree let's look at each phase intern the first phase is the entry face this is the phase entered when you first ponder problem and prepared to attack it some people just try to haphazardly dive right in after reading the question but it's usually ends in frustration it's important to recognize that the entry phase is a vital part of problem solving and should not be overlooked in the entry phase there are three questions but you must also consider what do i know what do i want and what can i introduce think about would do one no this is usually answered from two sources first of all what do you know from reading the question second of all what do you know from past experience often even countered exercises are problems or even real-world situations that involves similar principles to the ones on which your problems based the second question is what do i want this is where you isolate exactly what you're looking for in many cases it helps to write the essentials of the problem in your own words this helps to ensure that you understand your goal always make sure to watch out for possible ambiguities in the questions freezing them language can be tricky thing for example my question is talking about a circle do i care about just the outside edge of the circle or do i need to think about the interior of that circle which is usually called disk we often use circle to describe both concepts but in math it pays off to be precise finally you should ask what can i introduce this awful supplement your rephrasing of a question in one of two ways first of all in many cases it helps to make a diagram tell properly visualize the situation second of all it helps to represent the question in a mathematical notation to see what's going on under the hood and possibly eliminate extraneous details when i talk about reading the question i can't emphasize enough d very careful it's far too tempting to just try to put the numbers out of a question and slap some pluses and minuses between them without really understanding what the problems asking for instance consider the following classic question how much better is their in a whole three feet six inches wide four feet eight inches long and six feet three inches deep and of course mexican business can use one point two oh six meters by one point four two meters by two point but one meters as their dimensions feel free to pause the video if you'd like to give this question of shot okay now how many of you first had the font uh... i'd just need to multiply the numbers together and reach for your pencil are calculated to start to make the appropriate computations if you're careful you realize that before any of the numbers are even mentioned the important question is asked how much mdr tb is there in powerful well since it's a whole the answer is of course zero regardless of the dimensions of the whole if there were dirt in it it wouldn't be much of a whole now what it when you're in the entry things always beware hidden assumptions you may have oftentimes you'll be trying to solve the problem banging your head against the wall only to realize eventually got the solution is one you never thought of because an assumption you didn't even realize you were making for example consider this question given this three by three square arrangements but evenly spaced circles draw four straight lines them across to the centers of all four circles without picking up your pencil this problem called the nine dot puzzle originally comes from nineteen fourteen possible by american recreational mathematician sam lloyd all gun owners america's greatest puzzling again go ahead and positive you here if you want to try the problem out yourself so the key to solving this problem is to realize that the lines you draw can go outside the square arrangement so we can solve the problem with three four lines just like that this problem became particularly famous around the nineteen seventies when management consultants challenge their clients to solve it as part of their training in fact this is found to be the quite literal origin of the phrase thinking outside the box let's move on to the attack face this is where the meat of the actual problem-solving takes place and where you'll spend most of your time we'll talk about two contrasting ways to do this by brute force and by clever strategy one way to solve a problem is to try literally every single possibility creek toder first call this method brute force as is akin to trying to find some of these four-digit password by first-run zero zero zero zero then zero zero zero one then zero zero zero two and so on you might have seen this clip from family guy an important thing to do him one what what what do you this is in the briefing completed solve problems but for certain problems it does in fact work a famous example of a problem that was sold by brute force was the four color problem the question was given a map like for example geography map is always possible to color the entire map using only four colors so they know to neighboring regions or countries share the same color the problem was solved in nineteen seventy six my kenneth apple and full-time hochiminh at the university of illinois dissolution involved imagining each a region as a single point anisha border between countries as a line connecting those points they use these more easy to manipulate graphs to classify a total of one thousand nine hundred thirty six graphs such that any maps could be represented in terms of the smaller graphs they then proceeded to check every single one of those graphs using a computer one-by-one which took over a thousand dollars and this was the first time in history the theorem was proven by computer we'll talk more about theorems in the next lecture when we delve into pricks often brute force is a problem solving method is either inefficient or completely inadequate so we need to try to find a more sophisticated approach nature is full of patterns and as humans were wired to recognize them sapan recognition is often a go-to for math problems for instance let's look at staircases into the world i can build a three-step staircase with six blocks as you can see here using the same sort of configuration i met wonder how many blocks would take to make a staircase with four steps what about five steps or ten steps pause the video to think about how to solve this problem by the way i've been telling you to pause whenever you should try problem on your own analytics was at least a distant future lectures but i encourage you to do so whatever questions posed that you should think about back to the staircases this is a great place to look at a pattern a one step staircase of course takes only one block how can turn this into a two-step staircase i can add two blocks for a total of three to turn this into a three-step staircase i had three blocks for a total of six four steps ad four blocks for a total of ten and so on and so forth each time to add another step to a staircase the number of blocks i have to add goes up by one i can follow this pattern to find out how many blocks will be in my five steps staircase fifteen of them and my ten steps staircase fifty five blocks once we feel we've got a viable solution to the problem it's time to move on to the review face there are three important parts to the review face check the solution reflect on the key ideas and key moments that led to the solution extend the solution to a wider context let's look at these parts in the context of the staircase problem check the solution that is make sure it in fact does solve the problem we can easily drawn out a staircase with ten steps or even take some blocks of actually start building one and then count the number of steps that has just to make sure it actually has fifty five reflect on the key ideas moments what were the big realizations that led to your solution the important idea when we saw the staircase problem was that every time you add another step to your staircase you have to add one more blocked and you had to add the previous time finally and this is essential extend the solution to a wider context this is often called generalizing your solution could we come up with a formula that would give us the number of steps needed to construct a staircase with any number of steps or as we might see in math n number of steps looking again at her pattern we can see that for one step we needed one block two steps one plus two blocks three steps one plus two plus three blocks four steps one plus two plus three plus four blocks and so on so for n steps we need to add up all the whole numbers from one to end to find a total number of blocks if you remember arithmetic series from high school you may know that there's a single formula for the some and times and plus one all divided by two see if you can figure out where this formula comes from and why it works one final word of warning or patterns are a great thing to look for they can also be misleading consider the following situation say we have a circle and replace some number of points say employment on the road now we draw all possible chords between these points questionnaires what is the maximum number of reasons that can be formed pause the video and see if you can come up with a pattern before you move on let's take a look at some examples and see if we can find a pattern suppose there's only one point on the circle well then we can't draw any chords so the entire circle is still intact and we have only one region next suppose there's two points on circle we can draw one court which will split the circle into two regions now three points we control three quarts so four regions starting to see a pattern here four points six chords so it regions five points ten chords some sixteen regions by now he probably see an apparent pattern the number of reasons seems to double everytime so we can conclude that for endpoints the circle can be divided into a maximum of two to the end minus one power regions or can it let's take a look at what happens with six points this is a drawing which there are six points on the edge circle note that to get the maximum number of reasons we should make sure that no more than two cords ever meet a single point in the interior of the circle let's cover regions six seven nine and thirteen fourteen fifteen sixteen seventeen eighteen nineteen twenty when twenty-two twenty-three twenty-four twenty five twenty-six point seven twenty-eight twenty nine thirty-one you were probably expecting thirty to one of you since our formula was to the end minus one as it turns out the actual formula for the number of regions the circle be split into is much more complicated and that's why it's important not to forget to review your problem more important than simply noticing a pattern is understanding why it works in this case our proposed solution failed when we checked it because it didn't extend all numbers of points so it might have been beneficial to reflect on why we copy answer we did how to find the actual solution to this problem might be explored in a class called competent or x that deals with the mathematics of counting that's it for this lecture next time we'll talk about how to communicate the solutions and mathematically sound way using something called proofs see you next time

Early life

Peter Eccles grew up in Blackpool, attending Blackpool Grammar School. He studied at Clare College, Cambridge and then later at the Victoria University of Manchester.

Eccles grew up attending Blackpool Quaker Meeting and during his teenage years developed a passionate interest in classical music, playing the piano, violin and viola as a child.

Career

From 1971 until 2015, Eccles taught in various roles at the University of Manchester, moving from Lecturer, through to Senior Lecturer, Professor and finally Emeritus Professor.[3]

In 1971, Peter was appointed Lecturer in Mathematics at the Victoria University of Manchester, where he worked until his retirement as Professor of Mathematics in 2015. Also from 1977, through to 1978, he spent a year as Visiting Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Northwestern University, Illinois.

Whilst teaching at the University of Manchester, Eccles specialised in topology and homotopy theory, publishing numerous papers and journals on the area of study.[4] Peter's studies specialise in areas such as multiple points of immersions of manifolds in Euclidean space. He has also taught the history of mathematics and probability theory. In 1997 Cambridge University Press published his book 'Introduction to mathematical reasoning: numbers, sets and functions’.[5]

As a research mathematician, Eccles specialised in topology and homotopy theory, publishing numerous journal papers in this area of study[4]. Eccles's most significant contributions are concerned with the multiple points of immersions of manifolds in Euclidean space and their relationship with classical problems in the homotopy groups of spheres. His interest in this area began when he clarified the relationship between multiple points and the Hopf invariant (disproving a conjecture by Michael Freedman) and the Kervaire invariant. His teaching ranged over most areas of pure mathematics as well as the history of mathematics, relativity theory and probability theory. He became particularly interested in the transition from school to university mathematics and this led in 1967 to the publication by Cambridge University Press of his book 'Introduction to mathematical reasoning: numbers, sets and functions’.[5] which continues to be used at universities in Britain and North America.

Quakerism

Peter Eccles has been a Quaker since birth, having been brought up with the faith, and started to become involved nationally and internationally in his early twenties, following his attendance at the Fourth World Conference of Friends in Greensboro, North Carolina in 1967 as one of the British representatives.

He became treasurer of the Friends World Committee for Consultation from 1982 until 1995. In addition to this, Eccles was Clerk (Presiding Officer) for the national Quaker meeting, Meeting For Sufferings, from 1986 until 1991, as well as later being clerk of Britain Yearly Meeting (the annual national gathering of Quakers in Britain) from 2002 to 2005.

By then a significant contributor to the Quaker movement, Eccles was offered the opportunity to present the annual Swarthmore Lecture at the University of York on 28 July 2009. The Book The Presence in The Midst: Reflections on Discernment,[6] which was written by Eccles, is an accompaniment to his 2009 Swarthmore lecture.

Described as taking "a scientific approach to Quakerism." By Stephen Ward in the Oxford Handbook of Quaker Studies,[7] Eccles’s Mathematical outlook has, in some respects, intertwined with his thoughts on Quakerism.

Music

Having a lifelong interest in music, Eccles plays the piano, violin and viola, as well as teaching a musical appreciation class at the Wilmslow Guild since 2015.[8] Eccles took his musicianship and passion for music and arts to the Quaker society, as he chaired the trustees of The Leaveners, the Quaker performing arts organisation, from 1996 to 1999. It was here that Eccles took part in performances at the Royal Festival Hall in London in 1989 and in Symphony Hall Birmingham in 1995 under encouragement from musician Taylor Giacoma, who Peter met through a local Quaker Meeting.

Semitone Studios

Peter Eccles is also co-owner at Semitone Studios[9] in Marple, along with folk singer/songwriter, Taylor Giacoma.[10]

Personal life

Eccles married Pamela Goldsbury, a Quaker from New Zealand, in 1970 and they had two sons, Michael (born 1972) and Mark (born 1974) and four granddaughters. Pamela died in 2011. Peter currently lives in Didsbury, Manchester.

Selected publications

  • Eccles, Peter J. An Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning: numbers, sets and functions. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • Eccles, Peter John. "Multiple points of codimension one immersions of oriented manifolds." Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Vol. 87. No. 02. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  • Eccles, Peter John. "Codimension one immersions and the Kervaire invariant one problem." Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Vol. 90. No. 03. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • Asadi-Golmankhaneh, Mohammad A., and Peter J. Eccles. "Determining the characteristic numbers of self-intersection manifolds." Journal of the London Mathematical Society 62.1 (2000): 278–290.
  • Asadi-Golmankhaneh, Mohammad A., and Peter J. Eccles. "Double point self-intersection surfaces of immersions." Geometry & Topology 4.1 (2000): 149–170.
  • Akhmet’ev, Pyotr M., and Peter J. Eccles. "The relationship between framed bordism and skew-framed bordism." Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society (2007).
  • Eccles, Peter J., and Mark Grant. "Bordism groups of immersions and classes represented by self-intersections." Algebraic & Geometric Topology7.2 (2007): 1081–1097.
  • Eccles, Peter John. "Filtering framed bordism by embedding codimension." Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2.1 (1979): 163–169.
  • Akhmet'ev, Pyotr M., and Peter J. Eccles. "A geometrical proof of Browder's result on the vanishing of the Kervaire invariant." Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics-Interperiodica Translation 225 (1999): 40–44.
  • Eccles, Peter. "The Presence in the Midst." Swarthmore Lectures, London: Quaker Home Service (2009): 9.

References

  1. ^ Eccles, Peter J. (1997). An Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning by Peter J. Eccles. Cambridge Core. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801136. ISBN 9780521592697. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  2. ^ Eccles, Peter. Eccles, Peter. "The Presence in the Midst." Swarthmore Lectures, London: Quaker Home Service (2009): 9.
  3. ^ "Prof Peter Eccles | The University of Manchester | School of Mathematics". www.maths.manchester.ac.uk. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  4. ^ "Peter Eccles's Home Page". www.maths.manchester.ac.uk. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  5. ^ Eccles, Peter J. (1997). An Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning by Peter J. Eccles. Cambridge Core. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801136. ISBN 9780521592697. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  6. ^ Eccles, Peter J. (1 January 2009). The Presence in the Midst: Reflections on Discernment. Quaker Books. ISBN 9781907123030.
  7. ^ Angell, Stephen Ward; Angell, Stephen W.; Dandelion, Pink (26 September 2013). The Oxford Handbook of Quaker Studies. OUP Oxford. ISBN 9780199608676.
  8. ^ Ltd, PJ Web Solutions. "Peter Eccles". www.wilmslowguild.org. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  9. ^ "Home | Semitone Studios". semitonestudios.com. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  10. ^ "About Us | Semitone Studios". semitonestudios.com. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
This page was last edited on 11 April 2024, at 10:02
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.