Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector

Quantum field theory
Feynman diagram
History
Background Field theory Electromagnetism Weak force Strong force Quantum mechanics Special relativity General relativity Gauge theory Yang–Mills theory
Symmetries Symmetry in quantum mechanics C-symmetry P-symmetry T-symmetry Lorentz symmetry Poincaré symmetry Gauge symmetry Explicit symmetry breaking Spontaneous symmetry breaking Noether charge Topological charge
Tools Anomaly Background field method BRST quantization Correlation function Crossing Effective action Effective field theory Expectation value Feynman diagram Lattice field theory LSZ reduction formula Partition function Propagator Quantization Regularization Renormalization Vacuum state Wick's theorem
Equations Dirac equation Klein–Gordon equation Proca equations Wheeler–DeWitt equation Bargmann–Wigner equations
Standard Model Quantum electrodynamics Electroweak interaction Quantum chromodynamics Higgs mechanism
Incomplete theories String theory Supersymmetry Technicolor Theory of everything Quantum gravity
Scientists Adler Anderson Anselm Bargmann Becchi Belavin Bell Berezin Bethe Bjorken Bleuer Bogoliubov Brodsky Brout Buchholz Cachazo Callan Coleman Dashen DeWitt Dirac Doplicher Dyson Englert Faddeev Fadin Fayet Fermi Feynman Fierz Fock Frampton Fritzsch Fröhlich Fredenhagen Furry Glashow Gelfand Gell-Mann Goldstone Gribov Gross Gupta Guralnik Haag Heisenberg Hepp Higgs Hagen 't Hooft Iliopoulos Ivanenko Jackiw Jona-Lasinio Jordan Jost Källén Kendall Kinoshita Klebanov Kontsevich Kuraev Landau Lee Lehmann Leutwyler Lipatov Łopuszański Low Lüders Maiani Majorana Maldacena Migdal Mills Møller Naimark Nambu Neveu Nishijima Oehme Oppenheimer Osterwalder Parisi Pauli Peskin Plefka Polyakov Pomeranchuk Popov Proca Rubakov Ruelle Salam Schrader Schwarz Schwinger Segal Seiberg Semenoff Shifman Shirkov Skyrme Sommerfield Stora Stueckelberg Sudarshan Symanzik Thirring Tomonaga Tyutin Vainshtein Veltman Virasoro Ward Weinberg Weisskopf Wentzel Wess Wetterich Weyl Wick Wightman Wigner Wilczek Wilson Witten Yang Yukawa Zamolodchikov Zamolodchikov Zee Zimmermann Zinn-Justin Zuber Zumino
v t e

In physics, the Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector is an operator defined from the momentum and angular momentum, used in the quantum-relativistic description of angular momentum. It is named after Wolfgang Pauli and Józef Lubański,^[1]

It describes the spin states of moving particles.^[2] It is the generator of the little group of the Poincaré group, that is the maximal subgroup (with four generators) leaving the eigenvalues of the four-momentum vector P_μ invariant.^[3]

Definition

It is usually denoted by W (or less often by S) and defined by:^[4][5][6]

where

• ${\displaystyle \varepsilon _{\mu \nu \rho \sigma }}$ is the four-dimensional totally antisymmetric Levi-Civita symbol;
• ${\displaystyle J^{\nu \rho }}$ is the relativistic angular momentum tensor operator (${\displaystyle M^{\nu \rho }}$);
• ${\displaystyle P^{\sigma }}$ is the four-momentum operator.

In the language of exterior algebra, it can be written as the Hodge dual of a trivector,^[7]

Note ${\displaystyle W_{0}={\vec {J}}\cdot {\vec {P}}}$, and ${\displaystyle {\vec {W}}=E{\vec {J}}-{\vec {P}}\times {\vec {K}}.}$ Where ${\displaystyle {\vec {J}}}$ is the generator of rotations and ${\displaystyle {\vec {K}}}$ is the generator of boosts.

W_μ evidently satisfies

as well as the following commutator relations,

Consequently,

The scalar W_μW^μ is a Lorentz-invariant operator, and commutes with the four-momentum, and can thus serve as a label for irreducible unitary representations of the Poincaré group. That is, it can serve as the label for the spin, a feature of the spacetime structure of the representation, over and above the relativistically invariant label P_μP^μ for the mass of all states in a representation.

Little group

On an eigenspace ${\displaystyle S}$ of the 4-momentum operator ${\displaystyle P}$ with 4-momentum eigenvalue ${\displaystyle k}$ of the Hilbert space of a quantum system (or for that matter the standard representation with ℝ⁴ interpreted as momentum space acted on by 5×5 matrices with the upper left 4×4 block an ordinary Lorentz transformation, the last column reserved for translations and the action effected on elements ${\displaystyle p}$ (column vectors) of momentum space with 1 appended as a fifth row, see standard texts^[8][9]) the following holds:^[10]

• The components of ${\displaystyle W}$ with ${\displaystyle P^{\mu }}$ replaced by ${\displaystyle k^{\mu }}$ form a Lie algebra. It is the Lie algebra of the Little group ${\displaystyle L_{k}}$of ${\displaystyle k}$, i.e. the subgroup of the homogeneous Lorentz group that leaves ${\displaystyle k}$ invariant.
• For every irreducible unitary representation of ${\displaystyle L_{k}}$ there is an irreducible unitary representation of the full Poincaré group called an induced representation.
• A representation space of the induced representation can be obtained by successive application of elements of the full Poincaré group to a non-zero element of ${\displaystyle S}$ and extending by linearity.

The irreducible unitary representation of the Poincaré group are characterized by the eigenvalues of the two Casimir operators ${\displaystyle P^{2}}$ and ${\displaystyle W^{2}}$. The best way to see that an irreducible unitary representation actually is obtained is to exhibit its action on an element with arbitrary 4-momentum eigenvalue ${\displaystyle p}$ in the representation space thus obtained.^{[11] : 62–74}Irreducibility follows from the construction of the representation space.

Massive fields

In quantum field theory, in the case of a massive field, the Casimir invariant W_μW^μ describes the total spin of the particle, with eigenvalues

where s is the spin quantum number of the particle and m is its rest mass.

It is straightforward to see this in the rest frame of the particle, the above commutator acting on the particle's state amounts to [W_j , W_k] = i ε_jkl W_l m; hence W→ = mJ→ and W⁰ = 0, so that the little group amounts to the rotation group,

Since this is a Lorentz invariant quantity, it will be the same in all other reference frames.

It is also customary to take W³ to describe the spin projection along the third direction in the rest frame.

In moving frames, decomposing W = (W₀, W→) into components (W₁, W₂, W₃), with W₁ and W₂ orthogonal to P→, and W₃ parallel to P→, the Pauli–Lubanski vector may be expressed in terms of the spin vector S→ = (S₁, S₂, S₃) (similarly decomposed) as

where

is the energy–momentum relation.

The transverse components W₁, W₂, along with S₃, satisfy the following commutator relations (which apply generally, not just to non-zero mass representations),

For particles with non-zero mass, and the fields associated with such particles,

Massless fields

In general, in the case of non-massive representations, two cases may be distinguished. For massless particles,^{[11]: 71–72}

where K→ is the dynamic mass moment vector. So, mathematically, P² = 0 does not imply W² = 0.

Continuous spin representations

In the more general case, the components of W→ transverse to P→ may be non-zero, thus yielding the family of representations referred to as the cylindrical luxons ("luxon" is another term for "massless particle"), their identifying property being that the components of W→ form a Lie subalgebra isomorphic to the 2-dimensional Euclidean group ISO(2), with the longitudinal component of W→ playing the role of the rotation generator, and the transverse components the role of translation generators. This amounts to a group contraction of SO(3), and leads to what are known as the continuous spin representations. However, there are no known physical cases of fundamental particles or fields in this family. It can be argued that continuous spin states possess an internal degree of freedom not seen in observed massless particles.^{[11]: 69–74}

Helicity representations

In a special case, ${\displaystyle {\vec {W}}}$ is parallel to ${\displaystyle {\vec {P}};}$ or equivalently ${\displaystyle {\vec {W}}\times {\vec {P}}={\vec {\boldsymbol {0}}}.}$ For non-zero ${\displaystyle {\vec {W}}}$ this constraint can only be consistently imposed for luxons (massless particles), since the commutator of the two transverse components of ${\displaystyle {\vec {W}}}$ is proportional to ${\displaystyle m^{2}{\vec {J}}\cdot {\vec {P}}\,.}$ For this family, ${\displaystyle W^{2}=0}$ and ${\displaystyle W^{\mu }=\lambda \,P^{\mu }}$ the invariant is, instead given by

where so the invariant is represented by the helicity operator

All particles that interact with the weak nuclear force, for instance, fall into this family, since the definition of weak nuclear charge (weak isospin) involves helicity, which, by above, must be an invariant. The appearance of non-zero mass in such cases must then be explained by other means, such as the Higgs mechanism. Even after accounting for such mass-generating mechanisms, however, the photon (and therefore the electromagnetic field) continues to fall into this class, although the other mass eigenstates of the carriers of the electroweak force (the
W^±
boson and anti-boson and
Z⁰
boson) acquire non-zero mass.

Neutrinos were formerly considered to fall into this class as well. However, because neutrinos have been observed to oscillate in flavour, it is now known that at least two of the three mass eigenstates of the left-helicity neutrinos and right-helicity anti-neutrinos each must have non-zero mass.

See also

• Center of mass (relativistic)
• Wigner's classification
• Angular momentum operator
• Casimir operator
• Chirality
• Pseudovector
• Pseudotensor
• Induced representation

Notes

References

• Bogolyubov, N.N. (1989). General Principles of Quantum Field Theory (2nd ed.). Springer Verlag. ISBN 0-7923-0540-X.
• Brown, L. S. (1994). Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-46946-3.
• Hall, Brian C. (2015), Lie groups, Lie algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 222 (2nd ed.), Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13467-3, ISBN 978-3319134666, ISSN 0072-5285
• Lubański, J. K. (1942A). "Sur la theorie des particules élémentaires de spin quelconque. I". Physica (in French). 9 (3): 310–324. Bibcode:1942Phy.....9..310L. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(42)90113-7.
• Lubanski, J. K. (1942B). "Sur la théorie des particules élémentaires de spin quelconque. II". Physica (in French). 9 (3): 325–338. Bibcode:1942Phy.....9..325L. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(42)90114-9.
• Ohlsson, T. (2011). Relativistic Quantum Physics: From Advanced Quantum Mechanics to Introductory Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-50432-4.
• Penrose, R. (2005). The Road to Reality. Vintage books. ISBN 978-0-09-944068-0.
• Rossmann, Wulf (2002), Lie Groups - An Introduction Through Linear Groups, Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Oxford Science Publications, ISBN 0-19-859683-9
• Ryder, L.H. (1996). Quantum Field Theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-47814-6.
• Tung, Wu-Ki (1985). Group Theory in Physics (1st ed.). New Jersey·London·Singapore·Hong Kong: World Scientific. ISBN 978-9971966577.
• Weinberg, S. (2002) [1995], Foundations, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-55001-7
• Wigner, E. P. (1939). "On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group". Annals of Mathematics. 40 (1): 149–204. Bibcode:1939AnMat..40..149W. doi:10.2307/1968551. JSTOR 1968551. MR 1503456. S2CID 121773411.