To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Osterley & Spring Grove tube station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Osterley & Spring Grove
Station buildings next to the bridge over the railway line
Osterley & Spring Grove is located in Greater London
Osterley & Spring Grove
Osterley & Spring Grove
Location of Osterley & Spring Grove in Greater London
LocationOsterley
Local authorityLondon Borough of Hounslow
Railway companies
Original companyDistrict Railway
Key dates
1883Opened
1933Piccadilly line service introduced
1934Closed
Replaced byOsterley
Other information
WGS8451°28′59″N 0°20′54″W / 51.48306°N 0.34833°W / 51.48306; -0.34833
 London transport portal

Osterley & Spring Grove was a London Underground station in Osterley in west London. The station was served by the District and Piccadilly and was closed in 1934 when a new station, Osterley, was opened to the west.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    23 456
  • Osterley Park and House: The East India Company at Home, 1757-1857

Transcription

Osterley is a wonderful National Trust property that is often, in fact typically, represented as being European in its appearance, and neo-classical specifically. And yet, when one opens the doors to Osterley one is immediately overwhelmed with the Asian material goods dating from the 18th century. It's also the case that Osterley was owned by a family in the 18th century who played key governance roles in the East India Company. When you walk around the house you are surrounded by incredible objects from the east, from ivory junks to amazing porcelain parade jars, it's just fantastic - and these have sort of perhaps faded a little into the background what we expect from a country house interior. To the 18th century eye they would have been extraordinarily exotic and incredible objects to behold. The 18th century East India Company was set up to trade with Asia and controlled Britain's trade with Asia. Many of the items that were imported went into middling households, ultimately working class households, - tea, cotton textiles for example, saltpetre for gunpowder. At the same time the company allowed its captains and some of its senior staff to do what was called a 'private trade', which was to buy and sell things on commission in the Indies and bring them back to the UK, and almost certainly the goods that we have here would have come back as private trade commissions. This service is quite unique because it has this powder blue border which we haven't seen on any other armourial services which have entered the UK, so it's a really unique and special service. During the 18th century and the late 17th century around 5000 armourial services were commissioned in Canton for the English market. It's a very special commissioning process whereby coats of arms would be sent out on bookplates over to Canton, and then the finished product would return around three years later - so it was a very very long process. So these were incredibly unique and status-symbol pieces that really indicated both wealth and connection. What is really special about Osterley is that there is a whole sort of connection to India there, which can be picked up in its collection of textiles. This would have been brought into England between 1700-1730 (that was the sort of heyday of Kambi embroidery) and so you get a really intricate work of embroidery on normally a plain background and if you looked at them from a distance you would think they were painted on, but you have it go really close up to the textile to see that it's actually embroidered. Today we keep the fragments of this in our store room, you can see by just taking a look at some of the pieces here just how fragile it is. So we keep it in stores just to preserve it, to prevent it deteriorating further on exposure to light and other issues. At Osterley these Indian textiles are some of the remaining evidence of the monopoly with the textile trade that India and China had during that time, and how sought after these textiles were by wealthy families in England. This laquer secretaire is attributed to Thomas Chippendale and we believe it entered the house in the 1770s. It's most likely with most of the pieces that are made as a piece of "English furniture" that they're made from laquer screens which were then cut up. What's really interesting about this piece is its amalgamation of laquer and that the upper level is actually finished by the European attempt to recreate this incredible sheeny material in their own furniture, so this is really interesting piece in that it is made from a kind of amalgamation of different things but it's essentially attributed as an English piece. Chippendale was incredibly important to eighteenth-century furniture and interior design. We can see the ways in which English households were able to amalgamate these pieces into their own interiors, and make them appropriate for their own interiors. We often think of our current era as the period in which globalization and Europe's relations with Asia have taken off, but actually we take a much longer view, looking at the ways in which houses, in particular country houses and suburban villas, of the wealthy, which we now often think of as being quintessentially English, in fact were not just inflected with global material culture but were fundamentally infused and subsidised by Europe's trade with Asia.

History

When constructed the line and station were surrounded by countryside
Map showing operational dates for lines and stations in Hounslow

The station was opened by the District line's predecessor, the District Railway (DR), on 1 May 1883 on its line to Hounslow Town (located on Hounslow High Street, but now closed).[1] The station was on Thornbury Road east of the current Osterley station and served Osterley Park and a residential estate to the south named "Spring Grove".[2]

On 21 July 1884 a branch was constructed from shortly north of Hounslow Town to Hounslow Barracks (now Hounslow West). The branch line was constructed as single track and initially had no intermediate stations between the terminus and Osterley & Spring Grove. Until 31 March 1886 passengers travelling west from Osterley & Spring Grove could go to either Hounslow Barracks or Hounslow Town. On that date Hounslow Town station closed and a new station, Heston & Hounslow (now Hounslow Central), opened to the west.[1]

Electrification of the DR's tracks took place between 1903 and 1905 with electric trains replacing steam trains on the Hounslow branch from 13 June 1905.[3] When the branch was electrified, the track between Osterley & Spring Grove and Heston & Hounslow was closed and a new loop was opened from Hounslow Town back to Heston & Hounslow. Trains would run from Osterley & Spring Grove to Hounslow Town then reverse and run to Hounslow Barracks.

This method of operation was unsuccessful and short-lived. On 2 May 1909 the track between Heston & Hounslow and Osterley & Spring Grove was reopened with a new Hounslow Town station (now Hounslow East) located about 300 metres (1,000 ft) west of the loop to the old station.[1][4] The old Hounslow Town station and its two loop tracks were closed for good.

Piccadilly line services, which had been running as far as Northfields since January 1933, were extended to run to Hounslow West on 13 March 1933.[1][5] The station was closed on 24 March 1934, to be replaced the following day by a new Osterley station at a location 300 m (1,000 ft) to the west on Great West Road.[1] The stairways and platform awnings were removed in 1957,[6] but the platforms and station buildings remain. Since 1967 the latter has been used as a bookshop.[7]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Rose 1999.
  2. ^ Connor 2006, p. 52.
  3. ^ Horne 2006, p. 42.
  4. ^ Horne 2006, p. 47.
  5. ^ Horne 2006, p. 60.
  6. ^ Connor 2006, p. 53.
  7. ^ Longhurst, Chris (9 September 2014). "News Feature: Osterley Bookshop; the latest chapter in a long running saga". getwestlondon. Retrieved 17 November 2017.

Bibliography

  • Connor, J.E. (2006) [1999]. London's Disused Underground Stations (2nd ed.). Capital Transport. ISBN 1-85414-250-X.
  • Horne, Mike (2006). The District Line: An Illustrated History. Capital Transport. ISBN 1-85414-292-5.
  • Rose, Douglas (1999) [1980]. The London Underground, A Diagrammatic History (7th ed.). Douglas Rose/Capital Transport. ISBN 1-85414-219-4.

External links

Former services
Preceding station London Underground Following station
Hounslow Town
Terminus
District line
Hounslow Town branch
(1883–1884)
Boston Manor
District line
Hounslow Town branch
(1884–1886)
Boston Manor
towards Whitechapel
Hounslow Barracks
Terminus
District line
Hounslow West branch
(1884–1886)
Heston & Hounslow District line
Hounslow West branch
(1886–1902)
District line
Hounslow West branch
(1902–1905)
Boston Manor
towards Upminster
Hounslow Town
Terminus
District line
Hounslow Town branch
(1903–1905)
District line
Hounslow Town branch
(1905–1908)
Boston Manor
towards East Ham
District line
Hounslow Town branch
(1908–1909)
Boston Manor
towards Barking
Hounslow East District line
Hounslow West branch
(1909–1932)
District line
Hounslow West branch
(1932–1934)
Boston Manor
towards Upminster
Piccadilly line
(1933-34)
Boston Manor
This page was last edited on 25 December 2023, at 13:10
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.