To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Osborn v. Bank of the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Osborn v. Bank of the United States
Argued March 10, 1824
Decided March 19, 1824
Full case nameRalph Osborn and others, Appellants v. The President, Directors, and Company of the Bank of the United States, Respondents
Citations22 U.S. 738 (more)
9 Wheat. 738; 6 L. Ed. 204; 1824 U.S. LEXIS 409
Case history
PriorAppeal from the Circuit Court of Ohio
Holding
The Eleventh Amendment is inapplicable in suits in which a state is not a party of record even if a party is acting as a state official.[1]
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Marshall
Associate Justices
Bushrod Washington · William Johnson
Thomas Todd · Gabriel Duvall
Joseph Story · Smith Thompson
Case opinions
MajorityMarshall, joined by Washington, Todd, Duvall, Story, Thompson
DissentJohnson
Laws applied
Eleventh Amendment

Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 738 (1824), was a case set in the Banking Crisis of 1819, when many banks, including the Second Bank of the United States, demanded repayment for loans that they had issued on credit that they did not have. That led to an economic downturn and a shortage of money. In 1819, Ohio passed a law that put a tax on the Bank of the United States on the theory that taxing the bank would allow the state government to receive and distribute the scarce money.

On September 17, 1819, Ohio Auditor Ralph Osborn was given permission to seize $100,000 from a branch of the Bank of the United States. However, his agents mistakenly took $120,000 although the extra $20,000 was promptly returned. The bank chose to sue Osborn for the return of the additional $100,000, and a federal court ruled that Osborn had violated a court order, prohibiting the taxing of the bank.

Osborn argued that he had never been properly served with the order but still had to return the money. A problem arose when Osborn could pay back only $98,000, as the other $2,000 had been used to pay the salary of Osborn's tax agents.

In 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Bank of the United States and ordered the return of the disputed $2,000.[2]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    828
    502
    14 472
    564
    2 047
  • Osborn v. Bank of the United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
  • United States v. Banks Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
  • Ohio Town On The Move: The Osborn Story 1913-1950
  • Samson v. California Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
  • United Mine Workers v. Gibbs Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Transcription

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Richard H. Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System (Foundation Press, Fifth Edition, 2003), pg. 992.
  2. ^ "Osborn v. Bank of the United States - Ohio History Central". ohiohistorycentral.org.

External links


This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 02:51
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.