To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Orbit portrait

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, an orbit portrait is a combinatorial tool used in complex dynamics for understanding the behavior of one-complex dimensional quadratic maps.

In simple words one can say that it is :

  • a list of external angles for which rays land on points of that orbit
  • graph showing above list

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    162 776
    291 708
    1 913
    18 559
    135 289
  • ODE | Phase diagrams
  • sketching phase portraits
  • Mathematics’ Highest Prize Awarded to UT Austin’s Karen Uhlenbeck
  • INTERVIEW AT CIRM: PETER SARNAK
  • Phase Plane Plots

Transcription

'Phase diagrams' are: "a way to visualize solutions to autonomous ordinary differential equations". And in this video we'll consider the case of just one dependent variable, x. And so an autonomous ordinary differential equation will have the form: dx/dt = f(x). Now what's 'special' about this form? What makes it 'autonomous'? The right-hand side does not include the independent variable (the independent variable is not used in the definition of the differential equation.) I'll show you how to construct phase diagrams through an example: Let's consider the differential equation: dx/dt = x*(1 - x) This is 'autonomous' because the independent variable 't' does not appear on the right-hand side. Now phase diagrams are kind of related to 'slope fields'. So I'll start by drawing the slope field for this differential equation (as I've done here.) I'll remind you how to draw the slope field: You pick a point (t,x) in the t-x plane, and you imagine that you have a solution passing through that point. The tangent-line to that solution will have slope 'dx/dt'. But the equation says that 'dx/dt' is the same as 'x*(1-x)'. So if you go to that point,and you draw in a little line which has slope x*(1-x) that will be a tangent-line the solution. If I do that for a bunch of points in this plane, I begin to get a picture of how the solutions will ..'flow'. Now notice a special property of this slope field: because the equation is autonomous, the right-hand side does not depend on 't' so the slope field will not change as I move from left to right. If I choose a particular 'x' and I evaluate the slope by evaluating 'x*(1 - x)' then I can move from left to right in other words I can change the value of 't' and I still have the same slope. Phase diagrams take special advantage of this left-to-right symmetry in the slope, in order to collapse this two-dimensional picture down into a single line. So here's our phase diagram, at least the beginning of it and since it's a line, we'll call it a 'phase-line'. Now, before we draw any more of this phase-line, let's sketch in a few solutions to this differential equation. So I go with the flow of the slope field and sketch in some solutions in orange. Now notice we have two particular solutions, which are special: and those are the solutions x(t) = 1 and x(t) = 0, 'constant' solutions. Those correspond to the points where dx/dt = 0 and the solution is not changing. For all of the other solutions, it will change with time. And so I mark those guys in here by filling in an orange 'circle' corresponding to the points x = 0 and x = 1. So these are the guys where dx/dt = 0: the solutions are not changing. What about elsewhere on the phase-line? Well, if I start out above x = 1 then my solution will decrease. If I start out between x = 0 and x = 1 my solution will increase. If I start out below x = 0 then my solution will decrease. So that corresponds to 'different signs' for the derivative: Above x = 1, dx/dt (by this formula) is negative. Between x = 0 and x = 1 (again, by this formula) dx/dt is positive. And below x = 0, dx/dt is negative. As a shorthand, we can mark those signs on our phase-line by drawing in little 'arrows': At these orange points the solution will 'stand still' (so I just draw a little 'circle') Now in between the orange points - say right here - the solution will increase. So I draw a little arrow going up. Above the top orange point - at x = 1 - the solution will decrease. So I draw an arrow going down Now (likewise) for below x = 0, I draw an arrow going down And that's it: that's our phase-line. So we have a line, with dots to indicate where the solution is standing still and arrows to indicate where it's moving, and in which direction it's moving. So let me give you a little vocabulary that will help you talk about the phase-line. And the first thing is that these points, - where the solution is standing still - these are called 'equilibrium-points' (in our case x = 1 and x = 0) 'Equilibrium' meaning that the solution is not changing. Now, these equilibrium points have different properties. This equilibrium point: at x = 1 we call a stable equilibrium and we call it 'stable' because both of the arrows are pointing-in. So you imagine that if you were to start off close to x = 1 (either about that or below it) you would 'tend toward' x = 1 and that's what makes it stable (it's like the bottom of a valley.) The other point: [at x = 0] the arrows are pointing away from that equilibrium and so it's called an 'unstable' equilibrium (imagine like the top of a mountain.) So if I start at anywhere near x = 0 then I'll move away from x = 0. Similarly, if I were to concoct a differential equation which had 'this' as part of its phase diagram. where an arrow was pointing-in and an arrow was pointing-out, I would also call that 'unstable' (because it is 'not-stable') Now I have a task for you: since this type of unstable equilibrium did not appear in our example, come up with an example of an equation that exhibits this type of unstable equilibrium. that is: one arrow going into the equilibrium and one arrow going out. Now, after you have figured out how to do that, I have a question: is there any phase-line any configuration of stable and unstable equilibria which 'could not' occur as the phase-line for a differential equation? In other words could I 'glue together' a whole bunch of these guys in some line which could not possibly be a phase-line for a differential equation? Or is it true that any picture I draw I can come up with an example of a differential equation which has that picture as its phase-line?

Definition

Given a quadratic map

from the complex plane to itself

and a repelling or parabolic periodic orbit of , so that (where subscripts are taken 1 + modulo ), let be the set of angles whose corresponding external rays land at .

Then the set is called the orbit portrait of the periodic orbit .

All of the sets must have the same number of elements, which is called the valence of the portrait.

Examples

Julia set with external rays landing on period 3 orbit
Julia set with period two parabolic orbit. The associated orbit portrait has characteristic arc I = (22/63, 25/63) and valence v = 3 rays per orbit point.

Parabolic or repelling orbit portrait

valence 2





valence 3

Valence is 3 so rays land on each orbit point.

3 external rays of period 3 cycle : , which land on fixed point


For complex quadratic polynomial with c= -0.03111+0.79111*i portrait of parabolic period 3 orbit is :[1]


Rays for above angles land on points of that orbit . Parameter c is a center of period 9 hyperbolic component of Mandelbrot set.

For parabolic julia set c = -1.125 + 0.21650635094611*i. It is a root point between period 2 and period 6 components of Mandelbrot set. Orbit portrait of period 2 orbit with valence 3 is :[2]

valence 4

Formal orbit portraits

Every orbit portrait has the following properties:

  • Each is a finite subset of
  • The doubling map on the circle gives a bijection from to and preserves cyclic order of the angles.[3]
  • All of the angles in all of the sets are periodic under the doubling map of the circle, and all of the angles have the same exact period. This period must be a multiple of , so the period is of the form , where is called the recurrent ray period.
  • The sets are pairwise unlinked, which is to say that given any pair of them, there are two disjoint intervals of where each interval contains one of the sets.

Any collection of subsets of the circle which satisfy these four properties above is called a formal orbit portrait. It is a theorem of John Milnor that every formal orbit portrait is realized by the actual orbit portrait of a periodic orbit of some quadratic one-complex-dimensional map. Orbit portraits contain dynamical information about how external rays and their landing points map in the plane, but formal orbit portraits are no more than combinatorial objects. Milnor's theorem states that, in truth, there is no distinction between the two.

Trivial orbit portraits

Orbit portrait where all of the sets have only a single element are called trivial, except for orbit portrait . An alternative definition is that an orbit portrait is nontrivial if it is maximal, which in this case means that there is no orbit portrait that strictly contains it (i.e. there does not exist an orbit portrait such that ). It is easy to see that every trivial formal orbit portrait is realized as the orbit portrait of some orbit of the map , since every external ray of this map lands, and they all land at distinct points of the Julia set. Trivial orbit portraits are pathological in some respects, and in the sequel we will refer only to nontrivial orbit portraits.

Arcs

In an orbit portrait , each is a finite subset of the circle , so each divides the circle into a number of disjoint intervals, called complementary arcs based at the point . The length of each interval is referred to as its angular width. Each has a unique largest arc based at it, which is called its critical arc. The critical arc always has length greater than

These arcs have the property that every arc based at , except for the critical arc, maps diffeomorphically to an arc based , and the critical arc covers every arc based at once, except for a single arc, which it covers twice. The arc that it covers twice is called the critical value arc for . This is not necessarily distinct from the critical arc.

When escapes to infinity under iteration of , or when is in the Julia set, then has a well-defined external angle. Call this angle . is in every critical value arc. Also, the two inverse images of under the doubling map ( and ) are both in every critical arc.

Among all of the critical value arcs for all of the 's, there is a unique smallest critical value arc , called the characteristic arc which is strictly contained within every other critical value arc. The characteristic arc is a complete invariant of an orbit portrait, in the sense that two orbit portraits are identical if and only if they have the same characteristic arc.

Sectors

Much as the rays landing on the orbit divide up the circle, they divide up the complex plane. For every point of the orbit, the external rays landing at divide the plane into open sets called sectors based at . Sectors are naturally identified the complementary arcs based at the same point. The angular width of a sector is defined as the length of its corresponding complementary arc. Sectors are called critical sectors or critical value sectors when the corresponding arcs are, respectively, critical arcs and critical value arcs.[4]

Sectors also have the interesting property that is in the critical sector of every point, and , the critical value of , is in the critical value sector.

Parameter wakes

Two parameter rays with angles and land at the same point of the Mandelbrot set in parameter space if and only if there exists an orbit portrait with the interval as its characteristic arc. For any orbit portrait let be the common landing point of the two external angles in parameter space corresponding to the characteristic arc of . These two parameter rays, along with their common landing point, split the parameter space into two open components. Let the component that does not contain the point be called the -wake and denoted as . A quadratic polynomial realizes the orbit portrait with a repelling orbit exactly when . is realized with a parabolic orbit only for the single value for about

Primitive and satellite orbit portraits

Other than the zero portrait, there are two types of orbit portraits: primitive and satellite. If is the valence of an orbit portrait and is the recurrent ray period, then these two types may be characterized as follows:

  • Primitive orbit portraits have and . Every ray in the portrait is mapped to itself by . Each is a pair of angles, each in a distinct orbit of the doubling map. In this case, is the base point of a baby Mandelbrot set in parameter space.
  • Satellite orbit portraits have . In this case, all of the angles make up a single orbit under the doubling map. Additionally, is the base point of a parabolic bifurcation in parameter space.

Generalizations

Orbit portraits turn out to be useful combinatorial objects in studying the connection between the dynamics and the parameter spaces of other families of maps as well. In particular, they have been used to study the patterns of all periodic dynamical rays landing on a periodic cycle of a unicritical anti-holomorphic polynomial.[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ Flek, Ross; Keen, Linda (2010). "Boundaries of Bounded Fatou Components of Quadratic Maps" (PDF). Journal of Difference Equations and Applications. 16 (5–6): 555–572. doi:10.1080/10236190903205080. S2CID 54997658.
  2. ^ Milnor, John W. (1999). "Periodic Orbits, Externals Rays and the Mandelbrot Set: An Expository Account". Preprint. arXiv:math/9905169. Bibcode:1999math......5169M.
  3. ^ Chaotic 1D maps by Evgeny Demidov
  4. ^ Periodic orbits and external rays by Evgeny Demidov
  5. ^ Mukherjee, Sabyasachi (2015). "Orbit portraits of unicritical antiholomorphic polynomials". Conformal Geometry and Dynamics. 19 (3): 35–50. arXiv:1404.7193. doi:10.1090/S1088-4173-2015-00276-3.
This page was last edited on 11 December 2023, at 11:07
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.