To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Nixon v. Fitzgerald

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nixon v. Fitzgerald
Argued November 30, 1981
Decided June 24, 1982
Full case nameRichard Nixon v. A. Ernest Fitzgerald
Citations457 U.S. 731 (more)
102 S. Ct. 2690; 73 L. Ed. 2d 349; 1982 U.S. LEXIS 42; 50 U.S.L.W. 4797
Case history
PriorCert. to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Holding
The President is entitled to absolute immunity from liability for damages based on his official acts.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
MajorityPowell, joined by Burger, Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor
ConcurrenceBurger
DissentWhite, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun
DissentBlackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall

Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982), was a US Supreme Court case that dealt with immunity from prosecution of government officials performing discretionary functions when their actions did not violate clearly-established law.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    3 816
    1 931
    155 341
    36 112
    4 127 099
  • Nixon v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
  • Harlow v. Fitzgerald Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
  • Is the President Above the Law? | United States v. Nixon
  • Nixon v. United States Summary | quimbee.com
  • History vs. Richard Nixon - Alex Gendler

Transcription

Background

Arthur Ernest Fitzgerald filed a lawsuit against government officials that he had lost his position as a contractor for the US Air Force because of testimony made before Congress in 1968.[2] Among the people listed in the lawsuit was ex-President Richard Nixon, who argued that a president cannot be sued for actions taken while he is in office.[3]

The trial court and the appellate court rejected Nixon's claim of immunity. The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court.[4]

Opinion

In a 5–4 decision, the Court ruled that the President is entitled to absolute immunity from legal liability for civil damages based on his official acts. The Court, however, emphasized that the President is not necessarily immune from criminal charges stemming from his official or unofficial acts while he is in office.[5]

The Court noted that a grant of absolute immunity to the President would not leave him with unfettered power. It stated that there were formal and informal checks on presidential action that did not apply with equal force to other executive officials.[6]

The Court observed that the President was subjected to constant scrutiny by the press and noted that vigilant oversight by Congress would also serve to deter presidential abuses of office and to make the threat of impeachment credible. It determined that other incentives to avoid presidential misconduct existed, including the desire to earn re-election, the need to maintain prestige as an element of presidential influence, and the traditional concern for his historical stature.[7]

The decision was clarified by Clinton v. Jones, in which the Court held that a President is subject to civil suits for actions committed before he assumes the presidency.[5][8]

See also

References

  1. ^ Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982).
  2. ^ "Nixon v. Fitzgerald". Legal Information Institute. Retrieved September 6, 2018.
  3. ^ Stein, Theodore P. (1983). "Nixon v. Fitzgerald: Presidential Immunity as a Constitutional Imperative". Catholic University Law Review. Columbus School of Law. 32: 759.
  4. ^ Forry, Craig B. (March 15, 1983). "Nixon v. Fitzgerald: Recognition of Absolute Immunity From Personal Damage Liability for Presidential Acts". Pepperdine Law Review. Malibu, California: Pepperdine University School of Law. 10 (4): 674. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
  5. ^ a b Motos, Jennifer (1998). "Failing to Score: Clinton v. Jones and Claims of Presidential Immunity". Mercer Law Review. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University School of Law. 49: 583.
  6. ^ Motos, supra, pp. 583-584
  7. ^ Schultz, L. Peter (Spring 1986). "The Constitution, The Court, and Presidential Immunity: A Defense of Nixon v. Fitzgerald". Presidential Studies Quarterly. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. 16 (2): 256.
  8. ^ Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997).

Further reading

External links

This page was last edited on 13 February 2024, at 22:05
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.