To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Clark R. Bavin National Fish and Wildlife Forensic Laboratory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory
Clark R. Bavin National Fish and Wildlife Forensic Laboratory
Established1988
DirectorKen Goddard
LocationAshland, Oregon, USA
42°11′40″N 122°41′25″W / 42.1944°N 122.6902°W / 42.1944; -122.6902
AffiliationsCITES
Operating agency
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Websitehttp://www.fws.gov/lab

The National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory is located in Ashland, Oregon, United States. Founded in 1988 and run by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the forensics laboratory is the only such laboratory in the world devoted to wildlife law enforcement. By treaty, the forensics laboratory is also the official crime lab for CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) and the Wildlife Group of Interpol. The laboratory maintains an online feather database, called the Feather Atlas, which is available on their website. Ken Goddard serves as the current Lab Director.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    4 613
  • Wildlife Forensic Lab Livestream

Transcription

>> Hi and welcome. Today we are celebrating World Wildlife Day. I'm Danielle Brigida I work for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and I'm here with Ken Goddard, Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Forensic Laboratory . >> Welcome to our lab. What we want to do today is walk you through some of the things we do as I wildlife crime laboratory, and I should explain right away that while we're very used to working complex crime scenes and dealing with a wide range of sometimes gory, sometimes confusing evidence, we've never been on a web broadcast before. This is a new experience for us. And some of us are more adept to the new social media than others, so we'll see how this goes. But we want to be able to answer your questions and give you a sense of what we are. What we are is, sadly, the only crime lab for wildlife in the world. We would like not to be, but at this point, we're it. By treaty, we're the crime lab for the 180 countries that signed the treaty to enforce each other’s endangered species laws, the CITES treaty, as well as the crime lab for the wildlife working group of Interpol. That's in addition to working for our 200 special agents who investigate wildlife crimes and about 120 wildlife inspectors and all 50 state fish and game agencies. So, you have a sense, that we're rarely bored around here. We get a lot of evidence in every day of the year - FedEx, UPS, post office, brings us packages and we go to work. And that's why I want to explain to you today exactly what that work is. A classic example would be us getting a whole animal in. Like this Cayman crocodile. Barry, our herpetologist takes one look, and he knows what this is. Because we have the whole animal, we've got the species defining characteristics. We get in something like this, it's a little odd, but it's again, easy for Barry to work with because we have pretty much, the entire Cayman crocodile attached to this purse. But when we get to something like this, we've lost those species defining characteristics. And so as a laboratory, before we begin to do the things a crime lab does, which is examine evidence in a triangular fashion, try to link suspect, victim, and crime scene together, we've got to figure out what our victim is to figure out if a crime has been committed. In this case we had to conduct research to figure out what would be other species defining characteristics. It turns out it's the belly scales that allowed us to tell that this is a Cayman crocodile purse, which we have to distinguish from this guy which is a little $10 knock off. It's made out of plastic. But, it is made from the imprint of a real hide. So, we can get a wide range of evidence in and hopefully we can explain this. >> Yeah, Thank you so much, Ken. I'm moderating questions off camera in case anyone can't see me. But I have definitely collected a number of questions from online and I'm going to be talking through some of this. This is really interesting. In a study of shape is actually morphology, correct?  And so some of the evidence you can get in you can quickly identify, others you can't. Can you talk a little about how this lab became the only one and what its mission is and what you're trying to do? >> Sure. Way back in 1979, I was a police crime lab director, I was hired to set this laboratory up. It took a long time to do, in fact it took us seven years to get the funding and to get a location. We ended up here in this beautiful valley of Ashland, Oregon, and began accumulating our experts, hiring people for our different sections of laboratory which are morphology, pathology, genetics, analytical chemistry, and criminalistic police forensic science. We had to find experts who could tell what a Cayman crocodile is. This isn't a skill that's taught in universities. The pieces, parts, products. It may take five or six years for someone to learn morphology. Whereas, genetics, people coming to us with a degree in biochemistry or genetics, we can easily get them into the flow of our laboratory. >> That's great. I think a lot of people are interested, and maybe a lot of them watch CSI or some of these forensic shows. Can you talk about some of the procedures or processes that you guys use that maybe are featured on some of these shows? >> For those of you who have watched the CSI show, they get it wrong. They know it. I probably was as close to anything that I was a deputy sheriff, CSI, forensic scientist. But I never went chasing after the bad guy. I never interrogated, yelled, handcuffed, any of those sorts of things. My job was to work with the evidence. That's the real difference that I think people have a hard time understanding and TV doesn't really portray it right. The investigators, the special agent, the game warden, have every right to be emotional, aggressive, in going after the bad guy, that's their job. The prosecuting attorney again, should be emotional in taking that individual before the courts. The defense attorney has every right to defend his client. Our job is a little bit different. Our job, once we have the evidence in hand, is to speak for that evidence. To represent it in court. Not to take sides, but to explain to what degree does this evidence link the suspect and the crime scene to the victim. >> It's really important stuff. So I guess the next big question is, in honor of World Wildlife Day we're talking a lot about trafficking and getting serious about wildlife crimes. Are there any overall things that you guys are seeing or receiving into the lab that trends that you feel comfortable? I know you can't talk about current cases or anything like that, but trends or things that you're seeing  >> We see flows of evidence. Things like ivory materials. Things like the birds, the reptiles. Wood materials. In fact some of our experts are going to explain precisely what we do. >> That's great. Yeah. So if you want to introduce the next person. We're going to talk a little about a lot of different neat things. So we're going to shift on through. >> Barry Baker is the chief of this morphology section. He's the fellow that could identify this Cayman crocodile, and he's going to explain what we do here. >> Thank you, Ken. I'm going to make some room here. Hello! Yeah, so, Ken had mentioned that one of the things we commonly see as evidence items here are ivory pieces. Many of you may be aware that there's extensive poaching of elephants in the wildlife trade, that's been on the news a lot, especially recently with global efforts to curb some of those trends. And so I've brought examples here of various types of ivory today to talk briefly about how we do some of the types of works we do here. >> That's great. I don't think everyone knows that ivory doesn't necessarily just mean elephants. It's actually a lot of different species. >> Yea, Exactly. So, when most people think of the term ivory, they think about elephants Those are large iconic animals for sure. But the term ivory really just means it's a carve-able tooth and there are many animals that can have ivory. Some examples include walruses, even pigs or warthogs can have ivory tusks, sperm whales. There are many animals - hippopotamus, so in addition to elephants, there are several other types that we have to consider. And on top of that, there are also fake items, too. One of the things we have to test for whether it is in fact a real biological material. Is it even a tooth? That's kind of where we start. >> How do you do that? >> Well, the first thing that we do is, especially on a carving such a this, we would look at it under an alternate light source using UV light. And the mineral composition of ivory is different of course than what you would find in plastic so those fluoresce differently under different light sources. So we would look at these using UV light, then, if it looks like it has a signature that you would see in either bone or ivory, then we take a closer look at it and try to find some distinguishing characteristics that either we would see only in bone or only in certain types of ivory. >> That's great. So what do we have here? What are you showing us? >> So this is a part of a walrus tusk. It's just the tip of the tusk. It's been cut off. And for comparison, here's a fake piece of walrus, this is just made from a synthetic resin. It's broken here so one of the things I can do is I can look at the cross-section of this and compare it to a real piece of walrus ivory. And I quickly see that on the real piece of walrus ivory, I have certain features of the various types of dentin and cementum on this tooth, where as in the fake item I'm lacking all the features on the inside. In addition, this would fluoresce differently under UV light. So those are all clues that tell me that this is fake. >> But the lab receives both fake and real and that's one of the first steps? >> Yea, and that's true of everything. Not just for ivory. It can be for leather, as Ken alluded to, that one of these is plastic, and one is made from real skin. It can be from different types of medicines. It can be, that's one of the first questions that we ask of all of our evidence, is it real or is it fake. And if it's real, what is it made out of. >> What else do you have back there that might be interesting to show people? >> Many people are familiar with narwhals, a large whale that has this big tusk or tooth protruding out of the top of its' head. This was a formerly a walking stick that's been deconstructed, but it shows the spiral structure, characteristic of a narwhal tusk. And we also have sperm whale, which is commonly carved in a tradition known as scrimshaw. Many of these are real in the trade, and there's also fake ones, and plastic ones as well. And hippopotamus, their teeth can also be carved. So here's one that's not carved, a lower tusk, and here's one that's carved extensively. >> So how do you tell an animal that's maybe been extinct for a while versus one like an elephant vs mastodon? >> Yea, so that's a good question. If we're talking specifically about elephant ivory, this is a cross-section of an elephant tusk here, one of the questions that we have to answer is, is this from a modern elephant or could this be from an extinct form, such as a mammoth or mastodon. Those may not be protected in certain situations, whereas obviously, the modern elephants are. Early on in the history of this lab, some of the researchers did extensive studies on cross-sections of ivory and found some features in the micro structure that are called Schreger lines and those can be measured and we can use those as determinations of whether this is from a modern elephant or from an extinct form. This one is modern, so that tells me this is a modern elephant. But then if the question is, okay, is it an Asian elephant or an African elephant, then we would submit that for genetic testing and have DNA done. DNA can be obtained from all these types of items as well. So oftentimes come to morphology first. We authenticate it's real or not. Identify it as far as we can and if there are further questions, then there's genetic analysis done. >> Great. Thank you, so next we're going to take a look at some other specimens. Thank you so much. >> Sure! I'll move these off here so there's room for others. >> Ivory is a very serious issue and definitely one we've been keeping an eye on. And for our next segment, if you want to go on and introduce yourself. >> Hi. I'm Pepper Trail. I'm the ornithologist here and the Forensics Lab, and that means I study birds, ornithology is the study of birds. And we have a very diverse set of evidence types that we examine for ornithology. A lot of it deals with our native north American birds. For example, this is a spread tail of a bald eagle, an almost adult bald eagle. Pure white feathers would be a five year old or older bird. But this is probably a four year-old, almost adult. And bald eagles are actually the most common species I identify in my case work. There's still a lot of trade in their feathers, and there's also mortality that we get into the lab and we have to determine cause of death with pathology, as you'll hear a little bit later. One of the projects that we do here at the lab is a educational resource called the feather atlas. And any of you out there who are interested in feathers and learning how to identify them can just Google feather atlas and you'll find the site. And on that site we have scans of feathers. And these are some nearly adult bald eagle tail feathers with a scale and also not shown in this picture are data related to the feathers, how large they are and where they're from. So, it's really a great resource. We have over 300 species now, which is about half of the north American birds, the wing feathers and the tail feathers, so it's proven to be a popular public resource and you can use it to identify feathers. But it's important to make the point that possession of feathers of native North American birds, certainly of eagles, but even of birds you might find at the beach, you know, gull feathers, or duck feathers you might find are not legal to possess. And that's because of a law called the migratory bird treaty act which was enacted in response to the plume trade back of egrets and plume birds way back in the 20th century, but that law is still on the books. If you find feathers, enjoy them, identify them, pick them up and look at them and put them back down again and leave them where they are. But we also get quite a few international things. And this is sort of an interesting one. Morphology is the study of shape is very dependent of making comparisons between evidence items and between known reference standards. So we have a large museum-style collection of different birds and these are some of the most spectacular birds you can ever run into. These are four different species of macaws. Large South American parrots. This is a hyacinth macaw, a red and green macaw, a blue and yellow macaw, and a scarlet macaw. And so these are all birds that came from zoos. So when the birds die in the zoo, they get donated to us for our collection, which is great. And we also get evidence items, like this very spectacular South American feathered artifact, which is illegal to take out of Brazil and it's also illegal to bring into the country. So, this came in originally as part of a case which has now been settled. But, you can see that this spectacular item has all these blue feathers, and it might appear that maybe we've just got one or two of these macaw species represented, but when you turn the object over, not sure how well it will show up on camera, but you can see there's a whole range of colors. There's ones that are almost black underneath, ones that are dark red, ones that are red with a yellowish tinge and ones that are really just yellow. By using our specimens we can verify that the really dark ones are the hyacinth macaw, the pure yellow ones are the blue and yellow macaw, the dark red ones are the red and green macaw, and the red ones with the yellowish tinge are the scarlet macaw. And these species are all protected, but they're all protected but at different levels by international treaty. So for our purposes it's important to be able to make a correct species ID and we do that using our reference material. >> Wow. Alright, well this is all very important, and I think that stressing reference materials is a common trend I'm seeing as you guys are talking. Really using things that you received before to use in future cases is an important side note. >> Absolutely. >> Awesome. Well, I think next we want to hear from pathology. >> And did you want to see say condor wing? >> We did. Condors, from my understanding are a common thing that you guys process? >> Well, common may not be the right word since they're one of the most endangered species in the world, but yes. Sadly they're fairly frequent in our casework. There are two species of condors in the world. The California condor is a very, very endangered north American species. There used to be only 22 literally surviving in the world. But now it's up to several hundred. Thanks to captive breeding programs. But they still do die in the wild and they come to pathology as you'll hear in a second. Just to give you a sense of how big they are, this is the wing of a California condor, one that unfortunately died accidentally and we got the specimen. To give you an idea just how big it is, tada. Here is one of the smallest birds you can find. Here is an entire rufus hummingbird and you can see it's much smaller than these individual little underwing feathers of the California condor. So here you've got just about the whole range of sizes of birds. And we even do see these things in the trade believe it or not. This is an Andean condor feather, the other species of condor. And this you can see has got a pin on it. And this actually was seized by our customs officials off of the hat of a gentleman who was coming into Chicago from Poland to attend an international polka competition. So there's a trade of Andean condor feathers from Peru to Poland for polka hats and then back into the United States, so you can see that the trade leads us to unexpected places. So with that segue, pathology? >> Thank you so much. If you could introduce yourself and talk a little about pathology and what that means. >> My name is Rebecca Kagan and I'm a veterinarian pathologist here at the lab. So that means I'm a veterinarian with special training in pathology. And so what I do in the lab is I determine cause of death and essentially doing autopsies on animals. >> So you showed us a necropsy a few days ago. And I'm curious, about how many of those do you do every day or? >> A necropsy is another name for the autopsy. In the human world when we talk about doing autopsies, it's essentially the same thing. There are two pathologists who work here at the lab and between the two of us we probably do one or two a day every day that we're here. >> Can you talk a little bit about what you're showing us right now? >> I wanted to demonstrate an autopsy on the table but they wouldn't let me. It's a little bit messy. >> It's a bit graphic. >> I brought some bones instead which are nice and clean. We have here at the lab a colony of beetles and there are job is to clean off bones sometimes for the reference specimens that Barry and Pepper talked about. And sometimes for pathology because it will let us see the injuries that were previously covered by bloody gore. So this is an example, these are post-cleaned. This is a grizzly bear skull that we got. And what can you tell me about this skull? This is a pretty easy one. >> Cause of death appears to be a bullet hole? >> Yes. There's a bullet hole. The cleaning of the bugs allows us to see the bullet hole. And you can see which way it's going. And when you turn it over you can see it just blasted through the back of the skull. What it also let us see was these little marks in the teeth. So somebody tried to, after the bear was dead, cut the tooth out and realized it's really actually very hard to get a bear tooth out, and quit. We have tool marks on here, we have a bullet trajectory. And we have some more evidence that this is what killed the bear, because there is what's known as an acute hole, so it happened right before it died. There's blood staining around the hole and the edges of the fracture are sharp. All these things give us clues about how the animal died and what the circumstances of the death were. And you can contrast that bullet hole to this one. This is a Florida panther. And we cut through it. So pretend that it's all one piece. But this is a Florida panther scull and it was found by a roadside. So when we x-rayed the skull, we found a big chunk of metal and that will show up as a big white piece. But what we also found were injuries that looked like it had been hit by a car. The question is did somebody shoot the cat or did it get hit by a car or how did it die. So we give the skull to the bugs and they clean it off, you can see how different this hole is. It's got rounded edges and it's uneven. And this is actually the bone trying to heal. So what happened was this cat had gotten shot in the nose and the bullet had lodged in there a long time ago before it died. And what actually killed it was being hit by a car. So that's some of the things that bones can tell us and that the bugs help us to see. >> So aside from the bugs, what are some of the techniques you use to kind of answer these questions that you get asked from the cases? >> Well, we obviously do the autopsy which is kind of like you see on television. We open up the body and take pictures and document our findings and we do microscopic examinations on tissue so that let's you look for other things, I mean, diseases things like that, they don't, we don't kill all of them, believe it or not. Sometimes it's nobody's fault. So that helps us out there. We X-ray everything, so that can help us find bullets or fractures in tiny places that we wouldn't normally see, and we do alternate light source images, which is something that Barry mentioned doing on some of their things. And we do it on whole bodies. And it can let us see little things that are maybe hidden in fur and feathers because animals are obviously covered in fur. So if you're looking for things like fiber evidence, like on CSI they always do that, the alternate light source will let things like that glow, so artificial fibers will actually show up and we can pick them off, if somebody moved a body, we might be able to find evidence they did that. It lets us see burn marks. So if a bird gets electrocuted on a power line, sometimes it's very, very subtle and the light will let those things glow. And sometimes poisons have dyes in them that show up. So we use it for a lot of different things. That's probably the thing I use the most that I was never actually trained to do in vet school. It's kind of fun. >> I know that another kind of part of your work is histology. I don't know if you guys want to talk about that? >> Yeah. That's the microscopic exam. To me that's the fun stuff. That's looking at the secret, the things that you can't see with your own eyes. So we will take tissue from animals, if it's fresh enough, and process it and dye it so that when you look at it under a microscope, the different cells and bacteria and things will show up. >> It's really interesting. >> So that kind of helps us put the whole picture together of how this animal died and the circumstances around the death. >> Awesome. Great. Well, thank you so much. Next we're actually going to go into a little more about genetics. So we started with what you can see and the shape of the animal and we're moving into things that maybe questions that are sometimes way more challenging to answer. So please introduce yourself? >> My name is Dyan Straughan and I work here in the genetics section of the laboratory. And I love genetics so I can talk a long time about it. But what we do is basically take things like Barry pointed out earlier, the difference between sometimes you need to know the difference between Asian and African elephant and those characteristics aren't there. So they send it to genetics. And we extract the DNA by a method of basically taking a small piece of the ivory. And turning it into powder. And then we just go through the process like we would with blood or tissue, and you go through the extraction process, where you basically remove all the cell wall and all the other stuff inside the cell, and just isolate the DNA. And once you have the DNA, then you can carry through and do PCR, which is the polymerase chain reaction and you can sequence the DNA and look at the DNA sequence or you can also look at nuclear DNA, which is what they call DNA fingerprinting in the human crime world where you get half from the mom and half from the dad. That's the nuclear DNA. So we use both mitochondrial sequencing and the DNA fingerprinting to do the work that we do in genetics, which is species ID. And we also do geographic assignment for some species. And then of course individual identification. So you know, we can say that meat in the freezer came from the same animal as that gut pile in the field there. >> Tell me a little bit more about some of the questions you commonly get that you have to kind of piece out. >> We can get all sorts of, basically like everybody else here in the lab, we can get anything from you know your north American species to your African or Asian species. We can get anything in the world coming in through here. So a lot of the questions that we're asked to do is what is this. What species is this. And because I think Pepper alluded to that the laws are different, depending on what species question you have. So, for instance, with the wolfs, I work a lot with wolfs, so I tend to talk about them quite a bit. But with the wolves, sometimes, let's see, before they started going on and off the list, you had an area in the north and south Dakotas where Montana wolves were protected at a different level than wolves in Minnesota and from the wolves in Yellowstone. They were all three different levels. So if you found a wolf in one of the Dakotas, where did it come from? Did it come from Montana, the Yellowstone experimental population, or did it come from Minnesota? Or is it even a wolf? Is it a hybrid of some sort? Those are the kinds of questions we got for the wolves. But we can get, you know, somebody smuggling, that seems odd, but somebody may try to smuggle in meat products, just like people here eat elk and deer, some people from other countries want the taste from their homeland and they try to bring it in and so they have meat products. What is this species, can they have it, can they not have it, and what it is. If there's no morphological characteristics, which often there isn't with meat, it's up to us to try to determine what it is. We also get a lot of questions, like I said, with the matching. You know, is this feather from the same eagle. Is this deer carcass belong to the gut pile that was taken from a national park. Those type of questions. So we can get the questions all over across the board. The one thing we can't do that we get a lot of questions, is how old is the animal that this comes from. The DNA won't tell you how old it is. But DNA will tell you what species it is and we can use it to match blood stains and carcasses and so forth like that. >> So how long does it take to process some of this data? Is it pretty quick or does it take a few weeks? >> Well, that depends. It definitely doesn't take within the 45 minute period as you see on TV. That is definitely not. Even on Maury Povich where they have the results. That's not how it works. If everything goes according to the plan and the DNA is really good so, you have good tissue and good blood samples not degraded samples, ivory samples are harder to get through, so that takes longer. You can do it presumably in about a week. That's if everything goes well. Sometimes it will take much longer than that. If you go through the DNA extraction process and you go through the PCR and you don't get a product, now you have to determine why. Is it because there was no DNA to start with? Is it because the process through PCR that you use to amplify the piece to get your sequence, is it because those, what they call primers, don't work on the species that you're looking at? You were told that maybe they thought the species was elephant. But it turns out that it's not. If there's no morphological characteristics, we have to go on what we think it might be. And DNA doesn't match all DNA, right? That's why everything is different. Why we use DNA to determine species. And so we, we in the genetics section, if there are morphological characteristics, we work really closely with the other departments here. Because we don't know. Like I said, we don't know if the DNA is not working because there's no DNA there, if it's not working because it's not an elephant, it's something completely different. Or if we also don't know if maybe there is DNA there but it's inhibited by some chemical process that was in the substrate that it came from. So it can be really difficult. So the time question can go anywhere from a week to months, sometimes, depending on what the problem is. Or the question is. But I think that, you know, the good rule of thumb, though, is it's not 45 minutes. >> Thank you so much. That's really interesting stuff. All right. So the other big thing about the wildlife trade and just in general is that we don't often think of our plants and how they're treated. So if you want to introduce yourself, we've got some discussion around that. >> Hi. My name is Ed Espinosa and I'm a chemist here at the lab and most of what I've been doing the last few years is looking at timber-related trade issues. As everything else there is sustainable and legal logging and we support that 100 %. There is also quite a bit of illegal logging and unsustainable. So the questions that we get tasked with is what does it really mean when you have evidence that comes in as wood and where does it come from. And before I really talk about how the techniques work, I would just like to remind everybody that our habitat is so precious to our existence. I recently had a friend while they were at church on Sunday, they returned to their home and it had burned down. A mom and dad and three kids lost everything they had. They did not have their games, they did not have any clothing, they had only what is left on them. That is what habitat destruction is real impact in people's lives. And in illegal logging that's what happens. You do not displace a single species. So far we've been talking about species per species. But many times in illegal logging cases, they just clearcut a whole forest displacing a plethora of species that no longer have a place to live and perish as a consequence. So the animal extinguishes are a consequence of the illegal logging. But most of have a have a hard time of thinking of wood as being something we should protect because, you know, it's pretty, it's inert, you know how many trees have we really hugged? I mean, there's a couple of people who may do that, but you know most of us it's just a material. So this is an example, an assemblage of a certain types of species that are used in trade frequently. These round pieces of wood, they're called cookies, they tend to be in a case that involves a type of Dalbergia that is only found in Madagascar and no other place in the world. Everybody has seen the movies about Madagascar, and we know that in Madagascar we have this assemblage of species that are so unique that they don't exist any other place in the world but here we're cutting trees specifically so that we can produce different, very high items, very expensive. And I challenge you viewers out there, just sign into alibaba.com today, do a little search on rosewood, and find out that you too can buy some of this. But the entry fee to buy is around 5 million dollars. So this is not something that most of us use every day. Here we have another example of, I'll finish this, this is a whole series of black woods. Most of us consider black woods to be ebony. It is classical. And because we live in the United States and we don't live in Africa, we tend to think that all ebony is 100 % black and so if you cut any ebony tree that there you're going to have that. It turns out in reality only one out of every ten trees of this group, it's Diospyros, is completely black. So in order for us to receive a completely dark piece of wood like that, typically they cut down nine other trees. So in order to get a complete blackboard, there's ten trees that are knocked down, one of them turns out to be beneficial. Again, going back to habitat destruction. That's exactly what's happening. >> And would you see large numbers of those come in? >> We have had cases that deal with eight to nine pallets full of little pieces of wood like this. This is used primarily for the guitar industry, they're usually used in fret boards because it's hard material, very hard, so that's what this use is. We also have a whole bunch of very unique rose woods. These tend to come from central America and South America. As already was described, some of these are legal, some of these are illegal. These type of trees, this type of wood is a type of Dalbergia that occurs in Brazil. We have them coming from Bolivia from Peru. Some of it is used to make violin bows. Some of the best violin bows are made from endangered trees. But we don't think of violin bows as adding to habitat destruction. And at this end we have an assemblage of products made out of a tree, it's called agar wood, but it's really from a species called Aquilaria that is used only for its scent. And all of these products are only for scent purposes. This is some samples of agar wood that are the whole pieces of wood that can be used. You put it in a little, under coals and you can smell them. There's incense sticks, perfumes, there are incense sticks from Vietnam, these are a particular samples that come from the middle east. And so pretty much all cultures and all religions have gotten used to getting wood products for scent purposes. And the illegal logging going on in Malaysia, Indonesia and part of the southeast Asian peninsula is incredible only to address some of the needs we have for smelling nice. So a lot of illegal logging, I'd like to wrap it up, deals with habitat destruction and that is the worst part about it. >> So, as a chemist, you look at these pieces and you can actually kind of tell what, what information and what you're looking for to catch people? >> So yeah. What we have been doing here at the lab is we've developed some special techniques that have been looking at the chemical distribution of components that are found in the different species of wood that are protected. It turns out that these are really bad candidates for morphology as you can see, trees are described by the flowers, by the leaves, by the... but we can't see that here, turns out that hard wood, which is the middle part of the tree has very little, and very degraded DNA, and so this has been very challenge for individuals trying to do DNA, so we have developed a technique looking at chemistry, and with these chemical tools, we can assign species of these wood types. >>And do you also find that there are fake medicinals, scents out there that you come across? >>We published some work on all of the agar wood that we have analyzed, and we've probably analyzed close to 200 different brands and curiously a large percentage of the products that are already ready for commercial use, not the raw wood are in fact, fakes. And sometimes there are woods in which they add oils to give them a scent but they're not the real agar wood, and so in those cases the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service does not prosecute them, it's legal, you can have your stinky scent back, and it goes back to trade. >> Thank you so much. I think that is a really interesting part of trade that people don't often consider. So I really appreciate your work on that. >> Back again. >> So we've been receiving a lot of questions, actually. >> Good, Fantastic. >> We still have a couple of things obviously to talk about. But before we even go into that, you know, I'd love to hear some of the ways that all of these different pieces help actually catch the bad guy, if you will. We've seen a lot of this, and how this actually helps and maybe talk about how you go to court. >> Sure. For those of you who watch CSI-type shows on TV, you get the sense that scientists are out there kicking doors and dragging people into court and all that. That's so far from the reality. What you're seeing here from the five scientists who talked to you is our work which is getting at the items of evidence. Figuring out their meaning, their value, and trying to link the suspect, the victim, and crime scene together with the physical evidence. That is our job. Our job varies so much. You heard have been hearing six of the fifteen scientists in this laboratory describe what might before he one day in the couple hundred in the year that various continuously. We never know what's coming. Dr. Espinosa was a little modest here. He's our chief scientist as well as one of our chemists. He is deeply involved in wood analysis but he has found himself wading around in decomposed guts of a 2,000 year old walrus looking for cannon fragments. Wildlife forensics varies tremendously. It's a fascinating job and our primary job is to assist the investigators. Help them first of all find out if a crime has been committed. You know, what is the victim. Try to find evidence, traces of a suspect or maybe many suspects, using classic things like fingerprints and foot prints and tire tracks. Matching bullets back to a fire arm. The cause of death that you heard about. Just a little while ago is probably one of the more complex things we do because most of the science sections are involved. Becky may find stomach contents that she needs to identify, that may go to morphology. If there's enough structure, hair, fur, it may go to genetics to find out what that meal was all about. If we're looking for pesticide poison possibilities from blood, urine, liver, kidney samples, we may find projectiles, bullets, arrows in the body. We may have an arrow sticking through the head of an animal, it doesn't mean that's the cause of death. We're constantly trying to figure things out. It's a fascinating job. I'm very anxious to see some of the questions that have been posted here. >> One question, I think we're getting two repeats, but one is how do you get into this work and how does wildlife forensics become your job. >> I think all of us got into this by happenstance. It was the first big laboratory, before us there was a handful of 5, 6 scientists who did this kind of work. We're looking to bring on a second generation of young scientists. They may take five six years to train someone in morphology, whereas we might get a young scientist right out of college going right into DNA analysis. Pathology, far more complex. A lot more training. The analytical chemistry, the instrumentation is changing so rapidly. But something I learned, I was told very early in my career, as a young trainee deputy sheriff, is not to expect law enforcement to resolve issues. It almost never does. The best I was going to be able to do was hold things at bay to keep things from getting worse until smarter people came along. It's my sincere hope that the six of us today have been talking to some of those smarter people. >> Yeah. I can see how this is growing field. One of the other questions we're getting is how can we know or what if we suspect something is illegal. How do we  where do they go? >> First of all, don't engage with the suspects, please. In wildlife work, interestingly enough, the victims we're trying to protect can be very hazardous to us. The grizzly bear may not comprehend that we're trying to do something helpful. We have to be careful that we don't become a victim ourselves in engaging with some of the wildlife. The work is  well, it's worldwide, there are so many species out there. We're constantly reacting to what the game wardens, conservation officers, special agents, wildlife rangers tell us in terms of where they're going with their investigations. Our job is keep up with them with the science. It's fascinating work. We're going to be looking for that second generation. I hope that some of those may be people listening today. Even learning what a blog site is. This is fascinating. >> That is something that we do want to stress is that we definitely can't answer every question. But we, this is not a one and done. We want to continue answering the questions. And we'll be posting this video on our blog. And we'll make sure that you know we keep you apprised of this incredible work. I mean, this lab is doing stuff that, you know, I think in a lot of ways is solving crimes that, you know, we didn't even think we could ten years ago. >> I could tell you 25 years ago when we got this laboratory going, I had no idea that we were doing what we're doing today. It just wasn't comprehendible. I can't imagine what the next 25 years are going to be like. I'll be retired hanging around the hillside watching these folks and cheering them on. >> Thank you so much. And we'll catch up with everyone online. >> Thank you.

Mission

The primary mission of the laboratory is to identify the species or subspecies of pieces, parts or products of an animal to determine cause-of-death of an animal, to help wildlife officers determine if a violation of law has occurred and to identify and compare physical evidence in an attempt to link suspect, victim and crime scene.

History

The laboratory was established as a result of the need for a wildlife crime laboratory for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The need for this laboratory was brought to the attention of the Fish and Wildlife Service by Terry Grosz and Ken Goddard. In 1986, the location of the laboratory was selected to be Ashland, Oregon partially due to the efforts of Dr. Wehinger, a chiropractor from Eagle Point, Oregon. By September, 1987, construction had begun on the laboratory, and finished a year later. The laboratory was dedicated as the National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory in 1989, only to be re-dedicated as the Clark R. Bavin National Fish and Wildlife Forensic Laboratory two years later to honor former Fish and Wildlife Service Law Enforcement Chief Clark Bavin. Later, in 2006, a 17,000 square foot addition was constructed to house their new wildlife pathology and genetics labs, along with an isolated room for their dermestid beetles. In 2007, the laboratory complied with a Homeland Security mandate to protect the building by using landscaping and gardens instead of conventional methods, such as fences and buffers.[1][2]

USFWS Laser Surface Scanner at the National Fish and Wildlife Forensic Laboratory

Equipment

The laboratory utilizes various equipment, including:

Air-tight room at the Fish and Wildlife Service's National Fish and Wildlife Forensic Laboratory containing dermestid beetles used for skeletonization

Organization

The forensics laboratory is divided into six major units:[3]

Evidence Processing, part of Administration

References

  1. ^ "About the US FWS Forensics Laboratory: Our Lab's History".
  2. ^ "About the US FWS Forensics Laboratory: Our Lab's Timeline".
  3. ^ "About the US FWS Forensics Laboratory: Our Lab's History".

External links

This page was last edited on 22 July 2023, at 18:52
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.