To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

National Command Authority

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Command Authority (NCA) is a term used by the Department of Defense of the United States of America to refer to the ultimate source of lawful military orders.

The NCA comprises the president of the United States (as commander-in-chief) and the secretary of defense jointly, or their duly deputized successors, i.e. the vice president and the deputy secretary of defense.

The term also refers to communications with the commanding officers of the Unified Combatant Commands to put U.S. forces into action.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    57 682
  • ✪ America's Nuclear Weapon Chain of Command, with Eric Schlosser

Transcription

Well under the law the President is supposed to be the only person in the United States who can authorize the use of a nuclear weapon. But one of the challenges throughout the Cold War to the present day has been well what if there’s an enemy attack and the President’s killed. How do we retaliate with nuclear weapons? So beginning in the Eisenhower administration the decision was made for the President to pre-delegate his authority to use nuclear weapons to other officials down the chain of command. And that would mean that if the White House was destroyed and the President was killed that there would be officers in the military who knew the codes and had the ability to launch nuclear weapons in retaliation. The problem becomes though with command and control how far down the line do you pre-delegate that authority. And if you give junior officers access to the codes what’s going to prevent them from deciding on their own one day to just launch a few nuclear weapons. And that sort of dilemma of maintaining presidential authority and also maintaining the ability to retaliate has never been fully resolved. The film Dr. Strangelove was brutally attacked by the Pentagon, by the Air Force when it was released because the central plot element of Dr. Strangelove is that a crazed American general is going to try and start World War III by ordering American bombers to attack the Soviet Union without the President’s approval. And the Pentagon said that was ridiculous and the Air Force said that was ridiculous and that could never happen. We now know as a result of declassified documents that the basic scenario of Dr. Strangelove was entirely possible. And it wasn’t until the early 1970s that there were any locks on our nuclear weapons to prevent bomber crews or missile crews from using them. Again, you know there was this concern during the Cold War that the President would be killed and there’d be no way to use these weapons. So as recently as 1970, 1971 if an American bomber crew on its own had decided to fly to Moscow and bomb Moscow or an American bomber crew had decided to fly to Chicago and bomb Chicago with nuclear weapons there was nothing physically to prevent them from doing it. There was nothing physically to prevent missile officers from just turning their keys and launching their missiles whenever they wanted to. The only thing that stopped that was the professionalism and the discipline of our military forces. And I give the military great credit for, you know, training their troops and training their officers so that never happened. But that’s an enormous responsibility and enormous power to be vested in officers who are 23, 24, 25 years old. And it only took during the Cold War in terms of our missiles two guys – if two guys in their underground command center had decided hey, let’s nuke the Soviet Union there was nothing to prevent those two guys working in concert from turning the keys and launching their missiles. So ideally you would not have the power to kill hundreds of thousands or millions of people vested in two young guys. And it’s still unnerving that the President of the United States, one man, one woman, has the ability without a formal declaration of war to make a decision that could kill millions of people.

Authorization of a nuclear or strategic attack

Only the president can direct the use of nuclear weapons by U.S. armed forces, through plans like OPLAN 8010-12. The president has unilateral authority as commander-in-chief to order that nuclear weapons be used for any reason at any time.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ Blair, Bruce (June 11, 2016). "What Exactly Would It Mean to Have Trump's Finger on the Nuclear Button?". Politico Magazine. Retrieved 2019-06-30.
  2. ^ Broad, William J.; Sanger, David E. (August 4, 2016). "Debate Over Trump's Fitness Raises Issue of Checks on Nuclear Power". The New York Times. p. A1. Retrieved October 2, 2016.
  3. ^ Burns, Robert (2017-11-13). "Could anyone stop Trump from launching nukes? The answer: No". Associated Press. Retrieved 2019-06-30.
  4. ^ Stanton, Zack (2017-11-14). "Don't Count on the Cabinet to Stop a Trump-Ordered Nuclear Strike". Politico Magazine. Retrieved 2019-06-30.
  5. ^ William Perry [@SecDef19] (6 September 2018). "This is the correct answer" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  6. ^ William Perry [@SecDef19] (5 September 2018). "Correct" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
This page was last edited on 12 June 2020, at 00:43
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.